Total Posts:9|Showing Posts:1-9
Jump to topic:

Faster Than Light Neutrinos

blackhawk1331
Posts: 4,932
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Does anyone know what the current status of this is? Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly. I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened? And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?
Because you said it was a waste, numb nuts. - Drafter

So fvck you. :) - TV

Use prima facie correctly or not at all. - Noumena
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2012 10:48:39 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Does anyone know what the current status of this is? Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly. I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened? And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?

Last I heard, they had found a faulty wire that may have caused the clock to be inaccurate.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,278
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2012 11:22:34 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Yeah I heard the results are still in discrepancy.

If they're legit though, the Theory of Relativity is all but bust which is kind of interesting.
The wise have eyes in their heads, while the fool walks in the darkness; but I came to realizethat the same fate overtakes them both.
Then I said to myself,
"The fate of the fool will overtake me also.
What then do I gain by being wise?"
I said to myself, "This too is meaningless."
For the wise, like the fool, will not be long remembered;
the days have already come when both have been forgotten.
Like the fool, the wise too must die!
- Ecclesiastes 2:14-16
blackhawk1331
Posts: 4,932
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 1:43:04 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/17/2012 10:48:39 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Does anyone know what the current status of this is? Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly. I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened? And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?

Last I heard, they had found a faulty wire that may have caused the clock to be inaccurate.

Do you remeber how recently that came out? Because, like I said, I had heard the equipment was fine. Granted, that was probably 4-5 months ago or more, and they may not have checked the wires at that point.
Because you said it was a waste, numb nuts. - Drafter

So fvck you. :) - TV

Use prima facie correctly or not at all. - Noumena
belle
Posts: 4,113
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 2:04:28 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/18/2012 1:43:04 AM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
At 7/17/2012 10:48:39 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Does anyone know what the current status of this is? Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly. I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened? And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?

Last I heard, they had found a faulty wire that may have caused the clock to be inaccurate.

Do you remeber how recently that came out? Because, like I said, I had heard the equipment was fine. Granted, that was probably 4-5 months ago or more, and they may not have checked the wires at that point.

http://news.sciencemag.org...

february. interestingly, they discovered a second error that may have made the neutrinos appear to travel slower than they actually did... so its still up in the air... but with all these compounding errors i think the data is just considered unreliable at this point.
evidently i only come to ddo to avoid doing homework...
Sidewalker
Posts: 3,749
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 3:45:28 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Last I heard it was a faulty cable also, and as of the articles below dated early June , it's considered to have been put to bed as a bad conclusion, and the scientist in charge of the experiment resigned his post. Einstein's theory remains the rile of law.

http://news.sciencemag.org...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com...

http://www.latimes.com...

http://www.bbc.co.uk...
"It is one of the commonest of mistakes to consider that the limit of our power of perception is also the limit of all there is to perceive." " C. W. Leadbeater
tBoonePickens
Posts: 3,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 12:29:13 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/17/2012 10:42:20 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Does anyone know what the current status of this is?
Why?

Last I heard, it was confirmed that the machinery was working correctly.
No. There was a problem with some fiber optic lines.

I also just read an article more or less saying the results have been repeated a few times. Is there anything else that's happened?
Yes, the error was corrected and as expected, neutrinos cannot exceed c.

And if there is, can someone give me a link to an article for it?
http://news.sciencemag.org...

Cheers!
WOS
: At 10/3/2012 4:28:52 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
: Without nothing existing, you couldn't have something.
blackhawk1331
Posts: 4,932
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 9:02:22 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Thanks. I have to admit, I'm a little disappointed.
Because you said it was a waste, numb nuts. - Drafter

So fvck you. :) - TV

Use prima facie correctly or not at all. - Noumena
tBoonePickens
Posts: 3,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 9:32:15 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/18/2012 9:02:22 PM, blackhawk1331 wrote:
Thanks. I have to admit, I'm a little disappointed.
Why?
WOS
: At 10/3/2012 4:28:52 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
: Without nothing existing, you couldn't have something.