Total Posts:2|Showing Posts:1-2
Jump to topic:

Voters should be vetted.

Ricky_Zahnd
Posts: 36
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2012 3:06:58 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
The anti-logic constituency on this site seems very well organized to vote down anyone suggesting things that involve evidence. I'm starting to wish that we had arbitrated voting, or that users with an established track record of impartiality could function as judges.

Meanwhile, these debates could really use some help from impartial voters with decent reading comprehension:
"Is there a large body of evidence to support evolution?"
http://www.debate.org...
"Theism is fundamentally a danger to human society."
http://www.debate.org...
"It is possible that a flying pink unicorn exists."
http://www.debate.org...
"My argument was that by believing in God, it causes many people to live better lives than if they didn't believe in atheists which, then, would also cause them to be better citizens."

-keytarhero
Ricky_Zahnd
Posts: 36
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2012 3:25:15 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
sorry everyone - just realized there was actually an appropriate place to post this on forums>>debate.org
"My argument was that by believing in God, it causes many people to live better lives than if they didn't believe in atheists which, then, would also cause them to be better citizens."

-keytarhero