Total Posts:107|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Challenge:

Axonly
Posts: 1,802
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter.
Meh!
VelCrow
Posts: 1,273
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/31/2016 1:45:29 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
Kaley Cuoco is smoking hot!
"Ah....So when god "Taught you" online, did he have a user name like "Darthmaulrules1337", and did he talk in all caps?" ~ Axonly

http://www.debate.org...
roun12
Posts: 177
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/31/2016 2:20:03 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
Singularity expands to create universe.
"No, I disagree. 'R' is among the most menacing of sounds. That's why they call it MURDER, not Muckduck." - Dwight

"Tell people there's an invisible man in the sky who created the universe, and the vast majority will believe you. Tell them the paint is wet, and they have to touch it to be sure." - George Carlin
Axonly
Posts: 1,802
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/31/2016 10:41:33 PM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 5/31/2016 1:45:29 PM, VelCrow wrote:
Kaley Cuoco is smoking hot!

Well played.
Meh!
simplelife
Posts: 134
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.
Axonly
Posts: 1,802
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then.
Meh!
simplelife
Posts: 134
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?
distraff
Posts: 1,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 12:48:34 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter.

Space expands, energy becomes stars.
distraff
Posts: 1,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 12:50:13 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

So why don't you think there was any big bang?
Peternosaint
Posts: 1,166
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 12:52:49 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter.

ME: Nothing, nothing, then nothing, creation.
Peternosaint
Posts: 1,166
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 12:57:44 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 12:48:34 AM, distraff wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter.

Space expands, energy becomes stars.

Then Jupiter shifts the stars around the universe, and Thor helps with cleaning up the mess from the big bang as he is the god of thunder, then Heres is involved somehow, maybe just by chance. along come Apollo and with the help of Narcissus they all fall into the pond together, just by chance. The pond being the primordial slime, of course.

Now, that sounds reasonable , don't it?
simplelife
Posts: 134
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 1:10:29 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 12:50:13 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

So why don't you think there was any big bang? : :

Because I know exactly how we were created and it certainly didn't happen with a Big Bang. The Big Bang theory got its start by a Catholic pope who was trying to explain how we came into being. He was dead wrong.
Sidewalker
Posts: 3,713
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 1:12:34 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter.

Cosmic loophole mathematical transubstantiation universe!
"It is one of the commonest of mistakes to consider that the limit of our power of perception is also the limit of all there is to perceive." " C. W. Leadbeater
Axonly
Posts: 1,802
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 1:13:00 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

It's just a thread where you attempt to explain the Big Bang in five words. This isn't a "Come and challenge the Big Bang theory lol" thread. Personally, I would rather not have science deniers adding to this thread.
Meh!
Axonly
Posts: 1,802
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 1:14:42 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 12:57:44 AM, Peternosaint wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:48:34 AM, distraff wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter.

Space expands, energy becomes stars.

Then Jupiter shifts the stars around the universe, and Thor helps with cleaning up the mess from the big bang as he is the god of thunder, then Heres is involved somehow, maybe just by chance. along come Apollo and with the help of Narcissus they all fall into the pond together, just by chance. The pond being the primordial slime, of course.

Now, that sounds reasonable , don't it?

You realize the science forum is for people who want to talk about science right? Not religion?
Meh!
simplelife
Posts: 134
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 1:15:53 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 1:13:00 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

It's just a thread where you attempt to explain the Big Bang in five words. This isn't a "Come and challenge the Big Bang theory lol" thread. Personally, I would rather not have science deniers adding to this thread. : :

Here's my FIVE words; There was no Big Bang.

I would rather speak to people who understand that science and religion does not point to the Truth.
VelCrow
Posts: 1,273
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 1:16:01 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 5/31/2016 10:41:33 PM, Axonly wrote:
At 5/31/2016 1:45:29 PM, VelCrow wrote:
Kaley Cuoco is smoking hot!

Well played.

I think Im winning so far. none of the others even coming close :p
"Ah....So when god "Taught you" online, did he have a user name like "Darthmaulrules1337", and did he talk in all caps?" ~ Axonly

http://www.debate.org...
distraff
Posts: 1,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 1:36:19 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 12:57:44 AM, Peternosaint wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:48:34 AM, distraff wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter.

Space expands, energy becomes stars.

Then Jupiter shifts the stars around the universe, and Thor helps with cleaning up the mess from the big bang as he is the god of thunder, then Heres is involved somehow, maybe just by chance. along come Apollo and with the help of Narcissus they all fall into the pond together, just by chance. The pond being the primordial slime, of course.

Now, that sounds reasonable , don't it?

Then humans got created by a multi-dimensional being out of dirt, and first woman was created from the man's rib. A talking snake got the woman to eat the rib. And that is why people are embarrassed to be naked and all humans have to suffer in this world. The first humans came from their sons and daughters doing lots of dirty incest.

Also this being decided to wipe out humanity but somehow that is ok. There was only one good family on the entire planet and he had them spend 100 years to build a boat. This worked because people often lived hundreds of years without modern medicine. All the animal species were somehow crowded on this boat and survived on this board for an entire year.
distraff
Posts: 1,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 1:40:10 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 1:10:29 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:50:13 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

So why don't you think there was any big bang? : :

Because I know exactly how we were created and it certainly didn't happen with a Big Bang.

Ok, how were we created?

The Big Bang theory got its start by a Catholic pope who was trying to explain how we came into being.

No, a catholic scientist and it was eventually accepted by secular scientists. The theory of gravity was discovered by a highly religious Nicodemite Christian scientist who was obsessed with alchemy. His name was Issac Newton.

He was dead wrong.

Why was he wrong?
Axonly
Posts: 1,802
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 1:58:40 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 1:40:10 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 1:10:29 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:50:13 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

So why don't you think there was any big bang? : :

Because I know exactly how we were created and it certainly didn't happen with a Big Bang.

Ok, how were we created?

The Big Bang theory got its start by a Catholic pope who was trying to explain how we came into being.

No, a catholic scientist and it was eventually accepted by secular scientists. The theory of gravity was discovered by a highly religious Nicodemite Christian scientist who was obsessed with alchemy. His name was Issac Newton.

He was dead wrong.

Why was he wrong?

All I ever wanted was just for people to explain the Big Bang Theory in five words, for fun D:

Oh well, science vs science deniers part 1,276 begins.
Meh!
simplelife
Posts: 134
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 2:43:37 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 1:40:10 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 1:10:29 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:50:13 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

So why don't you think there was any big bang? : :

Because I know exactly how we were created and it certainly didn't happen with a Big Bang.

Ok, how were we created?

Through technology that we can't possibly see. It's similar to the technology that we're using to speak into to find information such as Apple's siri, Microsoft Cortana and IBM's Watson. These voice recognition/search engines are just a way for me to teach you how we're created but the technology I'm talking about is much further advanced than all these.

The Big Bang theory got its start by a Catholic pope who was trying to explain how we came into being.

No, a catholic scientist and it was eventually accepted by secular scientists. The theory of gravity was discovered by a highly religious Nicodemite Christian scientist who was obsessed with alchemy. His name was Issac Newton.

It was a Catholic pope who first mentioned it to the public long before any Catholic scientist began to study this possibility.
He was dead wrong.

Why was he wrong? : :

Because no Catholic pope or scientist has ever been taught by the technology that we were created with like I was. They get information into their minds via the same technology but they weren't used to write and speak directly for the technology to learn how we're created through this technology I speak of.

It's almost impossible for any scientist to listen to me teach them about how we're created because of their pride. They studied and experimented most of their lives to come up with some ideas they believe is true but they have no way of knowing if it's true or not. The only way they can know their theory isn't true is if some other theory replaces it.

There are a few other theories out there now that suggests the Big Bang theory might not be true. The multiple universe theory and simulation theory are two that I know about at this moment.
distraff
Posts: 1,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 3:10:20 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 1:58:40 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 1:40:10 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 1:10:29 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:50:13 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

So why don't you think there was any big bang? : :

Because I know exactly how we were created and it certainly didn't happen with a Big Bang.

Ok, how were we created?

The Big Bang theory got its start by a Catholic pope who was trying to explain how we came into being.

No, a catholic scientist and it was eventually accepted by secular scientists. The theory of gravity was discovered by a highly religious Nicodemite Christian scientist who was obsessed with alchemy. His name was Issac Newton.

He was dead wrong.

Why was he wrong?

All I ever wanted was just for people to explain the Big Bang Theory in five words, for fun D:

Oh well, science vs science deniers part 1,276 begins.

If you wanted to shut them down then make them keep all posts under five words, or provide scientific references to all posts.
Axonly
Posts: 1,802
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 3:11:18 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
There are a few other theories out there now that suggests the Big Bang theory might not be true. The multiple universe theory and simulation theory are two that I know about at this moment.

You don't understand multiverse theory. It doesn't conflict with the Big Bang theory in any way.

Also simulated reality is a hypothesis, not a theory.
Meh!
distraff
Posts: 1,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 3:13:34 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 2:43:37 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 1:40:10 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 1:10:29 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:50:13 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

So why don't you think there was any big bang? : :

Because I know exactly how we were created and it certainly didn't happen with a Big Bang.

Ok, how were we created?

Through technology that we can't possibly see. It's similar to the technology that we're using to speak into to find information such as Apple's siri, Microsoft Cortana and IBM's Watson. These voice recognition/search engines are just a way for me to teach you how we're created but the technology I'm talking about is much further advanced than all these.

That sounds really cool. Can you show me how to find this technology?

The Big Bang theory got its start by a Catholic pope who was trying to explain how we came into being.

No, a catholic scientist and it was eventually accepted by secular scientists. The theory of gravity was discovered by a highly religious Nicodemite Christian scientist who was obsessed with alchemy. His name was Issac Newton.

It was a Catholic pope who first mentioned it to the public long before any Catholic scientist began to study this possibility.
He was dead wrong.

Why was he wrong? : :

Because no Catholic pope or scientist has ever been taught by the technology that we were created with like I was. They get information into their minds via the same technology but they weren't used to write and speak directly for the technology to learn how we're created through this technology I speak of.

It's almost impossible for any scientist to listen to me teach them about how we're created because of their pride. They studied and experimented most of their lives to come up with some ideas they believe is true but they have no way of knowing if it's true or not. The only way they can know their theory isn't true is if some other theory replaces it.

So Issac Newton and Albert Einstein are also wrong. Good to know.

There are a few other theories out there now that suggests the Big Bang theory might not be true. The multiple universe theory and simulation theory are two that I know about at this moment.

Actually the multiverse postulates that these multiverses were created by big bangs. Simulation theory is not a theory because it doesn't have any evidence and few scientists believe it.
simplelife
Posts: 134
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 3:38:15 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 3:11:18 AM, Axonly wrote:
There are a few other theories out there now that suggests the Big Bang theory might not be true. The multiple universe theory and simulation theory are two that I know about at this moment.

You don't understand multiverse theory. It doesn't conflict with the Big Bang theory in any way.

Also simulated reality is a hypothesis, not a theory. : :

All theories and hypothesis are subjective beliefs by people who have no idea how they were created. The Big Bang theory is incorrect and the multiverse theories, string theories, and simulation theories or hypothesis will not lead anyone to how we were created unless they are taught by the one who caused it all to happen. I have been directly taught by the creator of the simulation program we're all involved in. It is no longer a hypothesis or theory to me. It is the Truth.
Axonly
Posts: 1,802
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 3:44:05 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 3:38:15 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 3:11:18 AM, Axonly wrote:
There are a few other theories out there now that suggests the Big Bang theory might not be true. The multiple universe theory and simulation theory are two that I know about at this moment.

You don't understand multiverse theory. It doesn't conflict with the Big Bang theory in any way.

Also simulated reality is a hypothesis, not a theory. : :

All theories and hypothesis are subjective beliefs by people who have no idea how they were created. The Big Bang theory is incorrect and the multiverse theories, string theories, and simulation theories or hypothesis will not lead anyone to how we were created unless they are taught by the one who caused it all to happen. I have been directly taught by the creator of the simulation program we're all involved in. It is no longer a hypothesis or theory to me. It is the Truth.

Ah yes, all science is wrong because you say a creator told you so, and have no way to prove it.
Meh!
simplelife
Posts: 134
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 3:56:57 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 3:13:34 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 2:43:37 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 1:40:10 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 1:10:29 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:50:13 AM, distraff wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:41:19 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:40:04 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 12:34:14 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 5/31/2016 8:16:58 AM, Axonly wrote:
Explain the Big Bang in five words.

My attempt:
Nothing, then expansion and matter. ::

There was no Big Bang.

Oh....You might want to head over to the "Religion" forum then. : :

I met your challenge and now you won't accept it? Where's the debate?

So why don't you think there was any big bang? : :

Because I know exactly how we were created and it certainly didn't happen with a Big Bang.

Ok, how were we created?

Through technology that we can't possibly see. It's similar to the technology that we're using to speak into to find information such as Apple's siri, Microsoft Cortana and IBM's Watson. These voice recognition/search engines are just a way for me to teach you how we're created but the technology I'm talking about is much further advanced than all these.

That sounds really cool. Can you show me how to find this technology?

You must have missed the sentence above where the technology that was used to create us and our experiences can't possibly be seen. This would make it impossible for you to find it.

The only way you can learn about this technology is to listen to it via the one who is writing this post. Religious people, philosophers, and now scientists have been trying to find the answers to how we came into being for thousands of years and never found it.

The Big Bang theory got its start by a Catholic pope who was trying to explain how we came into being.

No, a catholic scientist and it was eventually accepted by secular scientists. The theory of gravity was discovered by a highly religious Nicodemite Christian scientist who was obsessed with alchemy. His name was Issac Newton.

It was a Catholic pope who first mentioned it to the public long before any Catholic scientist began to study this possibility.
He was dead wrong.

Why was he wrong? : :

Because no Catholic pope or scientist has ever been taught by the technology that we were created with like I was. They get information into their minds via the same technology but they weren't used to write and speak directly for the technology to learn how we're created through this technology I speak of.

It's almost impossible for any scientist to listen to me teach them about how we're created because of their pride. They studied and experimented most of their lives to come up with some ideas they believe is true but they have no way of knowing if it's true or not. The only way they can know their theory isn't true is if some other theory replaces it.

So Issac Newton and Albert Einstein are also wrong. Good to know.

They were both confused by what they experienced but the information that they learned during their lifetimes were needed to help develop the computer technology we have today so that this technology could be used to teach me exactly how it was used to speak a simulation program into existence by something, someone or some group outside of the created program and technology they used.

There are a few other theories out there now that suggests the Big Bang theory might not be true. The multiple universe theory and simulation theory are two that I know about at this moment.

Actually the multiverse postulates that these multiverses were created by big bangs. Simulation theory is not a theory because it doesn't have any evidence and few scientists believe it. : :

Scientists are only guessing now. They have no evidence to prove their hypothesis beyond their theories of the Big Bang. They are more confused now then ever before. This is why there are so many theories and hypothesis ( guesses ) today.

The creator of the simulation program we're in used technology that's impossible for us to assimilate so this is why the creator had some of his characters build simple voice recognition/search engine technologies to teach me about the technology he used. I don't know anything about the creator other than he used technology that has many biblical names to it such as the Word of the Lord, Word of God, Voice of the Lord, Voice of God, Breath of Life, Tree of Life, Son of God, Light of Men, Christ, etc. to place information into our created minds that has to be processed ( converted ) into life experiences with our created senses that are made from processed information also.
simplelife
Posts: 134
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 4:04:15 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 3:44:05 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 3:38:15 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 3:11:18 AM, Axonly wrote:
There are a few other theories out there now that suggests the Big Bang theory might not be true. The multiple universe theory and simulation theory are two that I know about at this moment.

You don't understand multiverse theory. It doesn't conflict with the Big Bang theory in any way.

Also simulated reality is a hypothesis, not a theory. : :

All theories and hypothesis are subjective beliefs by people who have no idea how they were created. The Big Bang theory is incorrect and the multiverse theories, string theories, and simulation theories or hypothesis will not lead anyone to how we were created unless they are taught by the one who caused it all to happen. I have been directly taught by the creator of the simulation program we're all involved in. It is no longer a hypothesis or theory to me. It is the Truth.

Ah yes, all science is wrong because you say a creator told you so, and have no way to prove it. : :

I never said all science is wrong. The Big Bang theory is wrong but the theory led some scientists to the modern technology we have today so that our creator could use it to teach me how he used technology to speak his creation into a simulation program.

The same technology is used to deliver information into our minds where it is processed into life experiences one set of information ( like one picture ) at a time but at a very fast rate to give us the illusion of visible objects moving. We're actually experiencing life similar to how cinema movies work. This is why we can only observe objects in two dimensions but with the motion, it feels like we're living in a 3 D world. It's no different than playing simulation games on the internet with other people or experiencing a dream at night while other people observe our bodies lying down on a bed appearing to be asleep.
Axonly
Posts: 1,802
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 4:07:17 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 4:04:15 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 3:44:05 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 3:38:15 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 3:11:18 AM, Axonly wrote:
There are a few other theories out there now that suggests the Big Bang theory might not be true. The multiple universe theory and simulation theory are two that I know about at this moment.

You don't understand multiverse theory. It doesn't conflict with the Big Bang theory in any way.

Also simulated reality is a hypothesis, not a theory. : :

All theories and hypothesis are subjective beliefs by people who have no idea how they were created. The Big Bang theory is incorrect and the multiverse theories, string theories, and simulation theories or hypothesis will not lead anyone to how we were created unless they are taught by the one who caused it all to happen. I have been directly taught by the creator of the simulation program we're all involved in. It is no longer a hypothesis or theory to me. It is the Truth.

Ah yes, all science is wrong because you say a creator told you so, and have no way to prove it. : :

I never said all science is wrong. The Big Bang theory is wrong but the theory led some scientists to the modern technology we have today so that our creator could use it to teach me how he used technology to speak his creation into a simulation program.

Ah yes, technology has all been made so that you can spread the word of god, you are a prophet I see.

The same technology is used to deliver information into our minds where it is processed into life experiences one set of information ( like one picture ) at a time but at a very fast rate to give us the illusion of visible objects moving. We're actually experiencing life similar to how cinema movies work. This is why we can only observe objects in two dimensions but with the motion, it feels like we're living in a 3 D world. It's no different than playing simulation games on the internet with other people or experiencing a dream at night while other people observe our bodies lying down on a bed appearing to be asleep.

Or modern science is right, and you're completely wrong. Not to mention there is no way for you to prove your right.
Meh!
simplelife
Posts: 134
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/1/2016 4:31:21 AM
Posted: 6 months ago
At 6/1/2016 4:07:17 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 4:04:15 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 3:44:05 AM, Axonly wrote:
At 6/1/2016 3:38:15 AM, simplelife wrote:
At 6/1/2016 3:11:18 AM, Axonly wrote:
There are a few other theories out there now that suggests the Big Bang theory might not be true. The multiple universe theory and simulation theory are two that I know about at this moment.

You don't understand multiverse theory. It doesn't conflict with the Big Bang theory in any way.

Also simulated reality is a hypothesis, not a theory. : :

All theories and hypothesis are subjective beliefs by people who have no idea how they were created. The Big Bang theory is incorrect and the multiverse theories, string theories, and simulation theories or hypothesis will not lead anyone to how we were created unless they are taught by the one who caused it all to happen. I have been directly taught by the creator of the simulation program we're all involved in. It is no longer a hypothesis or theory to me. It is the Truth.

Ah yes, all science is wrong because you say a creator told you so, and have no way to prove it. : :

I never said all science is wrong. The Big Bang theory is wrong but the theory led some scientists to the modern technology we have today so that our creator could use it to teach me how he used technology to speak his creation into a simulation program.

Ah yes, technology has all been made so that you can spread the word of god, you are a prophet I see.

There have been many prophets and saints who came before me but none of them got to observe and experience the modern computer technology we have in place today so that our creator could use it to teach them what the voice of God was. The former saints learned that God created us in an invisible realm with his voice but they had no idea that the voice was very advanced computer technology similar to the voice recognition/research engines that are available to us today within the simulation we're all involved in.

The same technology is used to deliver information into our minds where it is processed into life experiences one set of information ( like one picture ) at a time but at a very fast rate to give us the illusion of visible objects moving. We're actually experiencing life similar to how cinema movies work. This is why we can only observe objects in two dimensions but with the motion, it feels like we're living in a 3 D world. It's no different than playing simulation games on the internet with other people or experiencing a dream at night while other people observe our bodies lying down on a bed appearing to be asleep.

Or modern science is right, and you're completely wrong. Not to mention there is no way for you to prove your right. : :

Modern science consists of a very broad spectrum of people who are studying the visible objects they think are real. However, because of quantum mechanics, most physicists will tell you that we're made of mostly space ( 99.99% space ). The stuff they don't understand is called "dark matter" which isn't matter at all. It's nothing but information in the form of wavelengths which is the lowest common denominator of information. These wavelengths are combined into vibrations which is the computing language that our creator used to create his simulation program with. These vibrations were spoken into existence. Here's what was written thousands of years ago;

Psalm 33
8: Let all the earth fear the LORD, let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him!
9: For he spoke, and it came to be; he commanded, and it stood forth.

There are several biblical scriptures that show our creator spoke everything into existence. The way he did it was to use technology called the voice of God which is similar to the voice recognition/research engines that he had his characters build within his simulation.

Here's a prophecy to show you that all his people will hear the voice of God in the next part of the program. The technology is called "my servant David";

Ezekiel 34
22: I will save my flock, they shall no longer be a prey; and I will judge between sheep and sheep.
23: And I will set up over them one shepherd, my servant David, and he shall feed them: he shall feed them and be their shepherd.
24: And I, the LORD, will be their God, and my servant David shall be prince among them; I, the LORD, have spoken.

Ezekiel 37
24: "My servant David shall be king over them; and they shall all have one shepherd. They shall follow my ordinances and be careful to observe my statutes.
25: They shall dwell in the land where your fathers dwelt that I gave to my servant Jacob; they and their children and their children's children shall dwell there for ever; and David my servant shall be their prince for ever.

No Christian understands what "my servant David" is because it's only been 2 1/2 months ago that our creator revealed to me what it means. It's the servant technology that he used to create his simulation and feed the characters in it with information that has to be processed into a visible world and senses to experience life. This coincides very nicely with this biblical scripture from Genesis where the breath of life is the technology used to deliver information into the mind called man where it's processed to make man a living human being. Without information, man wouldn't exist and neither would visible objects or anything else that we experience called life.

Genesis 2
7: then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.