Total Posts:7|Showing Posts:1-7
Jump to topic:

Proof of evolution

Otokage
Posts: 2,347
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/26/2015 5:26:45 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/26/2015 4:54:29 AM, Geneaux wrote:
Empirical proof of evolution has never been tendered. Post proving articles.

No. There aren't any articles nor there are any proofs. Evolution is a whole-world conspiracy inspired by the devil to take down our lord Jesus Christ. It has ZERO evidence, it is all assumptions, animals are PERFECT which is evidence of intelligent design, the DNA has INFORMATION which is something only INTELLIGENT beings can create, we can see/feel/taste the holy spirit in every single place yet we can not see animals evolving (checkmate). Transitional fossils and phylogenetical series do no exists, DNA analysis are wrong, the Earth is 6000 years old (younger than mesopotamia, which was a galactic empire before Earth was formed).

Praise Jesus, halleluyah.
Paleophyte
Posts: 57
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/26/2015 5:43:48 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/26/2015 4:54:29 AM, Geneaux wrote:
Empirical proof of evolution has never been tendered. Post proving articles.

Proof is for mathematicians and alcohol.

The rest of us use evidence.
SNP1
Posts: 2,403
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/26/2015 1:15:10 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Only the uneducated think that science deal with "proof".
#TheApatheticNihilistPartyofAmerica
#WarOnDDO
Envisage
Posts: 3,646
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/26/2015 2:43:27 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/26/2015 4:54:29 AM, Geneaux wrote:
Empirical proof of evolution has never been tendered. Post proving articles.

"Empirical proof" is an oxymoron.
Since empirical is inductive, and proof is deductive. The two are mutually exclusive.
Geneaux
Posts: 48
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/27/2015 12:04:27 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/26/2015 1:15:10 PM, SNP1 wrote:
Only the uneducated think that science deal with "proof".

I was quite obviously using proof in the colloquial sense.
Paleophyte
Posts: 57
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/27/2015 6:00:21 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/27/2015 12:04:27 AM, Geneaux wrote:
At 1/26/2015 1:15:10 PM, SNP1 wrote:
Only the uneducated think that science deal with "proof".

I was quite obviously using proof in the colloquial sense.

Obviously, that was not obvious. You should have used the word evidence if that was what you wanted.

What exactly would you like evidence for?