Total Posts:39|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Evolution is false

jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.
Such
Posts: 1,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/24/2014 6:56:26 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Sigh.

It's Christmas Eve, man.

Give it a rest. Do this shitt on the second or something.
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,566
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/24/2014 8:07:40 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis.

Evolution is based on random chance.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. S
the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

So incredibly misinformed. Wow.

I wonder what causes *religion* normally good people *religion* to be so dishonest *religion* especially when they have no clue *religion* as to what they're talking about?

Curious *religion* phenomenon.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
tabularasa
Posts: 200
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/24/2014 10:45:37 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

Yes, evolution is a theory. But it has been strongly demonstrated in dog breeding and breeding of other animals of short relative lifespans compared to human beings. Not to mention the fossil record. Evolution can be easily observed even in several human generations. Why so against evolution? What true harm does it cause? It is almost certainly true. I have not heard a single good argument against it. The truth will set you free.
1. I already googled it.

2. Give me an argument. Spell it out. "You're wrong," is not an argument.
komododragon8
Posts: 405
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.
SamStevens
Posts: 3,819
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/24/2014 11:55:44 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Ad hominen- (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

Also, evolution does not deal with the origins of the universe, the solar system, or Earth.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Mutations add information. Examples of information arising can be found mid-page: http://phylointelligence.com...


Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

Ad-hominem- (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

No, evolution does not violate the 2nd laws of thermodynamics: http://curious.astro.cornell.edu...


We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

Incorrect. Macro evolution is change at the species level or higher. Speciation is macro evolution.

http://www.talkorigins.org...
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...


We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

Transitional fossils do not show a T.Rex evolving into a bird. This is the correct model: https://www.youtube.com...

http://www.academia.edu...


The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology.

There are transitional fossils of humans, horses, whales, birds,etc.

The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

The Cambrian explosion occurred around 530 million years ago. Snakes appeared around 150 million years ago. The first 'fish like' creatures evolved around 530 million years ago. There is no issue here.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Even if that were the case, it would not invalidate the theory of evolution.


Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

http://infidels.org...


Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory.

It is a scientific theory. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. There is plenty of evidence to go around.

Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings.

Red herring- something intended to divert attention from the real problem or matter at hand

Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

Which scientific laws does evolution violate? There is plenty of evidence. Race has nothing to do with the validity of evolution.

http://rationalwiki.org...
"This is the true horror of religion. It allows perfectly decent and sane people to believe by the billions, what only lunatics could believe on their own." Sam Harris
Life asked Death "Why do people love me but hate you?"
Death responded: "Because you are a beautiful lie, and I am the painful truth."
jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...
komododragon8
Posts: 405
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...
Vox_Veritas
Posts: 7,065
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 1:15:19 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 9:47:16 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:
same text he posted some time a ago...

It's slightly different, actually.
Call me Vox, the Resident Contrarian of debate.org.

The DDO Blog:
https://debatedotorg.wordpress.com...

#drinkthecoffeenotthekoolaid
jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 5:23:59 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...

These sources are liberal deceit and censorship!
komododragon8
Posts: 405
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 8:46:29 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/25/2014 5:23:59 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...

These sources are liberal deceit and censorship!

Any evidence for that.
jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 9:09:10 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/25/2014 8:46:29 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 5:23:59 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...

These sources are liberal deceit and censorship!

Any evidence for that.

They are biased towards evolution; they are created by liberals spreading deceit.
komododragon8
Posts: 405
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 9:11:38 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/25/2014 9:09:10 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 8:46:29 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 5:23:59 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...

These sources are liberal deceit and censorship!

Any evidence for that.

They are biased towards evolution; they are created by liberals spreading deceit.

Again can I get some evidence for this so called liberal propaganda. Also why would they be lying about something like this?
jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 9:16:07 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/25/2014 9:11:38 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:09:10 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 8:46:29 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 5:23:59 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...

These sources are liberal deceit and censorship!

Any evidence for that.

They are biased towards evolution; they are created by liberals spreading deceit.

Again can I get some evidence for this so called liberal propaganda. Also why would they be lying about something like this?

You should open you mind and embrace the conservative truth!
komododragon8
Posts: 405
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 9:20:23 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/25/2014 9:16:07 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:11:38 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:09:10 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 8:46:29 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 5:23:59 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...

These sources are liberal deceit and censorship!

Any evidence for that.

They are biased towards evolution; they are created by liberals spreading deceit.

Again can I get some evidence for this so called liberal propaganda. Also why would they be lying about something like this?

You should open you mind and embrace the conservative truth!

Why?
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,083
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/25/2014 10:51:50 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

I haven't seen you post this version before, but I have to say you have hit all of the high points with this trolling. NICE!!
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
POPOO5560
Posts: 2,481
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/26/2014 4:47:03 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/25/2014 1:15:19 PM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 12/24/2014 9:47:16 PM, POPOO5560 wrote:
same text he posted some time a ago...

It's slightly different, actually.

little improvement its quite alright
Never fart near dog
HououinKyouma
Posts: 1,030
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/26/2014 6:06:53 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 6:56:26 PM, Such wrote:
Sigh.

It's Christmas Eve, man.

Give it a rest. Do this shitt on the second or something.

I think he is trolling. He can't possible be serious.
"Here the ways of men part: if you wish to strive for peace of soul and pleasure, then believe; if you wish to be a devotee of truth, then inquire." F. Nietzsche.

"Freedom is always freedom for the one who thinks differently." R. Luxemburg.

"The principle of the masochistic left is that, in general, two blacks make a white, half a loaf is the same as no bread." G. Orwell, paraphrase.

"Islamophobia is a word created by fascists, used by cowards, to manipulate morons". Andrew Cummins.
jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/26/2014 11:50:48 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/25/2014 9:20:23 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:16:07 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:11:38 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:09:10 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 8:46:29 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 5:23:59 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...

These sources are liberal deceit and censorship!

Any evidence for that.

They are biased towards evolution; they are created by liberals spreading deceit.

Again can I get some evidence for this so called liberal propaganda. Also why would they be lying about something like this?

You should open you mind and embrace the conservative truth!

Why?

http://www.conservapedia.com...
komododragon8
Posts: 405
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2014 1:23:38 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/26/2014 11:50:48 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:20:23 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:16:07 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:11:38 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:09:10 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 8:46:29 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 5:23:59 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...

These sources are liberal deceit and censorship!

Any evidence for that.

They are biased towards evolution; they are created by liberals spreading deceit.

Again can I get some evidence for this so called liberal propaganda. Also why would they be lying about something like this?

You should open you mind and embrace the conservative truth!

Why?

http://www.conservapedia.com...

I think that site is making me more liberal. :)
jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2014 12:34:19 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/27/2014 1:23:38 AM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/26/2014 11:50:48 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:20:23 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:16:07 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:11:38 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 9:09:10 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 8:46:29 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 5:23:59 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/25/2014 1:12:41 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/25/2014 11:10:49 AM, jh1234lnew wrote:
At 12/24/2014 11:42:06 PM, komododragon8 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory. Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings. Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

1. The big bang and abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution. Also it did not form randomly, gravity pulled the particles together to form solar systems and planets.
2. The mutations which appear in each individual organism are random however which organism survives is based on natural selection where the most advantageous traits survive.
3. Evolution does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics as the earth is a not a closed system. Animals are becoming more complex however other parts of the universe are becoming more chaotic.
4. We have plenty of evidence for "macroevolution" (which is just evolution by the way): the fossil record, genetics, and artificial selection. All of these show that the life in the past was different from life today and it shows a steady change overtime.
5. Just because some fossils are frauds doesnt mean all of them are unless you have evidence to the contrary.
6. No where in evolution does it say one organism is higher in value than another.
7. Source?
8. What do the liberals have to do with any of this. This is science not a conspiracy.
9. How on earth is evolution immoral.

Proof that you're wrong:http://www.conservapedia.com...

Really this source? Many people wonder if its just satire.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Any way I have many other sources which support evolution or refute your claims:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...
http://www.scientificamerican.com...
http://humanorigins.si.edu...

These sources are liberal deceit and censorship!

Any evidence for that.

They are biased towards evolution; they are created by liberals spreading deceit.

Again can I get some evidence for this so called liberal propaganda. Also why would they be lying about something like this?

You should open you mind and embrace the conservative truth!

Why?

http://www.conservapedia.com...

I think that site is making me more liberal. :)

Open your mind, and embrace conservatism!
jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/7/2015 5:29:46 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 11:55:44 PM, SamStevens wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
"Hello kids, do you want Darwinian indoctrination?" The pseudo-scientific guess of evolution has been lobbied by its proponents into our schools as "science", causing many types of immorality. Evolution goes against reason, is based on nothing, violates scientific laws, lacks evidence, and is racist. Evolution is not valid as a scientific theory.

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis. Evolution is a theory and not a law. As you can see, evolution is absurd and evolutionists are so close minded that they accept things this absurd as fact.

Ad hominen- (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

Also, evolution does not deal with the origins of the universe, the solar system, or Earth.

Evolution is based on random chance. How did you know we came from random chance? Were you there? Even with natural selection, random chance does not work because mutations cannot add information, only destroy it. Evolution requires new genetic information to form. However, all we see is genetic information decreasing and not increasing. Evolutionists claim to have evidence of new genetic information, but that is a lie-there is no proof for this wild and blatantly false claim.

Mutations add information. Examples of information arising can be found mid-page: http://phylointelligence.com...


Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. Some atheists claim that because the sun shines on the Earth, or because the organisms are open systems, the 2nd law does not apply. However, this is wrong: the sun increases heat, therefore increasing entropy.

Ad-hominem- (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

No, evolution does not violate the 2nd laws of thermodynamics: http://curious.astro.cornell.edu...


We should be able to observe macroevolution if evolution were to be true. However, we only see speciation, which is microevolution. Macroevolution is evolution between kinds, as defined by the truth-the Bible. The so called incidents of macroevolution are microevolution.

Incorrect. Macro evolution is change at the species level or higher. Speciation is macro evolution.

http://www.talkorigins.org...
http://evolution.berkeley.edu...


We also do not see any transitional fossils: atheists have given us dinosaurs with fake "feathers" as transitional fossils between T-rexes and little tiny birds, but they are fully dinosaur because if they were transitional fossils they would be like T-rexes with bird heads or whatever. Some transitional fossils are outright fraud like the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

Transitional fossils do not show a T.Rex evolving into a bird. This is the correct model: https://www.youtube.com...

http://www.academia.edu...


The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology.

There are transitional fossils of humans, horses, whales, birds,etc.

The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils...We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life"s history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.--Stephen Jay Gould

In the cambrian explosion, multicellular organisms such as fishes and snakes, which were supposed to appear much later, appeared. This is contrary to evolution and shows that evolution is a lie.

The Cambrian explosion occurred around 530 million years ago. Snakes appeared around 150 million years ago. The first 'fish like' creatures evolved around 530 million years ago. There is no issue here.

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

Even if that were the case, it would not invalidate the theory of evolution.


Evolution requires an old Earth, but the rate that the Earth is slowing down proves that the Earth must be young because back 4.6 billion years ago it would have been 14 hours per day and that is impossible because 6000 years ago a day was 24 hours, so therefore it has been 24 hours for all of the Earth's lifetime.

http://infidels.org...


Evolutionists should open their minds, stop listening to liberal censorship, and embrace what I have authoritatively proven to be a truth.

Evolution is invalid and is an unscientific theory.

It is a scientific theory. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. There is plenty of evidence to go around.


Evolution is pseudoscience forced onto America's schools as science, causing immorality and school shootings.

Red herring- something intended to divert attention from the real problem or matter at hand

Evolution is unscientific, based on flawed "evidence", violates fundamental laws of science, lacks evidence, and is racist.

Which scientific laws does evolution violate? There is plenty of evidence. Race has nothing to do with the validity of evolution.

http://rationalwiki.org...

These sources are lies and liberal deceit!
http://www.conservapedia.com...
Wtnjetro
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/7/2015 7:47:14 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
I think evolution is false, but I go beyond that. Evolution is not really science. Why? Because evolution, as it is postulated today, cannot have positive evidence for or against it because evolutionists argue that a particular kind of evidence (and its exact opposite) both show evolutionists truth. I wrote an article for Lutheran Science Institute arguing that very point at
http://www.lutheranscience.org...
Cornelius Hunter, whom I quote in the article, explains the problem well:
"There is nothing wrong with a theory that is comfortable with different outcomes, but there is something wrong when one of those outcomes is then claimed as supporting evidence. If a theory can predict both A and not-A, then neither A nor not-A can be used as evidence for the theory." This is what evolutionists do.

For instance, the presence of intermediate fossils is seen as evidence, but the nonexistence of intermediates is taken as evidence as well in the guise of punctuated equilibrium. Similarity of organs between species is seen as evidence under the assumption they came from a common ancestor. However, similarities between animals that did not share a common ancestor is also seen as evidence under what is called convergent evolution. Evolution is both seen as a random process incapable of creating clever design. In fact, it is argued that imperfect organs are an evidence that God did not create since God would not create organs like that. However, when we find organs that look designed, it is argued they can be created by evolutionary processes as well.

Those are at least three points I make in the essay. I hope everyone gets a chance to read it. Could evolutionists every clean up their act? I doubt it.
Author of the book The Vast Wastelands of Unbelief published by Tate Publishing, frequent author of articles at www.lutheranscience.org
komododragon8
Posts: 405
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/7/2015 8:33:09 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/29/2014 3:32:39 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:
bump

You should cast away your mammalian ways. Embrace the love of Megalania.
slo1
Posts: 4,308
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/8/2015 9:33:02 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 12/24/2014 8:07:40 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis.

Evolution is based on random chance.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. S
the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

So incredibly misinformed. Wow.

I wonder what causes *religion* normally good people *religion* to be so dishonest *religion* especially when they have no clue *religion* as to what they're talking about?

Curious *religion* phenomenon.

You hit it on the head. jh continues to spew the outright lie about 2nd law of thermodynamics. It is a quite simple explanation that a 2nd grader can understand. The way jh presents the law means that water vapor in the atmosphere would never come to together to form clouds and would instead diffuse through the atmosphere.

Since it is such a simple concept, one can only conclude that jh is a lying troll.
Ramshutu
Posts: 4,063
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/8/2015 9:55:25 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/7/2015 7:47:14 PM, Wtnjetro wrote:
I think evolution is false, but I go beyond that. Evolution is not really science. Why? Because evolution, as it is postulated today, cannot have positive evidence for or against it because evolutionists argue that a particular kind of evidence (and its exact opposite) both show evolutionists truth. I wrote an article for Lutheran Science Institute arguing that very point at
http://www.lutheranscience.org...
Cornelius Hunter, whom I quote in the article, explains the problem well:
"There is nothing wrong with a theory that is comfortable with different outcomes, but there is something wrong when one of those outcomes is then claimed as supporting evidence. If a theory can predict both A and not-A, then neither A nor not-A can be used as evidence for the theory." This is what evolutionists do.

For instance, the presence of intermediate fossils is seen as evidence, but the nonexistence of intermediates is taken as evidence as well in the guise of punctuated equilibrium. Similarity of organs between species is seen as evidence under the assumption they came from a common ancestor. However, similarities between animals that did not share a common ancestor is also seen as evidence under what is called convergent evolution. Evolution is both seen as a random process incapable of creating clever design. In fact, it is argued that imperfect organs are an evidence that God did not create since God would not create organs like that. However, when we find organs that look designed, it is argued they can be created by evolutionary processes as well.

Those are at least three points I make in the essay. I hope everyone gets a chance to read it. Could evolutionists every clean up their act? I doubt it.

Well considering you are actually completely mistaken on all three points and you're opinion statement, it's very difficult.

Firstly, you say Evolution predicts Transitional forms (true), and that they have been discovered (also true). We don't have all of them; but the positive prediction is true; and the opposite of this: that there are NO transitional forms is not a prediction of evolution; nor the prediction you claim evolution makes straight after AND contradicted by the fact you say there are transitional forms! The reality is what we know about fossilisation is that we should find many transitional forms, but it is unlikely we should find all.

Secondly, when two traits are the same, or very similar, it assumed to be related. If the two traits are superficially similar and have a similar purpose, but structurally very dissimilar it is called convergent. Dolphins are very different from Sharks but their superficial form and function are similar; hearts are common, because their structures are either the same similar. If Bats had bird wings, then you could talk; but they don't. Their wings are very structurally different and exemplars of two species evolving superficially simialr features due to natural selective pressures.

Thirdly, Evolution is NEVER explained to be a random process incapable of creating design. Ever. Evolution is a process that operates on randomly generated trial and error; and can come up with amazing solutions to problems.

In fact, so good is this random selective process at creating design, human designers in all their intelligence use it to come up with innovative solutions to design problems.

Finally, Evolution does have positive evidence; there have been dozens of predictions and thus ways to disprove it from geology, to taxonomy, to molecular biology. The low level patterns found in DNA and phylogeny and embryology between species show clear proof of common descent, with the low level DNA detail and nature of the differences between species indicitive of evolution through successive gradual steps and changes; further supported by the fact that the majority of types of change that have to have occured in order to explain the differences between all species within evolution have been observed. Ignoring the evidence and acting if it does not exist is never a legitimate argument against the evidence for evolution.

So considering you misrepresent evolution in four different ways in the four key points you are making; it is fairly evidence it is not evolution that needs to clean up it's act.
JHL1234
Posts: 74
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/8/2015 5:47:16 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/8/2015 9:33:02 AM, slo1 wrote:
At 12/24/2014 8:07:40 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 12/24/2014 5:48:31 PM, jh1234lnew wrote:

According to evolution, the universe was created by a huge explosion. Then, through random chance, the solar system formed out of nowhere after stardust collided together randomly, created the solar system, and caused abiogenesis.

Evolution is based on random chance.

Evolution, despite insistence by its close minded, ignorant supporters to the contrary, violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Evolution reduces entropy, while the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that entropy can only increase. S
the Piltdown and Nebraska men. Even the evolutionists themselves have admitted that transitional fossils do not exist:

Evolution states that some humans are superior to others, because some are closer to apes than others. This shows that evolution is racist.

So incredibly misinformed. Wow.

I wonder what causes *religion* normally good people *religion* to be so dishonest *religion* especially when they have no clue *religion* as to what they're talking about?

Curious *religion* phenomenon.

You hit it on the head. jh continues to spew the outright lie about 2nd law of thermodynamics. It is a quite simple explanation that a 2nd grader can understand. The way jh presents the law means that water vapor in the atmosphere would never come to together to form clouds and would instead diffuse through the atmosphere.

Since it is such a simple concept, one can only conclude that jh is a lying troll.

This is a staple of atheistic argumentation: accuse people you disagree with to be trolls; then cover one's ears and yell "LA LA LA".