Total Posts:6|Showing Posts:1-6
Jump to topic:

The meat industry impact on climate change

Hayd
Posts: 4,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 1:51:24 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
If there was a global transition to a low-meat diet would reduce climate change mitigation by 50% by 2050. Does this warrant a governmental reduction of the meat industry?
http://link.springer.com...
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,813
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 3:25:09 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/14/2016 1:51:24 AM, Hayd wrote:
If there was a global transition to a low-meat diet would reduce climate change mitigation by 50% by 2050. Does this warrant a governmental reduction of the meat industry?
http://link.springer.com...

I think educating the public would be the first course of action.
The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible. - Salman Rushdie

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. - Bertrand Russell
Hayd
Posts: 4,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 3:36:06 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/14/2016 3:25:09 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 4/14/2016 1:51:24 AM, Hayd wrote:
If there was a global transition to a low-meat diet would reduce climate change mitigation by 50% by 2050. Does this warrant a governmental reduction of the meat industry?
http://link.springer.com...

I think educating the public would be the first course of action.

How would that be carried out?
Subutai
Posts: 4,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 3:39:11 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/14/2016 1:51:24 AM, Hayd wrote:
If there was a global transition to a low-meat diet would reduce climate change mitigation by 50% by 2050. Does this warrant a governmental reduction of the meat industry?
http://link.springer.com...

I think it should. We're at the point that, if we don't start making drastic changes soon, the climate will reach a state so bad that no attempts after that could mitigate the plethora of bad effects it would cause. It doesn't have to be so drastic as to cut out all meat consumption, but severe limitations on particularly the beef industry (because the production of beef by far takes the most water of any major meat, and cows release a lot of methane into the atmosphere) are very important now.
Don't let this site's demise affect you:

- Make an account on eDeb8
- Message Mikal to transfer your stats to eDeb8 (if you want them transferred)
- Contact any friends on here you'd like to stay in contact with
- Download any debates you'd like archived (go here: http://webpagetopdf.com...)
- Download as many mafia games as you can to preserve stats and history
Hayd
Posts: 4,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 3:40:30 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/14/2016 3:39:11 AM, Subutai wrote:
At 4/14/2016 1:51:24 AM, Hayd wrote:
If there was a global transition to a low-meat diet would reduce climate change mitigation by 50% by 2050. Does this warrant a governmental reduction of the meat industry?
http://link.springer.com...

I think it should. We're at the point that, if we don't start making drastic changes soon, the climate will reach a state so bad that no attempts after that could mitigate the plethora of bad effects it would cause. It doesn't have to be so drastic as to cut out all meat consumption, but severe limitations on particularly the beef industry (because the production of beef by far takes the most water of any major meat, and cows release a lot of methane into the atmosphere) are very important now.

Exactly. Forcing a vegetarian diet is not an option, but rationing would be feasible.
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,813
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2016 3:51:28 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/14/2016 3:36:06 AM, Hayd wrote:
At 4/14/2016 3:25:09 AM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 4/14/2016 1:51:24 AM, Hayd wrote:
If there was a global transition to a low-meat diet would reduce climate change mitigation by 50% by 2050. Does this warrant a governmental reduction of the meat industry?
http://link.springer.com...

I think educating the public would be the first course of action.

How would that be carried out?

I would imagine most people are unaware of the quantity of emissions associated with the meat industry. This should be made common knowledge. To follow that, point out a healthy diet (with less meat) is good for the individual and the environment.
The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible. - Salman Rushdie

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. - Bertrand Russell