Total Posts:6|Showing Posts:1-6
Jump to topic:

A question to which I have no answer

sadolite
Posts: 8,896
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 4:52:11 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
How is it that a person can think their reproductive system is 0% my business yet 100% my financial responsibility as a tax payer? Just askin.
I am not what you think I am. You ARE what you think I am
Skepsikyma
Posts: 8,375
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 5:00:53 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 2/19/2016 4:52:11 AM, sadolite wrote:
How is it that a person can think their reproductive system is 0% my business yet 100% my financial responsibility as a tax payer? Just askin.

I don't expect you to pay for waxing sessions, if that's what you're getting at.
"Whatever else is evil, the pride of a good mother in the beauty of her daughter is good. It is one of those adamantine tendernesses which are the touchstones of every age and race. If other things are against it, other things must go down. If landlords and laws and sciences are against it, landlords and laws and sciences must go down. With the red hair of one she-urchin in the gutter I will set fire to all modern civilization."
- G. K. Chesterton -
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,447
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 1:38:44 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 2/19/2016 4:52:11 AM, sadolite wrote:
How is it that a person can think their reproductive system is 0% my business yet 100% my financial responsibility as a tax payer? Just askin.

1) I find your claim dubious.
2) the same way in which I disagree with air strikes in various parts of the world, but am 100% responsible for as a tax payer.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Objectivity
Posts: 1,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 5:48:21 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 2/19/2016 1:38:44 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 2/19/2016 4:52:11 AM, sadolite wrote:
How is it that a person can think their reproductive system is 0% my business yet 100% my financial responsibility as a tax payer? Just askin.

1) I find your claim dubious.
2) the same way in which I disagree with air strikes in various parts of the world, but am 100% responsible for as a tax payer.

In response to 2) Even if you disagree with how far we go to carry out said duty, do you discern between the duty to uphold natural rights and sustaining them? Like just because I have a right to buy a mansion does the government have a duty to buy it for me? If not why is what you want any different?
sadolite
Posts: 8,896
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 9:49:26 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 2/19/2016 5:48:21 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 2/19/2016 1:38:44 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 2/19/2016 4:52:11 AM, sadolite wrote:
How is it that a person can think their reproductive system is 0% my business yet 100% my financial responsibility as a tax payer? Just askin.

1) I find your claim dubious.
2) the same way in which I disagree with air strikes in various parts of the world, but am 100% responsible for as a tax payer.

In response to 2) Even if you disagree with how far we go to carry out said duty, do you discern between the duty to uphold natural rights and sustaining them? Like just because I have a right to buy a mansion does the government have a duty to buy it for me? If not why is what you want any different?

You do not have a right to reproduce or have sex. If you do then you have no idea what a right is.
I am not what you think I am. You ARE what you think I am
Objectivity
Posts: 1,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/20/2016 1:09:21 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 2/19/2016 9:49:26 PM, sadolite wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:48:21 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 2/19/2016 1:38:44 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 2/19/2016 4:52:11 AM, sadolite wrote:
How is it that a person can think their reproductive system is 0% my business yet 100% my financial responsibility as a tax payer? Just askin.

1) I find your claim dubious.
2) the same way in which I disagree with air strikes in various parts of the world, but am 100% responsible for as a tax payer.

In response to 2) Even if you disagree with how far we go to carry out said duty, do you discern between the duty to uphold natural rights and sustaining them? Like just because I have a right to buy a mansion does the government have a duty to buy it for me? If not why is what you want any different?

You do not have a right to reproduce or have sex. If you do then you have no idea what a right is.

What.. you don't have a right to have sex? That is an extension of the right to liberty, as is the right to reproduce, both are actions, liberty is unrestricted action, we can only restrict liberty insofar as it violates others rights or if there is a significant harm to societal welfare. Please tell me more about how I don't know what a right is..