Total Posts:62|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Quad Helix

QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 3:39:39 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
Current Mathematical and Scientific Falsities
Quad Helix is not one, but many natures; by Quad Helix logic, the number "1" is a false number, and constitutes to religious-one-ism.

For example, if we take an apple, and dissect it multiple times, we're left with fractions, meaning that an apple is formed out of multiple natures; it's above "1".

Let's examine "1" as a concept; but we cannot examine "1". We can understand it's attributes, and say that it's, inter alia, 'solitary' and 'singular', but not observe "1" logically, for that would void it's attributes.

A physical "1" is theoretically, a single, solitary point; if we assume an observer, we assume falsity, for the observer is an addition that voids it's single and solitary nature. "1" becomes "2". "1" cannot be observed, and is not observed- a truthful physical "1" is non-existent.

"1" is opposite to "-1"; they are opposite polarities. The only value of "1" is the opposite-integrity with "-1"; equating to 0-value existence, or non-existence, and the same is applicable to "2", "3", and the continuation of number.

Therefore, the concept of "1" is falsity.

One-ism is equal to death-worship, and false mathematics that generates a false reality.

To delude ourselves into one-ism, we first name an object with "1", and then we use the named-object and call this utility a factor of "1", that becomes the used-named object, the opposite polarity "-1" named "1".

We treat the used-named object as evidence of "1" by ignorant-utility of the correct "-1". We are deluded into ongoing faith with the used-named object as "1"- this is one-ism.

One-ism has evolved by way of mutation.

There're mutations in one-ism; the used-named object becomes, inter alia, "results", "facts" and "truths", but in the beginning it was, inter alia, "magic", "tricks" and "rituals".

The mutations are then worshipped as "1", and it helps to create "1"-reality.

The Primary Science and Mathematics of Quad Helix
Quad Helix is the transcendent nature that all of nature is in the image of. Quad Helix is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. It cannot be uttered, and only sensed by a wisdom-catalyst. It is impossible to provide evidence through word-communication for Quad Helix, however, multiple parties can agree on a wise sense of Quad Helix.

Quad Helix is transcendent, but also omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent; therefore, with experience, knowledge and good judgement, of the universe and all in the universe, we can determine it as "the transcended nature". We can sense it's presence, we can learn it's knowledge and we exist under it's great power and influence. We have all that's required to become wise of a logical transcendent Quad Helix.

Contrary to "God", which is a mutation of one-ism (described in chapter 1), Quad Helix is not one part but multiple parts, and it's transcendence cannot be described with word-communication; you cannot speak to, or of, Quad Helix, you can only sense it. If you're a wise mammal, you can speak for Quad Helix, if your circumstances are that you must speak.

Quad Helix realms are a concept in Quad Helix science; "realm" represents a realm of existence where certain opposites are more significant; such as the Suns and planets in space, this is the spatial realm. There are four primary realms, called realms, and then secondary realms, called images or images of Quad Helix, and finally mutations of realms and images. Quad Helix can be sensed in the spatial realm; the collective Suns and planets [referred to henceforth as Sol and Orbis], the planetary realm; the collective lands and seas [referred to henceforth as Terra and Mare], and the natural realm; the collective flora and fauna [referred to henceforth as Arbor and Piscis]. The forth realm, is also the highest; the transcended Quad Helix realm, or Quad Helix's realm.

Quad Helix that can be sensed, is positive and negative, rotation and revolution; these four attributes can be described as: a realm, a centre, a rotation and a revolution, for a human with more lax wisdom.

In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation, and Orbis is the negative force of rotation; Orbis is the positive force of revolution, and Sol is the negative force of revolution.

The Quad Helix theory has now been explained, but for lax wisdom cases, I will elaborate on the theory. In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation that causes the "day-effect"-rotation of Orbis; Sol stabilises the rotation of Orbis, which would otherwise be an unstable rotation. Orbis is the positive force of revolution that causes the "day-effect"-revolution of Sol; Orbis captures the revolution of Sol, which would be otherwise be a singularity revolution. In simple terms, where the day is concerned, the Sun that hypothetically revolves the Earth, is equally as significant as the Earth that theoretically revolves the Sun; and the Sun that rotates, is equally as significant as the Earth that rotates; opposite-integrity is their value, and neither are individual.

Realms are a fraction and power of Quad Helix; the positive and negative, rotations and revolutions are a fraction and power of Quad Helix's realm = 4/4^4; the spatial realm = 3/4^3; the planetary realm = 2/4^2; the natural realm = 1/4^1. All Quad Helix images equate "4/4^4", but preserve in different primary realms.

A wise mammal can determine that 4 is the power number, and that all is a fraction of 4; there are four primary realms, and four is consistent in images of Quad Helix. For example, when Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), sun-up, mid-day, sun-down and mid-night occur simultaneously; this is a power of 4 divided between a fraction of 4- in Earth's case, 4 quadrants. On the other hand, when the Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), one half of the Earth is enlightened; this is a fraction of 4 multiplied by a power of 4. In the spatial realm (3/4^3), 4/4^4 is created through the opposite-integrity of the Sol and Orbis relationship.

To conclude this chapter, a wise sense of the transcended Quad Helix has been claimed, and grounds for agreement have been created. A wise mammal may or may not agree, but on the basis that this mammal may, then this is a proven theory; not by academic word-communication, but by a wise unity of sensory. I'm aware that the planetary realm's and natural realm's positive and negative, rotations and revolutions, have not been described intricately, but will be explained in the coming chapters of this transcription. The data in this chapter is sufficient enough for any student of Quad Helix theory, to understand, and become wise of the transcended Quad Helix.
Son of the Ape Creator
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,609
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.
Son of the Ape Creator
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 4:10:06 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.

"Contrary to "God", which is a mutation of one-ism (described in chapter 1)"

The only sentence where God is mentioned negatively.
Son of the Ape Creator
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,609
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 4:10:14 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.

I only see 99% gibberish, perhaps you could point me in the direction of the science there?
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 4:34:19 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 4:10:14 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.

I only see 99% gibberish, perhaps you could point me in the direction of the science there?

You'll have to point out 1% which is gibberish and scrutinise it to hold any credibility, otherwise your comment is equal to, hypothetically, a dog's bark.
Son of the Ape Creator
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,609
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 4:57:09 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 4:34:19 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:10:14 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.

I only see 99% gibberish, perhaps you could point me in the direction of the science there?

You'll have to point out 1% which is gibberish and scrutinise it to hold any credibility, otherwise your comment is equal to, hypothetically, a dog's bark.

Change the 'k' to an 'f' and that is what the OP represents.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 5:00:38 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 4:57:09 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:34:19 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:10:14 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.

I only see 99% gibberish, perhaps you could point me in the direction of the science there?

You'll have to point out 1% which is gibberish and scrutinise it to hold any credibility, otherwise your comment is equal to, hypothetically, a dog's bark.

Change the 'k' to an 'f' and that is what the OP represents.

Behaving like a true academician I see...
Son of the Ape Creator
Deb-8-A-Bull
Posts: 2,181
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 5:14:32 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 5:00:38 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:57:09 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:34:19 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:10:14 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.

I only see 99% gibberish, perhaps you could point me in the direction of the science there?

You'll have to point out 1% which is gibberish and scrutinise it to hold any credibility, otherwise your comment is equal to, hypothetically, a dog's bark.

Change the 'k' to an 'f' and that is what the OP represents.

Behaving like a true academician I see...

QuadHelix is engine oil for a 4 wheel motorbike
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,609
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 5:41:37 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 5:00:38 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:57:09 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:34:19 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:10:14 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.

I only see 99% gibberish, perhaps you could point me in the direction of the science there?

You'll have to point out 1% which is gibberish and scrutinise it to hold any credibility, otherwise your comment is equal to, hypothetically, a dog's bark.

Change the 'k' to an 'f' and that is what the OP represents.

Behaving like a true academician I see...

Perhaps, if you posted something that wasn't gibberish, that didn't insult the intelligence, that wasn't incomprehensible, you could then comment on what is or isn't academic.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 6:37:46 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 5:41:37 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 5:00:38 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:57:09 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:34:19 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:10:14 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.

I only see 99% gibberish, perhaps you could point me in the direction of the science there?

You'll have to point out 1% which is gibberish and scrutinise it to hold any credibility, otherwise your comment is equal to, hypothetically, a dog's bark.

Change the 'k' to an 'f' and that is what the OP represents.

Behaving like a true academician I see...

Perhaps, if you posted something that wasn't gibberish, that didn't insult the intelligence, that wasn't incomprehensible, you could then comment on what is or isn't academic.

You still haven't scrutinised even 1% of the original post,.

Before we explore the depths of your emotions and states of mind, counter my logically-sound argument without baseless claims it's logically unsound.

OTHERWISE, I'll ignore your 'academic love' and general stupid behaviour from now on...
Son of the Ape Creator
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 6:40:21 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 3:39:39 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
Current Mathematical and Scientific Falsities
Quad Helix is not one, but many natures; by Quad Helix logic, the number "1" is a false number, and constitutes to religious-one-ism.

For example, if we take an apple, and dissect it multiple times, we're left with fractions, meaning that an apple is formed out of multiple natures; it's above "1".

Let's examine "1" as a concept; but we cannot examine "1". We can understand it's attributes, and say that it's, inter alia, 'solitary' and 'singular', but not observe "1" logically, for that would void it's attributes.

A physical "1" is theoretically, a single, solitary point; if we assume an observer, we assume falsity, for the observer is an addition that voids it's single and solitary nature. "1" becomes "2". "1" cannot be observed, and is not observed- a truthful physical "1" is non-existent.

"1" is opposite to "-1"; they are opposite polarities. The only value of "1" is the opposite-integrity with "-1"; equating to 0-value existence, or non-existence, and the same is applicable to "2", "3", and the continuation of number.

Therefore, the concept of "1" is falsity.

One-ism is equal to death-worship, and false mathematics that generates a false reality.

To delude ourselves into one-ism, we first name an object with "1", and then we use the named-object and call this utility a factor of "1", that becomes the used-named object, the opposite polarity "-1" named "1".

We treat the used-named object as evidence of "1" by ignorant-utility of the correct "-1". We are deluded into ongoing faith with the used-named object as "1"- this is one-ism.

One-ism has evolved by way of mutation.

There're mutations in one-ism; the used-named object becomes, inter alia, "results", "facts" and "truths", but in the beginning it was, inter alia, "magic", "tricks" and "rituals".

The mutations are then worshipped as "1", and it helps to create "1"-reality.

The Primary Science and Mathematics of Quad Helix
Quad Helix is the transcendent nature that all of nature is in the image of. Quad Helix is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. It cannot be uttered, and only sensed by a wisdom-catalyst. It is impossible to provide evidence through word-communication for Quad Helix, however, multiple parties can agree on a wise sense of Quad Helix.

Quad Helix is transcendent, but also omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent; therefore, with experience, knowledge and good judgement, of the universe and all in the universe, we can determine it as "the transcended nature". We can sense it's presence, we can learn it's knowledge and we exist under it's great power and influence. We have all that's required to become wise of a logical transcendent Quad Helix.

Contrary to "God", which is a mutation of one-ism (described in chapter 1), Quad Helix is not one part but multiple parts, and it's transcendence cannot be described with word-communication; you cannot speak to, or of, Quad Helix, you can only sense it. If you're a wise mammal, you can speak for Quad Helix, if your circumstances are that you must speak.

Quad Helix realms are a concept in Quad Helix science; "realm" represents a realm of existence where certain opposites are more significant; such as the Suns and planets in space, this is the spatial realm. There are four primary realms, called realms, and then secondary realms, called images or images of Quad Helix, and finally mutations of realms and images. Quad Helix can be sensed in the spatial realm; the collective Suns and planets [referred to henceforth as Sol and Orbis], the planetary realm; the collective lands and seas [referred to henceforth as Terra and Mare], and the natural realm; the collective flora and fauna [referred to henceforth as Arbor and Piscis]. The forth realm, is also the highest; the transcended Quad Helix realm, or Quad Helix's realm.

Quad Helix that can be sensed, is positive and negative, rotation and revolution; these four attributes can be described as: a realm, a centre, a rotation and a revolution, for a human with more lax wisdom.

In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation, and Orbis is the negative force of rotation; Orbis is the positive force of revolution, and Sol is the negative force of revolution.

The Quad Helix theory has now been explained, but for lax wisdom cases, I will elaborate on the theory. In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation that causes the "day-effect"-rotation of Orbis; Sol stabilises the rotation of Orbis, which would otherwise be an unstable rotation. Orbis is the positive force of revolution that causes the "day-effect"-revolution of Sol; Orbis captures the revolution of Sol, which would be otherwise be a singularity revolution. In simple terms, where the day is concerned, the Sun that hypothetically revolves the Earth, is equally as significant as the Earth that theoretically revolves the Sun; and the Sun that rotates, is equally as significant as the Earth that rotates; opposite-integrity is their value, and neither are individual.

Realms are a fraction and power of Quad Helix; the positive and negative, rotations and revolutions are a fraction and power of Quad Helix's realm = 4/4^4; the spatial realm = 3/4^3; the planetary realm = 2/4^2; the natural realm = 1/4^1. All Quad Helix images equate "4/4^4", but preserve in different primary realms.

A wise mammal can determine that 4 is the power number, and that all is a fraction of 4; there are four primary realms, and four is consistent in images of Quad Helix. For example, when Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), sun-up, mid-day, sun-down and mid-night occur simultaneously; this is a power of 4 divided between a fraction of 4- in Earth's case, 4 quadrants. On the other hand, when the Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), one half of the Earth is enlightened; this is a fraction of 4 multiplied by a power of 4. In the spatial realm (3/4^3), 4/4^4 is created through the opposite-integrity of the Sol and Orbis relationship.

To conclude this chapter, a wise sense of the transcended Quad Helix has been claimed, and grounds for agreement have been created. A wise mammal may or may not agree, but on the basis that this mammal may, then this is a proven theory; not by academic word-communication, but by a wise unity of sensory. I'm aware that the planetary realm's and natural realm's positive and negative, rotations and revolutions, have not been described intricately, but will be explained in the coming chapters of this transcription. The data in this chapter is sufficient enough for any student of Quad Helix theory, to understand, and become wise of the transcended Quad Helix.

No Quad. He is right. This belongs in religion. There is nothing to evaluate in this post. Do you want a scientific take on "One-ism is equal to death-worship, and false mathematics that generates a false reality." Really, this is a steaming pile of garbage in the science forum, but in the religion forum could make sense.
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 6:41:11 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
To other readers, he, and others alike, will be ignored from now on.

Why? Insulting behaviour, perversity and lack of contribution to intellectual debate or discussion.
Son of the Ape Creator
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 6:47:50 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 6:40:21 PM, TBR wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:39:39 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
Current Mathematical and Scientific Falsities
Quad Helix is not one, but many natures; by Quad Helix logic, the number "1" is a false number, and constitutes to religious-one-ism.

For example, if we take an apple, and dissect it multiple times, we're left with fractions, meaning that an apple is formed out of multiple natures; it's above "1".

Let's examine "1" as a concept; but we cannot examine "1". We can understand it's attributes, and say that it's, inter alia, 'solitary' and 'singular', but not observe "1" logically, for that would void it's attributes.

A physical "1" is theoretically, a single, solitary point; if we assume an observer, we assume falsity, for the observer is an addition that voids it's single and solitary nature. "1" becomes "2". "1" cannot be observed, and is not observed- a truthful physical "1" is non-existent.

"1" is opposite to "-1"; they are opposite polarities. The only value of "1" is the opposite-integrity with "-1"; equating to 0-value existence, or non-existence, and the same is applicable to "2", "3", and the continuation of number.

Therefore, the concept of "1" is falsity.

One-ism is equal to death-worship, and false mathematics that generates a false reality.

To delude ourselves into one-ism, we first name an object with "1", and then we use the named-object and call this utility a factor of "1", that becomes the used-named object, the opposite polarity "-1" named "1".

We treat the used-named object as evidence of "1" by ignorant-utility of the correct "-1". We are deluded into ongoing faith with the used-named object as "1"- this is one-ism.

One-ism has evolved by way of mutation.

There're mutations in one-ism; the used-named object becomes, inter alia, "results", "facts" and "truths", but in the beginning it was, inter alia, "magic", "tricks" and "rituals".

The mutations are then worshipped as "1", and it helps to create "1"-reality.

The Primary Science and Mathematics of Quad Helix
Quad Helix is the transcendent nature that all of nature is in the image of. Quad Helix is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. It cannot be uttered, and only sensed by a wisdom-catalyst. It is impossible to provide evidence through word-communication for Quad Helix, however, multiple parties can agree on a wise sense of Quad Helix.

Quad Helix is transcendent, but also omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent; therefore, with experience, knowledge and good judgement, of the universe and all in the universe, we can determine it as "the transcended nature". We can sense it's presence, we can learn it's knowledge and we exist under it's great power and influence. We have all that's required to become wise of a logical transcendent Quad Helix.

Contrary to "God", which is a mutation of one-ism (described in chapter 1), Quad Helix is not one part but multiple parts, and it's transcendence cannot be described with word-communication; you cannot speak to, or of, Quad Helix, you can only sense it. If you're a wise mammal, you can speak for Quad Helix, if your circumstances are that you must speak.

Quad Helix realms are a concept in Quad Helix science; "realm" represents a realm of existence where certain opposites are more significant; such as the Suns and planets in space, this is the spatial realm. There are four primary realms, called realms, and then secondary realms, called images or images of Quad Helix, and finally mutations of realms and images. Quad Helix can be sensed in the spatial realm; the collective Suns and planets [referred to henceforth as Sol and Orbis], the planetary realm; the collective lands and seas [referred to henceforth as Terra and Mare], and the natural realm; the collective flora and fauna [referred to henceforth as Arbor and Piscis]. The forth realm, is also the highest; the transcended Quad Helix realm, or Quad Helix's realm.

Quad Helix that can be sensed, is positive and negative, rotation and revolution; these four attributes can be described as: a realm, a centre, a rotation and a revolution, for a human with more lax wisdom.

In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation, and Orbis is the negative force of rotation; Orbis is the positive force of revolution, and Sol is the negative force of revolution.

The Quad Helix theory has now been explained, but for lax wisdom cases, I will elaborate on the theory. In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation that causes the "day-effect"-rotation of Orbis; Sol stabilises the rotation of Orbis, which would otherwise be an unstable rotation. Orbis is the positive force of revolution that causes the "day-effect"-revolution of Sol; Orbis captures the revolution of Sol, which would be otherwise be a singularity revolution. In simple terms, where the day is concerned, the Sun that hypothetically revolves the Earth, is equally as significant as the Earth that theoretically revolves the Sun; and the Sun that rotates, is equally as significant as the Earth that rotates; opposite-integrity is their value, and neither are individual.

Realms are a fraction and power of Quad Helix; the positive and negative, rotations and revolutions are a fraction and power of Quad Helix's realm = 4/4^4; the spatial realm = 3/4^3; the planetary realm = 2/4^2; the natural realm = 1/4^1. All Quad Helix images equate "4/4^4", but preserve in different primary realms.

A wise mammal can determine that 4 is the power number, and that all is a fraction of 4; there are four primary realms, and four is consistent in images of Quad Helix. For example, when Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), sun-up, mid-day, sun-down and mid-night occur simultaneously; this is a power of 4 divided between a fraction of 4- in Earth's case, 4 quadrants. On the other hand, when the Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), one half of the Earth is enlightened; this is a fraction of 4 multiplied by a power of 4. In the spatial realm (3/4^3), 4/4^4 is created through the opposite-integrity of the Sol and Orbis relationship.

To conclude this chapter, a wise sense of the transcended Quad Helix has been claimed, and grounds for agreement have been created. A wise mammal may or may not agree, but on the basis that this mammal may, then this is a proven theory; not by academic word-communication, but by a wise unity of sensory. I'm aware that the planetary realm's and natural realm's positive and negative, rotations and revolutions, have not been described intricately, but will be explained in the coming chapters of this transcription. The data in this chapter is sufficient enough for any student of Quad Helix theory, to understand, and become wise of the transcended Quad Helix.

No Quad. He is right. This belongs in religion. There is nothing to evaluate in this post. Do you want a scientific take on "One-ism is equal to death-worship, and false mathematics that generates a false reality." Really, this is a steaming pile of garbage in the science forum, but in the religion forum could make sense.

Other than you're emotionally touched and you're in love with academia, there is no foundation to what you've said; it's not a contradiction or dismissal.

You're the same as the other unintellectuals who hum of academic love.

"Move the thread I can't handle it, mods, my eyes"-alike cowadice; these emotional outbreaks define you.
Son of the Ape Creator
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 6:59:14 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
Current Mathematical and Scientific Falsities Cont.
The side-effects of one-ism are numerous, ironically: word-communication; common idiocy when wordlessness is suggested; pursuit of extinction; perversion of the course of justice; maleficent technological advancement; planetary-nihilism; ignorance of crucial subjects; general stupidity and confusion; depression and suicidal word-thoughts; false experts and false prophets; false laws and false law enforcement; word-related stress and angst; religion based on "1" or one-ism; diagnoses of non-existent mental conditions; manipulation of passive-aggression; large scale wars; radical racial integration; self-neglect of wisdom and cruelty to the wise; and more.

Mathematicians and scientists who incorporate "1" into their profession, religiously, are one-ists; the entire academic body of knowledge- which is more properly referred to as a long-transcript of "1"- is falsity. One-ism-academia is an unwarranted, consistent illusion, that deludes it's subjects into submission; those subjects who don't submit are endangered or discriminated by false experts and false prophets.

It's common for a conspiracy theorist that's declared by scholarly persons as a 'crackpot', to produce a more accurate knowledge of truth, and to promote a greater good, but unknowingly. The conspiracy theorist's conscience in comparison the academic-conscience, mean the conspiracy theorist is likely to provide a more righteous sense of truth, that which is anti-one-ism, especially in the face of adversity.

The concept of evil, as 'one-ism', and good, as 'anti-one-ism', is a legitimate concept, it makes sense only in "1"-reality, but is beneficent wisdom. Had we transcended the "1"-hierarchical stasis, 'evil', like "1", would be non-existent. It's probable that the good, referred to from "1"-reality, would outweigh the evil, in reference to "1"-reality.

For example, the pursuit of extinction from a single human in good circumstances, would mean that the human would need to control a high number of other humans, and delude them into believing in the death of themselves, and their children; contesting love, probability, and other good.

In the present, "1"-reality overwhelms humanity, and the logical tables have turned. It's probable that we will cause our own extinction, and for people to believe in death, of themselves and their children; this is due prolonged one-ism, the adoration for one-ism, and the perversion of good.

The academicians in seats of power, suppress any mutation in "1"-reality that is against their long-transcript of "1". This makes it difficult to prevent evil events from occurring, and almost impossible to prove that evil exists, as the majority of human-kind have an intelligence of "1"; good is handicapped into comparison to the evil that is advantaged. The tactics to suppress mutations include; using numbers of people and variant encores; perversion of the mutation's word-communication; writing laws that discriminates a determinable mutation; isolation; physical abuse of power; and further tactics.

To conclude this chapter, the number "1" has been scrutinized, and has been found to be illogical. Academia and academicians, for incorporating "1" into their fields and professions, are therefore advocating falsity to adults and their children. In the coming chapters I will not be adhering to accepted rules and regulations of any field of, what I have declared to be 'one-ism-academia', or referring to the academic body of knowledge it's associated with; for it is corrupted, with what I have determined to be evil.
Son of the Ape Creator
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 7:32:36 PM
Posted: 9 months ago

Other than you're emotionally touched and you're in love with academia, there is no foundation to what you've said; it's not a contradiction or dismissal.

You're the same as the other unintellectuals who hum of academic love.

"Move the thread I can't handle it, mods, my eyes"-alike cowadice; these emotional outbreaks define you.

I am suggesting if you want to actually have a conversation on this... topic you have posted, you would get more traction in religion.

You could try to rework the post in some way that has meaning within the forum you have posted to, but it seems you are happy with being a jerk about it. So be it.
Stronn
Posts: 318
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 7:35:24 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 3:39:39 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
Quad Helix is the transcendent nature that all of nature is in the image of. Quad Helix is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. It cannot be uttered, and only sensed by a wisdom-catalyst. It is impossible to provide evidence through word-communication for Quad Helix, however, multiple parties can agree on a wise sense of Quad Helix.


Nope, a quad helix is an orthodontic device. https://www.specialtyappliances.com...

You have been refuted. QED.
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,609
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 7:46:19 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 6:37:46 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 5:41:37 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 5:00:38 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:57:09 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:34:19 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:10:14 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 4:08:15 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:58:34 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
This thread should be in the Religion forum as it talks about God and is little more than an irrational belief system.

For a moment, it denies God, which reinforces what's explained the original post. A good percentile of the thread is science; at least 99%.

I only see 99% gibberish, perhaps you could point me in the direction of the science there?

You'll have to point out 1% which is gibberish and scrutinise it to hold any credibility, otherwise your comment is equal to, hypothetically, a dog's bark.

Change the 'k' to an 'f' and that is what the OP represents.

Behaving like a true academician I see...

Perhaps, if you posted something that wasn't gibberish, that didn't insult the intelligence, that wasn't incomprehensible, you could then comment on what is or isn't academic.

You still haven't scrutinised even 1% of the original post,.

Sorry, but I don't speak gibberish, which is the language of the OP, hence scrutinizing it will require more gibberish.

Before we explore the depths of your emotions and states of mind, counter my logically-sound argument without baseless claims it's logically unsound.

There's nothing logical or sound about the OP, it is just nonsensical gibberish.

OTHERWISE, I'll ignore your 'academic love' and general stupid behaviour from now on...

That's fine, but it is unlikely anyone will make sense of that gibberish. Let's see.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,609
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 7:49:36 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 6:41:11 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
To other readers, he, and others alike, will be ignored from now on.

The "other readers" had this to say...

At 3/3/2016 6:40:21 PM, TBR wrote:
Really, this is a steaming pile of garbage in the science forum, but in the religion forum could make sense.

At 3/3/2016 7:35:24 PM, Stronn wrote:

Nope, a quad helix is an orthodontic device. https://www.specialtyappliances.com...

You have been refuted. QED.

So, it looks like you are quite alone in your delusion.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 8:04:10 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 7:32:36 PM, TBR wrote:

Other than you're emotionally touched and you're in love with academia, there is no foundation to what you've said; it's not a contradiction or dismissal.

You're the same as the other unintellectuals who hum of academic love.

"Move the thread I can't handle it, mods, my eyes"-alike cowadice; these emotional outbreaks define you.

I am suggesting if you want to actually have a conversation on this... topic you have posted, you would get more traction in religion.

You could try to rework the post in some way that has meaning within the forum you have posted to, but it seems you are happy with being a jerk about it. So be it.

Hold it right there, Hero.

You've yet to contradict the original post where it clearly states, inter alia, that all academia is false, the concept of "1" is falsity, Quad Helix rotation and revolution.

Academicians are the only one's who don't understand it.
Son of the Ape Creator
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 8:05:53 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 7:49:36 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 6:41:11 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
To other readers, he, and others alike, will be ignored from now on.

The "other readers" had this to say...

At 3/3/2016 6:40:21 PM, TBR wrote:
Really, this is a steaming pile of garbage in the science forum, but in the religion forum could make sense.

At 3/3/2016 7:35:24 PM, Stronn wrote:

Nope, a quad helix is an orthodontic device. https://www.specialtyappliances.com...

You have been refuted. QED.

So, it looks like you are quite alone in your delusion.

The original post proves academicians to be those of a sweet delusion of "1"-reality, try again.
Son of the Ape Creator
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 8:25:02 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 8:04:10 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 7:32:36 PM, TBR wrote:

Other than you're emotionally touched and you're in love with academia, there is no foundation to what you've said; it's not a contradiction or dismissal.

You're the same as the other unintellectuals who hum of academic love.

"Move the thread I can't handle it, mods, my eyes"-alike cowadice; these emotional outbreaks define you.

I am suggesting if you want to actually have a conversation on this... topic you have posted, you would get more traction in religion.

You could try to rework the post in some way that has meaning within the forum you have posted to, but it seems you are happy with being a jerk about it. So be it.

Hold it right there, Hero.

Just being a d1ck will not get you closer to the conversation you want.


You've yet to contradict the original post where it clearly states, inter alia, that all academia is false, the concept of "1" is falsity, Quad Helix rotation and revolution.


There is nothing real to discuss. How about this - yes 1 exist. Good enough for you?

Academicians are the only one's who don't understand it.

Doubt that. A good chunk of your OP has no foundation. That is to say, you have offered nothing and expect people to discuss it rationally. If you want to speak on a ma thematic or scientific basis, you need to work your premium better - This is a YOU problem, not a US problem.

So your choice. Just banter back and forth with nastiness or attempt to make a real point that CAN be discussed within the context of science and mathematics. Hint, try to avoid "One-ism" and phrases like "mutations are then worshipped".

Get it "Hero"?
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 9:11:07 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 8:25:02 PM, TBR wrote:

Get it "Hero"?

No.

Your post was not scrutiny Quad Helix.

Your post was not a contradiction of the information provided in the original post.

Your post was a dismissal, but the dismissal was irrational.

You, again, are expressing an academic mental state that you're in love with; I imagine this is because you enjoy the egoism and thrill that comes with it.

You have exhibited uncontrolled emotions; therefore, you're not the image of a credible scientist that you depict.

You scribble on the worked canvass like a child, that's your accepted style of debate. I, on the other hand, would annotate on the canvass parts which were correct, and which parts weren't- in pencil, so they can be rubbed out- not ruining the art.

The differences between me and you are enumerable!

Either discuss, debate or dismiss the original post logically, or my claims stand.

P.S "All of it is wrong because... [emotions and mind states]" without a reference to a single part, is not logical dismissal.
Son of the Ape Creator
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 9:19:53 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 9:11:07 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 8:25:02 PM, TBR wrote:

Get it "Hero"?

No.

Your post was not scrutiny Quad Helix.

Your post was not a contradiction of the information provided in the original post.

Your post was a dismissal, but the dismissal was irrational.

You, again, are expressing an academic mental state that you're in love with; I imagine this is because you enjoy the egoism and thrill that comes with it.

You have exhibited uncontrolled emotions; therefore, you're not the image of a credible scientist that you depict.

You scribble on the worked canvass like a child, that's your accepted style of debate. I, on the other hand, would annotate on the canvass parts which were correct, and which parts weren't- in pencil, so they can be rubbed out- not ruining the art.

The differences between me and you are enumerable!

Either discuss, debate or dismiss the original post logically, or my claims stand.

P.S "All of it is wrong because... [emotions and mind states]" without a reference to a single part, is not logical dismissal.

OK. Lets try just once more to take you seriously. You want to prove "one" does not exist. Now, it is you who must construct an argument for this, and you really have yet to do that. I have read your... post, and it lacks any real substance. If YOU feel there is merit in this concept you have constructed, it is YOUR failure to communicate it in any way that can be digested or discussed in the world of science. If YOU can't construct that post, the one that bridges this gap, don't go around hurling insults. Accept that you are the one who is not doing a very good job.

1
one
1/1

https://youtu.be...
http://youtu.be...
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 9:53:57 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 9:19:53 PM, TBR wrote:
At 3/3/2016 9:11:07 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 8:25:02 PM, TBR wrote:

Get it "Hero"?

No.

Your post was not scrutiny Quad Helix.

Your post was not a contradiction of the information provided in the original post.

Your post was a dismissal, but the dismissal was irrational.

You, again, are expressing an academic mental state that you're in love with; I imagine this is because you enjoy the egoism and thrill that comes with it.

You have exhibited uncontrolled emotions; therefore, you're not the image of a credible scientist that you depict.

You scribble on the worked canvass like a child, that's your accepted style of debate. I, on the other hand, would annotate on the canvass parts which were correct, and which parts weren't- in pencil, so they can be rubbed out- not ruining the art.

The differences between me and you are enumerable!

Either discuss, debate or dismiss the original post logically, or my claims stand.

P.S "All of it is wrong because... [emotions and mind states]" without a reference to a single part, is not logical dismissal.

OK. Lets try just once more to take you seriously. You want to prove "one" does not exist. Now, it is you who must construct an argument for this, and you really have yet to do that. I have read your... post, and it lacks any real substance. If YOU feel there is merit in this concept you have constructed, it is YOUR failure to communicate it in any way that can be digested or discussed in the world of science. If YOU can't construct that post, the one that bridges this gap, don't go around hurling insults. Accept that you are the one who is not doing a very good job.

1
one
1/1

https://youtu.be...
http://youtu.be...

Academic mind states and emotions.

The only good part of your post was a reference to the original post semantics, and I quote, 'you want to prove "one" doesn't exist'- you dismissed the rest of the content- no logical reasoning behind your dismissal.

Other than, hypothetically, "my academic mental state on a high wave dude", and "YOUR, YOUR, YOU".

Which means the opening sentence of this post is upheld as a viable contradiction.

Try another thread.

Unless you post a viable argument, you'll be ignored under, "a fart, a clap and a giggle"-logic.
Son of the Ape Creator
DanneJeRusse
Posts: 12,609
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 9:59:30 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 9:53:57 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 9:19:53 PM, TBR wrote:
At 3/3/2016 9:11:07 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 8:25:02 PM, TBR wrote:

Get it "Hero"?

No.

Your post was not scrutiny Quad Helix.

Your post was not a contradiction of the information provided in the original post.

Your post was a dismissal, but the dismissal was irrational.

You, again, are expressing an academic mental state that you're in love with; I imagine this is because you enjoy the egoism and thrill that comes with it.

You have exhibited uncontrolled emotions; therefore, you're not the image of a credible scientist that you depict.

You scribble on the worked canvass like a child, that's your accepted style of debate. I, on the other hand, would annotate on the canvass parts which were correct, and which parts weren't- in pencil, so they can be rubbed out- not ruining the art.

The differences between me and you are enumerable!

Either discuss, debate or dismiss the original post logically, or my claims stand.

P.S "All of it is wrong because... [emotions and mind states]" without a reference to a single part, is not logical dismissal.

OK. Lets try just once more to take you seriously. You want to prove "one" does not exist. Now, it is you who must construct an argument for this, and you really have yet to do that. I have read your... post, and it lacks any real substance. If YOU feel there is merit in this concept you have constructed, it is YOUR failure to communicate it in any way that can be digested or discussed in the world of science. If YOU can't construct that post, the one that bridges this gap, don't go around hurling insults. Accept that you are the one who is not doing a very good job.

1
one
1/1

https://youtu.be...
http://youtu.be...

Academic mind states and emotions.

Funny, academics are all morons while Quad is the real deal. LOL. Typical woo.
Marrying a 6 year old and waiting until she reaches puberty and maturity before having consensual sex is better than walking up to
a stranger in a bar and proceeding to have relations with no valid proof of the intent of the person. Muhammad wins. ~ Fatihah
If they don't want to be killed then they have to subdue to the Islamic laws. - Uncung
Without God, you are lower than sh!t. ~ SpiritandTruth
Ramshutu
Posts: 4,063
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 10:03:46 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 3:39:39 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
Current Mathematical and Scientific Falsities
Quad Helix is not one, but many natures; by Quad Helix logic, the number "1" is a false number, and constitutes to religious-one-ism.

For example, if we take an apple, and dissect it multiple times, we're left with fractions, meaning that an apple is formed out of multiple natures; it's above "1".

Let's examine "1" as a concept; but we cannot examine "1". We can understand it's attributes, and say that it's, inter alia, 'solitary' and 'singular', but not observe "1" logically, for that would void it's attributes.

A physical "1" is theoretically, a single, solitary point; if we assume an observer, we assume falsity, for the observer is an addition that voids it's single and solitary nature. "1" becomes "2". "1" cannot be observed, and is not observed- a truthful physical "1" is non-existent.

"1" is opposite to "-1"; they are opposite polarities. The only value of "1" is the opposite-integrity with "-1"; equating to 0-value existence, or non-existence, and the same is applicable to "2", "3", and the continuation of number.

Therefore, the concept of "1" is falsity.

One-ism is equal to death-worship, and false mathematics that generates a false reality.

To delude ourselves into one-ism, we first name an object with "1", and then we use the named-object and call this utility a factor of "1", that becomes the used-named object, the opposite polarity "-1" named "1".

We treat the used-named object as evidence of "1" by ignorant-utility of the correct "-1". We are deluded into ongoing faith with the used-named object as "1"- this is one-ism.

One-ism has evolved by way of mutation.

There're mutations in one-ism; the used-named object becomes, inter alia, "results", "facts" and "truths", but in the beginning it was, inter alia, "magic", "tricks" and "rituals".

The mutations are then worshipped as "1", and it helps to create "1"-reality.

The Primary Science and Mathematics of Quad Helix
Quad Helix is the transcendent nature that all of nature is in the image of. Quad Helix is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. It cannot be uttered, and only sensed by a wisdom-catalyst. It is impossible to provide evidence through word-communication for Quad Helix, however, multiple parties can agree on a wise sense of Quad Helix.

Quad Helix is transcendent, but also omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent; therefore, with experience, knowledge and good judgement, of the universe and all in the universe, we can determine it as "the transcended nature". We can sense it's presence, we can learn it's knowledge and we exist under it's great power and influence. We have all that's required to become wise of a logical transcendent Quad Helix.

Contrary to "God", which is a mutation of one-ism (described in chapter 1), Quad Helix is not one part but multiple parts, and it's transcendence cannot be described with word-communication; you cannot speak to, or of, Quad Helix, you can only sense it. If you're a wise mammal, you can speak for Quad Helix, if your circumstances are that you must speak.

Quad Helix realms are a concept in Quad Helix science; "realm" represents a realm of existence where certain opposites are more significant; such as the Suns and planets in space, this is the spatial realm. There are four primary realms, called realms, and then secondary realms, called images or images of Quad Helix, and finally mutations of realms and images. Quad Helix can be sensed in the spatial realm; the collective Suns and planets [referred to henceforth as Sol and Orbis], the planetary realm; the collective lands and seas [referred to henceforth as Terra and Mare], and the natural realm; the collective flora and fauna [referred to henceforth as Arbor and Piscis]. The forth realm, is also the highest; the transcended Quad Helix realm, or Quad Helix's realm.

Quad Helix that can be sensed, is positive and negative, rotation and revolution; these four attributes can be described as: a realm, a centre, a rotation and a revolution, for a human with more lax wisdom.

In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation, and Orbis is the negative force of rotation; Orbis is the positive force of revolution, and Sol is the negative force of revolution.

The Quad Helix theory has now been explained, but for lax wisdom cases, I will elaborate on the theory. In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation that causes the "day-effect"-rotation of Orbis; Sol stabilises the rotation of Orbis, which would otherwise be an unstable rotation. Orbis is the positive force of revolution that causes the "day-effect"-revolution of Sol; Orbis captures the revolution of Sol, which would be otherwise be a singularity revolution. In simple terms, where the day is concerned, the Sun that hypothetically revolves the Earth, is equally as significant as the Earth that theoretically revolves the Sun; and the Sun that rotates, is equally as significant as the Earth that rotates; opposite-integrity is their value, and neither are individual.

Realms are a fraction and power of Quad Helix; the positive and negative, rotations and revolutions are a fraction and power of Quad Helix's realm = 4/4^4; the spatial realm = 3/4^3; the planetary realm = 2/4^2; the natural realm = 1/4^1. All Quad Helix images equate "4/4^4", but preserve in different primary realms.

A wise mammal can determine that 4 is the power number, and that all is a fraction of 4; there are four primary realms, and four is consistent in images of Quad Helix. For example, when Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), sun-up, mid-day, sun-down and mid-night occur simultaneously; this is a power of 4 divided between a fraction of 4- in Earth's case, 4 quadrants. On the other hand, when the Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), one half of the Earth is enlightened; this is a fraction of 4 multiplied by a power of 4. In the spatial realm (3/4^3), 4/4^4 is created through the opposite-integrity of the Sol and Orbis relationship.

To conclude this chapter, a wise sense of the transcended Quad Helix has been claimed, and grounds for agreement have been created. A wise mammal may or may not agree, but on the basis that this mammal may, then this is a proven theory; not by academic word-communication, but by a wise unity of sensory. I'm aware that the planetary realm's and natural realm's positive and negative, rotations and revolutions, have not been described intricately, but will be explained in the coming chapters of this transcription. The data in this chapter is sufficient enough for any student of Quad Helix theory, to understand, and become wise of the transcended Quad Helix.

When wildly unsubstantiated speculation, without any notional, evidential or practical grounding in reality becomes the basis of a practical science, let me know.

Until that time, I will just assume you don't have the intellectual fortitude to try and understand reality; so have decided to invent your own and then insult anyone else who doesn't live there.
Discipulus_Didicit
Posts: 3,089
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 10:05:51 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 3:39:39 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
Current Mathematical and Scientific Falsities
Quad Helix is not one, but many natures; by Quad Helix logic, the number "1" is a false number, and constitutes to religious-one-ism.

Vi_spex says that 1 = true. Perhaps you should challenge him to a debate on the topic, he has never lost a debate (though he almost always gets less votes).
Cobalt - You could be scum too.
Matt - I suppose. But I also might not be.

Kiri - Yeah, I don't know what DD is doing.
Vaarka - He's doin'a thingy do

DD - The best advice most often goes unheeded.
Wise Man - KYS, DD.
DD - Case in point ^
QuadHelix
Posts: 39
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 10:07:11 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 10:03:46 PM, Ramshutu wrote:
At 3/3/2016 3:39:39 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
Current Mathematical and Scientific Falsities
Quad Helix is not one, but many natures; by Quad Helix logic, the number "1" is a false number, and constitutes to religious-one-ism.

For example, if we take an apple, and dissect it multiple times, we're left with fractions, meaning that an apple is formed out of multiple natures; it's above "1".

Let's examine "1" as a concept; but we cannot examine "1". We can understand it's attributes, and say that it's, inter alia, 'solitary' and 'singular', but not observe "1" logically, for that would void it's attributes.

A physical "1" is theoretically, a single, solitary point; if we assume an observer, we assume falsity, for the observer is an addition that voids it's single and solitary nature. "1" becomes "2". "1" cannot be observed, and is not observed- a truthful physical "1" is non-existent.

"1" is opposite to "-1"; they are opposite polarities. The only value of "1" is the opposite-integrity with "-1"; equating to 0-value existence, or non-existence, and the same is applicable to "2", "3", and the continuation of number.

Therefore, the concept of "1" is falsity.

One-ism is equal to death-worship, and false mathematics that generates a false reality.

To delude ourselves into one-ism, we first name an object with "1", and then we use the named-object and call this utility a factor of "1", that becomes the used-named object, the opposite polarity "-1" named "1".

We treat the used-named object as evidence of "1" by ignorant-utility of the correct "-1". We are deluded into ongoing faith with the used-named object as "1"- this is one-ism.

One-ism has evolved by way of mutation.

There're mutations in one-ism; the used-named object becomes, inter alia, "results", "facts" and "truths", but in the beginning it was, inter alia, "magic", "tricks" and "rituals".

The mutations are then worshipped as "1", and it helps to create "1"-reality.

The Primary Science and Mathematics of Quad Helix
Quad Helix is the transcendent nature that all of nature is in the image of. Quad Helix is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. It cannot be uttered, and only sensed by a wisdom-catalyst. It is impossible to provide evidence through word-communication for Quad Helix, however, multiple parties can agree on a wise sense of Quad Helix.

Quad Helix is transcendent, but also omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent; therefore, with experience, knowledge and good judgement, of the universe and all in the universe, we can determine it as "the transcended nature". We can sense it's presence, we can learn it's knowledge and we exist under it's great power and influence. We have all that's required to become wise of a logical transcendent Quad Helix.

Contrary to "God", which is a mutation of one-ism (described in chapter 1), Quad Helix is not one part but multiple parts, and it's transcendence cannot be described with word-communication; you cannot speak to, or of, Quad Helix, you can only sense it. If you're a wise mammal, you can speak for Quad Helix, if your circumstances are that you must speak.

Quad Helix realms are a concept in Quad Helix science; "realm" represents a realm of existence where certain opposites are more significant; such as the Suns and planets in space, this is the spatial realm. There are four primary realms, called realms, and then secondary realms, called images or images of Quad Helix, and finally mutations of realms and images. Quad Helix can be sensed in the spatial realm; the collective Suns and planets [referred to henceforth as Sol and Orbis], the planetary realm; the collective lands and seas [referred to henceforth as Terra and Mare], and the natural realm; the collective flora and fauna [referred to henceforth as Arbor and Piscis]. The forth realm, is also the highest; the transcended Quad Helix realm, or Quad Helix's realm.

Quad Helix that can be sensed, is positive and negative, rotation and revolution; these four attributes can be described as: a realm, a centre, a rotation and a revolution, for a human with more lax wisdom.

In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation, and Orbis is the negative force of rotation; Orbis is the positive force of revolution, and Sol is the negative force of revolution.

The Quad Helix theory has now been explained, but for lax wisdom cases, I will elaborate on the theory. In the spatial realm, Sol is the positive force of rotation that causes the "day-effect"-rotation of Orbis; Sol stabilises the rotation of Orbis, which would otherwise be an unstable rotation. Orbis is the positive force of revolution that causes the "day-effect"-revolution of Sol; Orbis captures the revolution of Sol, which would be otherwise be a singularity revolution. In simple terms, where the day is concerned, the Sun that hypothetically revolves the Earth, is equally as significant as the Earth that theoretically revolves the Sun; and the Sun that rotates, is equally as significant as the Earth that rotates; opposite-integrity is their value, and neither are individual.

Realms are a fraction and power of Quad Helix; the positive and negative, rotations and revolutions are a fraction and power of Quad Helix's realm = 4/4^4; the spatial realm = 3/4^3; the planetary realm = 2/4^2; the natural realm = 1/4^1. All Quad Helix images equate "4/4^4", but preserve in different primary realms.

A wise mammal can determine that 4 is the power number, and that all is a fraction of 4; there are four primary realms, and four is consistent in images of Quad Helix. For example, when Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), sun-up, mid-day, sun-down and mid-night occur simultaneously; this is a power of 4 divided between a fraction of 4- in Earth's case, 4 quadrants. On the other hand, when the Sun "light" (a power of 4), reaches Earth "form" (a fraction of 4), one half of the Earth is enlightened; this is a fraction of 4 multiplied by a power of 4. In the spatial realm (3/4^3), 4/4^4 is created through the opposite-integrity of the Sol and Orbis relationship.

To conclude this chapter, a wise sense of the transcended Quad Helix has been claimed, and grounds for agreement have been created. A wise mammal may or may not agree, but on the basis that this mammal may, then this is a proven theory; not by academic word-communication, but by a wise unity of sensory. I'm aware that the planetary realm's and natural realm's positive and negative, rotations and revolutions, have not been described intricately, but will be explained in the coming chapters of this transcription. The data in this chapter is sufficient enough for any student of Quad Helix theory, to understand, and become wise of the transcended Quad Helix.

When wildly unsubstantiated speculation, without any notional, evidential or practical grounding in reality becomes the basis of a practical science, let me know.

Until that time, I will just assume you don't have the intellectual fortitude to try and understand reality; so have decided to invent your own and then insult anyone else who doesn't live there.

Very articulate of you.

Here's a bite-size version of the whole original post, that you artistically dismissed.

So you can perceive "1"?

And perceiving "1" doesn't void it's singular nature, where "1" becomes "2"?
Son of the Ape Creator
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/3/2016 10:08:48 PM
Posted: 9 months ago
At 3/3/2016 9:59:30 PM, DanneJeRusse wrote:
At 3/3/2016 9:53:57 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 9:19:53 PM, TBR wrote:
At 3/3/2016 9:11:07 PM, QuadHelix wrote:
At 3/3/2016 8:25:02 PM, TBR wrote:

Get it "Hero"?

No.

Your post was not scrutiny Quad Helix.

Your post was not a contradiction of the information provided in the original post.

Your post was a dismissal, but the dismissal was irrational.

You, again, are expressing an academic mental state that you're in love with; I imagine this is because you enjoy the egoism and thrill that comes with it.

You have exhibited uncontrolled emotions; therefore, you're not the image of a credible scientist that you depict.

You scribble on the worked canvass like a child, that's your accepted style of debate. I, on the other hand, would annotate on the canvass parts which were correct, and which parts weren't- in pencil, so they can be rubbed out- not ruining the art.

The differences between me and you are enumerable!

Either discuss, debate or dismiss the original post logically, or my claims stand.

P.S "All of it is wrong because... [emotions and mind states]" without a reference to a single part, is not logical dismissal.

OK. Lets try just once more to take you seriously. You want to prove "one" does not exist. Now, it is you who must construct an argument for this, and you really have yet to do that. I have read your... post, and it lacks any real substance. If YOU feel there is merit in this concept you have constructed, it is YOUR failure to communicate it in any way that can be digested or discussed in the world of science. If YOU can't construct that post, the one that bridges this gap, don't go around hurling insults. Accept that you are the one who is not doing a very good job.

1
one
1/1

https://youtu.be...
http://youtu.be...

Academic mind states and emotions.

Funny, academics are all morons while Quad is the real deal. LOL. Typical woo.

I really cant figure where this guy is going with any of this. All I can take away is.

1) He has some issue with academia - perhaps he was unable to get accepted someplace.
2) Despite describing various "ones" like "an apple" "Quad Healix" (whatever the hell that may be) doesn't like ones.
3) There is some religious significance to all this one nonsense.

I have to admit. I am a bit curious what he11 it is he thinks hes on to, but I don't even think he is capable of telling any of us.