Total Posts:13|Showing Posts:1-13
Jump to topic:

Atheist Science the New Faith Based Dogma

brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...

Do you believe?
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
bulproof
Posts: 25,240
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 7:22:40 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

Africa!
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
dhardage
Posts: 4,545
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 7:42:59 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

Gee, a blog by a couple of writers who specialize in metaphysical and supernatural stories. Meaningless unless there's some independent verification, such as the names of these so-called scientists, an actual date and time, and some photographs. The current location of these amazing fossils would also be appropriate.

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

" Egyptologists and archaeologists have thought the Great Sphinx of Giza to be about 4,500 years old, dating to around 2500 B.C. However, some recent studies have suggested that the Sphinx was built as long ago as 7000 B.C. "
http://www.nbcnews.com...

Even if the new one is right, the Sphinx is only about 9,000 years old. Hey, still older than the Earth according to some.

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

I believe they have the data that they say they do and it seems to validate the conclusion reached.
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,112
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 7:45:48 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

Since this is the religion forum (and not the science forum), I'll just point out what should be obvious: Science and atheism are not equivalent.

*plus, you've already illustrated your close minded nature - you ignore anything that contradicts your biased narrative. Your posts are propaganda by, and for, the willfully ignorant.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 7:48:44 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 7:45:48 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

Since this is the religion forum (and not the science forum), I'll just point out what should be obvious: Science and atheism are not equivalent.

*plus, you've already illustrated your close minded nature - you ignore anything that contradicts your biased narrative. Your posts are propaganda by, and for, the willfully ignorant.

Do you believe in an 8 feet tall race, walking whales, or that the pyramids are 30,000 years old? Atheists always preach science. Here it is.
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 7:50:31 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 7:42:59 PM, dhardage wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

Gee, a blog by a couple of writers who specialize in metaphysical and supernatural stories. Meaningless unless there's some independent verification, such as the names of these so-called scientists, an actual date and time, and some photographs. The current location of these amazing fossils would also be appropriate.

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

" Egyptologists and archaeologists have thought the Great Sphinx of Giza to be about 4,500 years old, dating to around 2500 B.C. However, some recent studies have suggested that the Sphinx was built as long ago as 7000 B.C. "
http://www.nbcnews.com...

Even if the new one is right, the Sphinx is only about 9,000 years old. Hey, still older than the Earth according to some.

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

I believe they have the data that they say they do and it seems to validate the conclusion reached.

Do you believe Ambulocetus existed?
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
dhardage
Posts: 4,545
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 8:09:31 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 7:50:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:42:59 PM, dhardage wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

Gee, a blog by a couple of writers who specialize in metaphysical and supernatural stories. Meaningless unless there's some independent verification, such as the names of these so-called scientists, an actual date and time, and some photographs. The current location of these amazing fossils would also be appropriate.

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

" Egyptologists and archaeologists have thought the Great Sphinx of Giza to be about 4,500 years old, dating to around 2500 B.C. However, some recent studies have suggested that the Sphinx was built as long ago as 7000 B.C. "
http://www.nbcnews.com...

Even if the new one is right, the Sphinx is only about 9,000 years old. Hey, still older than the Earth according to some.

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

I believe they have the data that they say they do and it seems to validate the conclusion reached.

Do you believe Ambulocetus existed?

I accept the conclusions of those who have the expertise in the field and the information provided and conclude that it probably did exist.
desmac
Posts: 5,078
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 8:39:25 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 8:09:31 PM, dhardage wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:50:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:42:59 PM, dhardage wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

Gee, a blog by a couple of writers who specialize in metaphysical and supernatural stories. Meaningless unless there's some independent verification, such as the names of these so-called scientists, an actual date and time, and some photographs. The current location of these amazing fossils would also be appropriate.

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

" Egyptologists and archaeologists have thought the Great Sphinx of Giza to be about 4,500 years old, dating to around 2500 B.C. However, some recent studies have suggested that the Sphinx was built as long ago as 7000 B.C. "
http://www.nbcnews.com...

Even if the new one is right, the Sphinx is only about 9,000 years old. Hey, still older than the Earth according to some.

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

I believe they have the data that they say they do and it seems to validate the conclusion reached.

Do you believe Ambulocetus existed?

I accept the conclusions of those who have the expertise in the field and the information provided and conclude that it probably did exist.

To a superficial layman's eye like mine, the specialised scientists appear to know their stuff. So it is likely the creatures did exist.
Can you prove they didn't?
dhardage
Posts: 4,545
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 8:42:46 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 8:39:25 PM, desmac wrote:
At 1/21/2016 8:09:31 PM, dhardage wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:50:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:42:59 PM, dhardage wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

Gee, a blog by a couple of writers who specialize in metaphysical and supernatural stories. Meaningless unless there's some independent verification, such as the names of these so-called scientists, an actual date and time, and some photographs. The current location of these amazing fossils would also be appropriate.

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

" Egyptologists and archaeologists have thought the Great Sphinx of Giza to be about 4,500 years old, dating to around 2500 B.C. However, some recent studies have suggested that the Sphinx was built as long ago as 7000 B.C. "
http://www.nbcnews.com...

Even if the new one is right, the Sphinx is only about 9,000 years old. Hey, still older than the Earth according to some.

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

I believe they have the data that they say they do and it seems to validate the conclusion reached.

Do you believe Ambulocetus existed?

I accept the conclusions of those who have the expertise in the field and the information provided and conclude that it probably did exist.

To a superficial layman's eye like mine, the specialised scientists appear to know their stuff. So it is likely the creatures did exist.
Can you prove they didn't?

I would not try to, I don't dispute their former existence, I have no reason to. There is sufficent evidence that supports the assertion so I accept it as most likely valid.
desmac
Posts: 5,078
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 9:04:22 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 8:42:46 PM, dhardage wrote:
At 1/21/2016 8:39:25 PM, desmac wrote:
At 1/21/2016 8:09:31 PM, dhardage wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:50:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:42:59 PM, dhardage wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

Gee, a blog by a couple of writers who specialize in metaphysical and supernatural stories. Meaningless unless there's some independent verification, such as the names of these so-called scientists, an actual date and time, and some photographs. The current location of these amazing fossils would also be appropriate.

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

" Egyptologists and archaeologists have thought the Great Sphinx of Giza to be about 4,500 years old, dating to around 2500 B.C. However, some recent studies have suggested that the Sphinx was built as long ago as 7000 B.C. "
http://www.nbcnews.com...

Even if the new one is right, the Sphinx is only about 9,000 years old. Hey, still older than the Earth according to some.

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

I believe they have the data that they say they do and it seems to validate the conclusion reached.

Do you believe Ambulocetus existed?

I accept the conclusions of those who have the expertise in the field and the information provided and conclude that it probably did exist.

To a superficial layman's eye like mine, the specialised scientists appear to know their stuff. So it is likely the creatures did exist.
Can you prove they didn't?

I would not try to, I don't dispute their former existence, I have no reason to. There is sufficent evidence that supports the assertion so I accept it as most likely valid.

Same here. I was asking grittyworm/brontoraptor to disprove the existence of Ambulocetus.
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,112
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/21/2016 10:05:55 PM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/21/2016 7:48:44 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:45:48 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

"July 1895, a party of miners working near Bridal Veil Falls, California, found the tomb of woman whose skeletal remains were six-feet-eight inches in length. The miners had found the Amazon behind a wall of rock that had been shaped and fitted together with an apparent knowledge of masonry. When they had broken through the wall, they hoped that they had stumbled upon some ancient treasure trove. Instead of gold or jewels, the miners remains of a woman whose skeletal frame measured six-feet-eight inches in height. The mysterious madonna had been wrapped in animal skins and covered with a fine gray powder. She clutched the remains of a child to her breast.

Scientists in Los Angeles agreed that the mummy was that of a woman from a race that had flourished on the continent long before any of the Native American tribes had become dominant. Their learned consensus was that she would have stood over seven feet tall in life, thereby making the males of her kind at least eight feet tall."

www.bradandsherry.com/ancientrabtexts.htm

"What you have to remember is that Egypt has monuments such as the Sphinx that are 30, 000 years old."

www.city-data.com/forum/history/554353-what-came-before-ancient-egypt-babylon.html

Ambulocetus

http://www.amnh.org...

The Science of Ambulocetus

http://youtu.be...



Do you believe?

Since this is the religion forum (and not the science forum), I'll just point out what should be obvious: Science and atheism are not equivalent.

*plus, you've already illustrated your close minded nature - you ignore anything that contradicts your biased narrative. Your posts are propaganda by, and for, the willfully ignorant.

Do you believe in an 8 feet tall race, walking whales, or that the pyramids are 30,000 years old? Atheists always preach science. Here it is.

As I said earlier, atheism is not science. To be an atheist, I don't need to agree with or even know everything science. These questions are irrelevant to atheism.

That being said, your "8 foot tall race" link and Brad Steiger do not represent any scientific authority. The same can be said for the pyramid source. So, as opposed to what the thread title suggested - these questions/tales have nothing to do with actual science or atheism.

Out of three examples, you finally hit one that is science. We have remains of the Ambulocetus - it existed. It had legs - it is not unreasonable to assume it could walk. Chemical analysis of the teeth confirm a marine environment, judging from the bone structure of the hind feet it had webbed feet, it has almost always been found in ancient shallow marine environments - it is reasonable to assume they swam. It shares characteristics with whales including a tail (no fluke), fat pads (for receiving sound through the lower jaw), it had no external ears, etc. It is found in the same vicinity as other creatures that share characteristics with it and whales (Pakistan). It shares characteristics with other creatures that are more like whales than it. These and many more details beyond my patience to absorb lead to the conclusion that the Ambulocetus is a progenitor of modern whales.

What you've overlooked is that none of these assumptions are claimed with 100% certainty, and neither is the conclusion built on them. Scientific conclusions are subject to evidence. Should new evidence reveal a flaw in this conclusion, then it will be modified or scrapped. That alone is enough to deny the "dogma" narrative.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
Illegalcombatant
Posts: 4,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/22/2016 4:08:06 AM
Posted: 10 months ago
At 1/22/2016 4:05:01 AM, Double_R wrote:
At 1/21/2016 7:15:31 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
Atheist Science

That's a new phrase. Perhaps you can define it for us?

The "science" that contradicts a literal account of genesis.

Also know as "satanic" science.
"Seems like another attempt to insert God into areas our knowledge has yet to penetrate. You figure God would be bigger than the gaps of our ignorance." Drafterman 19/5/12