Total Posts:78|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page

You have great potential

 Posts: 8,234 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AMPosted: 2 years agohttp://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.
 Posts: 561 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 6:08:49 AMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Another fun way to understand E=mc^2 is to calculate how fast the sun losses mass.Using the power of the Sun (4 x 10^26 joules of energy released every second) the Sun losses 4 million tonnes of mass every second.Let's hope "the truth is out there" cos there is bugger all round here.
 Posts: 9,333 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 8:24:51 AMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Well, well, well.The person who refused to answer a straight question regarding Einstein's famous equation here (http://www.debate.org...) now endorses it. How the tables have turned. First she was too afraid to enter that thread, now here she is promoting the thing she fought so hard against.Here she could not even bring herself to answer a yes/no question on E = mc^2.http://www.debate.org...Well Sky, you may not realize it but you have now been owned. It took a while but you fell for the trap I set for you. What do you think the 'c' stands for in the equation? Yep, it's our old friend the speed of light. You have now acknowledged that light has a speed and it is a constant as used by Einstein in this most famous of equations. Owned. Lol."Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you". "I am being absurd, but no way is it trolling". [paraphrased] --- dsjpk5
 Posts: 9,333 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 8:34:06 AMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 6:08:49 AM, chui wrote:At 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Another fun way to understand E=mc^2 is to calculate how fast the sun losses mass.Using the power of the Sun (4 x 10^26 joules of energy released every second) the Sun losses 4 million tonnes of mass every second.Don't confuse her, chui. She believes the Sun is an eternal cycle of energy. It doesn't lose mass. It is made of ball lightning according to Sky.Of course she can't explain what happens to all that energy which pours out into space away from the Sun. Somehow it gets returned. Somehow."Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you". "I am being absurd, but no way is it trolling". [paraphrased] --- dsjpk5
 Posts: 1,309 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 9:27:35 AMPosted: 2 years agohow long until you "own" EE?is it a sort of rent to own plan where you never own but on invisible scientific paper?Life is what YOU make it, Most just try and fake it...
 Posts: 9,333 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 9:39:29 AMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 9:27:35 AM, Electric-Eccentric wrote:how long until you "own" EE?is it a sort of rent to own plan where you never own but on invisible scientific paper?You're off-topic E-E, and not worth the trouble anyway. Please go ahead with some bizarre rant in reply which I will ignore, as I usually do with your posts."Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you". "I am being absurd, but no way is it trolling". [paraphrased] --- dsjpk5
 Posts: 1,309 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 9:44:17 AMPosted: 2 years agooff topic you say?in what way?p.s. rant rant rantp.s.s. rant rant some moreLife is what YOU make it, Most just try and fake it...
 Posts: 2,402 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 1:48:45 PMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Yes. As a product of the whole E=mc^2 deal.Most people even mildly acquaintded with Physics know all this, Sky.Just like a donut has more "per unit" explosive potential energy than than TNT. Look it up.Science Flies Us to the Moon. Religion Flies us Into Skyscrapers.
 Posts: 2,402 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 1:52:09 PMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 1:48:45 PM, Saint_of_Me wrote:At 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Yes. As a product of the whole E=mc^2 deal.Most people even mildly acquaintded with Physics know all this, Sky.Just like a donut has more "per unit" explosive potential energy than than TNT. Look it up.http://www.universetoday.com...Science Flies Us to the Moon. Religion Flies us Into Skyscrapers.
 Posts: 2,402 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 1:53:22 PMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 8:24:51 AM, dee-em wrote:At 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Well, well, well.The person who refused to answer a straight question regarding Einstein's famous equation here (http://www.debate.org...) now endorses it. How the tables have turned. First she was too afraid to enter that thread, now here she is promoting the thing she fought so hard against.Here she could not even bring herself to answer a yes/no question on E = mc^2.http://www.debate.org...Well Sky, you may not realize it but you have now been owned. It took a while but you fell for the trap I set for you. What do you think the 'c' stands for in the equation? Yep, it's our old friend the speed of light. You have now acknowledged that light has a speed and it is a constant as used by Einstein in this most famous of equations. Owned. Lol.Ouch!!Jobbed!Science Flies Us to the Moon. Religion Flies us Into Skyscrapers.
 Posts: 13,644 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 3:55:32 PMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.You have great hypocrisy.Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung There would be peace if you obeyed us.~Uncung Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
 Posts: 8,234 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 4:43:20 PMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 8:24:51 AM, dee-em wrote:At 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Well, well, well.The person who refused to answer a straight question regarding Einstein's famous equation here (http://www.debate.org...) now endorses it. How the tables have turned. First she was too afraid to enter that thread, now here she is promoting the thing she fought so hard against.Here she could not even bring herself to answer a yes/no question on E = mc^2.http://www.debate.org...Well Sky, you may not realize it but you have now been owned. It took a while but you fell for the trap I set for you. What do you think the 'c' stands for in the equation? Yep, it's our old friend the speed of light. You have now acknowledged that light has a speed and it is a constant as used by Einstein in this most famous of equations. Owned. Lol.I see you have still not figured out how an answer can be yes and no at the same time.Keep trying but don't blow a fuse in the process.
 Posts: 8,234 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 5:05:51 PMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 8:34:06 AM, dee-em wrote:At 7/10/2015 6:08:49 AM, chui wrote:At 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Another fun way to understand E=mc^2 is to calculate how fast the sun losses mass.Using the power of the Sun (4 x 10^26 joules of energy released every second) the Sun losses 4 million tonnes of mass every second.Don't confuse her, chui. She believes the Sun is an eternal cycle of energy. It doesn't lose mass. It is made of ball lightning according to Sky.Of course she can't explain what happens to all that energy which pours out into space away from the Sun. Somehow it gets returned. Somehow.Energy never moves away from its source so there is no need to for it to be returned. It is always all around its source like the force/ energy of a magnet is always around the magnet and never leaves it.http://877ef18e694c1f4ed2be-1a106c77022019a8f0a281e3e5787c14.r12.cf3.rackcdn.com...Energy is a cycle which apparently cannot be created or destroyed but simply recycles itself even if scientists have no clue how it does it.They can apparently convert mass into energy with Einsteins equation but they cannot convert energy into mass.http://www.circlon-theory.com..."The formula E=MC2 has long been interpreted to mean that the rest mass of matter could be converted into the energy of massless photons and that the kinetic energy inherent in the motion of bodies of mass increases the mass of those bodies. The validity of this idea rests on the arbitrary assumption that the photon has no mass. However, a classical interpretation of photon experiments would identify the photon as a particle of mass. Experiments show that photons have both energy and momentum and each of these is associated with the motion of mass. A careful examination of these experiments will show that energy and mass are separate and distinct parameters and that one is never converted to the other."The above article is interesting and fascinating. Take time to read it on the link.
 Posts: 13,644 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 6:39:54 PMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 5:05:51 PM, Skyangel wrote:At 7/10/2015 8:34:06 AM, dee-em wrote:At 7/10/2015 6:08:49 AM, chui wrote:At 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Another fun way to understand E=mc^2 is to calculate how fast the sun losses mass.Using the power of the Sun (4 x 10^26 joules of energy released every second) the Sun losses 4 million tonnes of mass every second.Don't confuse her, chui. She believes the Sun is an eternal cycle of energy. It doesn't lose mass. It is made of ball lightning according to Sky.Of course she can't explain what happens to all that energy which pours out into space away from the Sun. Somehow it gets returned. Somehow.Energy never moves away from its source so there is no need to for it to be returned. It is always all around its source like the force/ energy of a magnet is always around the magnet and never leaves it.http://877ef18e694c1f4ed2be-1a106c77022019a8f0a281e3e5787c14.r12.cf3.rackcdn.com...Energy is a cycle which apparently cannot be created or destroyed but simply recycles itself even if scientists have no clue how it does it.They can apparently convert mass into energy with Einsteins equation but they cannot convert energy into mass.http://www.circlon-theory.com..."The formula E=MC2 has long been interpreted to mean that the rest mass of matter could be converted into the energy of massless photons and that the kinetic energy inherent in the motion of bodies of mass increases the mass of those bodies. The validity of this idea rests on the arbitrary assumption that the photon has no mass. However, a classical interpretation of photon experiments would identify the photon as a particle of mass. Experiments show that photons have both energy and momentum and each of these is associated with the motion of mass. A careful examination of these experiments will show that energy and mass are separate and distinct parameters and that one is never converted to the other."The above article is interesting and fascinating. Take time to read it on the link.Good job, you found someone who is almost as insane as you, not quite as ignorant, but insane, nonetheless.Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung There would be peace if you obeyed us.~Uncung Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
 Posts: 9,333 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 7/10/2015 8:47:53 PMPosted: 2 years agoAt 7/10/2015 4:43:20 PM, Skyangel wrote:At 7/10/2015 8:24:51 AM, dee-em wrote:At 7/10/2015 4:05:12 AM, Skyangel wrote:http://www.universetoday.com...1 human being, has 88,403 times more explosive energy in them than a bomb that can destroy an entire city.Well, well, well.The person who refused to answer a straight question regarding Einstein's famous equation here (http://www.debate.org...) now endorses it. How the tables have turned. First she was too afraid to enter that thread, now here she is promoting the thing she fought so hard against.Here she could not even bring herself to answer a yes/no question on E = mc^2.http://www.debate.org...Well Sky, you may not realize it but you have now been owned. It took a while but you fell for the trap I set for you. What do you think the 'c' stands for in the equation? Yep, it's our old friend the speed of light. You have now acknowledged that light has a speed and it is a constant as used by Einstein in this most famous of equations. Owned. Lol.I see you have still not figured out how an answer can be yes and no at the same time.Keep trying but don't blow a fuse in the process.No. You have been owned. I know it, you know it, and everyone reading these threads knows it. You're a foolish, foolish woman."Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you". "I am being absurd, but no way is it trolling". [paraphrased] --- dsjpk5