Total Posts:19|Showing Posts:1-19
Jump to topic:

Haman in Quran vs Bible...

POPOO5560
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....
Never fart near dog
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,623
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/9/2015 10:48:34 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

The video invokes Maurice Bucaille, a medical doctor who wrote a book, "The Bible, The Qur'an and Science" in which he argues that the Quran contains no statements contradicting established scientific facts. Bucaille argued that the Quran is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not.

Nuff said. The guys an idiot but is the main source of the video's argument.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
POPOO5560
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/9/2015 11:38:01 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/9/2015 10:48:34 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

The video invokes Maurice Bucaille, a medical doctor who wrote a book, "The Bible, The Qur'an and Science" in which he argues that the Quran contains no statements contradicting established scientific facts. Bucaille argued that the Quran is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not.

Nuff said. The guys an idiot but is the main source of the video's argument.

so its all bullsh1t of that informetion about haman? becasue many religious people like to makes things up to suit their claims soo u know some source to reject these things?
Never fart near dog
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,623
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/9/2015 11:48:24 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/9/2015 11:38:01 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 10:48:34 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

The video invokes Maurice Bucaille, a medical doctor who wrote a book, "The Bible, The Qur'an and Science" in which he argues that the Quran contains no statements contradicting established scientific facts. Bucaille argued that the Quran is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not.

Nuff said. The guys an idiot but is the main source of the video's argument.

so its all bullsh1t of that informetion about haman? becasue many religious people like to makes things up to suit their claims soo u know some source to reject these things?

The argument used in the video is a self-refuting fallacy. Because the Book of Esther was discredited by biblical scholars, the Quran MUST be right. Childish one-dimensional nonsense.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
Harikrish
Posts: 11,010
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/9/2015 12:03:13 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

I think, when an illiterate Arab can refute the authenticity of the bible for what he heard in a talking cave, Christians should be very concerned. Because there are 800 million more illiterate Muslims ready to challenge them.
POPOO5560
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 1:32:16 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/9/2015 11:48:24 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:38:01 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 10:48:34 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

The video invokes Maurice Bucaille, a medical doctor who wrote a book, "The Bible, The Qur'an and Science" in which he argues that the Quran contains no statements contradicting established scientific facts. Bucaille argued that the Quran is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not.

Nuff said. The guys an idiot but is the main source of the video's argument.

so its all bullsh1t of that informetion about haman? becasue many religious people like to makes things up to suit their claims soo u know some source to reject these things?

The argument used in the video is a self-refuting fallacy. Because the Book of Esther was discredited by biblical scholars, the Quran MUST be right. Childish one-dimensional nonsense.

Its not saying because Book of Esther is discredited by biblical scholars the Quran is right about Haman, you missed the point here or just you skipped the end parts, it says when they studied egyptian hieroglyphs and it was dead language at the time of prophet Muhhamed for 2000 years they diccovered some names and one of the ministers of Pharoah was named Haman minister of the stone quarries constructions exacly what the Quran says... so now you have to refute that claim of french and german egyptian hieroglyphers who claim that.

and secondly if the prophet copied from the bible you would find the same mistake but we dont. toooozzz.
Never fart near dog
POPOO5560
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 1:36:46 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/9/2015 12:03:13 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

I think, when an illiterate Arab can refute the authenticity of the bible for what he heard in a talking cave, Christians should be very concerned. Because there are 800 million more illiterate Muslims ready to challenge them.

its not between muslims and christains its about Quran and Bible so yeahhhhh and you admitting the illiterate arab who knew about some information nobody could know such thing? lol
Never fart near dog
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,623
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 11:29:42 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 1:32:16 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:48:24 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:38:01 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 10:48:34 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

The video invokes Maurice Bucaille, a medical doctor who wrote a book, "The Bible, The Qur'an and Science" in which he argues that the Quran contains no statements contradicting established scientific facts. Bucaille argued that the Quran is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not.

Nuff said. The guys an idiot but is the main source of the video's argument.

so its all bullsh1t of that informetion about haman? becasue many religious people like to makes things up to suit their claims soo u know some source to reject these things?

The argument used in the video is a self-refuting fallacy. Because the Book of Esther was discredited by biblical scholars, the Quran MUST be right. Childish one-dimensional nonsense.

Its not saying because Book of Esther is discredited by biblical scholars the Quran is right about Haman, you missed the point here or just you skipped the end parts, it says when they studied egyptian hieroglyphs and it was dead language at the time of prophet Muhhamed for 2000 years they diccovered some names and one of the ministers of Pharoah was named Haman minister of the stone quarries constructions exacly what the Quran says... so now you have to refute that claim of french and german egyptian hieroglyphers who claim that.

and secondly if the prophet copied from the bible you would find the same mistake but we dont. toooozzz.

LOL. Then, why doesn't the name Haman appear in any Egyptian references?

http://www.reshafim.org.il...

http://www.egyptartsite.com...

And, why is that Hamam is a term for: a communal bathhouse, usually with separate baths for men and women?

http://dictionary.reference.com...
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,623
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 11:32:03 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 11:29:42 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 1:32:16 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:48:24 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:38:01 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 10:48:34 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

The video invokes Maurice Bucaille, a medical doctor who wrote a book, "The Bible, The Qur'an and Science" in which he argues that the Quran contains no statements contradicting established scientific facts. Bucaille argued that the Quran is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not.

Nuff said. The guys an idiot but is the main source of the video's argument.

so its all bullsh1t of that informetion about haman? becasue many religious people like to makes things up to suit their claims soo u know some source to reject these things?

The argument used in the video is a self-refuting fallacy. Because the Book of Esther was discredited by biblical scholars, the Quran MUST be right. Childish one-dimensional nonsense.

Its not saying because Book of Esther is discredited by biblical scholars the Quran is right about Haman, you missed the point here or just you skipped the end parts, it says when they studied egyptian hieroglyphs and it was dead language at the time of prophet Muhhamed for 2000 years they diccovered some names and one of the ministers of Pharoah was named Haman minister of the stone quarries constructions exacly what the Quran says... so now you have to refute that claim of french and german egyptian hieroglyphers who claim that.

and secondly if the prophet copied from the bible you would find the same mistake but we dont. toooozzz.

LOL. Then, why doesn't the name Haman appear in any Egyptian references?

http://www.reshafim.org.il...

http://www.egyptartsite.com...

And, why is that Hamam is a term for: a communal bathhouse, usually with separate baths for men and women?

http://dictionary.reference.com...

Sorry, I misspelled the name. Hamman does not appear in any reference books, however Haman does:

- a powerful prince at the court of Ahasuerus, who was hanged upon exposure of his plan to destroy the Jews of Persia. Esther 3"6.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
Harikrish
Posts: 11,010
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 11:39:58 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 1:36:46 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 12:03:13 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

I think, when an illiterate Arab can refute the authenticity of the bible for what he heard in a talking cave, Christians should be very concerned. Because there are 800 million more illiterate Muslims ready to challenge them.

its not between muslims and christains its about Quran and Bible so yeahhhhh and you admitting the illiterate arab who knew about some information nobody could know such thing? lol

The Quran is the recited words of the illiterate prophet. The Quran is used here to discredit the bible. And as easily as an illiterate Arab discredited the bible, there are 800 million illiterate Muslims just as capable of doing the same. The bible set a very low standard for itself. Even non believers are questioning the credibility of the bible pointing to contradictions, inconsistencies and pure fraud found in the bible.
POPOO5560
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 12:01:59 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 11:32:03 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 11:29:42 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 1:32:16 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:48:24 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:38:01 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 10:48:34 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

The video invokes Maurice Bucaille, a medical doctor who wrote a book, "The Bible, The Qur'an and Science" in which he argues that the Quran contains no statements contradicting established scientific facts. Bucaille argued that the Quran is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not.

Nuff said. The guys an idiot but is the main source of the video's argument.

so its all bullsh1t of that informetion about haman? becasue many religious people like to makes things up to suit their claims soo u know some source to reject these things?

The argument used in the video is a self-refuting fallacy. Because the Book of Esther was discredited by biblical scholars, the Quran MUST be right. Childish one-dimensional nonsense.

Its not saying because Book of Esther is discredited by biblical scholars the Quran is right about Haman, you missed the point here or just you skipped the end parts, it says when they studied egyptian hieroglyphs and it was dead language at the time of prophet Muhhamed for 2000 years they diccovered some names and one of the ministers of Pharoah was named Haman minister of the stone quarries constructions exacly what the Quran says... so now you have to refute that claim of french and german egyptian hieroglyphers who claim that.

and secondly if the prophet copied from the bible you would find the same mistake but we dont. toooozzz.

LOL. Then, why doesn't the name Haman appear in any Egyptian references?

http://www.reshafim.org.il...

http://www.egyptartsite.com...

And, why is that Hamam is a term for: a communal bathhouse, usually with separate baths for men and women?

http://dictionary.reference.com...

Sorry, I misspelled the name. Hamman does not appear in any reference books, however Haman does:

- a powerful prince at the court of Ahasuerus, who was hanged upon exposure of his plan to destroy the Jews of Persia. Esther 3"6.

lol its not mentioned there.. maybe it just a stuff made up by somebody.. anyway tnkx for that.....
Never fart near dog
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,623
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 12:05:24 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 12:01:59 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/10/2015 11:32:03 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 11:29:42 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 1:32:16 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:48:24 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:38:01 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 10:48:34 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

The video invokes Maurice Bucaille, a medical doctor who wrote a book, "The Bible, The Qur'an and Science" in which he argues that the Quran contains no statements contradicting established scientific facts. Bucaille argued that the Quran is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not.

Nuff said. The guys an idiot but is the main source of the video's argument.

so its all bullsh1t of that informetion about haman? becasue many religious people like to makes things up to suit their claims soo u know some source to reject these things?

The argument used in the video is a self-refuting fallacy. Because the Book of Esther was discredited by biblical scholars, the Quran MUST be right. Childish one-dimensional nonsense.

Its not saying because Book of Esther is discredited by biblical scholars the Quran is right about Haman, you missed the point here or just you skipped the end parts, it says when they studied egyptian hieroglyphs and it was dead language at the time of prophet Muhhamed for 2000 years they diccovered some names and one of the ministers of Pharoah was named Haman minister of the stone quarries constructions exacly what the Quran says... so now you have to refute that claim of french and german egyptian hieroglyphers who claim that.

and secondly if the prophet copied from the bible you would find the same mistake but we dont. toooozzz.

LOL. Then, why doesn't the name Haman appear in any Egyptian references?

http://www.reshafim.org.il...

http://www.egyptartsite.com...

And, why is that Hamam is a term for: a communal bathhouse, usually with separate baths for men and women?

http://dictionary.reference.com...

Sorry, I misspelled the name. Hamman does not appear in any reference books, however Haman does:

- a powerful prince at the court of Ahasuerus, who was hanged upon exposure of his plan to destroy the Jews of Persia. Esther 3"6.

lol its not mentioned there.. maybe it just a stuff made up by somebody.. anyway tnkx for that.....

Made up by somebody called Muhammad?
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
POPOO5560
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 12:09:11 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 12:05:24 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:01:59 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/10/2015 11:32:03 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 11:29:42 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 1:32:16 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:48:24 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 11:38:01 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/9/2015 10:48:34 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/9/2015 9:08:00 AM, POPOO5560 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com...

watch this and what is your opinion? its true or just crap.... muslims will always like to prove their stuff true as well as chrisians or any group.... so without any prejudice what you think....

The video invokes Maurice Bucaille, a medical doctor who wrote a book, "The Bible, The Qur'an and Science" in which he argues that the Quran contains no statements contradicting established scientific facts. Bucaille argued that the Quran is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not.

Nuff said. The guys an idiot but is the main source of the video's argument.

so its all bullsh1t of that informetion about haman? becasue many religious people like to makes things up to suit their claims soo u know some source to reject these things?

The argument used in the video is a self-refuting fallacy. Because the Book of Esther was discredited by biblical scholars, the Quran MUST be right. Childish one-dimensional nonsense.

Its not saying because Book of Esther is discredited by biblical scholars the Quran is right about Haman, you missed the point here or just you skipped the end parts, it says when they studied egyptian hieroglyphs and it was dead language at the time of prophet Muhhamed for 2000 years they diccovered some names and one of the ministers of Pharoah was named Haman minister of the stone quarries constructions exacly what the Quran says... so now you have to refute that claim of french and german egyptian hieroglyphers who claim that.

and secondly if the prophet copied from the bible you would find the same mistake but we dont. toooozzz.

LOL. Then, why doesn't the name Haman appear in any Egyptian references?

http://www.reshafim.org.il...

http://www.egyptartsite.com...

And, why is that Hamam is a term for: a communal bathhouse, usually with separate baths for men and women?

http://dictionary.reference.com...

Sorry, I misspelled the name. Hamman does not appear in any reference books, however Haman does:

- a powerful prince at the court of Ahasuerus, who was hanged upon exposure of his plan to destroy the Jews of Persia. Esther 3"6.

lol its not mentioned there.. maybe it just a stuff made up by somebody.. anyway tnkx for that.....

Made up by somebody called Muhammad?

im talking about the mentioning Haman in hieroglyphers findings... not the Quran...because people always whether athiests or theists looooove to make things up to suit themselves as usual...
Never fart near dog
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,623
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 12:19:38 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 12:09:11 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:

im talking about the mentioning Haman in hieroglyphers findings... not the Quran...because people always whether athiests or theists looooove to make things up to suit themselves as usual...

No, it was Muhammad who made it up.

"Haman is mentioned by name six times in the Qur"an and is referred to as an intimate person belonging to the close circle of Pharaoh, one who was engaged in construction projects. Western scholars have concluded that Haman is unknown to ancient Egyptian history.

Muhammad mixed biblical stories, namely the Jewish myths of the Tower of Babel and the story of Esther and Moses into a single confused account when composing the Qur"an."

http://islampapers.com...

http://www.islamic-awareness.org...
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
POPOO5560
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 12:21:34 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 12:19:38 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:09:11 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:

im talking about the mentioning Haman in hieroglyphers findings... not the Quran...because people always whether athiests or theists looooove to make things up to suit themselves as usual...

No, it was Muhammad who made it up.

"Haman is mentioned by name six times in the Qur"an and is referred to as an intimate person belonging to the close circle of Pharaoh, one who was engaged in construction projects. Western scholars have concluded that Haman is unknown to ancient Egyptian history.

Muhammad mixed biblical stories, namely the Jewish myths of the Tower of Babel and the story of Esther and Moses into a single confused account when composing the Qur"an."

http://islampapers.com...

http://www.islamic-awareness.org...

the second site is trying to prove the Quranic claim lol
Never fart near dog
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,623
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 12:26:28 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 12:21:34 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:19:38 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:09:11 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:

im talking about the mentioning Haman in hieroglyphers findings... not the Quran...because people always whether athiests or theists looooove to make things up to suit themselves as usual...

No, it was Muhammad who made it up.

"Haman is mentioned by name six times in the Qur"an and is referred to as an intimate person belonging to the close circle of Pharaoh, one who was engaged in construction projects. Western scholars have concluded that Haman is unknown to ancient Egyptian history.

Muhammad mixed biblical stories, namely the Jewish myths of the Tower of Babel and the story of Esther and Moses into a single confused account when composing the Qur"an."

http://islampapers.com...

http://www.islamic-awareness.org...

the second site is trying to prove the Quranic claim lol

Really? Are you trying to tell me honestly that you read both links in the 2 minutes between the time I posted them and you responded to them? LOL.

No, my friend, they both refute the Quran.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
POPOO5560
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 12:36:35 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 12:26:28 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:21:34 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:19:38 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:09:11 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:

im talking about the mentioning Haman in hieroglyphers findings... not the Quran...because people always whether athiests or theists looooove to make things up to suit themselves as usual...

No, it was Muhammad who made it up.

"Haman is mentioned by name six times in the Qur"an and is referred to as an intimate person belonging to the close circle of Pharaoh, one who was engaged in construction projects. Western scholars have concluded that Haman is unknown to ancient Egyptian history.

Muhammad mixed biblical stories, namely the Jewish myths of the Tower of Babel and the story of Esther and Moses into a single confused account when composing the Qur"an."

http://islampapers.com...

http://www.islamic-awareness.org...

the second site is trying to prove the Quranic claim lol

Really? Are you trying to tell me honestly that you read both links in the 2 minutes between the time I posted them and you responded to them? LOL.

No, my friend, they both refute the Quran.

dude www.islamic-awareness.org is islamic site and actually i read some stuff from there before you posted it.. go to home page..
Never fart near dog
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,623
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/10/2015 12:53:41 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/10/2015 12:36:35 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:26:28 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:21:34 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:19:38 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 2/10/2015 12:09:11 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:

im talking about the mentioning Haman in hieroglyphers findings... not the Quran...because people always whether athiests or theists looooove to make things up to suit themselves as usual...

No, it was Muhammad who made it up.

"Haman is mentioned by name six times in the Qur"an and is referred to as an intimate person belonging to the close circle of Pharaoh, one who was engaged in construction projects. Western scholars have concluded that Haman is unknown to ancient Egyptian history.

Muhammad mixed biblical stories, namely the Jewish myths of the Tower of Babel and the story of Esther and Moses into a single confused account when composing the Qur"an."

http://islampapers.com...

http://www.islamic-awareness.org...

the second site is trying to prove the Quranic claim lol

Really? Are you trying to tell me honestly that you read both links in the 2 minutes between the time I posted them and you responded to them? LOL.

No, my friend, they both refute the Quran.

dude www.islamic-awareness.org is islamic site and actually i read some stuff from there before you posted it.. go to home page..

So what? Both links show Muhammad was mistaken.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth