Total Posts:2|Showing Posts:1-2
Jump to topic:

Creationism and fossils?

Lukas8
Posts: 31
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/25/2015 2:42:34 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
I'm an atheist and don't believe in creationism. But I'd really like to know what the creationism thinks about fossils. According to the 'creationist' theory, all life started in the garden of even. But if that would have been true, then every fossil shouldn't be older than the time of the creation. But we can find different fossils in different eons. So if evolution isn't correct, why cant we find a mammal fossil that is 200+ million years old? If all species were born at the same time, then we should have seen fossils of all species of the same age? What do you think and please answer peacefully.
Fatihah
Posts: 7,770
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/25/2015 3:02:34 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/25/2015 2:42:34 PM, Lukas8 wrote:
I'm an atheist and don't believe in creationism. But I'd really like to know what the creationism thinks about fossils. According to the 'creationist' theory, all life started in the garden of even. But if that would have been true, then every fossil shouldn't be older than the time of the creation. But we can find different fossils in different eons. So if evolution isn't correct, why cant we find a mammal fossil that is 200+ million years old? If all species were born at the same time, then we should have seen fossils of all species of the same age? What do you think and please answer peacefully.

Response: Evolution and dinosaurs is the greatest hoax ever.

Join DatePost Thanks / Like"

Dinosaurs and Evolution: The Greatest Hoax

According to the document "The scientific dissent from Darwinism", it lists hundreds of signatures of scientists who doubt that natural selection in evolution is true. We also know the names of many scientists and their work admitting of hoax in paleontology, such as Piltdown Man, Piltdown Chicken, and Java Man. Scientists have even went far enough to take a real life African Boy by the name of Ota Benga and place him in a Zoo for public display, just to support evolution. The Boy eventually commits suicide by killing himself.

On top of this, many scientists have come forward to say that there is no evidence of a discovery of a complete skeleton of a dinosaur, that for some odd reason only scientists and their associates discover dinosaur bones instead of ordinary people who have no invested interest, which points to an organized conspiracy, that they are mostly discovered in specific areas such as America but nowhere else, that none were documented until the 1850"s despite the mining, farming, and digging of land and civilizations for thousands of years prior to the date. Furthermore, science is based on observable and testable evidence, yet a fossil was never observed to be formed by anyone, thus paleontology is based on a contradiction. Additionally, since random creation or chance is a significant component that drives evolution according to atheists, then the very same principle refutes that fossils are real since there is a chance that minerals can form and create a fossil shape that differs from the shape originally imprinted by the organism or bones where the fossil takes its shape from in the Earth.

Yet despite all of this evidence, atheists have the nerve to say that Evolution is true and Dinosaurs did exist. Rather, the evidence shows that they are false and nothing but a hoax because as demonstrated, the evidence to support it is full of contradictions and inconsistencies.