Total Posts:2|Showing Posts:1-2
Jump to topic:

Science dont know what species is-

shakuntala
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 7:07:02 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean schowsScience dont know what species is-thus cant disprove bible
https://www.scribd.com...
[quote] biologist classify living organisms by a heirarchy of taxonomies
ie species phylum
but again biologists cant tell us what species is or phylums are

species is a basic concept in biology
http://en.wikipedia.org...

"In biology a species is one of the basic units of biological classification and a taxonomic rank"

Yet biologist don"t know what a species is-so much for a science that cant even identify its object of investigation

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com...
http://en.wikipedia.org...
"However, the exact definition of the term "species" is still controversial, particularly in prokaryotes,[2] and this is called the species problem.[3"

http://en.wikipedia.org...
"Although a phylum is often spoken of as if it were a hard and fast entity, no satisfactory definition of a phylum exists"

With out a definition of these terms then biologists are really talking nonsense for with out definitions to locate and identify the things they talk about they are really not talking about anything at all If the biologist talks about say speciation or this species proving natural selection but cant tell you what a species or phylum is then he is talking meaningless nonsense. He could as easily said certain gibbles prove natural selection but with out knowing what a gibble is the claim is meaningless

Thus it can be seen that biology is not a science as its classificatory systems cannot identify the objects of its science if it cannot identify the objects of its investigations it cannot be a science
all it is is a meaningless array of terms which dont identify anything

Biologist don"t know what a species is
Biology end in meaningless nonsense as its idea of species ends in self contradiction

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com...

Many on here seem to think biologists know what species are

We hear biologist and such figures as dawkins gould talks about speciation ie the appearance of new species BUT biologists cannot tell us what a species or phylum is

http://en.wikipedia.org...
"However, the exact definition of the term "species" is still controversial, particularly in prokaryotes,[2] and this is called the species problem.[3"

http://en.wikipedia.org...
"Although a phylum is often spoken of as if it were a hard and fast entity, no satisfactory definition of a phylum exists"

With out a definition of these terms then biologists are really talking nonsense for with out definitions to locate and identify the things they talk about they are really not talking about anything at all If the biologist talks about say speciation or this species proving natural selection but cant tell you what a species or phylum is then he is talking meaningless nonsense. He could as easily said certain gibbles prove natural selection but with out knowing what a gibble is the claim is meaningless

some argue that
species can breed with each other
http://en.wikipedia.org...
"A species is often defined as a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring" [this following part will be discussed in the appendix where it will be shown leads to nonsense and again biologist cant agree on what a species is] While in many cases this definition is adequate, more precise or differing measures are often used, such as similarity of DNA, morphology or ecological niche

yet this definition is shown to end in meaningless nonsense

take the Bactrian and dromedary camels they are different species yet they can breed with fertile off spring which should mean they are the same species- yet they are different species

http://www.camelphotos.com...

Wild camels have three more genes than domestic camels and so they have concluded that they are a completely different species.

yet these two different species can interbreed and have fertile off spring
http://www.geocities.com...

thus we have a contradiction
dromedary and Bactrian camels are different species
yet they can interbreed , which only species can

thus the notion of species ends in self contradiction

thus because biologist cant tell us what a species is

thus all of this taxonomy is meaningless nonsense

[/quote]
Ramshutu
Posts: 4,063
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/27/2014 5:29:15 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 7:07:02 PM, shakuntala wrote:
Australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean schowsScience dont know what species is-thus cant disprove bible
https://www.scribd.com...
[quote] biologist classify living organisms by a heirarchy of taxonomies
ie species phylum
but again biologists cant tell us what species is or phylums are


species is a basic concept in biology
http://en.wikipedia.org...

"In biology a species is one of the basic units of biological classification and a taxonomic rank"

Yet biologist don"t know what a species is-so much for a science that cant even identify its object of investigation

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com...
http://en.wikipedia.org...
"However, the exact definition of the term "species" is still controversial, particularly in prokaryotes,[2] and this is called the species problem.[3"

http://en.wikipedia.org...
"Although a phylum is often spoken of as if it were a hard and fast entity, no satisfactory definition of a phylum exists"

With out a definition of these terms then biologists are really talking nonsense for with out definitions to locate and identify the things they talk about they are really not talking about anything at all If the biologist talks about say speciation or this species proving natural selection but cant tell you what a species or phylum is then he is talking meaningless nonsense. He could as easily said certain gibbles prove natural selection but with out knowing what a gibble is the claim is meaningless


Thus it can be seen that biology is not a science as its classificatory systems cannot identify the objects of its science if it cannot identify the objects of its investigations it cannot be a science
all it is is a meaningless array of terms which dont identify anything


Biologist don"t know what a species is
Biology end in meaningless nonsense as its idea of species ends in self contradiction

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com...

Many on here seem to think biologists know what species are

We hear biologist and such figures as dawkins gould talks about speciation ie the appearance of new species BUT biologists cannot tell us what a species or phylum is


http://en.wikipedia.org...
"However, the exact definition of the term "species" is still controversial, particularly in prokaryotes,[2] and this is called the species problem.[3"

http://en.wikipedia.org...
"Although a phylum is often spoken of as if it were a hard and fast entity, no satisfactory definition of a phylum exists"


With out a definition of these terms then biologists are really talking nonsense for with out definitions to locate and identify the things they talk about they are really not talking about anything at all If the biologist talks about say speciation or this species proving natural selection but cant tell you what a species or phylum is then he is talking meaningless nonsense. He could as easily said certain gibbles prove natural selection but with out knowing what a gibble is the claim is meaningless



some argue that
species can breed with each other
http://en.wikipedia.org...
"A species is often defined as a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring" [this following part will be discussed in the appendix where it will be shown leads to nonsense and again biologist cant agree on what a species is] While in many cases this definition is adequate, more precise or differing measures are often used, such as similarity of DNA, morphology or ecological niche


yet this definition is shown to end in meaningless nonsense


take the Bactrian and dromedary camels they are different species yet they can breed with fertile off spring which should mean they are the same species- yet they are different species

http://www.camelphotos.com...

Wild camels have three more genes than domestic camels and so they have concluded that they are a completely different species.




yet these two different species can interbreed and have fertile off spring
http://www.geocities.com...

thus we have a contradiction
dromedary and Bactrian camels are different species
yet they can interbreed , which only species can

thus the notion of species ends in self contradiction

thus because biologist cant tell us what a species is

thus all of this taxonomy is meaningless nonsense

[/quote]

Family cannot be defined.

Anyone related to you is family. Anyone related to them is also family. As there has to be a line where someone ceases to be family, there will be someone related to you who is family that has a child who is not family.

As the child is not family, and the parent is, it means they cannot be related; and thus family does not exist.

You are an idiot.