Total Posts:53|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

An Atheist Can Prove The Bible Is A Fairytale

newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,094
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.
Geogeer
Posts: 4,227
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:12:05 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

Yay! another JW!

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Good luck excavating on the Temple Mount...
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,094
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:22:10 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:12:05 AM, Geogeer wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

Yay! another JW!

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Good luck excavating on the Temple Mount...

Don't do man made religion like JW or any of those ministers of righteousness.
Geogeer
Posts: 4,227
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:25:55 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:22:10 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:12:05 AM, Geogeer wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

Yay! another JW!

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Good luck excavating on the Temple Mount...

Don't do man made religion like JW or any of those ministers of righteousness.

Oh I see, you just buy into their stauros argument.
brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:26:56 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

You've been challenged to a debate newnature unless you're scared of looking like a little girl...
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,094
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:35:39 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:26:56 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

You've been challenged to a debate newnature unless you're scared of looking like a little girl...

Nothing to debate, read a bible. The answer is there or it's not. This is for an Atheist, I'm not an Atheist. Just trying to help them out, instead of hacking on them.
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:36:54 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:25:55 AM, Geogeer wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:22:10 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:12:05 AM, Geogeer wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

Yay! another JW!

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Good luck excavating on the Temple Mount...

Don't do man made religion like JW or any of those ministers of righteousness.

Oh I see, you just buy into their stauros argument.

Who cares about Jw, they got to wash there own robes.
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,094
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:39:40 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

Additionally, according to a Biblical timeline, the Ark of the Covenant didn't exist when Adam and Eve were kicked out of the garden, so this seems to be complete absurdity as far as I can see.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
Geogeer
Posts: 4,227
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:41:33 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:36:54 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:25:55 AM, Geogeer wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:22:10 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:12:05 AM, Geogeer wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

Yay! another JW!

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Good luck excavating on the Temple Mount...

Don't do man made religion like JW or any of those ministers of righteousness.

Oh I see, you just buy into their stauros argument.

Who cares about Jw, they got to wash there own robes.

You do because you follow their faulty interpretation.
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:47:58 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:39:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

Additionally, according to a Biblical timeline, the Ark of the Covenant didn't exist when Adam and Eve were kicked out of the garden, so this seems to be complete absurdity as far as I can see.

The promise seed of the woman?
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:49:59 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:41:33 AM, Geogeer wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:36:54 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:25:55 AM, Geogeer wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:22:10 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:12:05 AM, Geogeer wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

Yay! another JW!

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Good luck excavating on the Temple Mount...

Don't do man made religion like JW or any of those ministers of righteousness.

Oh I see, you just buy into their stauros argument.

Who cares about Jw, they got to wash there own robes.

You do because you follow their faulty interpretation.

All I know about them is they are some kind of spiritual Israel.
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,094
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:52:11 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:47:58 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:39:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

Additionally, according to a Biblical timeline, the Ark of the Covenant didn't exist when Adam and Eve were kicked out of the garden, so this seems to be complete absurdity as far as I can see.

The promise seed of the woman?

seed = children (not blood)

Plus, you've not explained your anachronistic Ark of the Covenant.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 2:59:35 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:52:11 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:47:58 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:39:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

Additionally, according to a Biblical timeline, the Ark of the Covenant didn't exist when Adam and Eve were kicked out of the garden, so this seems to be complete absurdity as far as I can see.

The promise seed of the woman?

seed = children (not blood)

Plus, you've not explained your anachronistic Ark of the Covenant.

The story about the promise seed of the woman is written where no human hands can touch it. But the story has already been fulfilled, but it is a cool story.
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,094
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 3:01:59 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.

Yea, okay. I think I would need some sort of illicit drugs (strong ones) to continue this conversation any further. You're just swinging through the assertions like Tarzan through the trees.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 3:08:29 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 2:35:39 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:26:56 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

You've been challenged to a debate newnature unless you're scared of looking like a little girl...

Nothing to debate, read a bible. The answer is there or it's not. This is for an Atheist, I'm not an Atheist. Just trying to help them out, instead of hacking on them.

For what?
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 3:10:25 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 3:01:59 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.

Yea, okay. I think I would need some sort of illicit drugs (strong ones) to continue this conversation any further. You're just swinging through the assertions like Tarzan through the trees.

The Sphinx tells where to begin reading the stars and where the stars end.
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 3:16:02 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 3:08:29 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:35:39 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:26:56 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

You've been challenged to a debate newnature unless you're scared of looking like a little girl...

Nothing to debate, read a bible. The answer is there or it's not. This is for an Atheist, I'm not an Atheist. Just trying to help them out, instead of hacking on them.

For what?

To learn about Yahweh's Kavod.
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,598
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 3:47:32 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 3:01:59 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.

Yea, okay. I think I would need some sort of illicit drugs (strong ones) to continue this conversation any further. You're just swinging through the assertions like Tarzan through the trees.

Or, George of the Jungle, constantly swinging head on into a tree.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 3:57:14 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 3:47:32 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:01:59 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.

Yea, okay. I think I would need some sort of illicit drugs (strong ones) to continue this conversation any further. You're just swinging through the assertions like Tarzan through the trees.

Or, George of the Jungle, constantly swinging head on into a tree.

You can tell us about Yahweh's Kavod, Yahweh's presents. This stuff is way over an Atheists head, but it can be done, maybe.
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,598
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 4:06:53 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 3:57:14 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:47:32 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:01:59 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.

Yea, okay. I think I would need some sort of illicit drugs (strong ones) to continue this conversation any further. You're just swinging through the assertions like Tarzan through the trees.

Or, George of the Jungle, constantly swinging head on into a tree.

You can tell us about Yahweh's Kavod,

A Kavod is an Eastern European made car made popular in a James Bond movie.

Yahweh's presents.

He only got a lump of coal this year.

This stuff is way over an Atheists head, but it can be done, maybe.

Or, maybe maybe.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,094
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 4:11:17 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 3:47:32 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:01:59 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.

Yea, okay. I think I would need some sort of illicit drugs (strong ones) to continue this conversation any further. You're just swinging through the assertions like Tarzan through the trees.

Or, George of the Jungle, constantly swinging head on into a tree.

That's a better analogy!
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 4:13:06 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 4:06:53 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:57:14 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:47:32 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:01:59 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.

Yea, okay. I think I would need some sort of illicit drugs (strong ones) to continue this conversation any further. You're just swinging through the assertions like Tarzan through the trees.

Or, George of the Jungle, constantly swinging head on into a tree.

You can tell us about Yahweh's Kavod,

A Kavod is an Eastern European made car made popular in a James Bond movie.

Yahweh's presents.

He only got a lump of coal this year.

This stuff is way over an Atheists head, but it can be done, maybe.

Or, maybe maybe.

Or maybe maybe, the Old Testament is just a little to much for an Atheist. Learn the ancient Israelites history first.
newnature
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 4:18:12 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 4:11:17 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:47:32 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:01:59 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.

Yea, okay. I think I would need some sort of illicit drugs (strong ones) to continue this conversation any further. You're just swinging through the assertions like Tarzan through the trees.

Or, George of the Jungle, constantly swinging head on into a tree.

That's a better analogy!

Why debate someone who will not do the homework. No trees in my reasoning's, because if I were to debate you, I would start debating you with Genesis 1:1. Do your homework first, maybe a debate would be fun.
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,094
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/29/2016 4:30:35 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/29/2016 4:18:12 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 4:11:17 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:47:32 AM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/29/2016 3:01:59 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:56:13 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:34:40 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:20:23 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 2:14:16 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:51:52 AM, newnature wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:35:50 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 3/29/2016 1:29:46 AM, newnature wrote:
The bible can indeed be proved by an Atheist to be a fairytale, but there is one thing that will prove that the bible indeed right. There is one object on this earth, and this one object was made on this earth. Now what good would the second Adam"s blood do, falling on a piece of wood? The Greek word used for "the cross" on which Jesus was put to death is "stauros," which denotes an upright pale or stake. It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber. But who cares about that religion stuff, here is the challenge. R32;

To prove the bible is a fairytale, prove that that blood of the second Adam did NOT fall on the Ark Moses had built. Follow that ark, learn what it meant to the Israelites. Now I am going to show where that Ark is. In Matt. 27:51, the earthquake that fractured the rock opened a fissure that ran down through 20 foot of solid rock into a cave and cracked the stone lid on top of a black stone volt where the Ark of the Covenant lie hidden inside, pushing the lid aside. John 19:34, the blood that poured from the side of Jesus, ran down through that crevice and dripped onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant that was hidden by God and the prophet Jeremiah, right under where they crucified Jesus, 620 years earlier when the Babylonians destroyed Salomon"s temple. All a person has to do is prove that blood did NOT drip on that Ark.

Plagiarized: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

That is my post on abovetopsecret. No plagiarizing here. Atheists got there work cut out for them.

Indeed it is. My apologies.

As far as the argument. I think establishing exactly where Jesus was crucified (and the cave with the Ark of the Covenant below it) is necessary before your conclusions are anything more than a leap of faith (pun intended). You'll need some good (non-biased) sources before any substantive response is needed to push this argument down.

Good point, but the atheist answer is in the law of Moses. All they have to do is prove out of that law of Moses, that that the blood of Genesis 3:15 did not have to drip on that Ark.

First off, eh!? (there is no blood mentioned in Gen 3:15) Secondly, even if any sense could be made of that statement/claim, it would need to be substantiated before the atheist has any burden of rebuttal. In other words, there needs to be a case before it can be addressed.

The mystery of the Sphinx will show where to start reading the story about Genesis 3:15.

Yea, okay. I think I would need some sort of illicit drugs (strong ones) to continue this conversation any further. You're just swinging through the assertions like Tarzan through the trees.

Or, George of the Jungle, constantly swinging head on into a tree.

That's a better analogy!

Why debate someone who will not do the homework. No trees in my reasoning's, because if I were to debate you, I would start debating you with Genesis 1:1. Do your homework first, maybe a debate would be fun.

You've not established a cogent argument worthy of rebuttal.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten