Total Posts:9|Showing Posts:1-9
Jump to topic:

Faster Than Light Neutrinos

blackhawk1331
Posts: 4,932
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Does anyone know what the current status of this is? Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly. I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened? And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?
Because you said it was a waste, numb nuts. - Drafter

So fvck you. :) - TV

Use prima facie correctly or not at all. - Noumena
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2012 10:48:39 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Does anyone know what the current status of this is? Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly. I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened? And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?

Last I heard, they had found a faulty wire that may have caused the clock to be inaccurate.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2012 11:22:34 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Yeah I heard the results are still in discrepancy.

If they're legit though, the Theory of Relativity is all but bust which is kind of interesting.
blackhawk1331
Posts: 4,932
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 1:43:04 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/17/2012 10:48:39 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Does anyone know what the current status of this is? Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly. I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened? And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?

Last I heard, they had found a faulty wire that may have caused the clock to be inaccurate.

Do you remeber how recently that came out? Because, like I said, I had heard the equipment was fine. Granted, that was probably 4-5 months ago or more, and they may not have checked the wires at that point.
Because you said it was a waste, numb nuts. - Drafter

So fvck you. :) - TV

Use prima facie correctly or not at all. - Noumena
belle
Posts: 4,113
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 2:04:28 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/18/2012 1:43:04 AM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
At 7/17/2012 10:48:39 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Does anyone know what the current status of this is? Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly. I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened? And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?

Last I heard, they had found a faulty wire that may have caused the clock to be inaccurate.

Do you remeber how recently that came out? Because, like I said, I had heard the equipment was fine. Granted, that was probably 4-5 months ago or more, and they may not have checked the wires at that point.

http://news.sciencemag.org...

february. interestingly, they discovered a second error that may have made the neutrinos appear to travel slower than they actually did... so its still up in the air... but with all these compounding errors i think the data is just considered unreliable at this point.
evidently i only come to ddo to avoid doing homework...
Sidewalker
Posts: 3,713
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 3:45:28 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Last I heard it was a faulty cable also, and as of the articles below dated early June , it's considered to have been put to bed as a bad conclusion, and the scientist in charge of the experiment resigned his post. Einstein's theory remains the rile of law.

http://news.sciencemag.org...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com...

http://www.latimes.com...

http://www.bbc.co.uk...
"It is one of the commonest of mistakes to consider that the limit of our power of perception is also the limit of all there is to perceive." " C. W. Leadbeater
tBoonePickens
Posts: 3,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 12:29:13 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Does anyone know what the current status of this is?
Why?

Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly.
No. There was a problem with some fiber optic lines.

I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened?
Yes, the error was corrected and as expected, neutrinos cannot exceed c.

And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?
http://news.sciencemag.org...

Cheers!
WOS
: At 10/3/2012 4:28:52 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
: Without nothing existing, you couldn't have something.
blackhawk1331
Posts: 4,932
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 9:02:22 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Thanks. I have to admit, I'm a little disappointed.
Because you said it was a waste, numb nuts. - Drafter

So fvck you. :) - TV

Use prima facie correctly or not at all. - Noumena
tBoonePickens
Posts: 3,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 9:32:15 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/18/2012 9:02:22 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Thanks. I have to admit, I'm a little disappointed.
Why?
WOS
: At 10/3/2012 4:28:52 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
: Without nothing existing, you couldn't have something.