Total Posts:1|Showing Posts:1-1

# Godels theorem is invalid for 5 reasons

Posts: 32
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
11/23/2014 2:40:39 AM Posted: 1 year ago This work by Australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean proves Godels theorem is invalid for 5 reasons
https://www.scribd.com... here are 4 1) http://en.wikipedia.org... "Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In particular, for any consistent, effectively generated formal theory that proves certain basic arithmetic truths, [b]there is an arithmetical statement that is true[/b],[1] but not provable in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250)." Godel cant tell us what makes a mathematics statement true thus his theorem is meaningless -as the theorem is about there being true mathematic statements which cant be proven 2) the axiom of the system he uses ie axiom of reducibility outlaws/bans his G statement -it is this G statement which Godel uses to prove his theorem 3) a consequence of Godels theorem is that all provable mathematic statements cant be true-thus placing his proof in paradox Godels theorem is about http://en.wikipedia.org... "Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In particular, for any consistent, effectively generated formal theory that proves certain basic arithmetic truths,[b] there is an arithmetical statement that is true,[1] but not provable[/b] in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250)." thus a condition of truth of a maths statement must be its unprovablity thus all provable mathematics statements cant be true-including Godels theorem 4)http://en.wikipedia.org... "...For each consistent formal theory T having the required small amount of number theory " [b]provability-within-the-theory-T is not the same as truth;[/b] the theory T is incomplete....." Now it is said godel PROVED "there are true mathematical statements which cant be proven" in other words truth does not equate with proof.- note the wiki quote [b]provability-within-the-theory-T is not the same as truth;[/b] thus if that theorem is true then his theorem is false PROOF for if the theorem is true-because he proved it then truth does equate with proof- as it is implied that his proof makes the theorem true but his theorem says truth does not equate with proof. thus a paradox |