Total Posts:10Showing Posts:110
0.999 (Repeating) is equal to 1
Posts: 2,612
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 1:57:48 AM Posted: 2 years ago This blows my mind, here is the proof via algebra:
(R means repeating) (1/9)=0.111(R) 9x(1/9)=0.111(R) 1=0.999(R) Its so interesting how this works, normally I have limited interest in mathematics, but this takes the cake. https://en.wikipedia.org... "Hate begets hate" 
Posts: 1
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 4:59:50 PM Posted: 2 years ago Here's another way to understand 0.99 (repeating) is equal to 1:
1/3=0.33 (repeating) 1/3*3=1 0.33 (repeating)*3=0.99 (repeating)=1 There are several other "proofs". 
Posts: 6,127
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 8:16:12 PM Posted: 2 years ago http://www.debate.org...
just 1/3 is .3 repeating, the decimal is the real number 1/3. The reason why it is not an easy to see integer is because the ration 1/3 is applied to a base 10 system. In hexadecimal 1/3 is .5 repeating. It's a real number. But it's not a real quantity that is infinitely growing large. It's a common confusion to think a number that expands infinitely is somehow infinite itself. it isn't. It's just one representation of it is with remainder. 
Posts: 3,981
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 8:36:42 PM Posted: 2 years ago At 1/31/2016 1:57:48 AM, Axonly wrote: So 1+1 = 0.999 (R) + 0.999 (R) If this is the case then: So 1+1 = 1.888 (R) ? Because this is the result of 0.999 (R) + 0.999 (R). If they are the same then the result of this equation should be the same. "Life calls the tune, we dance." John Galsworthy 
Posts: 6,127
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 8:51:00 PM Posted: 2 years ago At 1/31/2016 8:36:42 PM, famousdebater wrote:At 1/31/2016 1:57:48 AM, Axonly wrote: Maybe you should type that into a calculator. If you type in .9999999999999999999999999 add to .9999999999999999999999999 You will get 1.99999999999999999999999998 That 8 is only because I could not type in .9 repeating. Essentially that 8 would never be present in .9 repeating plus .9 repeating. So .9... plus .9... equals 1.9... which is 1+ .9... which is equivalent to 1+1 which equals 2. Again when we correct for 1.8 error the conjecture holds true .9 repeating equals 1. 
Posts: 3,981
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 8:52:00 PM Posted: 2 years ago At 1/31/2016 8:51:00 PM, Mhykiel wrote:At 1/31/2016 8:36:42 PM, famousdebater wrote:At 1/31/2016 1:57:48 AM, Axonly wrote: So irl if you were asked 1+1 you would answer 1.9999 (R)? "Life calls the tune, we dance." John Galsworthy 
Posts: 6,127
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 8:59:26 PM Posted: 2 years ago At 1/31/2016 8:52:00 PM, famousdebater wrote:At 1/31/2016 8:51:00 PM, Mhykiel wrote:At 1/31/2016 8:36:42 PM, famousdebater wrote:At 1/31/2016 1:57:48 AM, Axonly wrote: Please refer to my previous debate on this subject http://www.debate.org... I would reply with 2. But I also would not state 2 is the only way to answer it. Do you understand that 4 = 2^2= (2+2) = W30;16 = (1+3) = 4/1 = (4/2+4/2) = ect... There are more then one way to answer and yet the answers be the same quantity. what is 1/3 plus 2/3? If you keep them as fractions you have 3/3 which simplifies to 1. But if you do the division which is the fraction sign you get .99 repeating. Again 1 and .999 is equal. 2 different ways of saying the same thing. 
Posts: 4,392
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 9:12:26 PM Posted: 2 years ago Didn't see this before I made my OP...

Posts: 13,673
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 11:02:56 PM Posted: 2 years ago At 1/31/2016 1:57:48 AM, Axonly wrote: The problem with this proof is that it takes for granted that which it attempts to justify. If .111 is actually equal to 1/9, rather than a mere approximation of it, then yes, .999 = 1. But that's kind of a lot to assume, since it's the exact question at issue. It's just the assumption restated in a different way, namely that you can assert the equivalence of two things by defining their difference to be so small as to be unspecifiable in precise mathematical terms. 
Posts: 6,514
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message 
1/31/2016 11:43:51 PM Posted: 2 years ago Yeah, that's not really a very good proof. The better one that tends to be more convincing is:
.999... = .999... x10 10(.999...) = 9.999... .999... 9(.999...)=9 /9 .999...=1 Stooge the Worst #StandWithBossy #UnbanTheCuntMan "bossy r u like 85 years old and have lost ur mind" ~mysteriouscrystals "I've honestly never seen seventh post anything that wasn't completely idiotic in a tryingtobefunny way." ~F16 "SeventhProfessor is actually a surprisingly good poster." ~Devilry https://docs.google.com... 