Total Posts:25|Showing Posts:1-25
Jump to topic:

We should be skeptical about evolution

jh1234l
Posts: 580
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/5/2014 4:37:08 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Evolution is commonly accepted as the theory to explain everything in biology today. However, we should be skeptical about it, as it has major flaws. It is based on random chance, violates the second law of thermodynamics, is in contrast with observed evidence, and encourages racism. Evolution should be treated with skepticism.

According to evolution, the universe exploded from nothing in an event referred to as the "big bang". Then, the solar system fromed by random chance. Life appeared spontaneously from rock, and evolved through random chance until they became humans. Evolution is just a theory, and not a law.

Now that we understand what evolution is about, we can assess how likely it would be true. Evolution is based on complete random chance, with no guidance from intelligence. If a tornado were to rip through a warehouse, it would not suddenly create a watch. The same applies to evolution, as random chance is insufficient when explaining how the universe as we know it formed.

The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy always increases in closed systems. Higher entropy means disorder increases over time. Evolution creats order, contradicting with this basic law of physics. Some atheists may use an escape hatch, like how the organisms are open system, or how the Earth is an open system, but they are deceitful as they resort to these escape hatches so that they can keep on believing these lies.

We should see new species (speciation), as well as transitional fossils, if evolution was true. However, all alleged speciation events and transitional fossils were frauds. An example is how Darwin made up the Piltdown man. Speciation is fake, too.

In the cambrian explosion, the world's first multicellular organisms suddenly spontaneously appeared out of nowhere and left their fossils. While some atheists may use loopholes, such as claiming that the cambrian is a historical period stretching millions of years, and not spontaneous, and that "transitional fossils" between old species and species created in the cambrian were found, but they cite the works of evil liberal scientists, who support Hitler, which is proof that they are wrong. The cambrian explosion can only be explained with a supreme being creating the life.

Also, evolution requires a old Earth. Evolutionists use radiomagnetic or whatever dating to prove it. That is obviously untrue, as their dating method gave a age of billions of years for lava from a volcano that only erupted a few days before it was dated! Some atheists may claim that the lava existed before the volcano erupted, but they are obviously liars! Who would you trust, an atheist who likes eating babies, or me, a very credible guy with a PhD from my own theology homeschooling institute?

Evolution causes racism, too. Hitler was a racist who used evokution's favoured races idea to support his killing of innocent Jewish people. Evolutionists believe that minorities are less evolved and must be exterminated.

Because of these fatal flaws to evolution, we should treat it with skepticism. Remember, anyone who disagrees with me must be the same mass murderers who disagree with the Heartland Institute!
My political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -1.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.82
1 square right of Nelson Mandela, 2 squares down from Francois Hollande
tkubok
Posts: 5,044
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/5/2014 1:55:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/5/2014 4:37:08 AM, jh1234l wrote:
Evolution is commonly accepted as the theory to explain everything in biology today. However, we should be skeptical about it, as it has major flaws. It is based on random chance, violates the second law of thermodynamics, is in contrast with observed evidence, and encourages racism. Evolution should be treated with skepticism.

According to evolution, the universe exploded from nothing in an event referred to as the "big bang". Then, the solar system fromed by random chance. Life appeared spontaneously from rock, and evolved through random chance until they became humans. Evolution is just a theory, and not a law.

Now that we understand what evolution is about, we can assess how likely it would be true. Evolution is based on complete random chance, with no guidance from intelligence. If a tornado were to rip through a warehouse, it would not suddenly create a watch. The same applies to evolution, as random chance is insufficient when explaining how the universe as we know it formed.

The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy always increases in closed systems. Higher entropy means disorder increases over time. Evolution creats order, contradicting with this basic law of physics. Some atheists may use an escape hatch, like how the organisms are open system, or how the Earth is an open system, but they are deceitful as they resort to these escape hatches so that they can keep on believing these lies.

We should see new species (speciation), as well as transitional fossils, if evolution was true. However, all alleged speciation events and transitional fossils were frauds. An example is how Darwin made up the Piltdown man. Speciation is fake, too.

In the cambrian explosion, the world's first multicellular organisms suddenly spontaneously appeared out of nowhere and left their fossils. While some atheists may use loopholes, such as claiming that the cambrian is a historical period stretching millions of years, and not spontaneous, and that "transitional fossils" between old species and species created in the cambrian were found, but they cite the works of evil liberal scientists, who support Hitler, which is proof that they are wrong. The cambrian explosion can only be explained with a supreme being creating the life.

Also, evolution requires a old Earth. Evolutionists use radiomagnetic or whatever dating to prove it. That is obviously untrue, as their dating method gave a age of billions of years for lava from a volcano that only erupted a few days before it was dated! Some atheists may claim that the lava existed before the volcano erupted, but they are obviously liars! Who would you trust, an atheist who likes eating babies, or me, a very credible guy with a PhD from my own theology homeschooling institute?

Evolution causes racism, too. Hitler was a racist who used evokution's favoured races idea to support his killing of innocent Jewish people. Evolutionists believe that minorities are less evolved and must be exterminated.

Because of these fatal flaws to evolution, we should treat it with skepticism. Remember, anyone who disagrees with me must be the same mass murderers who disagree with the Heartland Institute!

Skepticism is fine. But to actually disagree with it and oppose it as a scientist, would require actual evidence. Youre clearly a Poe, so I wont bother responding further, unless an actual creationist comes in to this discussion with the same arguments as you.
Sswdwm
Posts: 1,398
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/5/2014 7:39:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Agreed, we should be sceptical of evolution, along with every other claim. And judge solely on it's merits.
Resolved: the Zombie Apocalypse Will Happen
http://www.debate.org...

The most basic living cell was Intelligently Designed:
http://www.debate.org...

God most likely exists:
http://www.debate.org...
tkubok
Posts: 5,044
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 12:43:18 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/5/2014 7:39:14 PM, Sswdwm wrote:
Agreed, we should be sceptical of evolution, along with every other claim. And judge solely on it's merits.

Why stop there. Why not be skeptical of our skeptical nature. And then be skeptical of that. And then skeptical of that too. And so forth.
Dragonfang
Posts: 1,122
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 1:01:50 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The fallacy fallacy:

Person A: The sky is blue, therefore Obama is a democrat!

Person B: Person A's argument does not follow, thus not valid and fallicious. Therefore, the conclusion he tried to prove about Obama being a democrat is false!
slo1
Posts: 4,351
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 4:22:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
By your reckoning a rain cloud should never form because it contradicts the second law of thermodynamics.

Please, please, tell me how moisture in the air collects into a cloud to become more organized when it should universally dissipate according to the LAW. Maybe God is really p1ssing on us when it rains.
Iredia
Posts: 1,608
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 5:40:08 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 12:43:18 AM, tkubok wrote:
At 4/5/2014 7:39:14 PM, Sswdwm wrote:
Agreed, we should be sceptical of evolution, along with every other claim. And judge solely on it's merits.

Why stop there. Why not be skeptical of our skeptical nature. And then be skeptical of that. And then skeptical of that too. And so forth.

There's a word for that. Cynical.
Porn babes be distracting me. Dudes be stealing me stuff. I'm all about the cash from now. I'm not playing Jesus anymore.
tkubok
Posts: 5,044
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/7/2014 1:55:37 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 5:40:08 PM, Iredia wrote:
At 4/6/2014 12:43:18 AM, tkubok wrote:
At 4/5/2014 7:39:14 PM, Sswdwm wrote:
Agreed, we should be sceptical of evolution, along with every other claim. And judge solely on it's merits.

Why stop there. Why not be skeptical of our skeptical nature. And then be skeptical of that. And then skeptical of that too. And so forth.

There's a word for that. Cynical.

What about being skeptical of being cynical?
jh1234l
Posts: 580
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/13/2014 9:42:50 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/7/2014 3:52:06 AM, Installgentoo wrote:
Atheists- skeptical of everything- unless it supports their views.

Creaationists: confusing "skeptical" (requesting evidence) and "denial" (ignoring evidence)
My political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -1.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.82
1 square right of Nelson Mandela, 2 squares down from Francois Hollande
debletar
Posts: 6
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/13/2014 11:06:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/5/2014 4:37:08 AM, jh1234l wrote:
Evolution is commonly accepted as the theory to explain everything in biology today. However, we should be skeptical about it, as it has major flaws. It is based on random chance, violates the second law of thermodynamics, is in contrast with observed evidence, and encourages racism. Evolution should be treated with skepticism.

According to evolution, the universe exploded from nothing in an event referred to as the "big bang". Then, the solar system fromed by random chance. Life appeared spontaneously from rock, and evolved through random chance until they became humans. Evolution is just a theory, and not a law.

Now that we understand what evolution is about, we can assess how likely it would be true. Evolution is based on complete random chance, with no guidance from intelligence. If a tornado were to rip through a warehouse, it would not suddenly create a watch. The same applies to evolution, as random chance is insufficient when explaining how the universe as we know it formed.

The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy always increases in closed systems. Higher entropy means disorder increases over time. Evolution creats order, contradicting with this basic law of physics. Some atheists may use an escape hatch, like how the organisms are open system, or how the Earth is an open system, but they are deceitful as they resort to these escape hatches so that they can keep on believing these lies.

We should see new species (speciation), as well as transitional fossils, if evolution was true. However, all alleged speciation events and transitional fossils were frauds. An example is how Darwin made up the Piltdown man. Speciation is fake, too.

In the cambrian explosion, the world's first multicellular organisms suddenly spontaneously appeared out of nowhere and left their fossils. While some atheists may use loopholes, such as claiming that the cambrian is a historical period stretching millions of years, and not spontaneous, and that "transitional fossils" between old species and species created in the cambrian were found, but they cite the works of evil liberal scientists, who support Hitler, which is proof that they are wrong. The cambrian explosion can only be explained with a supreme being creating the life.

Also, evolution requires a old Earth. Evolutionists use radiomagnetic or whatever dating to prove it. That is obviously untrue, as their dating method gave a age of billions of years for lava from a volcano that only erupted a few days before it was dated! Some atheists may claim that the lava existed before the volcano erupted, but they are obviously liars! Who would you trust, an atheist who likes eating babies, or me, a very credible guy with a PhD from my own theology homeschooling institute?

Evolution causes racism, too. Hitler was a racist who used evokution's favoured races idea to support his killing of innocent Jewish people. Evolutionists believe that minorities are less evolved and must be exterminated.

Because of these fatal flaws to evolution, we should treat it with skepticism. Remember, anyone who disagrees with me must be the same mass murderers who disagree with the Heartland Institute!

i very agree evilutionists is evil
SkepticalStardust
Posts: 117
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2014 11:34:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
You're obviously trolling. Your profile says you're an atheist.
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." " Christopher Hitchens
jh1234l
Posts: 580
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/21/2014 6:59:49 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/15/2014 11:34:14 PM, SkepticalStardust wrote:
You're obviously trolling. Your profile says you're an atheist.

Your trying to discredit me I actually have 100 professor degrees from my own diploma mill so you must be a closed minded athshit
My political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -1.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.82
1 square right of Nelson Mandela, 2 squares down from Francois Hollande
slo1
Posts: 4,351
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2014 7:56:37 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
If a tornado were to rip through a warehouse, it would not suddenly create a watch.

How do you know this to be true, if there are watch parts lying around the warehouse and it happened 5 quadrillion times.

I love how everyone likes to put forth something very improbable and then take the last step of saying since it is extremely improbable thus we might as well say it is impossible. When it comes to probability, it is an error to say .9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is equal to 1. (lest the 9's go on forever) ;).
AlbinoBunny
Posts: 3,781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2014 11:52:19 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/22/2014 7:56:37 AM, slo1 wrote:
If a tornado were to rip through a warehouse, it would not suddenly create a watch.

How do you know this to be true, if there are watch parts lying around the warehouse and it happened 5 quadrillion times.

I love how everyone likes to put forth something very improbable and then take the last step of saying since it is extremely improbable thus we might as well say it is impossible. When it comes to probability, it is an error to say .9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is equal to 1. (lest the 9's go on forever) ;).

I heard a tornado created one of Da Vinci's paintings.
bladerunner060 | bsh1 , 2014! Presidency campaign!

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org... - Running for president.
http://www.debate.org... - Running as his vice president.

May the best man win!
sadolite
Posts: 8,838
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2014 6:57:58 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Nearly every theory about the natural world that man has proposed has been debunked by a new theory. Why would that change in the future?
It's not your views that divide us, it's what you think my views should be that divides us.

If you think I will give up my rights and forsake social etiquette to make you "FEEL" better you are sadly mistaken

If liberal democrats would just stop shooting people gun violence would drop by 90%
jh1234l
Posts: 580
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2014 10:26:20 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/22/2014 11:52:19 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/22/2014 7:56:37 AM, slo1 wrote:
If a tornado were to rip through a warehouse, it would not suddenly create a watch.

How do you know this to be true, if there are watch parts lying around the warehouse and it happened 5 quadrillion times.

I love how everyone likes to put forth something very improbable and then take the last step of saying since it is extremely improbable thus we might as well say it is impossible. When it comes to probability, it is an error to say .9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is equal to 1. (lest the 9's go on forever) ;).

I heard a tornado created one of Da Vinci's paintings.

Stop u evilutionists
My political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -1.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.82
1 square right of Nelson Mandela, 2 squares down from Francois Hollande
sadolite
Posts: 8,838
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/23/2014 4:33:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
"We should be skeptical about evolution" I agree. Every theory that man has proposed about the natural world has been wrong and replaced with a new theory. Why would that not continue to be the case in the future.
It's not your views that divide us, it's what you think my views should be that divides us.

If you think I will give up my rights and forsake social etiquette to make you "FEEL" better you are sadly mistaken

If liberal democrats would just stop shooting people gun violence would drop by 90%
sadolite
Posts: 8,838
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/23/2014 4:34:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/23/2014 4:33:39 PM, sadolite wrote:
"We should be skeptical about evolution" I agree. Every theory that man has proposed about the natural world has been wrong and replaced with a new theory. Why would that not continue to be the case in the future.

Woops already said it two posts ago
It's not your views that divide us, it's what you think my views should be that divides us.

If you think I will give up my rights and forsake social etiquette to make you "FEEL" better you are sadly mistaken

If liberal democrats would just stop shooting people gun violence would drop by 90%
Installgentoo
Posts: 1,420
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 7:18:38 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/13/2014 9:42:50 PM, jh1234l wrote:
At 4/7/2014 3:52:06 AM, Installgentoo wrote:
Atheists- skeptical of everything- unless it supports their views.

Creaationists: confusing "skeptical" (requesting evidence) and "denial" (ignoring evidence)

There is evidence for Creationism and against evolution, it's called the strong anthropic principle.
jhs20381
Posts: 1
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2014 6:07:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/5/2014 4:37:08 AM, jh1234l wrote:
Evolution is commonly accepted as the theory to explain everything in biology today. However, we should be skeptical about it, as it has major flaws. It is based on random chance, violates the second law of thermodynamics, is in contrast with observed evidence, and encourages racism. Evolution should be treated with skepticism.

According to evolution, the universe exploded from nothing in an event referred to as the "big bang". Then, the solar system fromed by random chance. Life appeared spontaneously from rock, and evolved through random chance until they became humans. Evolution is just a theory, and not a law.

It's fine to be skeptical of scientific theories. That's how science moves forward. But assuming nonsense and being ignorant is not the right way to be skeptical. For one, evolution is not based on random chance. It's based on natural selection of "random" traits. In no way does it violate the law of thermodynamics (as energy from the sun is sufficient to account for it.) It's consistent with observed evidence. In no way does it encourage racism, unless you misinterpret what it tells us.
Conservative101
Posts: 191
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/27/2014 1:08:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/5/2014 4:37:08 AM, jh1234l wrote:
Evolution is commonly accepted as the theory to explain everything in biology today. However, we should be skeptical about it, as it has major flaws. It is based on random chance, violates the second law of thermodynamics, is in contrast with observed evidence, and encourages racism. Evolution should be treated with skepticism.

According to evolution, the universe exploded from nothing in an event referred to as the "big bang".

Actually, there is evidence of the big bang. This theory is consistent with Einstein's equation of relativity and the second law of thermodynamics. Edwin Hubble, while peering through his telescope, discovered that galaxies were rapidly moving away from each other. NASA's COBE satellite has confirmed primordial background radiation that supports this theory. Many other findings support the big bang as well.

Then, the solar system fromed by random chance. Life appeared spontaneously from rock, and evolved through random chance until they became humans. Evolution is just a theory, and not a law.

Now that we understand what evolution is about, we can assess how likely it would be true. Evolution is based on complete random chance, with no guidance from intelligence. If a tornado were to rip through a warehouse, it would not suddenly create a watch. The same applies to evolution, as random chance is insufficient when explaining how the universe as we know it formed.

The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy always increases in closed systems. Higher entropy means disorder increases over time. Evolution creats order, contradicting with this basic law of physics. Some atheists may use an escape hatch, like how the organisms are open system, or how the Earth is an open system, but they are deceitful as they resort to these escape hatches so that they can keep on believing these lies.

We should see new species (speciation), as well as transitional fossils, if evolution was true. However, all alleged speciation events and transitional fossils were frauds. An example is how Darwin made up the Piltdown man. Speciation is fake, too.

In the cambrian explosion, the world's first multicellular organisms suddenly spontaneously appeared out of nowhere and left their fossils. While some atheists may use loopholes, such as claiming that the cambrian is a historical period stretching millions of years, and not spontaneous, and that "transitional fossils" between old species and species created in the cambrian were found, but they cite the works of evil liberal scientists, who support Hitler, which is proof that they are wrong. The cambrian explosion can only be explained with a supreme being creating the life.

Also, evolution requires a old Earth. Evolutionists use radiomagnetic or whatever dating to prove it. That is obviously untrue, as their dating method gave a age of billions of years for lava from a volcano that only erupted a few days before it was dated! Some atheists may claim that the lava existed before the volcano erupted, but they are obviously liars! Who would you trust, an atheist who likes eating babies, or me, a very credible guy with a PhD from my own theology homeschooling institute?

Evolution causes racism, too. Hitler was a racist who used evokution's favoured races idea to support his killing of innocent Jewish people. Evolutionists believe that minorities are less evolved and must be exterminated.

Because of these fatal flaws to evolution, we should treat it with skepticism. Remember, anyone who disagrees with me must be the same mass murderers who disagree with the Heartland Institute!

I'm a creationist, so I agree on most things, except the big bang of course.
When in doubt, start riots and scream racism
ArcTImes
Posts: 294
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/27/2014 9:08:34 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/5/2014 4:37:08 AM, jh1234l wrote:
Evolution is commonly accepted as the theory to explain everything in biology today. However, we should be skeptical about it, as it has major flaws. It is based on random chance, violates the second law of thermodynamics, is in contrast with observed evidence, and encourages racism. Evolution should be treated with skepticism.

According to evolution, the universe exploded from nothing in an event referred to as the "big bang". Then, the solar system fromed by random chance. Life appeared spontaneously from rock, and evolved through random chance until they became humans. Evolution is just a theory, and not a law.

Now that we understand what evolution is about, we can assess how likely it would be true. Evolution is based on complete random chance, with no guidance from intelligence. If a tornado were to rip through a warehouse, it would not suddenly create a watch. The same applies to evolution, as random chance is insufficient when explaining how the universe as we know it formed.

The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy always increases in closed systems. Higher entropy means disorder increases over time. Evolution creats order, contradicting with this basic law of physics. Some atheists may use an escape hatch, like how the organisms are open system, or how the Earth is an open system, but they are deceitful as they resort to these escape hatches so that they can keep on believing these lies.

We should see new species (speciation), as well as transitional fossils, if evolution was true. However, all alleged speciation events and transitional fossils were frauds. An example is how Darwin made up the Piltdown man. Speciation is fake, too.

In the cambrian explosion, the world's first multicellular organisms suddenly spontaneously appeared out of nowhere and left their fossils. While some atheists may use loopholes, such as claiming that the cambrian is a historical period stretching millions of years, and not spontaneous, and that "transitional fossils" between old species and species created in the cambrian were found, but they cite the works of evil liberal scientists, who support Hitler, which is proof that they are wrong. The cambrian explosion can only be explained with a supreme being creating the life.

Also, evolution requires a old Earth. Evolutionists use radiomagnetic or whatever dating to prove it. That is obviously untrue, as their dating method gave a age of billions of years for lava from a volcano that only erupted a few days before it was dated! Some atheists may claim that the lava existed before the volcano erupted, but they are obviously liars! Who would you trust, an atheist who likes eating babies, or me, a very credible guy with a PhD from my own theology homeschooling institute?

Evolution causes racism, too. Hitler was a racist who used evokution's favoured races idea to support his killing of innocent Jewish people. Evolutionists believe that minorities are less evolved and must be exterminated.

Because of these fatal flaws to evolution, we should treat it with skepticism. Remember, anyone who disagrees with me must be the same mass murderers who disagree with the Heartland Institute!

I agree we should be skeptical of evolution just like we should do with any scientific theory, but you don't understand evolution.
You are combining a lot of different theories.

I agree with conservative, it looks like you are trolling.