Total Posts:43|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

drug laws

JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 1:58:50 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
does anyone here think that all drugs should be legalised? i've often heard this put forward as a solution to societies drug problem. i think it would cause a revolt against the government.
Reasoning
Posts: 4,456
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 1:59:51 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 1:58:50 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
does anyone here think that all drugs should be legalised?

Yes.

i've often heard this put forward as a solution to societies drug problem. i think it would cause a revolt against the government.

Really? Why? I hope so though.
"What we really ought to ask the liberal, before we even begin addressing his agenda, is this: In what kind of society would he be a conservative?" - Joseph Sobran
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 2:03:03 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 1:59:51 PM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/16/2010 1:58:50 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
does anyone here think that all drugs should be legalised?

Yes.

i've often heard this put forward as a solution to societies drug problem. i think it would cause a revolt against the government.

Really? Why? I hope so though.

do you not think there would be?
Reasoning
Posts: 4,456
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 2:04:37 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 2:03:03 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
do you not think there would be?

A revolt against the government because they legalized drugs? No I do not think that would happen.
"What we really ought to ask the liberal, before we even begin addressing his agenda, is this: In what kind of society would he be a conservative?" - Joseph Sobran
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 2:10:15 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 2:04:37 PM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:03:03 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
do you not think there would be?

A revolt against the government because they legalized drugs? No I do not think that would happen.

of course it would. people are afraid of what they know nothing about. do you think your parents would let you outside the door if they knew there were junkies roaming around the place unchecked.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 2:10:15 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:04:37 PM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:03:03 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
do you not think there would be?

A revolt against the government because they legalized drugs? No I do not think that would happen.

of course it would. people are afraid of what they know nothing about. do you think your parents would let you outside the door if they knew there were junkies roaming around the place unchecked.

Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 2:58:37 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

Well, thats not true - there is still alcoholics, still gamblers, still cigarette smokers, etc., even though all that is sold safely in licensed shops.
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:05:14 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:10:15 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:04:37 PM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:03:03 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
do you not think there would be?

A revolt against the government because they legalized drugs? No I do not think that would happen.

of course it would. people are afraid of what they know nothing about. do you think your parents would let you outside the door if they knew there were junkies roaming around the place unchecked.

Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

drug legalisation = drugs easier to aquire = more junkies

depends how you look at it.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:11:49 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 2:58:37 PM, Volkov wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

Well, thats not true - there is still alcoholics, still gamblers, still cigarette smokers, etc., even though all that is sold safely in licensed shops.

But I mean the drop in people whos lives are ruined by bad chemicals and substance added to the drugs. Yes people will take drugs but it will be much safer
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:13:26 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:05:14 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:10:15 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:04:37 PM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:03:03 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
do you not think there would be?

A revolt against the government because they legalized drugs? No I do not think that would happen.

of course it would. people are afraid of what they know nothing about. do you think your parents would let you outside the door if they knew there were junkies roaming around the place unchecked.

Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

drug legalisation = drugs easier to aquire = more junkies

depends how you look at it.

Safer drug are acquired. No drugs with dangerous chemicals will be sold, hence saving lives. As for more junkies, sure, but police will arrest on the grounds of public intoxication, and they'll then keep to doing it in private.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:16:28 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:11:49 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:58:37 PM, Volkov wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

Well, thats not true - there is still alcoholics, still gamblers, still cigarette smokers, etc., even though all that is sold safely in licensed shops.

But I mean the drop in people whos lives are ruined by bad chemicals and substance added to the drugs. Yes people will take drugs but it will be much safer

thats not who i was talking about though. stop posting irrelevant opinions. thank you.
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:24:25 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:13:26 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:05:14 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:10:15 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:04:37 PM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:03:03 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
do you not think there would be?

A revolt against the government because they legalized drugs? No I do not think that would happen.

of course it would. people are afraid of what they know nothing about. do you think your parents would let you outside the door if they knew there were junkies roaming around the place unchecked.

Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

drug legalisation = drugs easier to aquire = more junkies

depends how you look at it.

Safer drug are acquired. No drugs with dangerous chemicals will be sold, hence saving lives. As for more junkies, sure, but police will arrest on the grounds of public intoxication, and they'll then keep to doing it in private.

and you don't think people will revolt over having their streets filled with junkies? junkies can also be very dangerous as some will do anything to get their fix. If you agree that the numbers of junkies would increase you surely agree the number of dangerous junkies would increase too?
Reasoning
Posts: 4,456
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:25:31 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:24:25 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
and you don't think people will revolt over having their streets filled with junkies? junkies can also be very dangerous as some will do anything to get their fix. If you agree that the numbers of junkies would increase you surely agree the number of dangerous junkies would increase too?

Drugs would be much cheaper because they wouldn't be illegal.
"What we really ought to ask the liberal, before we even begin addressing his agenda, is this: In what kind of society would he be a conservative?" - Joseph Sobran
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:30:17 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:25:31 PM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:24:25 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
and you don't think people will revolt over having their streets filled with junkies? junkies can also be very dangerous as some will do anything to get their fix. If you agree that the numbers of junkies would increase you surely agree the number of dangerous junkies would increase too?

Drugs would be much cheaper because they wouldn't be illegal.

lol you obviously don't smoke or drink.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:32:33 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:16:28 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:11:49 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:58:37 PM, Volkov wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

Well, thats not true - there is still alcoholics, still gamblers, still cigarette smokers, etc., even though all that is sold safely in licensed shops.

But I mean the drop in people whos lives are ruined by bad chemicals and substance added to the drugs. Yes people will take drugs but it will be much safer

thats not who i was talking about though. stop posting irrelevant opinions. thank you.

We're discussing drug laws, and the effect thereof. Don't think you're standing up to me or anything.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:34:07 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:24:25 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:13:26 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:05:14 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:10:15 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:04:37 PM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:03:03 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
do you not think there would be?

A revolt against the government because they legalized drugs? No I do not think that would happen.

of course it would. people are afraid of what they know nothing about. do you think your parents would let you outside the door if they knew there were junkies roaming around the place unchecked.

Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

drug legalisation = drugs easier to aquire = more junkies

depends how you look at it.

Safer drug are acquired. No drugs with dangerous chemicals will be sold, hence saving lives. As for more junkies, sure, but police will arrest on the grounds of public intoxication, and they'll then keep to doing it in private.

and you don't think people will revolt over having their streets filled with junkies? junkies can also be very dangerous as some will do anything to get their fix. If you agree that the numbers of junkies would increase you surely agree the number of dangerous junkies would increase too?

No. They said people will revolt if black were given rights, and if slaves were freed (Well, sort of in the latter). And the number of dangerous junkies? No, mandate drugs are for use in private institutions only. Problem solved.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
Reasoning
Posts: 4,456
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:34:51 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:30:17 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
lol you obviously don't smoke or drink.

If they sin tax the hell out of the drugs then it might make little difference to the price, yes.
"What we really ought to ask the liberal, before we even begin addressing his agenda, is this: In what kind of society would he be a conservative?" - Joseph Sobran
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:42:14 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:32:33 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:16:28 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:11:49 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:58:37 PM, Volkov wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

Well, thats not true - there is still alcoholics, still gamblers, still cigarette smokers, etc., even though all that is sold safely in licensed shops.

But I mean the drop in people whos lives are ruined by bad chemicals and substance added to the drugs. Yes people will take drugs but it will be much safer

thats not who i was talking about though. stop posting irrelevant opinions. thank you.

We're discussing drug laws, and the effect thereof. Don't think you're standing up to me or anything.

i could've sworn that i started this discussion and that it was about whether there would be a revolt or not if all drugs were legalised. standing up to you? so you see yourself as someone to be reckoned with do you? i bet you're as quiet as a mouse in the real world. your compensation for it here with your whiny little posts pisses me off so i said i'd have a stab at you.
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:46:28 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:34:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:24:25 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:13:26 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:05:14 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:50:39 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:10:15 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:04:37 PM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/16/2010 2:03:03 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
do you not think there would be?

A revolt against the government because they legalized drugs? No I do not think that would happen.

of course it would. people are afraid of what they know nothing about. do you think your parents would let you outside the door if they knew there were junkies roaming around the place unchecked.

Drug legalisation = Safer drugs sold in licensed shops = No more junkies.

drug legalisation = drugs easier to aquire = more junkies

depends how you look at it.

Safer drug are acquired. No drugs with dangerous chemicals will be sold, hence saving lives. As for more junkies, sure, but police will arrest on the grounds of public intoxication, and they'll then keep to doing it in private.

and you don't think people will revolt over having their streets filled with junkies? junkies can also be very dangerous as some will do anything to get their fix. If you agree that the numbers of junkies would increase you surely agree the number of dangerous junkies would increase too?

No. They said people will revolt if black were given rights, and if slaves were freed (Well, sort of in the latter). And the number of dangerous junkies? No, mandate drugs are for use in private institutions only. Problem solved.

Yes i suppose drug users are very cooperative.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:53:05 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:42:14 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:32:33 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

We're discussing drug laws, and the effect thereof. Don't think you're standing up to me or anything.

i could've sworn that i started this discussion and that it was about whether there would be a revolt or not if all drugs were legalised. standing up to you? so you see yourself as someone to be reckoned with do you? i bet you're as quiet as a mouse in the real world. your compensation for it here with your whiny little posts pisses me off so i said i'd have a stab at you.

Revolt = Effect of Drug Laws. This is DDO, not on-topic land.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:53:32 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:46:28 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:34:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

No. They said people will revolt if black were given rights, and if slaves were freed (Well, sort of in the latter). And the number of dangerous junkies? No, mandate drugs are for use in private institutions only. Problem solved.

Yes i suppose drug users are very cooperative.

They tend to be with a gun pointed at them
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 3:56:08 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:53:32 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:46:28 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:34:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

No. They said people will revolt if black were given rights, and if slaves were freed (Well, sort of in the latter). And the number of dangerous junkies? No, mandate drugs are for use in private institutions only. Problem solved.

Yes i suppose drug users are very cooperative.

They tend to be with a gun pointed at them

do you point guns at junkies often?
JoeSoap
Posts: 28
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 4:04:04 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:53:05 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:42:14 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:32:33 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

We're discussing drug laws, and the effect thereof. Don't think you're standing up to me or anything.

i could've sworn that i started this discussion and that it was about whether there would be a revolt or not if all drugs were legalised. standing up to you? so you see yourself as someone to be reckoned with do you? i bet you're as quiet as a mouse in the real world. your compensation for it here with your whiny little posts pisses me off so i said i'd have a stab at you.

Revolt = Effect of Drug Laws. This is DDO, not on-topic land.

it's not text required with links land either. you mind your business and ill mind mine.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 4:05:47 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 4:04:04 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:53:05 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:42:14 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:32:33 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

We're discussing drug laws, and the effect thereof. Don't think you're standing up to me or anything.

i could've sworn that i started this discussion and that it was about whether there would be a revolt or not if all drugs were legalised. standing up to you? so you see yourself as someone to be reckoned with do you? i bet you're as quiet as a mouse in the real world. your compensation for it here with your whiny little posts pisses me off so i said i'd have a stab at you.

Revolt = Effect of Drug Laws. This is DDO, not on-topic land.

it's not text required with links land either. you mind your business and ill mind mine.

*sigh* Each site has a certain way of doing things because it suits the site. I was trying show you how to be most efficient on this site.

We often go off topic. We also discuss points and quote our links. Standard practice.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 4:06:51 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 3:56:08 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:53:32 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:46:28 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:34:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

No. They said people will revolt if black were given rights, and if slaves were freed (Well, sort of in the latter). And the number of dangerous junkies? No, mandate drugs are for use in private institutions only. Problem solved.

Yes i suppose drug users are very cooperative.

They tend to be with a gun pointed at them

do you point guns at junkies often?

How is it relevant? f you point a gun at anyone they will submit to your will 99% of the time.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
J.Kenyon
Posts: 4,194
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 4:14:09 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 4:06:51 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:56:08 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:53:32 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:46:28 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:34:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

No. They said people will revolt if black were given rights, and if slaves were freed (Well, sort of in the latter). And the number of dangerous junkies? No, mandate drugs are for use in private institutions only. Problem solved.

Yes i suppose drug users are very cooperative.

They tend to be with a gun pointed at them

do you point guns at junkies often?

How is it relevant? f you point a gun at anyone they will submit to your will 99% of the time.*

*DISCLAIMER: Do not attempt this in Texas.
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 4:14:55 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 4:06:51 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:56:08 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:53:32 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:46:28 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:34:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

No. They said people will revolt if black were given rights, and if slaves were freed (Well, sort of in the latter). And the number of dangerous junkies? No, mandate drugs are for use in private institutions only. Problem solved.

Yes i suppose drug users are very cooperative.

They tend to be with a gun pointed at them

do you point guns at junkies often?

How is it relevant? f you point a gun at anyone they will submit to your will 99% of the time.

Except for people on drugs. Funny thing about drugs is that they kinda affect people's minds and decision making abilities. So when a gun is pointed at them, they are more likely then the average person to do something foolish.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 4:18:58 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 4:14:09 PM, J.Kenyon wrote:
At 2/16/2010 4:06:51 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:56:08 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:53:32 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:46:28 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:34:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

No. They said people will revolt if black were given rights, and if slaves were freed (Well, sort of in the latter). And the number of dangerous junkies? No, mandate drugs are for use in private institutions only. Problem solved.

Yes i suppose drug users are very cooperative.

They tend to be with a gun pointed at them

do you point guns at junkies often?

How is it relevant? f you point a gun at anyone they will submit to your will 99% of the time.*

*DISCLAIMER: Do not attempt this in Texas.

11/10. You have won this thread.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2010 4:20:31 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/16/2010 4:14:55 PM, OreEle wrote:
At 2/16/2010 4:06:51 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:56:08 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:53:32 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:46:28 PM, JoeSoap wrote:
At 2/16/2010 3:34:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:

No. They said people will revolt if black were given rights, and if slaves were freed (Well, sort of in the latter). And the number of dangerous junkies? No, mandate drugs are for use in private institutions only. Problem solved.

Yes i suppose drug users are very cooperative.

They tend to be with a gun pointed at them

do you point guns at junkies often?

How is it relevant? f you point a gun at anyone they will submit to your will 99% of the time.

Except for people on drugs. Funny thing about drugs is that they kinda affect people's minds and decision making abilities. So when a gun is pointed at them, they are more likely then the average person to do something foolish.

Then you shoot their kneecap to stop them attacking you, or restrain them if they do not comply.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.