Total Posts:45|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Evidence against evolution

Sswdwm
Posts: 1,398
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2014 8:39:03 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/6/2014 8:25:03 PM, PotBelliedGeek wrote:
http://www.debate.org...

A most cogent and clinical rebuttal if I have ever seen one, even when considering it's coming from you. Nice job.

I won't vote on it however, I'm probably too biased. Interesting point about the stability of peptides however. I guess the phosphodiester bonds just aren't anywhere near as stable as the peptide bonds. I wonder if the inter-layer hydrogen bonding also plays a part in the stability of peptides/proteins, more so than in DNA.
Resolved: the Zombie Apocalypse Will Happen
http://www.debate.org...

The most basic living cell was Intelligently Designed:
http://www.debate.org...

God most likely exists:
http://www.debate.org...
PotBelliedGeek
Posts: 4,298
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2014 7:58:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/13/2014 7:33:06 PM, nonprophet wrote:
At 5/6/2014 8:25:03 PM, PotBelliedGeek wrote:
http://www.debate.org...

If you can prove evolution is wrong, there's a Nobel Prize waiting for you.

You obviously did not click the link. Please do.
Religion Forum Ambassador

HUFFLEPUFF FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!
GarretKadeDupre
Posts: 2,023
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2014 8:52:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/13/2014 7:58:30 PM, PotBelliedGeek wrote:
At 5/13/2014 7:33:06 PM, nonprophet wrote:
At 5/6/2014 8:25:03 PM, PotBelliedGeek wrote:
http://www.debate.org...

If you can prove evolution is wrong, there's a Nobel Prize waiting for you.

You obviously did not click the link. Please do.

Lmao!
Proof that people witnessed living dinosaurs:
http://www.debate.org...
Enji
Posts: 1,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2014 7:31:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

Do you also believe that 1.000000000000 repeating equals 1.1??
Enji
Posts: 1,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2014 10:21:13 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/14/2014 7:31:39 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

Do you also believe that 1.000000000000 repeating equals 1.1??

Would you rather debate me on this topic. To be clear: 0.9 repeating means 0.999..., not 0.9
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
Posts: 720
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 3:11:19 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

I know this is late. But seriously how?
Sagey
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 3:30:57 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Any Person Who Can Prove Evolution Wrong, Will Be Regarded As The Greatest Scientific Mind Ever!
-D~
Mhykiel
Posts: 5,987
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 4:04:09 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 3:30:57 AM, Sagey wrote:
Any Person Who Can Prove Evolution Wrong, Will Be Regarded As The Greatest Scientific Mind Ever!
-D~

The universe popped into existence 2 days ago. It came from nothing with all the quantum states and arrangement to replicate false memories and fossils. Ergo Evolution is false. Prove me wrong.
Sagey
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 4:13:06 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 4:04:09 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 3:30:57 AM, Sagey wrote:
Any Person Who Can Prove Evolution Wrong, Will Be Regarded As The Greatest Scientific Mind Ever!
-D~

The universe popped into existence 2 days ago. It came from nothing with all the quantum states and arrangement to replicate false memories and fossils. Ergo Evolution is false. Prove me wrong.

Ha Ha!
Good 1!
Get it Peer Reviewed (Creationist Reviewers like Andrew Snelling (nutjob geologist) ) will gladly do it and have it published. Though if you can get it Peer Reviewed by Genuine Scientific Peers, it would have infinitely more standing.
Then let them pick holes in it.
If it survives: Voila! You are now the world's greatest Scientific Mind.

Though I'll be waiting for the piles of evidence you will be required to present to state your case, since the BOP is on you to prove it via Evidence and there is no BOP on any of us to prove you wrong.
Since you are the one who made the Assertion.
LOL!
Sagey
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 4:19:36 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Though my statement is Factual:
The Theory Of Evolution is the most supported Theory in Science.
It has more evidence supporting it than any other Theory in existence.
The fundamentals are also more well known than any other large Theory.
So to be able to destroy what is known by many scientists as the Greatest Theory in the world of Science.
Would naturally make that person the Greatest Scientist in the world.
Mhykiel
Posts: 5,987
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 4:25:19 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 4:19:36 AM, Sagey wrote:
Though my statement is Factual:
The Theory Of Evolution is the most supported Theory in Science.
It has more evidence supporting it than any other Theory in existence.
The fundamentals are also more well known than any other large Theory.
So to be able to destroy what is known by many scientists as the Greatest Theory in the world of Science.
Would naturally make that person the Greatest Scientist in the world.

You know there was a time no distinguished Scientist accepted the Big Bang Theory.
Mhykiel
Posts: 5,987
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 4:31:31 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 3:11:19 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

I know this is late. But seriously how?

Fact: .9999... repeating exactly equals 1

If .999... was not equal to 1 then there would be a number between .9999...(repeating) and 1. What number would that be? There is none.
Sagey
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 4:35:23 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 4:25:19 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 4:19:36 AM, Sagey wrote:
Though my statement is Factual:
The Theory Of Evolution is the most supported Theory in Science.
It has more evidence supporting it than any other Theory in existence.
The fundamentals are also more well known than any other large Theory.
So to be able to destroy what is known by many scientists as the Greatest Theory in the world of Science.
Would naturally make that person the Greatest Scientist in the world.

You know there was a time no distinguished Scientist accepted the Big Bang Theory.

True, but eventually enough evidence was brought to their attention and now it is commonly accepted as true, because of all that evidence discovered since it was first hypothesized.

Science is evidence based.
You can create a Hypothesis about anything, you want.
If you can scrounge around and do a lot of investigation and find enough Evidence that can be consistently confirmed and is observer independent, then Science will consider your Hypothesis as real.
If your Hypothesis is confirmed as being strong and possibly factual, they will give it the Ultimate Exaltation of THEORY!
A Theory is as high as a concept can get in Science.
People think facts are higher, but they are indeed wrong.
Because a Theory is higher than fact, because it explains what makes the fact a fact.
Some Theories like Evolution encompass numerous Facts.
Evolution explains thousands of facts.
Mhykiel
Posts: 5,987
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 4:38:55 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 4:31:31 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 3:11:19 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

I know this is late. But seriously how?

Fact: .9999... repeating exactly equals 1

If .999... was not equal to 1 then there would be a number between .9999...(repeating) and 1. What number would that be? There is none.

I'm kind of shocked PotbellieGeek keeps winning those debates on this fact.

There is no number 0.0000......infinity....1
Sagey
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 4:42:58 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
This is what Creationists don't understand and why Creationism will always fall short of being an alternative to Evolution.

Evolution explains numerous biological and species related Facts.
Thus Evolution provides comprehensive and detailed explanations of why and how reproductive functions and biological facts exist.

For Creationism to compete, it much also explain these facts in a more detailed and provide a technically superior model for those facts.
Which is absolutely Impossible to do.

Thus for Creation to compete with Evolution is Completely Impossible!
Creationism according to Science is Dead.
Its concepts have reached a Dead End.
It provides detailed explanations for Absolutely Nothing!
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
Posts: 720
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 6:43:47 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 4:31:31 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 3:11:19 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

I know this is late. But seriously how?

Fact: .9999... repeating exactly equals 1

If .999... was not equal to 1 then there would be a number between .9999...(repeating) and 1. What number would that be? There is none.

The number would be 1-0.999999999999999....
Mhykiel
Posts: 5,987
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 8:06:02 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 6:43:47 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/15/2014 4:31:31 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 3:11:19 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

I know this is late. But seriously how?

Fact: .9999... repeating exactly equals 1

If .999... was not equal to 1 then there would be a number between .9999...(repeating) and 1. What number would that be? There is none.

The number would be 1-0.999999999999999....

That would be 0
Enji
Posts: 1,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 2:59:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 6:43:47 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/15/2014 4:31:31 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 3:11:19 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

I know this is late. But seriously how?

Fact: .9999... repeating exactly equals 1

If .999... was not equal to 1 then there would be a number between .9999...(repeating) and 1. What number would that be? There is none.

The number would be 1-0.999999999999999....

I'll debate you on 1-0.9r > 0 (which is really debating .9r equals 1).
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
Posts: 720
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 7:57:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 2:59:55 PM, Enji wrote:
At 5/15/2014 6:43:47 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/15/2014 4:31:31 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 3:11:19 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

I know this is late. But seriously how?

Fact: .9999... repeating exactly equals 1

If .999... was not equal to 1 then there would be a number between .9999...(repeating) and 1. What number would that be? There is none.

The number would be 1-0.999999999999999....

I'll debate you on 1-0.9r > 0 (which is really debating .9r equals 1).

No that is certainly not the same thing.

I would debate you that 0.9 recurring is not equal to 1.
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
Posts: 720
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/15/2014 7:58:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 8:06:02 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 6:43:47 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/15/2014 4:31:31 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 3:11:19 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

I know this is late. But seriously how?

Fact: .9999... repeating exactly equals 1

If .999... was not equal to 1 then there would be a number between .9999...(repeating) and 1. What number would that be? There is none.

The number would be 1-0.999999999999999....

That would be 0

No, it is not.

If you can validate that scientifically I will entertain the idea. But pure simple mathematics tells me that it is not.
Mhykiel
Posts: 5,987
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2014 11:19:02 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 7:58:26 PM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/15/2014 8:06:02 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 6:43:47 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/15/2014 4:31:31 AM, Mhykiel wrote:
At 5/15/2014 3:11:19 AM, iamanatheistandthisiswhy wrote:
At 5/13/2014 9:50:42 PM, Enji wrote:
PotBelliedGeek -- would you debate me on .9 repeating equals 1?

I'd be arguing "yup sure do" and you'd be arguing "no it don't."

Obviously this comment isn't off topic >.>

I know this is late. But seriously how?

Fact: .9999... repeating exactly equals 1

If .999... was not equal to 1 then there would be a number between .9999...(repeating) and 1. What number would that be? There is none.

The number would be 1-0.999999999999999....

That would be 0

No, it is not.

If you can validate that scientifically I will entertain the idea. But pure simple mathematics tells me that it is not.

The 9's in .9 repeating, continue for infinity. Meaning those nines go one forever.
What you propose is that there is a number between 1 an .9999...
That number would be . then 0's repeated out into infinity and at the end a 1

There is no end to infinity so the 1 will never come.

That makes it 0.0000... or 0
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2014 7:06:12 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/15/2014 4:42:58 AM, Sagey wrote:

This is what Creationists don't understand and why Creationism will always fall short of being an alternative to Evolution.

Evolution explains numerous biological facts

Can you give an example of a "fact" about macro-evolution, that only the ToE can explain??

and species related Facts.

I know immediately that this claim is false because you can't even give me an objective and consistent means of even telling what a species is.

That said, can you give an example of a "fact", that isn't an artifact of the theory, that the ToE is needed to explain??

Thus Evolution provides comprehensive and detailed explanations of why and how reproductive functions and biological facts exist.

Ok, this is a clear case of false advertising and it's obvious that you've gone around the bend with this claim.

First off, evolutionists jump out of their skin when we mention anything about the origin of life, in a discussion about the ToE, but you can't make this claim without addressing the origin of life, so which is it?? Would you prefer to re-word your statement, or does the ToE address the origin of life??

Secondly, the bible gives a general explanation of how biology and reproduction operate, so we knew that thousands of years before evolutionism ever came along. We know more about the details now than they did then, and scientists a hundred years from now will know more about the details than we do now.

Knowledge of the details is gained through the study of biological life and reproductive systems. A theory, in science, is an attempt to explain a set of observations, thus the observations still exist, independent of the theory. It's possible for all the observations and data to be correct, and the theory wrong.

All that said, your attempt to credit evolutionism with all our knowledge of biological life is patently false. That knowledge is gained through the study of biology, not by believing in evolutionism.

For Creationism to compete, it much also explain these facts in a more detailed and provide a technically superior model for those facts.
Which is absolutely Impossible to do.
Thus for Creation to compete with Evolution is Completely Impossible!
Creationism according to Science is Dead.
Its concepts have reached a Dead End.


Sorry but I'm not convinced. Maybe try typing it in bold AND caps next time, I'm sure that would make your opinion much more convincing.

It's laughable when evolutionists try to speak as though they represent all of "science", when what they say isn't even a scientifically supportable statement.

BTW, didn't Nietzsche try that "God is dead" thing already?? That didn't seem to end so well for him.

It provides detailed explanations for Absolutely Nothing

The statement, "You are alive", provides no detailed explanations but that doesn't stop it from being true. What good are your "explanations", if you can't really ever know if they're true or not?? So much for your materialism, huh??
Sagey
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2014 7:40:44 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/17/2014 7:06:12 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 5/15/2014 4:42:58 AM, Sagey wrote:

This is what Creationists don't understand and why Creationism will always fall short of being an alternative to Evolution.

Evolution explains numerous biological facts

Can you give an example of a "fact" about macro-evolution, that only the ToE can explain??

and species related Facts.

I know immediately that this claim is false because you can't even give me an objective and consistent means of even telling what a species is.

That said, can you give an example of a "fact", that isn't an artifact of the theory, that the ToE is needed to explain??

Thus Evolution provides comprehensive and detailed explanations of why and how reproductive functions and biological facts exist.

Ok, this is a clear case of false advertising and it's obvious that you've gone around the bend with this claim.

First off, evolutionists jump out of their skin when we mention anything about the origin of life, in a discussion about the ToE, but you can't make this claim without addressing the origin of life, so which is it?? Would you prefer to re-word your statement, or does the ToE address the origin of life??

Secondly, the bible gives a general explanation of how biology and reproduction operate, so we knew that thousands of years before evolutionism ever came along. We know more about the details now than they did then, and scientists a hundred years from now will know more about the details than we do now.

Knowledge of the details is gained through the study of biological life and reproductive systems. A theory, in science, is an attempt to explain a set of observations, thus the observations still exist, independent of the theory. It's possible for all the observations and data to be correct, and the theory wrong.

All that said, your attempt to credit evolutionism with all our knowledge of biological life is patently false. That knowledge is gained through the study of biology, not by believing in evolutionism.

For Creationism to compete, it much also explain these facts in a more detailed and provide a technically superior model for those facts.
Which is absolutely Impossible to do.
Thus for Creation to compete with Evolution is Completely Impossible!
Creationism according to Science is Dead.
Its concepts have reached a Dead End.


Sorry but I'm not convinced. Maybe try typing it in bold AND caps next time, I'm sure that would make your opinion much more convincing.

It's laughable when evolutionists try to speak as though they represent all of "science", when what they say isn't even a scientifically supportable statement.

BTW, didn't Nietzsche try that "God is dead" thing already?? That didn't seem to end so well for him.

It provides detailed explanations for Absolutely Nothing

The statement, "You are alive", provides no detailed explanations but that doesn't stop it from being true. What good are your "explanations", if you can't really ever know if they're true or not?? So much for your materialism, huh??

It's even funnier when Creatards assert that The Theory Evolution has flaws, since if it did have flaws, it would not even be a Theory.
A scientific Theory cannot be a Theory if flaws exist in it.
It was because it is Flawless that it got the distinction of being a Theory.
A scientific Theory is not just an idea as laypeople's theories are.
In Science, a Theory is the Highest distinction possible.
It is even above Facts.

Evolution is a Theory because no flaws have ever been found.
That is the whole truth and nothing but the TRUTH!
160 years of constant testing has never uncovered a single flaw in Evolution.

If one person can find a flaw in evolution, they will be renowned as the greatest scientist of this century.
Because The Theory of Evolution is the strongest Theory known to science.
It explains thousands of Facts.
That is why 98.5% of scientists support it and the vast majority of Biologists consider Evolution greater than a Fact.

There is not a single Theory man can devise or even devised by a supreme being that comes anywhere near close to Evolution.

You cannot think of any, as I know this for absolute certainty.

You have no grounds for your complete nonsense.
A law court would take my side and you would be laughed out of court.
Because Evolution has infinitely more evidence supporting it than you can ever muster up for Creationism.
Most of the evidence in science was found using the laws of Evolution.
So Creation cannot use the same evidence, that is plagiarism.

If it was not for Evolution, genetics and knowledge of DNA matching and tracking would be still unknown.
Sagey
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2014 8:00:06 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Yes Creatards are Extremely Arrogant and dumber than doggy doo.
They argue against the Theory Of Evolution and they don't even know what a Scientific Theory is.

They don't understand that to become a Theory, a Hypothesis must be found to be Flawless.
Darwin proposed a Hypothesis of Evolution by Natural Selection.
Peers and many scientists around the world tested this and found no flaws in it.
Thus the Hypothesis of Natural Selection became known as the Theory of Natural Selection.
It became joined with other Theories already demonstrated and together they became the "Theory Of Evolution".
Darwin's contribution was only Natural Selection.

Since then it has been thoroughly tested by every single test scientists can think of and nothing has even dented it.
It has remained Flawless, thus it remains a Theory.

If a flaw is ever found in any Scientific Theory, it is instantly dismissed as a Theory and consigned to the rubbish bin and the whole thing is revised and a new Scientific Theory will replace it.

If Evolution is destroyed tomorrow, a new version of Evolution will be devised and replace it, without any of the flaws discovered resolved.
No Theological concept will ever be considered in science, so it will have to be a practical, natural Scientific Theory that replaces Evolution, no magic (God) allowed in a Theory.

Creatards are far to dumb to understand that this is how science actually works.
They are the lowest in human intelligence that exist on planet Earth bar none.
Sagey
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2014 8:03:49 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/17/2014 8:00:06 AM, Sagey wrote:
Yes Creatards are Extremely Arrogant and dumber than doggy doo.
They argue against the Theory Of Evolution and they don't even know what a Scientific Theory is.

They don't understand that to become a Theory, a Hypothesis must be found to be Flawless.
Darwin proposed a Hypothesis of Evolution by Natural Selection.
Peers and many scientists around the world tested this and found no flaws in it.
Thus the Hypothesis of Natural Selection became known as the Theory of Natural Selection.
It became joined with other Theories already demonstrated and together they became the "Theory Of Evolution".
Darwin's contribution was only Natural Selection.

Since then it has been thoroughly tested by every single test scientists can think of and nothing has even dented it.
It has remained Flawless, thus it remains a Theory.

If a flaw is ever found in any Scientific Theory, it is instantly dismissed as a Theory and consigned to the rubbish bin and the whole thing is revised and a new Scientific Theory will replace it.

If Evolution is destroyed tomorrow, a new version of Evolution will be devised and replace it, without any of the flaws discovered..
No Theological concept will ever be considered in science, so it will have to be a practical, natural Scientific Theory that replaces Evolution, no magic (God) allowed in a Theory.

Creatards are far to dumb to understand that this is how science actually works.
They are the lowest in human intelligence that exist on planet Earth bar none.

Oops, noticed a grammar error and resolved it, LOL!

-D~
Sagey
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2014 8:08:17 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
-D~

Yes Creatards are Extremely Arrogant and dumber than doggy doo.
They argue against the Theory Of Evolution and they don't even know what a Scientific Theory is.

They don't understand that to become a Theory, a Hypothesis must be found to be Flawless.
Darwin proposed a Hypothesis of Evolution by Natural Selection.
Peers and many scientists around the world tested this and found no flaws in it.
Thus the Hypothesis of Natural Selection became known as the Theory of Natural Selection.
It became joined with other Theories already demonstrated and together they became the "Theory Of Evolution".
Darwin's contribution was only Natural Selection.

Since then it has been thoroughly tested by every single test scientists can think of and nothing has even dented it.
It has remained Flawless, thus it remains a Theory.

If a flaw is ever found in any Scientific Theory, it is instantly dismissed as a Theory and consigned to the rubbish bin and the whole thing is revised and a new Scientific Theory will replace it.

If Evolution is destroyed tomorrow, a new version of Evolution will be devised and replace it, without any of the flaws discovered..
No Theological concept will ever be considered in science, so it will have to be a practical, natural Scientific Theory that replaces Evolution, no magic (God) allowed in a Theory.

Creatards are far to dumb to understand that this is how science actually works.
They are the lowest in human intelligence that exist on planet Earth bar none.


I recall emphasis was asked for, so I delivered: ROFL!

-D~