Total Posts:2|Showing Posts:1-2
Jump to topic:

Natural selection is invalid 4 reasons

shakuntala
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/23/2014 2:42:29 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Many science types like Dawkins etc believe natural selection disproves God
but
this work by Australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean show sthat Natural selection is invalid as a theory about the generation of new species -thus it cant disprove God
https://www.scribd.com...

4 reasons
1)the Cambrian explosion as darwin saw invalidates his theory
2)NS is invalidated by the fact of speciation as NS only deals with traits already present and cant deal with the generation of new species genetics might be able to account for the generation of new species
3) NS deals with the transmission of favorable traits and the eradication of unfavorable traits so the fact that unfavorable traits ie the gene for breast cancer are and can be transmitted and become common invalidates NS
4) genetics cannot account for the generation of new species-ie the Cambrian explosion as it is claimed the generation of new genes is a random process due to radiation, viruses, chemicals etc and genetic cannot account for these process happening as they are out side the scope of genetics physics chaos theory etc may give some explanation but genetics cant
jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/23/2014 11:00:41 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/23/2014 2:42:29 AM, shakuntala wrote:
Many science types like Dawkins etc believe natural selection disproves God
but
this work by Australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean show sthat Natural selection is invalid as a theory about the generation of new species -thus it cant disprove God
https://www.scribd.com...

4 reasons
1)the Cambrian explosion as darwin saw invalidates his theory

There were transitional fossils between singlecellular organisms and post-Cambrian explosion multicellular organisms. The cambrian explosion did not invalidate evolution.(http://www.talkorigins.org...)

2)NS is invalidated by the fact of speciation as NS only deals with traits already present and cant deal with the generation of new species genetics might be able to account for the generation of new species

Well, there's a large number of speciation events. (http://www.talkorigins.org...) NS deals with all traits and causes traits more beneficial for an environment to become more common. This happens regardless of whether or not the trait is caused by speciation or already existent.

3) NS deals with the transmission of favorable traits and the eradication of unfavorable traits so the fact that unfavorable traits ie the gene for breast cancer are and can be transmitted and become common invalidates NS

Except no. Epigenetics and punnet squares.

4) genetics cannot account for the generation of new species-ie the Cambrian explosion as it is claimed the generation of new genes is a random process due to radiation, viruses, chemicals etc and genetic cannot account for these process happening as they are out side the scope of genetics physics chaos theory etc may give some explanation but genetics cant

Already explained: new species happen all the time and are accounted for by genetics.