Total Posts:14|Showing Posts:1-14
Jump to topic:

Forcing out the Genocidal, Infanticidal, and

Bendido
Posts: 421
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 8:49:25 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
The God of the Bible: Forcing out the Genocidal, Infanticidal, and Filicidal

We come to the other charges of an evolutionary biologist against the God of the Bible that He is genocidal, infanticidal, and filicidal.

These shocking definitions come from Richard Dawkins who, until lately, is known as the most famous atheist. In recent debates with some clergy, Dawkins has described himself as an agnostic and "cannot disprove the existence of God," prompting the religious to call on atheists to look for another leader. Dawkins, after all, is not a militant secularist although he would like the world to believe he is one. For all his mudslinging at the God of the Bible, he admittedly "cannot disprove the existence of God."

Nevertheless, in coming up with a book where has earned a fortune and still is, Dawkins called God, among other descriptions, "genocidal, infanticidal, and filicidal."

Genocide is defined in the dictionary as murder of an entire ethnic group: the systematic killing of all the people from a national, ethnic, or religious group, or an attempt to do this.

Infanticide is defined as the act of killing infants or a newborn baby.

And filicide means killing of one"s own child.

The -al variations, of course, are adjectives. If God were genocidal, infanticidal, filicidal, that means he is capable of doing all these, has done them, is doing them, or tends to do them " along the terms that Dawkins understands.

But all these charges of Dawkins against the God of the Bible redounds to him bull's eye! In writing for Daily Mail of UK (www.dailymail.co.uk), George Pitcher on December 16, 2011, exposed the mind of Dawkins who asked another atheist, Christopher Hitchens, 'Do you ever worry that if we win and, so to speak, destroy Christianity, that vacuum would be filled by Islam?'

Titled "Professor Richard Dawkins makes a festive vow to 'destroy Christianity,'" Pitcher wrote -

Hitchens is thoughtful about CS Lewis and Christianity and rather leaves Prof. Dawkins floundering in his wake, occasionally interjecting little assents to show that he's still there, as he struggles to keep up.

But one of these interjections is most revealing. About half-way through, the Prof gets this in edgeways: 'Do you ever worry that if we win and, so to speak, destroy Christianity, that vacuum would be filled by Islam?'

For background, very few of the major atheists have come into the open, declaring that their purpose is to destroy Christianity. Their intent is usually limited to simple criticism, open dialogue. But here comes Dawkins.

In an interview with Christopher Hitchens, Dawkins queries the late atheist whether he has considered a scenario wherein they win and destroy Christianity. Should that happen, would the vacuum be filled by Islam?

Dawkins denied later on that he said this but George Pitcher stands pat on what he wrote. The reporter of Daily Mail said Hitchens was an atheist while he lived but did not have "destroy Christianity" as an agenda.

So, Dawkin"s unfulfilled plan to destroy all Christianity is definitely genocidal! If the God of the Bible were genocidal, no atheist would be alive today!

As part of the comments on George Pitcher"s article, a reader from United Kingdom said the speech of Dawkins should be monitored closely. Imagine having a dream of destroying Christianity, calling religion as virus, and impressing that teaching children about God is child abuse.

This kind of speech should be monitored closely. To "destroy" people, to label religious views as a "virus" and to bring children up in Christianity as "child abuse" are all things he has said. This kind of talk would not be out of place in Nazi Germany. We have to be very careful.

King David, after experiencing cruelty and bitterness from his enemies with whom he had done no wrong, prayed that God may destroy them all.

PSALMS 109:4-5, 13

4 For my love they are my adversaries: but I give myself unto prayer.

5 And they have rewarded me evil for good, and hatred for my love.

13 Let his posterity be cut off; and in the generation following let their name be blotted out.

PSALMS 83:17

Let them be confounded and troubled forever; yea, let them be put to shame, and perish:

Although David was a favored man of God, God did not hearken unto him! Why? Because He is not genocidal.

II PETER 3:9

The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

God ordering the annihilation of the Canaanites was not being genocidal. The order was an execution of judgment against a people or a nation of infanticides and filicides! This is about a race needing to be blotted out because of what they did to their children (child sacrifice, free sex, child prostitution, and the like). Their culture did not merit being preserved.

DEUTERONOMY 12:29-31

29 When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land;

30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou inquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise.

31 Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods.

How can a God that abhors infanticide, Himself be infanticidal and filicidal? In truth, it is Dawkins who is infanticidal and certainly filicidal when he advised someone in twitter asking a hypothetical question to abort her child!

God would never agree to hurt an unborn fetus! Unlike Dawkins who arrogates to himself some authority as to who should live and who should die, here is what the God of the Bible says -

EXODUS 21:22-24

22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.

23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,

24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,

By God's law Richard Dawkins merits death for being genocidal, infanticidal, and filicidal!

Forgetting Richard Dawkins, let us discover from the Bible the gentleness and the loving kindness of the God of the Bible.

God takes care of a baby from conception to adulthood until death.

Before a baby is born, the mammary glands of the mother works in preparing all the necessary ingredients of life and the defenses for the baby's well-being. The breast of a feeding mother is nature-tuned for her to remember that her baby must be fed at the right moment.

An authority on breastfeeding, Kelly Bonyata, wrote on August 31, 2011 (http://kellymom.com...) -

During pregnancy and the first few days postpartum, milk supply is hormonally driven " this is called the endocrine control system. Essentially, as long as the proper hormones are in place, mom will start making colostrum about halfway through pregnancy (Lactogenesis I) and her milk will increase in volume (Lactogenesis II) around 30-40 hours after birth.

According to her, earlier researchers observed that milk volume is typically greater in the morning hours and falls gradually as the day progresses. Quoting Hurgoiu (1985), she wrote that fat content tends to increase as the day progresses. These observations are consistent with current research where babies were found to normally have longer sleep at night and gradually decreases the amount of time between nursing as the day progresses.

ISAIAH 49:15

Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have c
Bendido
Posts: 421
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 8:49:38 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
God is protecting each growing child by his injunctions to parents to care for their children. He placed those paternal instincts in their consciousness.

I TIMOTHY 5:8 (RSV)

If any one does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his own family, he has disowned the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.

EPHESIANS 6:4

And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

These laws are not only protective measures but penalties go with those uncaring and disobeying parents!

REVELATION 21:8
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

An uncaring parent is worse than an infidel or unbeliever, and infidels are destined to the lake of fire. At the age of puberty, a virgin is placed under the protection of the father.

I CORINTHIANS 7:37 (RSV)
Nevertheless he that standeth steadfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well.

How can the God of the Bible that cares for a human being from conception until adulthood be infanticidal, filicidal, and genocidal?

Back to Dawkins, surely, he doesn't deserve to be a professor! He is a MONSTER!!!

Arguably, Dawkins is the most repulsive character around - not in fiction - but in the physical, spiritual, and mental reality!
Illegalcombatant
Posts: 4,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 9:01:58 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
You lost me when you talked about a God who looks after babies.

Out of respect for every child who didn't make it to the age of 5, could we not go around talking about God who looks after the little children ?
"Seems like another attempt to insert God into areas our knowledge has yet to penetrate. You figure God would be bigger than the gaps of our ignorance." Drafterman 19/5/12
Bendido
Posts: 421
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 9:18:49 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/1/2015 9:01:58 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
You lost me when you talked about a God who looks after babies.

Out of respect for every child who didn't make it to the age of 5, could we not go around talking about God who looks after the little children ?

Just read: the blog:

http://www.controversyextraordinary.com...
Illegalcombatant
Posts: 4,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 9:21:45 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/1/2015 9:18:49 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:01:58 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
You lost me when you talked about a God who looks after babies.

Out of respect for every child who didn't make it to the age of 5, could we not go around talking about God who looks after the little children ?

Just read: the blog:

http://www.controversyextraordinary.com...

And why should I read the blog ? what objective exactly are you trying to achieve here ?
"Seems like another attempt to insert God into areas our knowledge has yet to penetrate. You figure God would be bigger than the gaps of our ignorance." Drafterman 19/5/12
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 9:24:49 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/1/2015 9:21:45 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:18:49 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:01:58 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
You lost me when you talked about a God who looks after babies.

Out of respect for every child who didn't make it to the age of 5, could we not go around talking about God who looks after the little children ?

Just read: the blog:

http://www.controversyextraordinary.com...

And why should I read the blog ? what objective exactly are you trying to achieve here ?

Reblogging and boost traffic, obviously. Drive by plagurist. He should just like the blog it was originally ripped from, and save us the read.

Second, even the blog isn't all that good as it doesn't defend God, but attempts to attack others on the bases that 2 wrongs make a right, even if one of those wrongs is committed by an entity that supposedly can do no wrong.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Bendido
Posts: 421
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 9:31:48 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/1/2015 9:24:49 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:21:45 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:18:49 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:01:58 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
You lost me when you talked about a God who looks after babies.

Out of respect for every child who didn't make it to the age of 5, could we not go around talking about God who looks after the little children ?

Just read: the blog:

http://www.controversyextraordinary.com...

And why should I read the blog ? what objective exactly are you trying to achieve here ?


Reblogging and boost traffic, obviously. Drive by plagurist. He should just like the blog it was originally ripped from, and save us the read.

Second, even the blog isn't all that good as it doesn't defend God, but attempts to attack others on the bases that 2 wrongs make a right, even if one of those wrongs is committed by an entity that supposedly can do no wrong.

to all atheist: just read all the blog...to learned how God exist..
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 9:47:33 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/1/2015 9:31:48 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:24:49 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:21:45 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:18:49 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:01:58 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
You lost me when you talked about a God who looks after babies.

Out of respect for every child who didn't make it to the age of 5, could we not go around talking about God who looks after the little children ?

Just read: the blog:

http://www.controversyextraordinary.com...

And why should I read the blog ? what objective exactly are you trying to achieve here ?


Reblogging and boost traffic, obviously. Drive by plagurist. He should just like the blog it was originally ripped from, and save us the read.

Second, even the blog isn't all that good as it doesn't defend God, but attempts to attack others on the bases that 2 wrongs make a right, even if one of those wrongs is committed by an entity that supposedly can do no wrong.

to all atheist: just read all the blog...to learned how God exist..

Why? You aren't just gonna regurgitate something else? You have proven all we have to do is wait for your next Already Been Chewed click bait.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
celestialtorahteacher
Posts: 1,369
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 9:54:24 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Some day in the future, people driven by religious need in the West will learn the real history of the Fraud of Israel, yes, that old Bible God that has such a bad rep for killing women and children along with everyone else who gets in the way of Bible God's people or ones who don't worship Bible God's orders.

I learned around 18 years ago in the Semitic Languages Prof. John Gray's book (not to be confused with the author of Men are from Mars book) Near Eastern Mythologies about how ancient Canaanites viewed and worshiped their top God, the same one as the Hebrews worshiped too, EL Elyon, God Most High. The Canaanites loved EL and went to Him even though He was a distant God and didn't really rule the world of humanity directly but through his sons and daughter gods and goddesses, of whom, Yahweh was one of them. Yahweh was the tribal war god of the Israelites but he was appointed to that job by his Father, EL Elyon. Deuteronomy 32 n Hebrew still retains that true historical relationship but Bible versions changed the words to fit Judaism's remake of EL, actually a real Lucifer stunt of raising Yahweh, called by ancient Hebrews , the Great Angel of God, to EL's position as top God. This is reported in the Bible as Moses Sinai Covenant where God informs of a change of names. "YHWH" is invented in this process, but YHWH is a man-made god, just like Allah is too and it shows, really shows to those who know the original Father face of the Godhead in EL Elyon. EL, was/is a Good God, unknown in Canaanite texts of ever condemning any human being to hell yet it was to EL that Canaanites went to for forgiveness of their sins, and He gave it freely and easily. Now who's "Abba" does this sound like? It is Jesus' Father as Jesus represents Yahweh and reestablishes the true spiritual relationship of Son to Father that was destroyed by Jewish makeover of EL to create YHWH. It's almost like, may spiritually be, that Jesus took the fall for Yahweh's Lucifer attempt that still is working in all Abrahamic believers who still do not know there were TWO original gods and they are worshiping the lesser war god instead of God Most High. Worship a war god and you can expect war after war after war and that's what Abrahamic religions have wrought.

I teach Celestial Torah Christianity which also reestablishes the right top God Most High back into the Godhead with the Son relationship at His right hand side as the Messiah.
Illegalcombatant
Posts: 4,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 9:56:46 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/1/2015 9:31:48 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:24:49 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:21:45 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:18:49 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:01:58 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
You lost me when you talked about a God who looks after babies.

Out of respect for every child who didn't make it to the age of 5, could we not go around talking about God who looks after the little children ?

Just read: the blog:

http://www.controversyextraordinary.com...

And why should I read the blog ? what objective exactly are you trying to achieve here ?


Reblogging and boost traffic, obviously. Drive by plagurist. He should just like the blog it was originally ripped from, and save us the read.

Second, even the blog isn't all that good as it doesn't defend God, but attempts to attack others on the bases that 2 wrongs make a right, even if one of those wrongs is committed by an entity that supposedly can do no wrong.

to all atheist: just read all the blog...to learned how God exist..

Yes I have heard that Canaanite explanation, and I don't really but it for some many reasons.

So there is a "problem" that "God" would like to address. God decides in it's infinite wisdom, glory , intelligence that the best way to address it is to tell one group to kill everyone man, woman, child of the other group.

There are so many holes in there I don't know where to begin..........
"Seems like another attempt to insert God into areas our knowledge has yet to penetrate. You figure God would be bigger than the gaps of our ignorance." Drafterman 19/5/12
celestialtorahteacher
Posts: 1,369
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/1/2015 11:28:41 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Hint: God works in mysterious ways..and it's true..I mean who would ever have predicted a sword named after a pagan king's sword with a blade reformed into a hippie peace sign would become the Holy Land's most powerful spiritual icon and honored by hundreds of Christian and Muslim believers in Christianity's second most holy city as a Sign from God?

Good can come out of evil but it takes sacrifice to make it happen. We are being told to sacrifice our ancient religions of war to make room for a new revelation of peace from God for all humankind, no artificial divisions created by man-made religions.
Bendido
Posts: 421
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/2/2015 8:20:18 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/1/2015 9:56:46 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:31:48 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:24:49 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:21:45 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:18:49 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:01:58 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
You lost me when you talked about a God who looks after babies.

Out of respect for every child who didn't make it to the age of 5, could we not go around talking about God who looks after the little children ?

Just read: the blog:

http://www.controversyextraordinary.com...

And why should I read the blog ? what objective exactly are you trying to achieve here ?


Reblogging and boost traffic, obviously. Drive by plagurist. He should just like the blog it was originally ripped from, and save us the read.

Second, even the blog isn't all that good as it doesn't defend God, but attempts to attack others on the bases that 2 wrongs make a right, even if one of those wrongs is committed by an entity that supposedly can do no wrong.

to all atheist: just read all the blog...to learned how God exist..

Yes I have heard that Canaanite explanation, and I don't really but it for some many reasons.

So there is a "problem" that "God" would like to address. God decides in it's infinite wisdom, glory , intelligence that the best way to address it is to tell one group to kill everyone man, woman, child of the other group.

There are so many holes in there I don't know where to begin..........

God given chances to repent canaanite,Amorrhites and other countries to their sin...

Douay-Rheims Bible:

Genesis 15:16
But in the fourth generation they shall return hither: for as yet the iniquities of the Amorrhites are not at the full until this present time.

After long years the iniquities of all countries is full...God Judged this people even the kids
Illegalcombatant
Posts: 4,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/2/2015 8:28:21 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/2/2015 8:20:18 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:56:46 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:31:48 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:24:49 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:21:45 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:18:49 PM, Bendido wrote:
At 2/1/2015 9:01:58 PM, Illegalcombatant wrote:
You lost me when you talked about a God who looks after babies.

Out of respect for every child who didn't make it to the age of 5, could we not go around talking about God who looks after the little children ?

Just read: the blog:

http://www.controversyextraordinary.com...

And why should I read the blog ? what objective exactly are you trying to achieve here ?


Reblogging and boost traffic, obviously. Drive by plagurist. He should just like the blog it was originally ripped from, and save us the read.

Second, even the blog isn't all that good as it doesn't defend God, but attempts to attack others on the bases that 2 wrongs make a right, even if one of those wrongs is committed by an entity that supposedly can do no wrong.

to all atheist: just read all the blog...to learned how God exist..

Yes I have heard that Canaanite explanation, and I don't really but it for some many reasons.

So there is a "problem" that "God" would like to address. God decides in it's infinite wisdom, glory , intelligence that the best way to address it is to tell one group to kill everyone man, woman, child of the other group.

There are so many holes in there I don't know where to begin..........

God given chances to repent canaanite,Amorrhites and other countries to their sin...

Douay-Rheims Bible:

Genesis 15:16
But in the fourth generation they shall return hither: for as yet the iniquities of the Amorrhites are not at the full until this present time.

After long years the iniquities of all countries is full...God Judged this people even the kids

How about you question the story a little more..............

All powerful, all wise, wants to deal with a problem ? tells one group to kill man, women , children of the other group.

Did it ever occur to you that the story may contain bullsh*t ?
"Seems like another attempt to insert God into areas our knowledge has yet to penetrate. You figure God would be bigger than the gaps of our ignorance." Drafterman 19/5/12
celestialtorahteacher
Posts: 1,369
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/2/2015 9:33:36 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
"God given chances to repent canaanite,Amorrhites and other countries to their sin...

Douay-Rheims Bible:

Genesis 15:16
But in the fourth generation they shall return hither: for as yet the iniquities of the Amorrhites are not at the full until this present time.

After long years the iniquities of all countries is full...God Judged this people even the kids"

As long as Jewish myths of origin are taken seriously as "real history" when they were nothing ever more than Hebrew propaganda as archeologists have proven yet true believers won't listen or learn anything contradicting their paper and ink "Word of God
" idols. And peoples lives die for this narcissistic selfishness of true believers keeping religious lies in place of historical truth. Witness modern Israel using religious lies in the Bible about "Abraham" giving a deed to all of Canaan to Israel and all Jews exclusively when Abraham was always a fiction and Hebrews didn't exist to witness any of their tall tales of earlier mighty men who never were and events that never happened, like Israelites conquering Canaan under Joshua. Egyptians conquered Canaan and it was them and Assyrians who destroyed the Canaanite cities later Hebrews claimed for Joshua. Everything is Jewish history must be analysed for historical accuracy as these myths are dangerous weapons when coupled with high tech arms and unlimited money as Americans fooled continually support racist Jewish destruction of Palestine.