Total Posts:1|Showing Posts:1-1
Jump to topic:

Godels theorem is invalid for 5 reasons

shakuntala
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/23/2014 2:40:39 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
This work by Australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean proves Godels theorem is invalid for 5 reasons
https://www.scribd.com...

here are 4
1) http://en.wikipedia.org...

"Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In particular, for any consistent, effectively generated formal theory that proves certain basic arithmetic truths, [b]there is an arithmetical statement that is true[/b],[1] but not provable in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250)."

Godel cant tell us what makes a mathematics statement true thus his theorem is meaningless -as the theorem is about there being true mathematic statements which cant be proven

2) the axiom of the system he uses ie axiom of reducibility outlaws/bans his G statement -it is this G statement which Godel uses to prove his theorem

3) a consequence of Godels theorem is that all provable mathematic statements cant be true-thus placing his proof in paradox
Godels theorem is about

http://en.wikipedia.org...

"Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In particular, for any consistent, effectively generated formal theory that proves certain basic arithmetic truths,[b] there is an arithmetical statement that is true,[1] but not provable[/b] in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250)."

thus a condition of truth of a maths statement must be its unprovablity
thus all provable mathematics statements cant be true-including Godels theorem

4)http://en.wikipedia.org...

"...For each consistent formal theory T having the required small amount of number theory
" [b]provability-within-the-theory-T is not the same as truth;[/b] the theory T is incomplete....."

Now it is said godel PROVED
"there are true mathematical statements which cant be proven"
in other words
truth does not equate with proof.- note the wiki quote [b]provability-within-the-theory-T is not the same as truth;[/b]
thus
if that theorem is true
then his theorem is false

PROOF
for if the theorem is true-because he proved it
then truth does equate with proof- as it is implied that his proof makes the theorem true
but his theorem says
truth does not equate with proof.
thus a paradox