Total Posts:158|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Truly God's son

MadCornishBiker
Posts: 23,302
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?
bornofgod
Posts: 11,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 7:54:08 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings? : :

You have no idea what the Son of God or the Word of God means, MCB.
bulproof
Posts: 25,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 7:58:38 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

Who did he fuk?
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,602
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 8:23:47 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You are the human distorting simple meanings.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
MadCornishBiker
Posts: 23,302
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 8:51:39 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 8:23:47 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You are the human distorting simple meanings.

In your opinion. Fortunately for me, not in the opinion of God and Christ.
bornofgod
Posts: 11,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 8:54:48 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 8:51:39 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:23:47 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You are the human distorting simple meanings.

In your opinion. Fortunately for me, not in the opinion of God and Christ. : :

You have no idea what Christ, Son of God or Word of God means, MCB. All you do is lie with your own interpretations and stolen ideas.
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,602
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 8:55:03 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 8:51:39 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:23:47 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You are the human distorting simple meanings.

In your opinion. Fortunately for me, not in the opinion of God and Christ.

Sorry, but God and Christ are not here to defend you, you're entirely on your own. They would probably send your sorry a$$ straight to hell for the massive conflict you cause to your fellow man.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
bulproof
Posts: 25,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 10:27:05 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You do understand how sons are created? Yes? Read post# 3
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
MadCornishBiker
Posts: 23,302
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 10:38:18 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 8:55:03 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:51:39 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:23:47 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You are the human distorting simple meanings.

In your opinion. Fortunately for me, not in the opinion of God and Christ.

Sorry, but God and Christ are not here to defend you, you're entirely on your own. They would probably send your sorry a$$ straight to hell for the massive conflict you cause to your fellow man.

Ah but they are with me at all times, just as they are with all who support them.

You remind me of the words of my leader and King:

Matthew 10:34-36
ASV(i) 34 Think not that I came to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. 35 For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law: 36 and a mans foes shall be they of his own household.

It is neither Christ nor I who cause the conflict, but those who, like you, follow us around to disrupt the teaching of truth.

Those who choose to fight against truth have only themselves to blame.
bornofgod
Posts: 11,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 10:44:33 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 10:38:18 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:55:03 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:51:39 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:23:47 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You are the human distorting simple meanings.

In your opinion. Fortunately for me, not in the opinion of God and Christ.

Sorry, but God and Christ are not here to defend you, you're entirely on your own. They would probably send your sorry a$$ straight to hell for the massive conflict you cause to your fellow man.

Ah but they are with me at all times, just as they are with all who support them.

You remind me of the words of my leader and King:

Matthew 10:34-36
ASV(i) 34 Think not that I came to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. 35 For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law: 36 and a mans foes shall be they of his own household.

It is neither Christ nor I who cause the conflict, but those who, like you, follow us around to disrupt the teaching of truth.

Those who choose to fight against truth have only themselves to blame.

Some fight the Truth and others like you ignore Him.
MadCornishBiker
Posts: 23,302
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 10:44:45 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 10:27:05 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You do understand how sons are created? Yes? Read post# 3

I don;t need to look back at #3, I deliberately ignored it because it was your usual sick gutter level posting.

However, to answer this question, it depends on what sort of sons.

The Angelic sons of God were all created the same way, including God's own son, no sexual congress involved, no female consort, the same way Adam and Eve were created, and also the embryo Jesus inside Mary's womb.

I know, in your puerile mind, you are obsessed with sex, but it is not the answer to everything, much as it appears to be for you.
bulproof
Posts: 25,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 10:45:01 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 10:38:18 AM, MadCornishBiker

Post# 8
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
MadCornishBiker
Posts: 23,302
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 10:45:48 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 10:44:33 AM, bornofgod wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:38:18 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:55:03 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:51:39 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:23:47 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You are the human distorting simple meanings.

In your opinion. Fortunately for me, not in the opinion of God and Christ.

Sorry, but God and Christ are not here to defend you, you're entirely on your own. They would probably send your sorry a$$ straight to hell for the massive conflict you cause to your fellow man.

Ah but they are with me at all times, just as they are with all who support them.

You remind me of the words of my leader and King:

Matthew 10:34-36
ASV(i) 34 Think not that I came to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. 35 For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law: 36 and a mans foes shall be they of his own household.

It is neither Christ nor I who cause the conflict, but those who, like you, follow us around to disrupt the teaching of truth.

Those who choose to fight against truth have only themselves to blame.

Some fight the Truth and others like you ignore Him.

Oh I never ignore truth just, most often, you. The two are far from connected.
bornofgod
Posts: 11,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 10:50:37 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 10:45:48 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:44:33 AM, bornofgod wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:38:18 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:55:03 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:51:39 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:23:47 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You are the human distorting simple meanings.

In your opinion. Fortunately for me, not in the opinion of God and Christ.

Sorry, but God and Christ are not here to defend you, you're entirely on your own. They would probably send your sorry a$$ straight to hell for the massive conflict you cause to your fellow man.

Ah but they are with me at all times, just as they are with all who support them.

You remind me of the words of my leader and King:

Matthew 10:34-36
ASV(i) 34 Think not that I came to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. 35 For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law: 36 and a mans foes shall be they of his own household.

It is neither Christ nor I who cause the conflict, but those who, like you, follow us around to disrupt the teaching of truth.

Those who choose to fight against truth have only themselves to blame.

Some fight the Truth and others like you ignore Him.

Oh I never ignore truth just, most often, you. The two are far from connected. : :

You ignore all the prophecies that the Truth gives you to read in this forum. Liars like you don't even know what Christ, Son of God, Holy Spirit or the Kingdom of Heaven means.
bulproof
Posts: 25,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 11:35:10 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 10:44:45 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
However, to answer this question, it depends on what sort of sons.
No it doesn't now answer the question.
Your lies only convince you.
Answer the question.
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
bornofgod
Posts: 11,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 11:36:45 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 11:23:21 AM, JJ50 wrote:
MCB and Brad are the blind leading the blind! : :

And you're too blind to notice which one is a Christian and which one does not support a religious group or needs any support from any group in this world.
Harikrish
Posts: 11,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 12:38:36 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 11:23:21 AM, JJ50 wrote:
MCB and Brad are the blind leading the blind!

Are you trying to increase your shock value? They are the two most God possessed members with slightly different interpretations, but God possessed nevertheless. Go with the alcoholic Bras, at least you know what he drinks. The clinically depressed suicidal MCB, you don't know what he is hiding in his closet.
MadCornishBiker
Posts: 23,302
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 12:48:15 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 11:23:21 AM, JJ50 wrote:
MCB and Brad are the blind leading the blind!

Oh I'm not blind, but I am certainly trying to open the eyes of the blind such as you.
MadCornishBiker
Posts: 23,302
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 12:49:00 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 11:35:10 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:44:45 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
However, to answer this question, it depends on what sort of sons.
No it doesn't now answer the question.
Your lies only convince you.
Answer the question.

I don't lie.
ThinkFirst
Posts: 1,391
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 4:40:27 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 11:23:21 AM, JJ50 wrote:
MCB and Brad are the blind leading the blind!

Too bad they aren't "mute" and fingerless...
"Never attribute to villainy that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
-----
"Men rarely if ever dream up a god superior to themselves. Most gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child. "

-- Robert A Heinlein
ThinkFirst
Posts: 1,391
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 4:41:36 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 12:49:00 PM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 11:35:10 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:44:45 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
However, to answer this question, it depends on what sort of sons.
No it doesn't now answer the question.
Your lies only convince you.
Answer the question.

I don't lie.

Liar.
"Never attribute to villainy that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
-----
"Men rarely if ever dream up a god superior to themselves. Most gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child. "

-- Robert A Heinlein
annanicole
Posts: 19,785
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 4:48:15 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own

That's not what "only begotten Son" means, and you know it. There was no "only begotten Son" before the birth of Jesus.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Yes, there was the Son - but not the only begotten Son.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.

Yes, it teaches that the Son was the " that by which anything begins to be, the origin, active cause" in all creation. Nobody denies it.

John 1:14

"And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth."

Certainly He did.
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

kai - and
theos - God
en - was
ho - the
logos - word

That's a literal translation. Would you like to distort it again for us?
Madcornishbiker: "No, I don't need a dictionary, I know how scripture uses words and that is all I need to now."
annanicole
Posts: 19,785
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 4:57:31 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 10:38:18 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:55:03 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:51:39 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
At 3/31/2015 8:23:47 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

You are the human distorting simple meanings.

In your opinion. Fortunately for me, not in the opinion of God and Christ.

Sorry, but God and Christ are not here to defend you, you're entirely on your own. They would probably send your sorry a$$ straight to hell for the massive conflict you cause to your fellow man.

Ah but they are with me at all times, just as they are with all who support them.

You remind me of the words of my leader and King:


Here are the words of your "leader and king":

"Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up."

Decades later, John said, "But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was raised from the dead, his disciples remembered that he spake this."

Now THAT is what Christ and His apostles taught. That's not what YOU teach, though. Thus, by default, you do not teach what Christ and His apostles taught. You claim you do. But you don't. Then you said - (and let me get the exact quote) -

"I don't lie"

Ummmm ... okies.
Madcornishbiker: "No, I don't need a dictionary, I know how scripture uses words and that is all I need to now."
ChopChopSuey
Posts: 204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 9:05:01 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 4:57:31 PM, annanicole wrote:

Here are the words of your "leader and king":

"Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up."

Decades later, John said, "But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was raised from the dead, his disciples remembered that he spake this."

Now THAT is what Christ and His apostles taught. That's not what YOU teach, though. Thus, by default, you do not teach what Christ and His apostles taught. You claim you do. But you don't. Then you said - (and let me get the exact quote) -

"I don't lie"

Ummmm ... okies.

This thread seems to be going nowhere, fast. LOL.

What say we first look to see what we can agree upon?
ChopChopSuey
Posts: 204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 9:08:54 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

I can agree that John 1:14 says the following: "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory [in a man of flesh], the glory as of the only [son of flesh] begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."
Gentorev
Posts: 2,895
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 9:19:13 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 7:58:38 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

Who did he fuk?

You'll be out on your ear again, if the new moderator (Of whatever persuasion) happens to see the foul language you use in the denigration of another's God.
annanicole
Posts: 19,785
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 9:23:13 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 9:08:54 PM, ChopChopSuey wrote:
At 3/31/2015 7:48:57 AM, MadCornishBiker wrote:
God's son, The Word as John calls him, was and is truly the son of God, the only being or thing which God created purely on his own, making John's description of him at John 1:14 100% accurate.

As John there points out, it was that son who came to earth to become incarnate as the Christ.

Can you accept the simple, truthful meanings of:

Revelation 3:14.
John 1:14
Colossians 1:13-20

Or do you intend to stand by the human distortions of those most simple meanings?

I can agree that John 1:14 says the following: "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory [in a man of flesh], the glory as of the only [son of flesh] begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

Well when was the Word made into flesh?
Madcornishbiker: "No, I don't need a dictionary, I know how scripture uses words and that is all I need to now."
ChopChopSuey
Posts: 204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 9:32:20 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 9:23:13 PM, annanicole wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:08:54 PM, ChopChopSuey wrote:

I can agree that John 1:14 says the following: "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory [in a man of flesh], the glory as of the only [son of flesh] begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

Well when was the Word made into flesh?

When God's spirit shaped the spirit of understanding into Jesus after he was born. That Word is literally God's Word written to the heart of a man.

It is similar to how 1st John 4:8, 16 says God is love. A man who is completely built up spiritually on God's Word in his heart is God's Word, living that Word and only that Word in his flesh.
ChopChopSuey
Posts: 204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 9:57:58 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
When God's spirit shaped the spirit of understanding into Jesus after he was born. That Word is literally God's Word written to the heart of a man.

It is similar to how 1st John 4:8, 16 says God is love. A man who is completely built up spiritually on God's Word in his heart is God's Word, living that Word and only that Word in his flesh.

Now, that Word is God, not that the man is God but that the Word is God, for that Word is what brings forth a man to image God.

This begins the pivotal theme for the "one new man." Ephesians 2:15

Jesus was the first new man and the rest of us now have him to model ourselves after that we may become that "one new man."

Colossians 3:9 "Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds;
10 "And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:
11 "Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.

Ephesians 4:23 "And be renewed in the spirit of your mind;
24 "And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.