Total Posts:16|Showing Posts:1-16

# A theoretical question

 Posts: 1,516 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/18/2016 11:04:50 AMPosted: 1 year agoImagine a triangle with points A, B and C, each being a hundred miles apart. At each point is a person, let's call them A1, B1 and C1. Now let's imagine light travels at 200 miles per hour. If a car left from A to B at 10am and travels at 100 miles per hour, how long would it's journey seem to last from B1's perspective? And at what time would C1 see the car arrive at B?
 Posts: 6,138 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/18/2016 9:40:49 PMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/18/2016 11:04:50 AM, Furyan5 wrote:Imagine a triangle with points A, B and C, each being a hundred miles apart. At each point is a person, let's call them A1, B1 and C1. Now let's imagine light travels at 200 miles per hour. If a car left from A to B at 10am and travels at 100 miles per hour, how long would it's journey seem to last from B1's perspective? And at what time would C1 see the car arrive at B?Is C1's clock synchronized with A1 and B1?If so the trip started at 10am and ended at 11am for all observers.
 Posts: 1,516 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/18/2016 10:20:20 PMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/18/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mhykiel wrote:At 8/18/2016 11:04:50 AM, Furyan5 wrote:Imagine a triangle with points A, B and C, each being a hundred miles apart. At each point is a person, let's call them A1, B1 and C1. Now let's imagine light travels at 200 miles per hour. If a car left from A to B at 10am and travels at 100 miles per hour, how long would it's journey seem to last from B1's perspective? And at what time would C1 see the car arrive at B?Is C1's clock synchronized with A1 and B1?If so the trip started at 10am and ended at 11am for all observers.Yes, all clocks are synchronizedAnd No.
 Posts: 6,138 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/18/2016 11:53:27 PMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/18/2016 10:20:20 PM, Furyan5 wrote:At 8/18/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mhykiel wrote:At 8/18/2016 11:04:50 AM, Furyan5 wrote:Imagine a triangle with points A, B and C, each being a hundred miles apart. At each point is a person, let's call them A1, B1 and C1. Now let's imagine light travels at 200 miles per hour. If a car left from A to B at 10am and travels at 100 miles per hour, how long would it's journey seem to last from B1's perspective? And at what time would C1 see the car arrive at B?Is C1's clock synchronized with A1 and B1?If so the trip started at 10am and ended at 11am for all observers.Yes, all clocks are synchronizedAnd No.Why not.
 Posts: 10,274 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/19/2016 6:16:49 AMPosted: 1 year agoB1 would not see A1 start his journey until 10.30am (since the image would take 0.5 hours to reach him). A1 would take an hour to make the journey so he would arrive at B at exactly 11am (ignoring relativistic effects). Therefore, from B1's persective, the journey took 0.5 hours.It's not that simple though. If B1 is aware of the speed of light then he could adjust the departure time to have been 10am compensating for the time it took for the image of the car embarking on its journey to reach him. Therefore, if B1 is science literate, then he could work out that the journey took 1 hour.
 Posts: 1,516 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/19/2016 6:45:52 AMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/19/2016 6:16:49 AM, dee-em wrote:B1 would not see A1 start his journey until 10.30am (since the image would take 0.5 hours to reach him). A1 would take an hour to make the journey so he would arrive at B at exactly 11am (ignoring relativistic effects). Therefore, from B1's persective, the journey took 0.5 hours.It's not that simple though. If B1 is aware of the speed of light then he could adjust the departure time to have been 10am compensating for the time it took for the image of the car embarking on its journey to reach him. Therefore, if B1 is science literate, then he could work out that the journey took 1 hour.Correct. Well done.
 Posts: 1,516 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/19/2016 3:45:41 PMPosted: 1 year agoAlthough light travels much faster than 200 miles an hour, it still takes time to reach our eyes. Therefore anything we see has already happened before we see it. The further away the object is, the further back in time we are seeing. When looking in a mirror, you are looking back in time at a fractionally younger you.
 Posts: 1,234 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/22/2016 2:43:00 AMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/19/2016 3:45:41 PM, Furyan5 wrote:Although light travels much faster than 200 miles an hour, it still takes time to reach our eyes. Therefore anything we see has already happened before we see it. The further away the object is, the further back in time we are seeing. When looking in a mirror, you are looking back in time at a fractionally younger you.I can safely say I actually agree with you here.
 Posts: 1,516 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/22/2016 10:13:29 AMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/22/2016 2:43:00 AM, MagicAintReal wrote:At 8/19/2016 3:45:41 PM, Furyan5 wrote:Although light travels much faster than 200 miles an hour, it still takes time to reach our eyes. Therefore anything we see has already happened before we see it. The further away the object is, the further back in time we are seeing. When looking in a mirror, you are looking back in time at a fractionally younger you.I can safely say I actually agree with you here.Thanks. So does that mean we don't see reality as it truly is, but rather as it was?
 Posts: 1,234 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/22/2016 12:57:00 PMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/22/2016 10:13:29 AM, Furyan5 wrote:At 8/22/2016 2:43:00 AM, MagicAintReal wrote:At 8/19/2016 3:45:41 PM, Furyan5 wrote:Although light travels much faster than 200 miles an hour, it still takes time to reach our eyes. Therefore anything we see has already happened before we see it. The further away the object is, the further back in time we are seeing. When looking in a mirror, you are looking back in time at a fractionally younger you.I can safely say I actually agree with you here.Thanks. So does that mean we don't see reality as it truly is, but rather as it was?Yes, because seeing isn't a singular event, rather it's a process that occurs over time, and light traveling is also a process, so, though it's slightly misleading to say, it is true that we see reality as it was, not as it is...you win this round Furyan...
 Posts: 2,319 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/22/2016 9:28:36 PMPosted: 1 year agoWe are seeing reality as it is, for us. The entire point of relativity of simultaneity is that there is no objective sense in which anyone could say Event A happened before event B so there is no objective sense in which anyone could say we see things how they were.
 Posts: 7,578 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/23/2016 2:03:09 AMPosted: 1 year agoPossibly reality is not something we see but something we infer. If you 'see' what I mean you do not 'see what I mean' with your eyes, do you?
 Posts: 62 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/23/2016 1:26:49 PMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/18/2016 11:04:50 AM, Furyan5 wrote:Imagine a triangle with points A, B and C, each being a hundred miles apart. At each point is a person, let's call them A1, B1 and C1. Now let's imagine light travels at 200 miles per hour. If a car left from A to B at 10am and travels at 100 miles per hour, how long would it's journey seem to last from B1's perspective? And at what time would C1 see the car arrive at B? : :For one thing, light only appears to be traveling from one's perspective. That illusion alone has confused most observers, especially those physicists who have spent their whole life studying light. You would have a problem arguing with some physicists who understand that light itself doesn't travel. https://lightspeedzero.wordpress.com...In order to set up an argument like this, you need to assume that the one you're debating with totally understands the details of your argument. Otherwise, it can be picked apart and not appreciated as a reality from their perspective.I know for a fact that light is only an illusion that is formed from the processing of invisible waves when experienced by man's created senses. I didn't learn this from physicists. I learned it from the ONE who created light waves with his voice.Genesis 11 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.Without invisible waves that form the sensation of light in man's consciousness, man wouldn't be able to observe any object.
 Posts: 2,464 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/25/2016 6:49:12 PMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/22/2016 10:13:29 AM, Furyan5 wrote:At 8/22/2016 2:43:00 AM, MagicAintReal wrote:At 8/19/2016 3:45:41 PM, Furyan5 wrote:Although light travels much faster than 200 miles an hour, it still takes time to reach our eyes. Therefore anything we see has already happened before we see it. The further away the object is, the further back in time we are seeing. When looking in a mirror, you are looking back in time at a fractionally younger you.I can safely say I actually agree with you here.Thanks. So does that mean we don't see reality as it truly is, but rather as it was?In fact, I believe more accurate would be to say we don't see reality as it is OR was, but we see a personal interpretation (made by our brain) of a past reality.
 Posts: 1,516 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/25/2016 11:00:27 PMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/25/2016 6:49:12 PM, Otokage wrote:At 8/22/2016 10:13:29 AM, Furyan5 wrote:At 8/22/2016 2:43:00 AM, MagicAintReal wrote:At 8/19/2016 3:45:41 PM, Furyan5 wrote:Although light travels much faster than 200 miles an hour, it still takes time to reach our eyes. Therefore anything we see has already happened before we see it. The further away the object is, the further back in time we are seeing. When looking in a mirror, you are looking back in time at a fractionally younger you.I can safely say I actually agree with you here.Thanks. So does that mean we don't see reality as it truly is, but rather as it was?In fact, I believe more accurate would be to say we don't see reality as it is OR was, but we see a personal interpretation (made by our brain) of a past reality.Well put.
 Posts: 2,645 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 8/30/2016 10:35:24 AMPosted: 1 year agoAt 8/18/2016 11:04:50 AM, Furyan5 wrote:Imagine a triangle with points A, B and C, each being a hundred miles apart. At each point is a person, let's call them A1, B1 and C1. Now let's imagine light travels at 200 miles per hour. If a car left from A to B at 10am and travels at 100 miles per hour, how long would it's journey seem to last from B1's perspective? And at what time would C1 see the car arrive at B?Uh oh Physics.(Hides under table, hugging Biology book while in fetal position)"Hate begets hate"