Total Posts:4|Showing Posts:1-4
Jump to topic:

The similarities in mystical theology and sci

shakuntala
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/23/2014 10:16:59 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
This work shows
THE SIMILARITIES IN MYSTICAL THEOLOGY AND SCIENCE

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com...

[quote]Mystical theology and science share a common understanding in regard to the limitations and hindrance of language in unlocking reality.[b] Both would agree that language falsifies reality. It falsifies it by imposing limits to the real. It falsifies it by imposing human categories and classifications to the real. For both realities is beyond words and human concepts.[/b] Reality transcends language. [b]Language in fact hinders a true understanding of the real[/b]. What language does is create what the Hindus" call Maya. Namely a conventional reality based upon language -a world of appearances and forms of illusion or deception generated by a falsifying language which an unenlightened mind takes as the only reality. [b]For the physicist Bohr language is a barrier to understanding reality Dante like Lao Tzu, Pseudo-Dionysius St Augustine (354-430), St Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) Zen and many forms of Eastern mysticism knew the simultaneous inapplicability and inevitability of human language when talking of reality or God and his attributes and domains.[/b] Whether the reality as investigated by science is really just another name for God or the reality investigated by science is just a reality and not the God of religion. In other words is God just another name for reality or is reality just another name for God is by the by. What is important is this reality/God as understood by both science and theology is beyond the ability of human language "and thus intellect to grasp[/quote]
chui
Posts: 507
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/25/2014 6:02:47 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Due to the limitations of language scientists found it useful to use other means of expression such as mathematical notation and diagrams.
shakuntala
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/25/2014 7:17:40 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/25/2014 6:02:47 AM, chui wrote:
Due to the limitations of language scientists found it useful to use other means of expression such as mathematical notation and diagrams.

"Due to the limitations of language scientists found it useful to use other means of expression such as mathematical notation and diagrams."
but
This work proves maths ends in self contradiction for 4 reasons
https://www.scribd.com...

1) maths proves 1=0.999.. or a finite number 1 = a non-finite number 0.9999.. thus a contradiction in terms thus maths ends in contradiction
2) maths proves 1=1 thus maths ends in contradiction ie 1 heap of salt+1 heap of salt=1 heap of salt
3) ZFC axiomatic set theory is inconsistent as one of its axioms the axiom of separation bans impredicative statements but being impredicative itself it must ban itself thus maths ends in contradiction
4) maths cant tell us what a number is without circularity thus mathematics is meaningless

so if the universe is understood by mathematics then that universe must be meaningless as maths ends in meaninglessness
thus supporting mystical theology that the universe/god is beyond language
RoyLatham
Posts: 4,488
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/28/2014 12:13:49 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Gamahucher Press is a blog of Colin Leslie Dean, who is a master of incomprehensible mumbo jumbo. There a better ways to spend time than try to unravel his doubletalk.

A "gamahucher" is a person who engages in oral-genital sex. I suppose that might be on an SAT vocabulary test. ... or maybe not.