Total Posts:28|Showing Posts:1-28
Jump to topic:

The top ten reasons why evolution is DUMB

GamrDeb8rBbrH8r
Posts: 341
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*
"There's no diversity because we're burning in the melting pot."

-Immortal Technique

Rap battle VS Truth_Seeker: http://www.debate.org...
retrogamer176
Posts: 47
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 10:04:15 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

LOLZ!!!
Retro, out.
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r
Posts: 341
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 10:50:41 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 10:04:15 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

LOLZ!!!

Good. That was the point of this thread.
"There's no diversity because we're burning in the melting pot."

-Immortal Technique

Rap battle VS Truth_Seeker: http://www.debate.org...
retrogamer176
Posts: 47
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 11:32:37 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 10:50:41 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:04:15 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

LOLZ!!!

Good. That was the point of this thread.

When I first saw the title, I thought it was a serious christian writing 10 ridiculous reasons who will call anyone why tried to dispute it a bigot.... and then I saw the reasons...
Retro, out.
tkubok
Posts: 5,044
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 12:32:10 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 11:32:37 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:50:41 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:04:15 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

LOLZ!!!

Good. That was the point of this thread.

When I first saw the title, I thought it was a serious christian writing 10 ridiculous reasons who will call anyone why tried to dispute it a bigot.... and then I saw the reasons...

I was going down the list, and only when i hit around reason 8 did i see it was just a joke.
retrogamer176
Posts: 47
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 12:33:45 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 12:32:10 PM, tkubok wrote:
At 3/31/2015 11:32:37 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:50:41 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:04:15 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

LOLZ!!!

Good. That was the point of this thread.

When I first saw the title, I thought it was a serious christian writing 10 ridiculous reasons who will call anyone why tried to dispute it a bigot.... and then I saw the reasons...

I was going down the list, and only when i hit around reason 8 did i see it was just a joke.

I can't wait until an offended creationist comes and sees this. That will be interesting!
Retro, out.
tkubok
Posts: 5,044
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 12:49:15 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 12:33:45 PM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 12:32:10 PM, tkubok wrote:
At 3/31/2015 11:32:37 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:50:41 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:04:15 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

LOLZ!!!

Good. That was the point of this thread.

When I first saw the title, I thought it was a serious christian writing 10 ridiculous reasons who will call anyone why tried to dispute it a bigot.... and then I saw the reasons...

I was going down the list, and only when i hit around reason 8 did i see it was just a joke.

I can't wait until an offended creationist comes and sees this. That will be interesting!

Dunno, thats the problem with Poes. i wouldnt put it past a creationist coming over here and saying "Well.... Yeah, those are reasons why evolution is dumb..."
retrogamer176
Posts: 47
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 12:50:35 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 12:49:15 PM, tkubok wrote:
At 3/31/2015 12:33:45 PM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 12:32:10 PM, tkubok wrote:
At 3/31/2015 11:32:37 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:50:41 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
At 3/31/2015 10:04:15 AM, retrogamer176 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

LOLZ!!!

Good. That was the point of this thread.

When I first saw the title, I thought it was a serious christian writing 10 ridiculous reasons who will call anyone why tried to dispute it a bigot.... and then I saw the reasons...

I was going down the list, and only when i hit around reason 8 did i see it was just a joke.

I can't wait until an offended creationist comes and sees this. That will be interesting!

Dunno, thats the problem with Poes. i wouldnt put it past a creationist coming over here and saying "Well.... Yeah, those are reasons why evolution is dumb..."

Either way it will still be interesting.
Retro, out.
Otokage
Posts: 2,347
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/31/2015 2:05:09 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

Most sensible than most reasons people often give.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/5/2015 11:30:23 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

Another internet parrot...lol
Accipiter
Posts: 1,162
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2015 2:00:53 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/5/2015 11:30:23 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

Another internet parrot...lol

And you are not?
tkubok
Posts: 5,044
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2015 3:31:40 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/6/2015 2:00:53 PM, Accipiter wrote:
At 4/5/2015 11:30:23 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

Another internet parrot...lol

And you are not?

Good one.
genesis01
Posts: 33
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/8/2015 2:01:45 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
The bible may say it's wrong but there's outside historical evidence to prove parts of the bible. The bible is likely correct and you weren't really there. God was there to observe himself creating the universe and life on Earth.

The fossils only prove a flood, it likely threw them around. The transitional forms are likely just animals mix-breeding. Like how a liger is a mixbred tiger and lion.
Iredia
Posts: 1,608
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/8/2015 2:54:47 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Funny, I'd say no 1 perfectly describes the attitude of evolutionists.
Porn babes be distracting me. Dudes be stealing me stuff. I'm all about the cash from now. I'm not playing Jesus anymore.
genesis01
Posts: 33
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/8/2015 3:58:47 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/8/2015 2:54:47 PM, Iredia wrote:
Funny, I'd say no 1 perfectly describes the attitude of evolutionists.
kman100
Posts: 24
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/8/2015 4:11:49 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Wow, I thought it was real until you said platapi.

This just goes to show why Poe's law is correct
janesix
Posts: 3,437
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/8/2015 4:26:56 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/8/2015 2:01:45 PM, genesis01 wrote:
The bible may say it's wrong but there's outside historical evidence to prove parts of the bible. The bible is likely correct and you weren't really there. God was there to observe himself creating the universe and life on Earth.

The fossils only prove a flood, it likely threw them around. The transitional forms are likely just animals mix-breeding. Like how a liger is a mixbred tiger and lion.

Sure, there's evidence that places like Egypt and Babylon existed, but that's about all you can get evidence for in the Bible. Try proving that a human can resurrect after three days of being dead, or that snakes and donkeys can talk.
kman100
Posts: 24
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/8/2015 6:25:01 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/8/2015 2:01:45 PM, genesis01 wrote:
The bible may say it's wrong but there's outside historical evidence to prove parts of the bible. The bible is likely correct and you weren't really there. God was there to observe himself creating the universe and life on Earth.

The fossils only prove a flood, it likely threw them around. The transitional forms are likely just animals mix-breeding. Like how a liger is a mixbred tiger and lion.

So you're saying that fossils like tiktaalik are the result of a fish crawling into lad an having sex with a lizard?
CCE
Posts: 11
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/9/2015 10:30:27 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*
"It's just a theory anyway."
MaxCool
Posts: 12
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2015 5:35:29 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

How about no evidence you arrogant schmuck...sure lots of groovy well founded ideas with lots of nice big effing holes in them. About as provable as God is.
debate_power
Posts: 726
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/30/2015 3:15:52 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*

At least you gave reasons... lel
You can call me Mark if you like.
debate_power
Posts: 726
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/30/2015 3:16:36 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/9/2015 10:30:27 PM, CCE wrote:
At 3/31/2015 9:34:54 AM, GamrDeb8rBbrH8r wrote:
10. There are no transitional fossils.
9. It's racist
8. All those fossils were put there by the devil to decieve us
7. Platypi
6. The bible says it's wrong
5. Uhh......
4. Uh........
3. Uh.......
2. Uh.......
1. *plugs fingers in ears* IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG LALALALLALAA #ICANTHEARYOU *runs off*
"It's just a theory anyway."

A scientific theory, which means that facts support it. Not a conjecture.
You can call me Mark if you like.
debate_power
Posts: 726
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/30/2015 3:27:55 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/8/2015 2:01:45 PM, genesis01 wrote:
The bible may say it's wrong but there's outside historical evidence to prove parts of the bible. The bible is likely correct and you weren't really there. God was there to observe himself creating the universe and life on Earth.

Where's the "outside historical evidence" to prove the Creation story in the Bible? Where's the "outside historical evidence" to prove that God is/was even around in the first place?

The fossils only prove a flood, it likely threw them around. The transitional forms are likely just animals mix-breeding. Like how a liger is a mixbred tiger and lion.

A liger is a cross, not a species. A species is a group of organisms that only has the ability to produce fertile offspring by breeding within itself. Scientists can test for species using that definition... I'll leave it to your imagination how they do it. In other words, you can produce ligers, but the only way they can become a species is through evolution. So no, it wasn't cross-breeding between species that produced such genetic variation- it was evolution. I learned that in a high-school biology class.

The fossils show many floods. So far, no one's found the remnants of an ark. And if the ark touched down on a mountain in Turkey, why doesn't the fossil record show long lines of dead kangaroos that tried to make their way to Australia? What about long lines of dead pandas that tried to make their way to China? What of the elephants?

One man putting two of each land animal species currently on earth into a wooden boat in the Stone Age is nowhere near as evidenced as evolution is. The only historical record that shows that that kind of boat technology even existed in the Stone Age is the same book that instructs followers to burn dove entrails as atonement to a deity that does not reveal itself but asks for faith in it regardless.
You can call me Mark if you like.
debate_power
Posts: 726
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/30/2015 3:29:41 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/30/2015 3:27:55 PM, debate_power wrote:
At 4/8/2015 2:01:45 PM, genesis01 wrote:
The bible may say it's wrong but there's outside historical evidence to prove parts of the bible. The bible is likely correct and you weren't really there. God was there to observe himself creating the universe and life on Earth.

Where's the "outside historical evidence" to prove the Creation story in the Bible? Where's the "outside historical evidence" to prove that God is/was even around in the first place?

The fossils only prove a flood, it likely threw them around. The transitional forms are likely just animals mix-breeding. Like how a liger is a mixbred tiger and lion.

A liger is a cross, not a species. A species is a group of organisms that only has the ability to produce fertile offspring by breeding within itself. Scientists can test for species using that definition... I'll leave it to your imagination how they do it. In other words, you can produce ligers, but the only way they can become a species is through evolution. So no, it wasn't cross-breeding between species that produced such genetic variation- it was evolution. I learned that in a high-school biology class.

The fossils show many floods. So far, no one's found the remnants of an ark. And if the ark touched down on a mountain in Turkey, why doesn't the fossil record show long lines of dead kangaroos that tried to make their way to Australia? What about long lines of dead pandas that tried to make their way to China? What of the elephants?

One man putting two of each land animal species currently on earth into a wooden boat in the Stone Age is nowhere near as evidenced as evolution is. The only historical record that shows that that kind of boat technology even existed in the Stone Age is the same book that instructs followers to burn dove entrails as atonement to a deity that does not reveal itself but asks for faith in it regardless.

To say nothing of the fact that a global flood that sloshed around all water on the surface of Earth would have ruined all sources of freshwater on the surface, destroying enormous numbers of species.
You can call me Mark if you like.
debate_power
Posts: 726
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/30/2015 3:31:56 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/8/2015 2:54:47 PM, Iredia wrote:
Funny, I'd say no 1 perfectly describes the attitude of evolutionists.

Yes, we think we're right because we have proven hypotheses, the fossil record, extensive knowledge of DNA, etc. You most likely think you're right because you have your creation stories. We have our things and you have yours, and yes, we evolutionists think we are right.
You can call me Mark if you like.
Iredia
Posts: 1,608
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/1/2015 3:28:50 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/30/2015 3:31:56 PM, debate_power wrote:
At 4/8/2015 2:54:47 PM, Iredia wrote:
Funny, I'd say no 1 perfectly describes the attitude of evolutionists.

Yes, we think we're right because we have proven hypotheses, the fossil record, extensive knowledge of DNA, etc. You most likely think you're right because you have your creation stories. We have our things and you have yours, and yes, we evolutionists think we are right.

Fossils show organisms as sharks, bacteria etc being not much different from their living counterparts. Where DNA sequences don't match phylogenies based on morphology evolutionists play deaf and dumb, your hypotheses run counter to facts like species always reproducing after their like. it's a pity so many minds rot away believing such nonsense.
Porn babes be distracting me. Dudes be stealing me stuff. I'm all about the cash from now. I'm not playing Jesus anymore.
Ramshutu
Posts: 4,063
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/1/2015 9:25:07 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 5/1/2015 3:28:50 AM, Iredia wrote:
At 4/30/2015 3:31:56 PM, debate_power wrote:
At 4/8/2015 2:54:47 PM, Iredia wrote:
Funny, I'd say no 1 perfectly describes the attitude of evolutionists.

Yes, we think we're right because we have proven hypotheses, the fossil record, extensive knowledge of DNA, etc. You most likely think you're right because you have your creation stories. We have our things and you have yours, and yes, we evolutionists think we are right.

Fossils show organisms as sharks, bacteria etc being not much different from their living counterparts. Where DNA sequences don't match phylogenies based on morphology evolutionists play deaf and dumb, your hypotheses run counter to facts like species always reproducing after their like. it's a pity so many minds rot away believing such nonsense.

1.) Please demonstrate with a scientific argument and evidence the basis for claiming that fossile species you cite are "not much different"; pay particular attention to ways in which they are dissimilar, and ways in which you cannot tell due to the fossilisation process.

2.) Please explain the logical reasoning for implying such examples are not consistent with an evolutionary paradigm, and why it breaks expected or outlined evolutionary processes.

3.) Please cite examples where phylogenies and morphologies "Do not match", clarifying how they do not match, the significance of their lack of match; and a naunced explanation of how such a lack of match implicitly causes an invalidation of the currently defined twin nested heirarchy.

Until such time, the response is a simple:

Fossils show organisms as sharks, bacteria etc being not much different from their living counterparts. So? Where DNA sequences don't match phylogenies based on morphology evolutionists play deaf and dumb No they don't, your hypotheses run counter to facts like species always reproducing after their like no it doesn't. it's a pity so many minds rot away believing such nonsense It appears Ranty McRantRant has no argument
Saint_of_Me
Posts: 2,402
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/8/2015 5:35:22 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
LOL...what are ya? Around 14 years old?

Anyway...your list of reasons why you think Evolution is wrong can be dismantled easily and thoroughly, one-by-one. Which I will do. Anytime.

To get things rolling..let us begin with a partial list of the thousands of transitional fossils that we have found thus far. (More every week! LOL)...........

http://en.wikipedia.org...
Science Flies Us to the Moon. Religion Flies us Into Skyscrapers.