Total Posts:35|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

What Term is this Definiton for?

Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 12:11:18 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Can anyone guess what term this definition represents?

- of or relating to a kind of reproduction that does not involve the combining of male and female cells

(or) "sex without reproduction"

Asexual

http://www.merriam-webster.com...

Maybe the members of the LGBT should add an "A" instead of a "Q" to their name: LGBTA

(and) call themselves "Asexuals"

Reference: The LGBT coming to an Elementary School near you...

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net...

I am Pro-Choice on Homosexuality and Pro-born-that-way on Abortion. I am against the DOGMA (Defense of Gay Marriage Act) of the LGBT but am for DOMA.
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 12:52:27 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Jikpamu: Here"s a story you can run with"

Can anyone guess what term this definition represents?

- of or relating to a kind of reproduction that does not involve the combining of male and female cells

(or) "sex without reproduction"

Asexual

http://www.merriam-webster.com...

Maybe the members of the LGBT should add an "A" instead of a "Q" to their name: LGBTA not the LGBTQ

(and) call themselves "Asexuals"

Reference: The LGBTA coming to an Elementary School near you...

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net...

I am Pro-Choice on Homosexuality and Pro-born-that-way on Abortion. I am against the DOGMA (Defense of Gay Marriage Act) of the LGBTA but am for DOMA.

See also: The LGBTA coming to a Highschool near you...

http://abcnews.go.com...

Last Minute Additions to this amazing news story:

The LGBT is already using A as in Asexual:

LGBTQA (Google Definitions): Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, and Asexual or Ally

Jikpamu: When is this silliness going to end? How many abominable sex acts can we give initials to from the Alphabet? Only 20 Letters left in the Alphabet of Sex that have not been used"

Leviticus 18:22 (NASB 95) - 'You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
The_Fool_on_the_hill
Posts: 6,071
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 1:30:46 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 12:52:27 AM, Jikpamu wrote:
Jikpamu: Here"s a story you can run with"

Can anyone guess what term this definition represents?

- of or relating to a kind of reproduction that does not involve the combining of male and female cells

(or) "sex without reproduction"

Asexual

http://www.merriam-webster.com...

Maybe the members of the LGBT should add an "A" instead of a "Q" to their name: LGBTA not the LGBTQ

(and) call themselves "Asexuals"

Reference: The LGBTA coming to an Elementary School near you...

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net...

I am Pro-Choice on Homosexuality and Pro-born-that-way on Abortion. I am against the DOGMA (Defense of Gay Marriage Act) of the LGBTA but am for DOMA.

See also: The LGBTA coming to a Highschool near you...

http://abcnews.go.com...

Last Minute Additions to this amazing news story:

The LGBT is already using A as in Asexual:

LGBTQA (Google Definitions): Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, and Asexual or Ally

Jikpamu: When is this silliness going to end? How many abominable sex acts can we give initials to from the Alphabet? Only 20 Letters left in the Alphabet of Sex that have not been used"

Leviticus 18:22 (NASB 95) - 'You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.

Buddha: You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished "by" your anger.
"The bud disappears when the blossom breaks through, and we might say that the former is refuted by the latter; in the same way when the fruit comes, the blossom may be explained to be a false form of the plant's existence, for the fruit appears as its true nature in place of the blossom. These stages are not merely differentiated; they supplant one another as being incompatible with one another." G. W. F. HEGEL
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 6:18:44 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 1:02:43 AM, YYW wrote:
You're in denial, man.

I don't seem to be denying anything...

I only wish Asexuals would deny themselves...

(And wait until they get married to have sex and only then between them, the man, and their wife)
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 6:21:09 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 1:30:46 AM, The_Fool_on_the_hill wrote:
At 7/13/2014 12:52:27 AM, Jikpamu wrote:
Jikpamu: Here"s a story you can run with"

Can anyone guess what term this definition represents?

- of or relating to a kind of reproduction that does not involve the combining of male and female cells

(or) "sex without reproduction"

Asexual

http://www.merriam-webster.com...

Maybe the members of the LGBT should add an "A" instead of a "Q" to their name: LGBTA not the LGBTQ

(and) call themselves "Asexuals"

Reference: The LGBTA coming to an Elementary School near you...

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net...

I am Pro-Choice on Homosexuality and Pro-born-that-way on Abortion. I am against the DOGMA (Defense of Gay Marriage Act) of the LGBTA but am for DOMA.

See also: The LGBTA coming to a Highschool near you...

http://abcnews.go.com...

Last Minute Additions to this amazing news story:

The LGBT is already using A as in Asexual:

LGBTQA (Google Definitions): Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, and Asexual or Ally

Jikpamu: When is this silliness going to end? How many abominable sex acts can we give initials to from the Alphabet? Only 20 Letters left in the Alphabet of Sex that have not been used"

Leviticus 18:22 (NASB 95) - 'You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.

Buddha: You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished "by" your anger.

Do I appear angry? : ) - See I'm smiling.

And Hello btw : )
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
YYW
Posts: 36,391
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 12:31:10 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 6:18:44 AM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 1:02:43 AM, YYW wrote:
You're in denial, man.

I don't seem to be denying anything...

I only wish Asexuals would deny themselves...

(And wait until they get married to have sex and only then between them, the man, and their wife)

I really pity you....
Tsar of DDO
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 12:46:57 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 12:31:10 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:18:44 AM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 1:02:43 AM, YYW wrote:
You're in denial, man.

I don't seem to be denying anything...

I only wish Asexuals would deny themselves...

(And wait until they get married to have sex and only then between them, the man, and their wife)

I really pity you....

LOL!! Why? : )
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
YYW
Posts: 36,391
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 12:52:25 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 12:46:57 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 12:31:10 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:18:44 AM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 1:02:43 AM, YYW wrote:
You're in denial, man.

I don't seem to be denying anything...

I only wish Asexuals would deny themselves...

(And wait until they get married to have sex and only then between them, the man, and their wife)

I really pity you....

LOL!! Why? : )

You believe that your faith compels your politics, when your politics come at the expense of your faith.
Tsar of DDO
Greyparrot
Posts: 14,325
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 1:03:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Haven't we reached a level of science yet that can predict wok?hat are good policies for human society rather than the guidelines of a 2000+ year old textbook?
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 1:09:33 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 12:52:25 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/13/2014 12:46:57 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 12:31:10 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:18:44 AM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 1:02:43 AM, YYW wrote:
You're in denial, man.

I don't seem to be denying anything...

I only wish Asexuals would deny themselves...

(And wait until they get married to have sex and only then between them, the man, and their wife)

I really pity you....

LOL!! Why? : )

You believe that your faith compels your politics, when your politics come at the expense of your faith.

I don't think I'm doing anything here but espousing truth : )
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 1:11:38 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Mr. Parrot, there is quite the profundity in that 2000+ book. It is, in fact, order as a result of science.
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 1:12:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 1:03:26 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
Haven't we reached a level of science yet that can predict wok?hat are good policies for human society rather than the guidelines of a 2000+ year old textbook?

You should really see some of my other posts:

http://www.debate.org... (If the Bible was written by ancient goat herders, is it still relevant for today in 2014?)

Let me know if that debate went over your head : )
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
Greyparrot
Posts: 14,325
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 2:05:19 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 1:11:38 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Mr. Parrot, there is quite the profundity in that 2000+ book. It is, in fact, order as a result of science.

http://christianity.stackexchange.com...

It's not really a textbook, just a bunch of conflicting opinions about how we should treat others.
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 2:10:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 2:05:19 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 7/13/2014 1:11:38 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Mr. Parrot, there is quite the profundity in that 2000+ book. It is, in fact, order as a result of science.

http://christianity.stackexchange.com...

It's not really a textbook, just a bunch of conflicting opinions about how we should treat others.

Care to expound on one of those "opinions" about how we should treat others as taught in the Bible? : )
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
AnDoctuir
Posts: 11,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 4:22:53 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 2:05:19 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 7/13/2014 1:11:38 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Mr. Parrot, there is quite the profundity in that 2000+ book. It is, in fact, order as a result of science.

http://christianity.stackexchange.com...

It's not really a textbook, just a bunch of conflicting opinions about how we should treat others.

I think it's a manipulation. It's the oldest con in the book to conjure up a thing which must then be gotten over.
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 4:50:53 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 4:22:53 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
At 7/13/2014 2:05:19 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 7/13/2014 1:11:38 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Mr. Parrot, there is quite the profundity in that 2000+ book. It is, in fact, order as a result of science.

http://christianity.stackexchange.com...

It's not really a textbook, just a bunch of conflicting opinions about how we should treat others.

I think it's a manipulation. It's the oldest con in the book to conjure up a thing which must then be gotten over.

The Bible is NOT a con and hello : )
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 5:52:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 5:08:25 PM, AnDoctuir wrote:
Sorry, but it is, and it's textbook really.

Maybe you would care to expound on this claim?
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 6:32:37 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 6:16:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
I thought you'd like asexuals, seeing as they're basically celibate, which the Bible praises.

Sex is perfectly fine between a husband and his wife but only under those conditions (I know many OT people had more than 1 wife).
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
EndarkenedRationalist
Posts: 14,201
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 6:37:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 6:32:37 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:16:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
I thought you'd like asexuals, seeing as they're basically celibate, which the Bible praises.

Sex is perfectly fine between a husband and his wife but only under those conditions (I know many OT people had more than 1 wife).

What about no sex at all?
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 7:02:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 6:37:45 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:32:37 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:16:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
I thought you'd like asexuals, seeing as they're basically celibate, which the Bible praises.

Sex is perfectly fine between a husband and his wife but only under those conditions (I know many OT people had more than 1 wife).

What about no sex at all?

1 Corinthians 7:5 (New International Version 2011)
1Co 7:5 Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.
(In the context of a husband and a wife)
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
EndarkenedRationalist
Posts: 14,201
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 7:12:09 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 7:02:46 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:37:45 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:32:37 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:16:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
I thought you'd like asexuals, seeing as they're basically celibate, which the Bible praises.

Sex is perfectly fine between a husband and his wife but only under those conditions (I know many OT people had more than 1 wife).

What about no sex at all?

1 Corinthians 7:5 (New International Version 2011)
1Co 7:5 Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.
(In the context of a husband and a wife)

Matthew 19:12 "For their are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it."
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2014 7:22:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 7:12:09 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 7/13/2014 7:02:46 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:37:45 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:32:37 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:16:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
I thought you'd like asexuals, seeing as they're basically celibate, which the Bible praises.

Sex is perfectly fine between a husband and his wife but only under those conditions (I know many OT people had more than 1 wife).

What about no sex at all?

1 Corinthians 7:5 (New International Version 2011)
1Co 7:5 Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.
(In the context of a husband and a wife)

Matthew 19:12 "For their are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it."

Yes - thank you : ) Very good quote. That is speaking that some have been set apart by God to never marry so that they can serve Him better. Paul expounds upon this:

1 Corinthians 7:38 (New International Version 2011)
1Co 7:38 So then, he who marries the virgin does right, but he who does not marry her does better.

It's not wrong to marry and as long as you can handle God's terms for marriage (Mark 10:6-9 and also I believe Matthew 19) then have at it - however some are so dedicated to God they even don't want a woman to get in the way of being able to serve God (or for a woman: a man). Nothing wrong with getting married though : )
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
Khaos_Mage
Posts: 23,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/14/2014 12:31:43 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 12:11:18 AM, Jikpamu wrote:
Can anyone guess what term this definition represents?

- of or relating to a kind of reproduction that does not involve the combining of male and female cells

(or) "sex without reproduction"

Asexual

http://www.merriam-webster.com...

Maybe the members of the LGBT should add an "A" instead of a "Q" to their name: LGBTA

(and) call themselves "Asexuals"

Reference: The LGBT coming to an Elementary School near you...

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net...

I am Pro-Choice on Homosexuality and Pro-born-that-way on Abortion. I am against the DOGMA (Defense of Gay Marriage Act) of the LGBT but am for DOMA.

Ummmm, you realize that asexual reproduction is still reproduction, right?
Last I checked, two dudes don't make a baby. Ergo, it is not asexual.
My work here is, finally, done.
Khaos_Mage
Posts: 23,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/14/2014 12:33:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2014 6:37:45 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:32:37 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/13/2014 6:16:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
I thought you'd like asexuals, seeing as they're basically celibate, which the Bible praises.

Sex is perfectly fine between a husband and his wife but only under those conditions (I know many OT people had more than 1 wife).

What about no sex at all?

That's called marriage.
ba-da-tish
My work here is, finally, done.
Jikpamu
Posts: 226
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/14/2014 1:57:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/14/2014 12:31:43 PM, Khaos_Mage wrote:
At 7/13/2014 12:11:18 AM, Jikpamu wrote:
Can anyone guess what term this definition represents?

- of or relating to a kind of reproduction that does not involve the combining of male and female cells

(or) "sex without reproduction"

Asexual

http://www.merriam-webster.com...

Maybe the members of the LGBT should add an "A" instead of a "Q" to their name: LGBTA

(and) call themselves "Asexuals"

Reference: The LGBT coming to an Elementary School near you...

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net...

I am Pro-Choice on Homosexuality and Pro-born-that-way on Abortion. I am against the DOGMA (Defense of Gay Marriage Act) of the LGBT but am for DOMA.

Ummmm, you realize that asexual reproduction is still reproduction, right?
Last I checked, two dudes don't make a baby. Ergo, it is not asexual.

Depends on how you define it: "a" means "without"
Jikpamu: Conservative "Libertarian" Born-Again Bible-Believing Christian
I am against homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion (particularly abortion).
I am for anything Jesus and the Bible : )
Khaos_Mage
Posts: 23,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/14/2014 2:05:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/14/2014 1:57:17 PM, Jikpamu wrote:
At 7/14/2014 12:31:43 PM, Khaos_Mage wrote:
At 7/13/2014 12:11:18 AM, Jikpamu wrote:
Can anyone guess what term this definition represents?

- of or relating to a kind of reproduction that does not involve the combining of male and female cells

(or) "sex without reproduction"

Asexual

http://www.merriam-webster.com...

Maybe the members of the LGBT should add an "A" instead of a "Q" to their name: LGBTA

(and) call themselves "Asexuals"

Reference: The LGBT coming to an Elementary School near you...

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net...

I am Pro-Choice on Homosexuality and Pro-born-that-way on Abortion. I am against the DOGMA (Defense of Gay Marriage Act) of the LGBT but am for DOMA.

Ummmm, you realize that asexual reproduction is still reproduction, right?
Last I checked, two dudes don't make a baby. Ergo, it is not asexual.

Depends on how you define it: "a" means "without"

You just defined it in your OP. It is a means of reproduction.
And for the record, there are asexuals; those that do not have sex. Hardly part of the gay community.
My work here is, finally, done.
Oryus
Posts: 8,280
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/14/2014 2:13:28 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
lol

https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net...
: : :Tulle: The fool, I purposely don't engage with you because you don't have proper command of the English language.
: :
: : The Fool: It's my English writing. Either way It's okay have a larger vocabulary then you, and a better grasp of language, and you're a woman.
:
: I'm just going to leave this precious struggle nugget right here.