Total Posts:4|Showing Posts:1-4
Jump to topic:

Macroevolution and mutation fixation.

Dr_Obvious
Posts: 551
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/20/2014 7:34:57 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
First of, this is not a troll post. I ran across this article and I'd like some of the more knowledgeable members of this site to comment on it. If I understand this correctly, macro evolution is extremely unlikely, if not downright impossible. Please try to keep it civil, and I'll do the same.

http://www.icr.org...
Burzmali
Posts: 1,310
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/20/2014 8:21:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
That article is based on research that's more than 40 years old. A lot of population genetics work has been done sInce then that roundly refutes what ICR has there.
Dr_Obvious
Posts: 551
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/20/2014 9:07:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/20/2014 8:21:54 PM, Burzmali wrote:
That article is based on research that's more than 40 years old. A lot of population genetics work has been done sInce then that roundly refutes what ICR has there.

How about a source?
Burzmali
Posts: 1,310
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/20/2014 10:23:05 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/20/2014 9:07:07 PM, Dr_Obvious wrote:
At 10/20/2014 8:21:54 PM, Burzmali wrote:
That article is based on research that's more than 40 years old. A lot of population genetics work has been done sInce then that roundly refutes what ICR has there.

How about a source?

This review provides a summary of the research history of mutation fixation: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...