Total Posts:12|Showing Posts:1-12
Jump to topic:

Free access to scientific papers by 2020?

Skepticalone
Posts: 6,088
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/30/2016 4:57:04 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
https://www.theguardian.com...
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,088
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/30/2016 4:57:56 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 5/30/2016 4:57:04 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com...

All publicly funded scientific papers published in Europe could be made free to access by 2020, under a "life-changing" reform ordered by the European Union"s science chief, Carlos Moedas.

The Competitiveness Council, a gathering of ministers of science, innovation, trade and industry, agreed on the target following a two-day meeting in Brussels last week.

The move means publications of the results of research supported by public and public-private funds would be freely available to and reusable by anyone. It could affect the paid-for subscription model used by many scientific journals, and undermine the common practice of releasing reports under embargo.

At present the results of some publicly funded research are not accessible to people outside universities and similar institutions without one-off payments, which means that many teachers, doctors, entrepreneurs and others do not have access to the latest scientific insights. In the UK, funding bodies generally require that researchers publish under open access terms, with open access publishing fees paid from the researcher"s grant.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
Diqiucun_Cunmin
Posts: 2,710
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/30/2016 5:37:52 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
Hayd actually posted that in politics yesterday, so I'll just C/P my post from there:

Open access only harms the big publishing companies that earn bigger margins than Apple.

Open access is the future... look at what happened to Lingua :)

)
The thing is, I hate relativism. I hate relativism more than I hate everything else, excepting, maybe, fibreglass powerboats... What it overlooks, to put it briefly and crudely, is the fixed structure of human nature. - Jerry Fodor

Don't be a stat cynic:
http://www.debate.org...

Response to conservative views on deforestation:
http://www.debate.org...

Topics I'd like to debate (not debating ATM): http://tinyurl.com...
Biodome
Posts: 138
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/4/2016 3:32:36 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
This would be great. Fortunately for me, I am part of an institution, so I do get free access to most of these, but other people are locked behind a paywall, unable to access all the fresh and exciting science.
Axonly
Posts: 1,801
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/6/2016 8:03:40 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 5/30/2016 4:57:04 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com...

It would be excellent if they were, but it seems unlikely.
Meh!
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,088
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/6/2016 12:34:38 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/4/2016 3:32:36 PM, Biodome wrote:
This would be great. Fortunately for me, I am part of an institution, so I do get free access to most of these, but other people are locked behind a paywall, unable to access all the fresh and exciting science.

I'm envious!
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,088
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/6/2016 12:38:44 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/6/2016 8:03:40 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 5/30/2016 4:57:04 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com...

It would be excellent if they were, but it seems unlikely.

Why do you think it seems unlikely?
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
Axonly
Posts: 1,801
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/6/2016 12:43:52 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/6/2016 12:38:44 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 6/6/2016 8:03:40 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 5/30/2016 4:57:04 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com...

It would be excellent if they were, but it seems unlikely.

Why do you think it seems unlikely?

Well, it such a big change is such a short time, I was thinking that in a few decades perhaps. Regardless, I'm not expert on scientific literature policies.
Meh!
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,088
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/6/2016 2:55:41 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/6/2016 12:43:52 PM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/6/2016 12:38:44 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
At 6/6/2016 8:03:40 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 5/30/2016 4:57:04 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com...

It would be excellent if they were, but it seems unlikely.

Why do you think it seems unlikely?

Well, it such a big change is such a short time, I was thinking that in a few decades perhaps. Regardless, I'm not expert on scientific literature policies.

I agree it would be huge change, but the benefits of open access seems like a no-brainer. I'm not sure what the downside would be (for society as a whole).
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten
Axonly
Posts: 1,801
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/13/2016 10:11:38 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 5/30/2016 4:57:04 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com...

Since this is relevant: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk...

A Russian neuroscientist (It's always Russians xD) is just letting people download scientific articles/journals for free.

I don't know how to feel about this.
Meh!
Skepticalone
Posts: 6,088
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/13/2016 1:37:15 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/13/2016 10:11:38 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 5/30/2016 4:57:04 PM, Skepticalone wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com...

Since this is relevant: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk...

A Russian neuroscientist (It's always Russians xD) is just letting people download scientific articles/journals for free.

I don't know how to feel about this.

Obviously, I agree with her desired outcome (free access), but I don't agree with her method. Her actions take what has not been freely given.
This thread is like eavesdropping on a conversation in a mental asylum. - Bulproof

You can call your invisible friends whatever you like. - Desmac

What the hell kind of coked up sideshow has this thread turned into. - Casten