Total Posts:2|Showing Posts:1-2
Jump to topic:

Transcendental Argument for God

Cogito-ergo-sum
Posts: 36
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/22/2010 12:06:21 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Why does this theory get wheeled out by the religious to disprove that morals and truth, beauty and goodness can not be here because of the evolution of mankind socially?

The case for 'modern art' at the moment in which someone can pickle a shark in formaldehyde and it viewed as good, doesn't mean we know objective truths because of God. It means enough people with a similar subjective opinion agree and that this mass agreement on any given topic brings about a collective objective.

The flip side of TAG is that, if there is no God, what the f*ck are you religious people basing your objective positions on? 'cause if God ain't there then you're getting it only from one other place, mankind.
Veridas
Posts: 733
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/22/2010 12:20:17 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Because they're not smart enough to realise that saying that beauty and truth and morality comes from something that nobody has any proof of existing is a bit like saying you only exist while people are looking at you.
What fresh dickery is the internet up to today?