Total Posts:12|Showing Posts:1-12
Jump to topic:

Are we neanderthals?

janesix
Posts: 7,869
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?
sadolite
Posts: 10,078
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/24/2015 5:11:18 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

Compared to the intellect of man 200 years ago I would say we are
Beware of the people who are in your circle but are not in your corner.

And with the stroke of a pen people 18 to 21 who own a gun became criminals and public enemy #1 having committed no crime and having said nothing. Just like the Jews in Germany during WW2. Must be a weird feeling.

When I hear people crying and whining about their first world problems I think about the universe with everything in it and people in wheelchairs and all of their problems go away.
August_Burns_Red
Posts: 1,253
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/24/2015 8:07:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

No we are not Neanderthals. We are homo sapiens. actually homo sapien sapiens. we shared a common ancestor with them up till about 1Million years ago. When we both came out of Africa into Northern Europe we co-existed for awhile before eventually vanquishing them. why we DID prevail is still debated today among Anthropologists. the favored theory is our brains evolved a bit more.

http://news.discovery.com...
Tomorrow's forecast: God reigns and the Son shines!
janesix
Posts: 7,869
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/25/2015 1:51:24 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/24/2015 8:07:42 PM, August_Burns_Red wrote:
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

No we are not Neanderthals. We are homo sapiens. actually homo sapien sapiens. we shared a common ancestor with them up till about 1Million years ago. When we both came out of Africa into Northern Europe we co-existed for awhile before eventually vanquishing them. why we DID prevail is still debated today among Anthropologists. the favored theory is our brains evolved a bit more.

http://news.discovery.com...

Then how could we mate with them if we are seperate species?
tejretics
Posts: 6,925
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/25/2015 2:48:57 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/25/2015 1:51:24 AM, janesix wrote:
At 7/24/2015 8:07:42 PM, August_Burns_Red wrote:
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

No we are not Neanderthals. We are homo sapiens. actually homo sapien sapiens. we shared a common ancestor with them up till about 1Million years ago. When we both came out of Africa into Northern Europe we co-existed for awhile before eventually vanquishing them. why we DID prevail is still debated today among Anthropologists. the favored theory is our brains evolved a bit more.

http://news.discovery.com...

Then how could we mate with them if we are seperate species?

Your logic: only same species can mate. Then how do you explain the existence of (1) the lemon (Citrus x limon) or (2) the liger (Panthera leo x Panthera tigris)?
Just because you're magic doesn't mean you aren't real.

http://gotejas.com...
Aran55633
Posts: 155
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/25/2015 10:29:07 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/25/2015 1:51:24 AM, janesix wrote:
At 7/24/2015 8:07:42 PM, August_Burns_Red wrote:
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

No we are not Neanderthals. We are homo sapiens. actually homo sapien sapiens. we shared a common ancestor with them up till about 1Million years ago. When we both came out of Africa into Northern Europe we co-existed for awhile before eventually vanquishing them. why we DID prevail is still debated today among Anthropologists. the favored theory is our brains evolved a bit more.

http://news.discovery.com...

Then how could we mate with them if we are seperate species?

This is where the lines can get a bit blurred. Animals cannot always be placed into separate, arbitrarily erected categories easily.

I'll point out that humans and neanderthals are sometimes considered separate subspecies within the same species. The paleontological community is moving away from this position, but that is still the opinion of some.

And there are other examples of separate species producing fertile offspring.
Aran55633
Posts: 155
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/25/2015 10:48:11 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/24/2015 8:07:42 PM, August_Burns_Red wrote:
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

No we are not Neanderthals. We are homo sapiens. actually homo sapien sapiens. we shared a common ancestor with them up till about 1Million years ago. When we both came out of Africa into Northern Europe we co-existed for awhile before eventually vanquishing them. why we DID prevail is still debated today among Anthropologists. the favored theory is our brains evolved a bit more.

http://news.discovery.com...

Being pedantic... I'll point out that Neanderthals did not come out of Africa. They arose, by all indications, in Europe.

And when you're talking about two contemporaneous species, it's incorrect to say that one is "more evolved" in any respect. If one is, by some measure, superior to another, that's simply because of the evolutionary path followed by each of the two species.

An Orca is not any more or less evolved than an anchovy in terms of intelligence, or in terms of size, or by way of any of its other attributes.
janesix
Posts: 7,869
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/25/2015 12:42:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/25/2015 2:48:57 AM, tejretics wrote:
At 7/25/2015 1:51:24 AM, janesix wrote:
At 7/24/2015 8:07:42 PM, August_Burns_Red wrote:
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

No we are not Neanderthals. We are homo sapiens. actually homo sapien sapiens. we shared a common ancestor with them up till about 1Million years ago. When we both came out of Africa into Northern Europe we co-existed for awhile before eventually vanquishing them. why we DID prevail is still debated today among Anthropologists. the favored theory is our brains evolved a bit more.

http://news.discovery.com...

Then how could we mate with them if we are seperate species?

Your logic: only same species can mate. Then how do you explain the existence of (1) the lemon (Citrus x limon) or (2) the liger (Panthera leo x Panthera tigris)?

Then what is the definition of species, if it is not a mating group?
janesix
Posts: 7,869
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/25/2015 12:44:31 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/25/2015 2:48:57 AM, tejretics wrote:
At 7/25/2015 1:51:24 AM, janesix wrote:
At 7/24/2015 8:07:42 PM, August_Burns_Red wrote:
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

No we are not Neanderthals. We are homo sapiens. actually homo sapien sapiens. we shared a common ancestor with them up till about 1Million years ago. When we both came out of Africa into Northern Europe we co-existed for awhile before eventually vanquishing them. why we DID prevail is still debated today among Anthropologists. the favored theory is our brains evolved a bit more.

http://news.discovery.com...

Then how could we mate with them if we are seperate species?

Your logic: only same species can mate. Then how do you explain the existence of (1) the lemon (Citrus x limon) or (2) the liger (Panthera leo x Panthera tigris)?

Then what is the definition of species, if it is not a mating group?

Species: a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding. The species is the principal natural taxonomic unit, ranking below a genus and denoted by a Latin binomial
tejretics
Posts: 6,925
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/25/2015 12:44:51 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/25/2015 12:42:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 7/25/2015 2:48:57 AM, tejretics wrote:
At 7/25/2015 1:51:24 AM, janesix wrote:
At 7/24/2015 8:07:42 PM, August_Burns_Red wrote:
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

No we are not Neanderthals. We are homo sapiens. actually homo sapien sapiens. we shared a common ancestor with them up till about 1Million years ago. When we both came out of Africa into Northern Europe we co-existed for awhile before eventually vanquishing them. why we DID prevail is still debated today among Anthropologists. the favored theory is our brains evolved a bit more.

http://news.discovery.com...

Then how could we mate with them if we are seperate species?

Your logic: only same species can mate. Then how do you explain the existence of (1) the lemon (Citrus x limon) or (2) the liger (Panthera leo x Panthera tigris)?

Then what is the definition of species, if it is not a mating group?

The offspring produced must be *fertile*. Ligers/lemons/Neanderthal-human hybrids are all infertile (generally). But there are other problems:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org...
Just because you're magic doesn't mean you aren't real.

http://gotejas.com...
SamStevens
Posts: 5,445
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/25/2015 1:01:41 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

All non Africans are part Neanderthal: http://news.discovery.com...
janesix
Posts: 7,869
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/25/2015 1:05:24 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/25/2015 12:44:51 PM, tejretics wrote:
At 7/25/2015 12:42:45 PM, janesix wrote:
At 7/25/2015 2:48:57 AM, tejretics wrote:
At 7/25/2015 1:51:24 AM, janesix wrote:
At 7/24/2015 8:07:42 PM, August_Burns_Red wrote:
At 7/24/2015 4:15:01 PM, janesix wrote:
Since we could mate with Neaderthals and produce viable offspring, does that then mean that we are the same species?

No we are not Neanderthals. We are homo sapiens. actually homo sapien sapiens. we shared a common ancestor with them up till about 1Million years ago. When we both came out of Africa into Northern Europe we co-existed for awhile before eventually vanquishing them. why we DID prevail is still debated today among Anthropologists. the favored theory is our brains evolved a bit more.

http://news.discovery.com...

Then how could we mate with them if we are seperate species?

Your logic: only same species can mate. Then how do you explain the existence of (1) the lemon (Citrus x limon) or (2) the liger (Panthera leo x Panthera tigris)?

Then what is the definition of species, if it is not a mating group?

The offspring produced must be *fertile*. Ligers/lemons/Neanderthal-human hybrids are all infertile (generally). But there are other problems:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org...

Neanderthal -human hybrids would have had to be fertile, or how would we have gotten their dna?

Although it's possible the hybrids could only mate with a parent species. It happens in plants. So maybe that's what's going on.