Total Posts:178|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Teacher fired for being in playboy

ClassicRobert
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/18/2013 5:06:52 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Recently, a high school spanish teacher in Dallas, Texas was fired because just a few years prior, she modeled nude in playboy. Should she have been fired? No? Would you mind if your kids were being taught by a 21 year old ex-playboy model?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
Debate me: Economic decision theory should be adjusted to include higher-order preferences for non-normative purposes http://www.debate.org...

Do you really believe that? Or not? If you believe it, you should man up and defend it in a debate. -RoyLatham

My Pet Fish is such a Douche- NiamC

It's an app to meet friends and stuff, sort of like an adult club penguin- Thett3, describing Tinder
thett3
Posts: 14,334
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/18/2013 5:10:58 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/18/2013 5:06:52 PM, ClassicRobert wrote:
Recently, a high school spanish teacher in Dallas, Texas was fired because just a few years prior, she modeled nude in playboy. Should she have been fired? No? Would you mind if your kids were being taught by a 21 year old ex-playboy model?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...

Of course I wouldn't mind. In fact I would instruct them to be as rowdy as possible in the hopes of getting multiple parent-teacher conferences scheduled.
DDO Vice President

#StandwithBossy

#UnbanTheMadman

#BetOnThett

"Don't quote me, ever." -Max

"My name is max. I'm not a big fan of slacks"- Max rapping

"Walmart should have the opportunity to bribe a politician to it's agenda" -Max

"Thett, you're really good at convincing people you're a decent person"-tulle

"You fit the character of Regina George quite nicely"- Sam

: At 11/12/2016 11:49:40 PM, Raisor wrote:
: thett was right
ClassicRobert
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/18/2013 5:13:28 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/18/2013 5:10:58 PM, thett3 wrote:
At 10/18/2013 5:06:52 PM, ClassicRobert wrote:
Recently, a high school spanish teacher in Dallas, Texas was fired because just a few years prior, she modeled nude in playboy. Should she have been fired? No? Would you mind if your kids were being taught by a 21 year old ex-playboy model?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...

Of course I wouldn't mind. In fact I would instruct them to be as rowdy as possible in the hopes of getting multiple parent-teacher conferences scheduled.

BUT AREN'T YOU A GIRL??
Debate me: Economic decision theory should be adjusted to include higher-order preferences for non-normative purposes http://www.debate.org...

Do you really believe that? Or not? If you believe it, you should man up and defend it in a debate. -RoyLatham

My Pet Fish is such a Douche- NiamC

It's an app to meet friends and stuff, sort of like an adult club penguin- Thett3, describing Tinder
thett3
Posts: 14,334
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/18/2013 5:14:36 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/18/2013 5:13:28 PM, ClassicRobert wrote:
At 10/18/2013 5:10:58 PM, thett3 wrote:
At 10/18/2013 5:06:52 PM, ClassicRobert wrote:
Recently, a high school spanish teacher in Dallas, Texas was fired because just a few years prior, she modeled nude in playboy. Should she have been fired? No? Would you mind if your kids were being taught by a 21 year old ex-playboy model?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...

Of course I wouldn't mind. In fact I would instruct them to be as rowdy as possible in the hopes of getting multiple parent-teacher conferences scheduled.

BUT AREN'T YOU A GIRL??

Didn't you read the article?

"Deweese, 21, posed for Playboy when she was 18, before she was ever a teacher. At least one parent complained after students discovered photos of Deweese posing nude and in a simulated lesbian sex scene."
DDO Vice President

#StandwithBossy

#UnbanTheMadman

#BetOnThett

"Don't quote me, ever." -Max

"My name is max. I'm not a big fan of slacks"- Max rapping

"Walmart should have the opportunity to bribe a politician to it's agenda" -Max

"Thett, you're really good at convincing people you're a decent person"-tulle

"You fit the character of Regina George quite nicely"- Sam

: At 11/12/2016 11:49:40 PM, Raisor wrote:
: thett was right
ClassicRobert
Posts: 2,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/18/2013 5:16:42 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/18/2013 5:14:36 PM, thett3 wrote:
At 10/18/2013 5:13:28 PM, ClassicRobert wrote:
At 10/18/2013 5:10:58 PM, thett3 wrote:
At 10/18/2013 5:06:52 PM, ClassicRobert wrote:
Recently, a high school spanish teacher in Dallas, Texas was fired because just a few years prior, she modeled nude in playboy. Should she have been fired? No? Would you mind if your kids were being taught by a 21 year old ex-playboy model?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...

Of course I wouldn't mind. In fact I would instruct them to be as rowdy as possible in the hopes of getting multiple parent-teacher conferences scheduled.

BUT AREN'T YOU A GIRL??

Didn't you read the article?

"Deweese, 21, posed for Playboy when she was 18, before she was ever a teacher. At least one parent complained after students discovered photos of Deweese posing nude and in a simulated lesbian sex scene."
Debate me: Economic decision theory should be adjusted to include higher-order preferences for non-normative purposes http://www.debate.org...

Do you really believe that? Or not? If you believe it, you should man up and defend it in a debate. -RoyLatham

My Pet Fish is such a Douche- NiamC

It's an app to meet friends and stuff, sort of like an adult club penguin- Thett3, describing Tinder
themohawkninja
Posts: 816
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/18/2013 5:32:29 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
No, there's nothing wrong with it.

Plus, it's not entirely relevant (to the argument that the kids were distracted by photos of her) that she was a model, because her yearbook picture + porn picture + MS-Paint, and there you go!
"Morals are simply a limit to man's potential."~Myself

Political correctness is like saying you can't have a steak, because a baby can't eat one ~Unknown
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/18/2013 8:38:16 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
It's called moral turpitude, and many teacher contracts have language requiring teachers to remain morally upstanding. I agree with the school's decision to let her go.
themohawkninja
Posts: 816
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/18/2013 9:12:49 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/18/2013 8:38:16 PM, medic0506 wrote:
It's called moral turpitude, and many teacher contracts have language requiring teachers to remain morally upstanding. I agree with the school's decision to let her go.

But she was hired in the first place, so the school must have considered it okay from a moral standpoint that she did the modelling, unless they didn't know about it in the first place. Even then, isn't that more of the schools fault than her own?
"Morals are simply a limit to man's potential."~Myself

Political correctness is like saying you can't have a steak, because a baby can't eat one ~Unknown
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/18/2013 11:55:53 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
I agree with medic. I saw the pics, she could've put someone's eye out with those nipples.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 12:05:08 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/18/2013 9:12:49 PM, themohawkninja wrote:
At 10/18/2013 8:38:16 PM, medic0506 wrote:
It's called moral turpitude, and many teacher contracts have language requiring teachers to remain morally upstanding. I agree with the school's decision to let her go.

But she was hired in the first place, so the school must have considered it okay from a moral standpoint that she did the modelling, unless they didn't know about it in the first place. Even then, isn't that more of the schools fault than her own?

That's not something that shows up on the standard background check, so it's unlikely that it was known when she was hired. Unless we want to use taxpayer dollars to do full background checks, using private investigators, we'll just have to deal with these situations as they become known.
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 12:07:59 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 12:05:08 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/18/2013 9:12:49 PM, themohawkninja wrote:
At 10/18/2013 8:38:16 PM, medic0506 wrote:
It's called moral turpitude, and many teacher contracts have language requiring teachers to remain morally upstanding. I agree with the school's decision to let her go.

But she was hired in the first place, so the school must have considered it okay from a moral standpoint that she did the modelling, unless they didn't know about it in the first place. Even then, isn't that more of the schools fault than her own?

That's not something that shows up on the standard background check, so it's unlikely that it was known when she was hired. Unless we want to use taxpayer dollars to do full background checks, using private investigators, we'll just have to deal with these situations as they become known.

I love it. "We'll," said Hitler to his Nazi followers.
Df0512
Posts: 966
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 12:23:31 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
I don't think she should be fired for a few unfavorable decisions she has made in the past. Not like she hurt anyone. My only worry would be how her experiences would relate to how she handles certain situations in school. She teaches at a high school. Young girls may feel more comfortable coming to her for sexual advice. For advice about condoms and what not. I would much rather the teacher inform me that my student is asking about that then try and handle it themselves. Or she may even stumble upon in sexually inappropriate situation between students. Could be in the bathroom, written on a letter, or even on a phone taken in class. How do we know the ex-playboy model won't let it slide or get involved for heavens sake. Lets not pretend that that trend hasn't grown in popularity within the female teaching community. But I won't assume she is part of "that" group of women. I'd say that she shouldn't be banned from teaching because of her past but high school kids are to aware of playboy. Maybe elementary school.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part? Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 9:37:35 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
I mean, you realize your "morality" is completely arbitrary, right? that there's not even a utilitarian ethic to it? It all goes back to retarded Christianity and its predecessors.

What you're putting forward here is to deprive this woman of a means of survival that she has supposedly put a lot of time into acquiring and just because she showed her tits. Are nipples evil or what?
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 9:52:13 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part?

You seem to bmc anytime I bring up a moral stance so I read that as an overall lack of morality. I could be wrong, but I have nothing to go on other than what you've demonstrated so far.

Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?

The justification is that her posing nude for public viewing, exhibits moral turpitude. In most jobs and professions I'd probably say it's not that big of a deal, but when that job involves being a role model for children, then that behavior is absolutely unacceptable. I don't think homosexuals, trannies, or adulterers should be allowed to teach either, for the same reasons.
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 9:54:43 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 9:52:13 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part?

You seem to bmc anytime I bring up a moral stance so I read that as an overall lack of morality. I could be wrong, but I have nothing to go on other than what you've demonstrated so far.

Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?

The justification is that her posing nude for public viewing, exhibits moral turpitude. In most jobs and professions I'd probably say it's not that big of a deal, but when that job involves being a role model for children, then that behavior is absolutely unacceptable. I don't think homosexuals, trannies, or adulterers should be allowed to teach either, for the same reasons.

Where is your justification? You can't just say "moral turpitude". I think you're exhibiting moral turpitude now in unjustifiably discriminating against people. Why is she a bad role model because she's exposed her tits for Playboy? Is Playboy the devil?
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 10:05:21 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 9:54:43 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:52:13 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part?

You seem to bmc anytime I bring up a moral stance so I read that as an overall lack of morality. I could be wrong, but I have nothing to go on other than what you've demonstrated so far.

Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?

The justification is that her posing nude for public viewing, exhibits moral turpitude. In most jobs and professions I'd probably say it's not that big of a deal, but when that job involves being a role model for children, then that behavior is absolutely unacceptable. I don't think homosexuals, trannies, or adulterers should be allowed to teach either, for the same reasons.

Where is your justification? You can't just say "moral turpitude". I think you're exhibiting moral turpitude now in unjustifiably discriminating against people. Why is she a bad role model because she's exposed her tits for Playboy? Is Playboy the devil?

I rest my case.
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 10:07:46 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 10:05:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:54:43 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:52:13 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part?

You seem to bmc anytime I bring up a moral stance so I read that as an overall lack of morality. I could be wrong, but I have nothing to go on other than what you've demonstrated so far.

Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?

The justification is that her posing nude for public viewing, exhibits moral turpitude. In most jobs and professions I'd probably say it's not that big of a deal, but when that job involves being a role model for children, then that behavior is absolutely unacceptable. I don't think homosexuals, trannies, or adulterers should be allowed to teach either, for the same reasons.

Where is your justification? You can't just say "moral turpitude". I think you're exhibiting moral turpitude now in unjustifiably discriminating against people. Why is she a bad role model because she's exposed her tits for Playboy? Is Playboy the devil?

I rest my case.

You never had a case. You're just an angry, morally corrupted, repressed homosexual.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 8:48:24 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 10:07:46 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 10:05:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:54:43 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:52:13 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part?

You seem to bmc anytime I bring up a moral stance so I read that as an overall lack of morality. I could be wrong, but I have nothing to go on other than what you've demonstrated so far.

Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?

The justification is that her posing nude for public viewing, exhibits moral turpitude. In most jobs and professions I'd probably say it's not that big of a deal, but when that job involves being a role model for children, then that behavior is absolutely unacceptable. I don't think homosexuals, trannies, or adulterers should be allowed to teach either, for the same reasons.

Where is your justification? You can't just say "moral turpitude". I think you're exhibiting moral turpitude now in unjustifiably discriminating against people. Why is she a bad role model because she's exposed her tits for Playboy? Is Playboy the devil?

I rest my case.

You never had a case. You're just an angry, morally corrupted, repressed homosexual.

Only in your wet dreams.
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 8:50:04 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 8:48:24 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 10:07:46 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 10:05:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:54:43 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:52:13 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part?

You seem to bmc anytime I bring up a moral stance so I read that as an overall lack of morality. I could be wrong, but I have nothing to go on other than what you've demonstrated so far.

Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?

The justification is that her posing nude for public viewing, exhibits moral turpitude. In most jobs and professions I'd probably say it's not that big of a deal, but when that job involves being a role model for children, then that behavior is absolutely unacceptable. I don't think homosexuals, trannies, or adulterers should be allowed to teach either, for the same reasons.

Where is your justification? You can't just say "moral turpitude". I think you're exhibiting moral turpitude now in unjustifiably discriminating against people. Why is she a bad role model because she's exposed her tits for Playboy? Is Playboy the devil?

I rest my case.

You never had a case. You're just an angry, morally corrupted, repressed homosexual.

Only in your wet dreams.

You've still provided no justification but to say that to pose nude is moral turpitude. You've condemned a women to joblessness, dude, and have no argument as to why but that your 2,000 year old Bible says that's how it should be.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 9:02:01 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 8:50:04 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 8:48:24 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 10:07:46 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 10:05:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:54:43 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:52:13 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part?

You seem to bmc anytime I bring up a moral stance so I read that as an overall lack of morality. I could be wrong, but I have nothing to go on other than what you've demonstrated so far.

Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?

The justification is that her posing nude for public viewing, exhibits moral turpitude. In most jobs and professions I'd probably say it's not that big of a deal, but when that job involves being a role model for children, then that behavior is absolutely unacceptable. I don't think homosexuals, trannies, or adulterers should be allowed to teach either, for the same reasons.

Where is your justification? You can't just say "moral turpitude". I think you're exhibiting moral turpitude now in unjustifiably discriminating against people. Why is she a bad role model because she's exposed her tits for Playboy? Is Playboy the devil?

I rest my case.

You never had a case. You're just an angry, morally corrupted, repressed homosexual.

Only in your wet dreams.

You've still provided no justification but to say that to pose nude is moral turpitude. You've condemned a women to joblessness, dude, and have no argument as to why but that your 2,000 year old Bible says that's how it should be.

If you can't see the immorality of someone who teaches young girls, posing nude in public, for money, then nothing I can say is going to sway you.
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 9:10:26 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 9:02:01 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 8:50:04 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 8:48:24 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 10:07:46 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 10:05:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:54:43 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:52:13 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part?

You seem to bmc anytime I bring up a moral stance so I read that as an overall lack of morality. I could be wrong, but I have nothing to go on other than what you've demonstrated so far.

Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?

The justification is that her posing nude for public viewing, exhibits moral turpitude. In most jobs and professions I'd probably say it's not that big of a deal, but when that job involves being a role model for children, then that behavior is absolutely unacceptable. I don't think homosexuals, trannies, or adulterers should be allowed to teach either, for the same reasons.

Where is your justification? You can't just say "moral turpitude". I think you're exhibiting moral turpitude now in unjustifiably discriminating against people. Why is she a bad role model because she's exposed her tits for Playboy? Is Playboy the devil?

I rest my case.

You never had a case. You're just an angry, morally corrupted, repressed homosexual.

Only in your wet dreams.

You've still provided no justification but to say that to pose nude is moral turpitude. You've condemned a women to joblessness, dude, and have no argument as to why but that your 2,000 year old Bible says that's how it should be.

If you can't see the immorality of someone who teaches young girls, posing nude in public, for money, then nothing I can say is going to sway you.

There's nothing inherently wrong with posing nude, bro. Good job screwing a woman out of her livelihood.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 9:16:59 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 9:09:59 PM, FREEDO wrote:
Hopefully the publicity will get her a better job.

Well I haven't seen the pics but if she made it into Playboy she apparently has potential as a model. Or she could teach nude adult ed, teaching English to immigrants.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/19/2013 9:20:48 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 10/19/2013 9:10:26 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:02:01 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 8:50:04 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 8:48:24 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 10:07:46 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 10:05:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:54:43 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:52:13 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:31:29 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 10/19/2013 9:28:21 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 10/19/2013 12:01:48 AM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Wait, no.....medic is actually retarded.

Lack of morality on your part does not equal retardation of anyone who has morals. That's a rather childish argument you're presenting. I like titties just as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that I think a woman who poses nude for money, knowing those pictures will be made public, should be allowed to teach in our schools.

I think we have a right to demand that the people we turn our kids over to, be of a high moral standard. We don't just allow any old warm body to come into our home and babysit our kids. I think that out of all the professions, teachers of our children should be held to the highest moral standard.

Um, where's the lack of morality on my part?

You seem to bmc anytime I bring up a moral stance so I read that as an overall lack of morality. I could be wrong, but I have nothing to go on other than what you've demonstrated so far.

Where's your justification for your agreeing with this woman being deprived of a job?

The justification is that her posing nude for public viewing, exhibits moral turpitude. In most jobs and professions I'd probably say it's not that big of a deal, but when that job involves being a role model for children, then that behavior is absolutely unacceptable. I don't think homosexuals, trannies, or adulterers should be allowed to teach either, for the same reasons.

Where is your justification? You can't just say "moral turpitude". I think you're exhibiting moral turpitude now in unjustifiably discriminating against people. Why is she a bad role model because she's exposed her tits for Playboy? Is Playboy the devil?

I rest my case.

You never had a case. You're just an angry, morally corrupted, repressed homosexual.

Only in your wet dreams.

You've still provided no justification but to say that to pose nude is moral turpitude. You've condemned a women to joblessness, dude, and have no argument as to why but that your 2,000 year old Bible says that's how it should be.

If you can't see the immorality of someone who teaches young girls, posing nude in public, for money, then nothing I can say is going to sway you.

There's nothing inherently wrong with posing nude, bro. Good job screwing a woman out of her livelihood.

She can still work, just not teaching kids. If she didn't know this would create a problem for her as a teacher then she isn't smart enough to be teaching anyway. Regardless, don't blame me, it was her own actions that got her in trouble.