Total Posts:29|Showing Posts:1-29
Jump to topic:

Let us demonstrate evolution -

HOAXdEER
Posts: 3
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?
Guest Moderator, DDO
RedAtheist912
Posts: 89
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 12:40:12 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?

You clearly have no idea what evolution is. At least do some research.
dhardage
Posts: 4,545
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 12:51:48 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/14/2016 12:42:43 PM, dee-em wrote:
And another creationist oaf open his mouth to reveal his ignorance.

Either that or he does know and is lying for his Lord.
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,208
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?

Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Would the Olmecs have benefitted from white skin? Would the Scandanavians have benefitted from shorter statures?
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Riwaaz_Ras
Posts: 1,046
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.

Would the Olmecs have benefitted from white skin? Would the Scandanavians have benefitted from shorter statures?
(This is not a goodbye message. I may or may not come back after ten years.)
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,208
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/16/2016 3:24:44 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.

Would the Olmecs have benefitted from white skin? Would the Scandanavians have benefitted from shorter statures?

And arguably it was not "England" then either. You see the point I was driving to, though, yes?
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
janesix
Posts: 3,460
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/16/2016 6:18:45 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.
Who built Stonehenge?

Would the Olmecs have benefitted from white skin? Would the Scandanavians have benefitted from shorter statures?
Riwaaz_Ras
Posts: 1,046
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/16/2016 6:18:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.
Who built Stonehenge?

There are taller Stonehenges in India. Most of them were destroyed by the white man during the British Rule.

Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.

Would the Olmecs have benefitted from white skin? Would the Scandanavians have benefitted from shorter statures?
(This is not a goodbye message. I may or may not come back after ten years.)
bulproof
Posts: 25,221
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 4:09:26 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/16/2016 6:18:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.
Who built Stonehenge?

There are taller Stonehenges in India. Most of them were destroyed by the white man during the British Rule.

Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.
Can't you find any in India? Off you go build a stonehenge. lol
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Riwaaz_Ras
Posts: 1,046
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 4:41:40 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 4:09:26 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/16/2016 6:18:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.
Who built Stonehenge?

There are taller Stonehenges in India. Most of them were destroyed by the white man during the British Rule.

Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.
Can't you find any in India? Off you go build a stonehenge. lol

There are several Stonehenges in India . Willong Khullen Nagaland has its own Stonehenge of the tallest stones nearly 8 meters tall and more than meter thick--which dwarfs the British Stonehenge

http://4.bp.blogspot.com...
(This is not a goodbye message. I may or may not come back after ten years.)
bulproof
Posts: 25,221
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 4:46:30 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 4:41:40 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/17/2016 4:09:26 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/16/2016 6:18:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.
Who built Stonehenge?

There are taller Stonehenges in India. Most of them were destroyed by the white man during the British Rule.

Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.
Can't you find any in India? Off you go build a stonehenge. lol

There are several Stonehenges in India . Willong Khullen Nagaland has its own Stonehenge of the tallest stones nearly 8 meters tall and more than meter thick--which dwarfs the British Stonehenge

http://4.bp.blogspot.com...
I don't give a fck what's already there, go and build one with 4 strong men as you claimed. Off you go.
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
janesix
Posts: 3,460
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 4:50:18 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/16/2016 6:18:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.
Who built Stonehenge?

There are taller Stonehenges in India. Most of them were destroyed by the white man during the British Rule.

Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.

Would the Olmecs have benefitted from white skin? Would the Scandanavians have benefitted from shorter statures?
You claimed stonehenge wasnt built by the english. Explain.
Riwaaz_Ras
Posts: 1,046
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 4:54:15 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 4:50:18 AM, janesix wrote:
At 4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/16/2016 6:18:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.
Who built Stonehenge?

There are taller Stonehenges in India. Most of them were destroyed by the white man during the British Rule.

Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.

Would the Olmecs have benefitted from white skin? Would the Scandanavians have benefitted from shorter statures?
You claimed stonehenge wasnt built by the english. Explain.

Every Stonehenge on this planet from Gobekli Tepi , Alaska Stonehenge, English Stonehenge, Arkaim Russia Stonehenge , Asota Pakistan , Gidduhaur Jharkhand India etc are all made by ancient Indians.

Most of the ancient Indian Stonehenges have been deliberately destroyed by the white invader"so that they can claim the British Salibury Stonehenge for themselves .After all it is their own WONDER , right?
(This is not a goodbye message. I may or may not come back after ten years.)
Riwaaz_Ras
Posts: 1,046
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 4:56:18 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 4:46:30 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 4/17/2016 4:41:40 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/17/2016 4:09:26 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/16/2016 6:18:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.
Who built Stonehenge?

There are taller Stonehenges in India. Most of them were destroyed by the white man during the British Rule.

Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.
Can't you find any in India? Off you go build a stonehenge. lol

There are several Stonehenges in India . Willong Khullen Nagaland has its own Stonehenge of the tallest stones nearly 8 meters tall and more than meter thick--which dwarfs the British Stonehenge

http://4.bp.blogspot.com...
I don't give a fck what's already there, go and build one with 4 strong men as you claimed. Off you go.

L O L
(This is not a goodbye message. I may or may not come back after ten years.)
bulproof
Posts: 25,221
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 5:15:30 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.
Are you taking lying lessons from madman?
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Riwaaz_Ras
Posts: 1,046
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 5:52:37 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 5:15:30 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.
Are you taking lying lessons from madman?

Good sense of humor.
(This is not a goodbye message. I may or may not come back after ten years.)
Pandit
Posts: 354
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 7:58:49 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
Here the Proof of Evolution ^_^

Matsya - fish, the first class of vertebrates; evolved in water(Indicates origin of Fishes in Silurian Period

Kurma - amphibious (living in both water and land; but not to confuse with the vertebrate class amphibians)(Indicates origin of Amphibians in Devonian Period

Varaha - mammals, wild land animals (Indicates Mammals origin in Triassic Period

Narasimha - beings that are half-animal and half-human (indicative of emergence of human thoughts and intelligence in powerful wild nature)

Vamana - short, premature human beings

Parasurama - early humans living in forests and using weapons

Rama - humans living in community, beginning of civil society

Krishna - humans practicing animal husbandry, politically advanced societies

Buddha - humans finding enlightenment

Kalki - advanced humans with great powers of destruction.
Riwaaz_Ras
Posts: 1,046
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 8:05:41 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 7:58:49 AM, Pandit wrote:
Here the Proof of Evolution ^_^

Matsya - fish, the first class of vertebrates; evolved in water(Indicates origin of Fishes in Silurian Period

Kurma - amphibious (living in both water and land; but not to confuse with the vertebrate class amphibians)(Indicates origin of Amphibians in Devonian Period

Varaha - mammals, wild land animals (Indicates Mammals origin in Triassic Period

Narasimha - beings that are half-animal and half-human (indicative of emergence of human thoughts and intelligence in powerful wild nature)

Vamana - short, premature human beings

Parasurama - early humans living in forests and using weapons

Rama - humans living in community, beginning of civil society

Krishna - humans practicing animal husbandry, politically advanced societies

Buddha - humans finding enlightenment

Kalki - advanced humans with great powers of destruction.

Stop injecting Buddha as 9th avatar, again and again I have warned you, you idiot!
(This is not a goodbye message. I may or may not come back after ten years.)
Pandit
Posts: 354
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 8:12:52 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 8:05:41 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/17/2016 7:58:49 AM, Pandit wrote:
Here the Proof of Evolution ^_^

Matsya - fish, the first class of vertebrates; evolved in water(Indicates origin of Fishes in Silurian Period

Kurma - amphibious (living in both water and land; but not to confuse with the vertebrate class amphibians)(Indicates origin of Amphibians in Devonian Period

Varaha - mammals, wild land animals (Indicates Mammals origin in Triassic Period

Narasimha - beings that are half-animal and half-human (indicative of emergence of human thoughts and intelligence in powerful wild nature)

Vamana - short, premature human beings

Parasurama - early humans living in forests and using weapons

Rama - humans living in community, beginning of civil society

Krishna - humans practicing animal husbandry, politically advanced societies

Buddha - humans finding enlightenment

Kalki - advanced humans with great powers of destruction.

Stop injecting Buddha as 9th avatar, again and again I have warned you, you idiot!

There were many Buddhas ^_^ Buddhas Mother saw Indra Elephant in Dream . Buddha was a Hindu Kshatriya . Buddha is mentioned in Puranas . As per ISKCON ^_^ Buddha took people away from the path of Adharma in a Unique way .

And I know some people want to replace Buddha . Some replace him with Jagannath , Balrama and few other local deities .
Riwaaz_Ras
Posts: 1,046
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 8:29:08 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 8:12:52 AM, Pandit wrote:
At 4/17/2016 8:05:41 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/17/2016 7:58:49 AM, Pandit wrote:
Here the Proof of Evolution ^_^

Matsya - fish, the first class of vertebrates; evolved in water(Indicates origin of Fishes in Silurian Period

Kurma - amphibious (living in both water and land; but not to confuse with the vertebrate class amphibians)(Indicates origin of Amphibians in Devonian Period

Varaha - mammals, wild land animals (Indicates Mammals origin in Triassic Period

Narasimha - beings that are half-animal and half-human (indicative of emergence of human thoughts and intelligence in powerful wild nature)

Vamana - short, premature human beings

Parasurama - early humans living in forests and using weapons

Rama - humans living in community, beginning of civil society

Krishna - humans practicing animal husbandry, politically advanced societies

Buddha - humans finding enlightenment

Kalki - advanced humans with great powers of destruction.

Stop injecting Buddha as 9th avatar, again and again I have warned you, you idiot!

There were many Buddhas ^_^ Buddhas Mother saw Indra Elephant in Dream . Buddha was a Hindu Kshatriya . Buddha is mentioned in Puranas . As per ISKCON ^_^ Buddha took people away from the path of Adharma in a Unique way .

And I know some people want to replace Buddha . Some replace him with Jagannath , Balrama and few other local deities .

So according to you, Lord Krishna symbolizes humans practicing animal husbandry? And Buddha 'humans finding enlightenment'?

You fucking_ Choot, you call yourself kashmiri pandit!!
(This is not a goodbye message. I may or may not come back after ten years.)
Pandit
Posts: 354
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 9:18:02 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 8:29:08 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/17/2016 8:12:52 AM, Pandit wrote:
At 4/17/2016 8:05:41 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/17/2016 7:58:49 AM, Pandit wrote:
Here the Proof of Evolution ^_^

Matsya - fish, the first class of vertebrates; evolved in water(Indicates origin of Fishes in Silurian Period

Kurma - amphibious (living in both water and land; but not to confuse with the vertebrate class amphibians)(Indicates origin of Amphibians in Devonian Period

Varaha - mammals, wild land animals (Indicates Mammals origin in Triassic Period

Narasimha - beings that are half-animal and half-human (indicative of emergence of human thoughts and intelligence in powerful wild nature)

Vamana - short, premature human beings

Parasurama - early humans living in forests and using weapons

Rama - humans living in community, beginning of civil society

Krishna - humans practicing animal husbandry, politically advanced societies

Buddha - humans finding enlightenment

Kalki - advanced humans with great powers of destruction.

Stop injecting Buddha as 9th avatar, again and again I have warned you, you idiot!

There were many Buddhas ^_^ Buddhas Mother saw Indra Elephant in Dream . Buddha was a Hindu Kshatriya . Buddha is mentioned in Puranas . As per ISKCON ^_^ Buddha took people away from the path of Adharma in a Unique way .

And I know some people want to replace Buddha . Some replace him with Jagannath , Balrama and few other local deities .

So according to you, Lord Krishna symbolizes humans practicing animal husbandry? And Buddha 'humans finding enlightenment'?

You fucking_ Choot, you call yourself kashmiri pandit!!

5000 years ago around 3000 BCE , It was the beginning of Socially , Economically and Politically Developed Societies . Its your problem if you see animal husbandry as a low class Job >_< And by 600 BCE its called Age of Enlightenment as many Societies started developing Philosophy , Science , Art and Medicine . Yes all these thing were in existence during the time of Lord Krishna but the knowledge was limited to certain section of society . By the time of Buddha it spread across a large area .

NOPE DOPE ! Krishna was born in that time period and not the other way .
Pandit
Posts: 354
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 9:35:01 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 9:22:58 AM, UUU wrote:
Pandit,

Do hindus believe in theory of evolution?

I do . Can't tell about 1 billion of us ^_^
If I generalize , Then we do believe in Evolution as well as Devolution .
desmac
Posts: 5,078
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 9:59:22 AM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 8:29:08 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/17/2016 8:12:52 AM, Pandit wrote:
At 4/17/2016 8:05:41 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/17/2016 7:58:49 AM, Pandit wrote:
Here the Proof of Evolution ^_^

Matsya - fish, the first class of vertebrates; evolved in water(Indicates origin of Fishes in Silurian Period

Kurma - amphibious (living in both water and land; but not to confuse with the vertebrate class amphibians)(Indicates origin of Amphibians in Devonian Period

Varaha - mammals, wild land animals (Indicates Mammals origin in Triassic Period

Narasimha - beings that are half-animal and half-human (indicative of emergence of human thoughts and intelligence in powerful wild nature)

Vamana - short, premature human beings

Parasurama - early humans living in forests and using weapons

Rama - humans living in community, beginning of civil society

Krishna - humans practicing animal husbandry, politically advanced societies

Buddha - humans finding enlightenment

Kalki - advanced humans with great powers of destruction.

Stop injecting Buddha as 9th avatar, again and again I have warned you, you idiot!

There were many Buddhas ^_^ Buddhas Mother saw Indra Elephant in Dream . Buddha was a Hindu Kshatriya . Buddha is mentioned in Puranas . As per ISKCON ^_^ Buddha took people away from the path of Adharma in a Unique way .

And I know some people want to replace Buddha . Some replace him with Jagannath , Balrama and few other local deities .

So according to you, Lord Krishna symbolizes humans practicing animal husbandry? And Buddha 'humans finding enlightenment'?

You fucking_ Choot, you call yourself kashmiri pandit!!

The true language of religion.
janesix
Posts: 3,460
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 5:53:35 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/17/2016 4:54:15 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/17/2016 4:50:18 AM, janesix wrote:
At 4/17/2016 3:36:13 AM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/16/2016 6:18:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 4/16/2016 3:18:15 PM, Riwaaz_Ras wrote:
At 4/14/2016 4:51:19 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?


Even better, lets do it for generations, not just a few decades, and lets use males and females, both.

Where would you like to start? I would suggest we look at the inhabitants of England, say the builders of Stonehenge, and compare them to the Olmecs.

Stonehenges were Not built by them.
Who built Stonehenge?

There are taller Stonehenges in India. Most of them were destroyed by the white man during the British Rule.

Give me four strong man and I can build Stonehenges. No big deal.

Would the Olmecs have benefitted from white skin? Would the Scandanavians have benefitted from shorter statures?
You claimed stonehenge wasnt built by the english. Explain.

Every Stonehenge on this planet from Gobekli Tepi , Alaska Stonehenge, English Stonehenge, Arkaim Russia Stonehenge , Asota Pakistan , Gidduhaur Jharkhand India etc are all made by ancient Indians.

Most of the ancient Indian Stonehenges have been deliberately destroyed by the white invader"so that they can claim the British Salibury Stonehenge for themselves .After all it is their own WONDER , right?

Do you have proof of that?
brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 8:03:16 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?

Evolution is a myth believed on by faith. There are variations in species. This why everyone looks different. But there is never a change in kind. Bacteria stay bacteria. One particular strand will survive in a given environment. So now the bacteria in this environment look like this particular strand because it is all that survived. But if the environment changes backto the original environment, the old bacteria become the selected version. It's like if we wiped out all of the people on Earth except for you and your mate. Now all of the newborn humans will look like you and your mate and have your general characteristics. Now, all humans except for one particular couple are wiped out. Now all of humanity willresemble this couple. What does not happen is we get a change of kind. That's not how variation works. Variation has a quadzillion variables that make one different from the next. What it does not have are variations that leap completely out of the massive programmed circle of information within the kind. Humans will never naturally become squidnoids. They may all one day be taller, shorter, skinnier, fatter, brown, white, black, etc, but they will always be humans. Creatures do not change kind. They have differences within their kind. Variation is not the magical evolution thatatheists dishonestly toss into the arena that has never been witnessed, examined, or tested. It fails the scientific method. It's a pipe dream that is ideologically based.
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
matt8800
Posts: 2,077
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 9:35:13 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?

Already been done and it worked https://en.wikipedia.org...

Its already been done with lizards. We introduced them to a new environment and in 40 years, they beneficially evolved to that environment. http://news.nationalgeographic.com...

Saltwater fish evolved to live in fresh water https://around.uoregon.edu...
Athomos
Posts: 401
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2016 9:38:47 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 4/14/2016 12:32:09 PM, HOAXdEER wrote:
We need volunteers to help.

Basically, what we have to do is - select a bunch of guys, who will face extremely harsh weather for a decade.

Then, we can test whether or not they've got any beneficial mutations.

We need your help in this, first of all - are we getting it right or not?

Get back to this thread when you're not as committed to parading your ignorance on the topic.