Total Posts:16|Showing Posts:1-16
Jump to topic:

A question I really need to ask God.

Willows
Posts: 6,538
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/14/2016 12:23:28 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

If I were you I wouldn't be tempting fate.

Given that, He is known to have a severe psychotic anger management problem, it is likely that you will experience the inevitable consequences of a rapidly descending piano landing on your head and go straight to Hell.
KthulhuHimself
Posts: 1,097
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/14/2016 1:04:24 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 12:23:28 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

If I were you I wouldn't be tempting fate.

Given that, He is known to have a severe psychotic anger management problem, it is likely that you will experience the inevitable consequences of a rapidly descending piano landing on your head and go straight to Hell.

Bonus points if you understand which part of the bible I was referencing with the OP.
Willows
Posts: 6,538
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/14/2016 2:03:57 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 1:04:24 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 12:23:28 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

If I were you I wouldn't be tempting fate.

Given that, He is known to have a severe psychotic anger management problem, it is likely that you will experience the inevitable consequences of a rapidly descending piano landing on your head and go straight to Hell.

Bonus points if you understand which part of the bible I was referencing with the OP.

You got me there, what is the quote?
PureX
Posts: 3,543
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/14/2016 2:08:32 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

Presuming that "God" is that anthropomorphic is a recipe for a lot of needless foolishness and resentment.
KthulhuHimself
Posts: 1,097
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/14/2016 2:14:53 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 2:03:57 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 1:04:24 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 12:23:28 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

If I were you I wouldn't be tempting fate.

Given that, He is known to have a severe psychotic anger management problem, it is likely that you will experience the inevitable consequences of a rapidly descending piano landing on your head and go straight to Hell.

Bonus points if you understand which part of the bible I was referencing with the OP.

You got me there, what is the quote?

https://www.biblegateway.com... (Verse 30 onwards).

It seems that only the 19th chapters in the bible have this sort of thing in them.
KthulhuHimself
Posts: 1,097
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/14/2016 2:20:47 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 2:08:32 PM, PureX wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

Presuming that "God" is that anthropomorphic is a recipe for a lot of needless foolishness and resentment.

"God" as presented in the bible is most definitely anthropomorphic. Perhaps the "Ohr", a being above God, and one that is most definitely not anthropomorphic; could be considered "God" as you see it. I've studied the bible and what it entails more than those on the clapham omnibus, and there isn't too much doubt about it.

Just to clarify, I don't believe in this; I'm just discussing the Theology.
PureX
Posts: 3,543
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/14/2016 3:07:43 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 2:20:47 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:08:32 PM, PureX wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

Presuming that "God" is that anthropomorphic is a recipe for a lot of needless foolishness and resentment.

"God" as presented in the bible is most definitely anthropomorphic. Perhaps the "Ohr", a being above God, and one that is most definitely not anthropomorphic; could be considered "God" as you see it. I've studied the bible and what it entails more than those on the clapham omnibus, and there isn't too much doubt about it.

Just to clarify, I don't believe in this; I'm just discussing the Theology.

The Bible depicts two relatively small groups of ancient people's conception of "God". Nothing more, unless we foolishly turn it into some sort of idol or oracle, in our minds. The text does not propose itself as being either of these.

There is theology, and then there is the human folly that pretends to be theology. Which is it that you wish to discuss?
dee-em
Posts: 8,294
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/14/2016 9:38:25 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 2:14:53 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:03:57 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 1:04:24 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 12:23:28 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

If I were you I wouldn't be tempting fate.

Given that, He is known to have a severe psychotic anger management problem, it is likely that you will experience the inevitable consequences of a rapidly descending piano landing on your head and go straight to Hell.

Bonus points if you understand which part of the bible I was referencing with the OP.

You got me there, what is the quote?

https://www.biblegateway.com... (Verse 30 onwards).

It seems that only the 19th chapters in the bible have this sort of thing in them.

33 That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and slept with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

34 The next day the older daughter said to the younger, "Last night I slept with my father. Let"s get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and sleep with him so we can preserve our family line through our father." 35 So they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in and slept with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.


Highly believable. A blind drunk has an involuntary erection and copulates whilst fully asleep. And the two daughters were in the receptive part of their cycle simultaneously. And they both became pregnant from a single act. Potent sperm old Lot had. I can buy it!

And who was there to witness these events? I bet you Lot wrote this cock-and-bull story. The truth is he was randy up there with no other women on the mountain and raped his two daughters repeatedly. The usual Bible cover-up.
Fatihah: It's like your mother making spaghetti and after you taste it and don't like it, you say "well my mom must not exist". Not because their is no logical evidence but because she doesn't do what you want.
Willows
Posts: 6,538
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/15/2016 5:49:23 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 2:14:53 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:03:57 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 1:04:24 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 12:23:28 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

If I were you I wouldn't be tempting fate.

Given that, He is known to have a severe psychotic anger management problem, it is likely that you will experience the inevitable consequences of a rapidly descending piano landing on your head and go straight to Hell.

Bonus points if you understand which part of the bible I was referencing with the OP.

You got me there, what is the quote?

https://www.biblegateway.com... (Verse 30 onwards).

It seems that only the 19th chapters in the bible have this sort of thing in them.
I tell you what....he raised some pretty bad-assed, wayward daughters.
KthulhuHimself
Posts: 1,097
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/16/2016 10:58:23 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 3:07:43 PM, PureX wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:20:47 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:08:32 PM, PureX wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

Presuming that "God" is that anthropomorphic is a recipe for a lot of needless foolishness and resentment.

"God" as presented in the bible is most definitely anthropomorphic. Perhaps the "Ohr", a being above God, and one that is most definitely not anthropomorphic; could be considered "God" as you see it. I've studied the bible and what it entails more than those on the clapham omnibus, and there isn't too much doubt about it.

Just to clarify, I don't believe in this; I'm just discussing the Theology.

The Bible depicts two relatively small groups of ancient people's conception of "God". Nothing more, unless we foolishly turn it into some sort of idol or oracle, in our minds. The text does not propose itself as being either of these.

Don't see how this connects.
There is theology, and then there is the human folly that pretends to be theology. Which is it that you wish to discuss?

The theology, of course; yet be weary of arrogantly assuming you are the absolute arbiter between the two.
KthulhuHimself
Posts: 1,097
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/16/2016 11:01:06 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/15/2016 5:49:23 AM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:14:53 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:03:57 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 1:04:24 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 12:23:28 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

If I were you I wouldn't be tempting fate.

Given that, He is known to have a severe psychotic anger management problem, it is likely that you will experience the inevitable consequences of a rapidly descending piano landing on your head and go straight to Hell.

Bonus points if you understand which part of the bible I was referencing with the OP.

You got me there, what is the quote?

https://www.biblegateway.com... (Verse 30 onwards).

It seems that only the 19th chapters in the bible have this sort of thing in them.
I tell you what....he raised some pretty bad-assed, wayward daughters.

Or good-assed.

https://ci.memecdn.com...
KthulhuHimself
Posts: 1,097
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/16/2016 11:02:02 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/14/2016 9:38:25 PM, dee-em wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:14:53 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:03:57 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 1:04:24 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 12:23:28 PM, Willows wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

If I were you I wouldn't be tempting fate.

Given that, He is known to have a severe psychotic anger management problem, it is likely that you will experience the inevitable consequences of a rapidly descending piano landing on your head and go straight to Hell.

Bonus points if you understand which part of the bible I was referencing with the OP.

You got me there, what is the quote?

https://www.biblegateway.com... (Verse 30 onwards).

It seems that only the 19th chapters in the bible have this sort of thing in them.

33 That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and slept with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

34 The next day the older daughter said to the younger, "Last night I slept with my father. Let"s get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and sleep with him so we can preserve our family line through our father." 35 So they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in and slept with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.


Highly believable. A blind drunk has an involuntary erection and copulates whilst fully asleep. And the two daughters were in the receptive part of their cycle simultaneously. And they both became pregnant from a single act. Potent sperm old Lot had. I can buy it!

And who was there to witness these events? I bet you Lot wrote this cock-and-bull story. The truth is he was randy up there with no other women on the mountain and raped his two daughters repeatedly. The usual Bible cover-up.

Meh. This is a thread for poking fun at the bible. Chances are, there was never such a man as Lot to begin with.
bulproof
Posts: 30,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/16/2016 11:04:17 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
I've been drunker than ten men but never been drunk enough that I could fuk my daughter and not know it.
Is there any of that wine left?
When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead
And the white knight is talking backwards
And the red queen's off with her head
Remember what the dormouse said
Feed your head, feed your head
PureX
Posts: 3,543
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/16/2016 2:10:59 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/16/2016 10:58:23 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 3:07:43 PM, PureX wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:20:47 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:08:32 PM, PureX wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

Presuming that "God" is that anthropomorphic is a recipe for a lot of needless foolishness and resentment.

"God" as presented in the bible is most definitely anthropomorphic. Perhaps the "Ohr", a being above God, and one that is most definitely not anthropomorphic; could be considered "God" as you see it. I've studied the bible and what it entails more than those on the clapham omnibus, and there isn't too much doubt about it.

Just to clarify, I don't believe in this; I'm just discussing the Theology.

The Bible depicts two relatively small groups of ancient people's conception of "God". Nothing more, unless we foolishly turn it into some sort of idol or oracle, in our minds. The text does not propose itself as being either of these.

Don't see how this connects.
There is theology, and then there is the human folly that pretends to be theology. Which is it that you wish to discuss?

The theology, of course; yet be weary of arrogantly assuming you are the absolute arbiter between the two.

Superstition, fantasy, and blind adherence to some authoritarian dogma is not theology. That was my point.
KthulhuHimself
Posts: 1,097
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/16/2016 2:21:23 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/16/2016 2:10:59 PM, PureX wrote:
At 10/16/2016 10:58:23 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 3:07:43 PM, PureX wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:20:47 PM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
At 10/14/2016 2:08:32 PM, PureX wrote:
At 10/14/2016 5:03:09 AM, KthulhuHimself wrote:
"Is it just good sportsmanship, or was he really that drunk?"

Presuming that "God" is that anthropomorphic is a recipe for a lot of needless foolishness and resentment.

"God" as presented in the bible is most definitely anthropomorphic. Perhaps the "Ohr", a being above God, and one that is most definitely not anthropomorphic; could be considered "God" as you see it. I've studied the bible and what it entails more than those on the clapham omnibus, and there isn't too much doubt about it.

Just to clarify, I don't believe in this; I'm just discussing the Theology.

The Bible depicts two relatively small groups of ancient people's conception of "God". Nothing more, unless we foolishly turn it into some sort of idol or oracle, in our minds. The text does not propose itself as being either of these.

Don't see how this connects.
There is theology, and then there is the human folly that pretends to be theology. Which is it that you wish to discuss?

The theology, of course; yet be weary of arrogantly assuming you are the absolute arbiter between the two.

Superstition, fantasy, and blind adherence to some authoritarian dogma is not theology. That was my point.

Sure; I agree with that. What I've presented here is what I've studied myself, not what I've been taught by some dogma.