Total Posts:34|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Feminazis... A brief history lesson

Mr.Wonderful
Posts: 98
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
Well there's plenty of good reasons:

The founding of Feminism- The mother of modern Feminism is Margaret Sanger, a eugenicist that worked closely with and was funded by Satanic organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation as well as many other racially motivated groups such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Aryan Nation to reduce the number of "genetically inferior negros"... Sanger's words, not mine... to a more manageable population size that could be disposed of more efficiently. To this end, she founded Planned Parenthood and set up operation in predominantly African American communities with some facilities also being set up in poor rural white communities since the poor and underprivileged were considered by these monsters to be a blight on society as well. Her most famous line "The most merciful thing a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it". The truth is the globalists know that after being enslaved no race would willingly choose to endure slavery a second time... so any such race had to be eliminated.

Truth about the "Pay Gap"- . This was really the end game Rockefeller and his peers sought from this movement because men would form unions and effectively resist the globalist tyranny of the robber barons... these men were fighting against globalist enslavement and winning higher wages which was a real problem. At the same time, the Globalists faced a secondary dilemma in which they could only tax half the population. The answer of course would be to increase competition for jobs... and much feminist propaganda during the second world war focused on this stating the ideals that women could do just as much work as men... and as a result many women became unpaid volunteers or low paid factory workers mass-producing clothing and munitions for the war effort at less than a third of what it would cost these manufacturers to pay a man to do the same job. These women were strongly indoctrinated that it was a show of patriotism, equality and strength... the truth was all they were doing was cutting their life-spans considerably while working like dogs for peanuts to make the Globalist Progressives rich... but yeah that's the origin of the pay gap that did actually exist and it had nothing to do with competition from males but all to do with the general gullibility of the feminists of that era. Feminists would continue fighting for equal wages which they of course would be granted but instead of moving the pay scale upward and paying women as much as men the savvy globalist corporations who with great foresight seized the opportunity to reduce the pay of men by about 40% against the rise of inflation to keep them at the same level as women who saw about a 10% increase in their pay going into the early 60s... and thus began to levy heavier taxes against all... in 1970 the average globalist CEO made 500% of what their average worker made... BUT... in the year 2016 this number has climbed to an astounding 12,000-27,000% of the earnings of a typical worker all which would have been impossible without the hard work of feminists lowering the pay to peanuts across the board and the service based economy (mass-outsourcing of manufacturing jobs) was an indirect result of the feminist cry for a safer work environment. Now with the advent of automation there is little need for men or women in the manufacturing sector... and most of that sector is now located in China, Taiwan, Mexico, and India.

Destruction of the Nuclear Family- Finding it much easier to control women who did not have a husband they could rely on for support, the globalists in government started creating fascist anti-male constructs to ensure the future enslavement of the human race... in cases of divorce, custody of children would almost exclusively be given to women, in cases of consensual sex the legal system would charge men with rape or sexual assault if a woman filed such a complaint regardless of any factual basis to substantiate it, in cases of child abuse men would certainly and deservedly be confined to a prison cell whereas women who went as far over the line as murdering five of their own children in cold blood would be given a short stay in a mental hospital and later released back into the general population where they could kill again. This type of legal system serves a twofold purpose... one is to force men to pay money to see their children and the second is to charge women legal fees to keep fathers out of the picture... once either party runs out of money the Globalist system could care less, it is simply about providing money to the state to fund its totalitarian infrastructure while providing a path for future generations to be raised by the state instead of their parents... an impossible thing to do with men willing to die for their families standing in the way so the answer is obviously to push men out of the way so the Globalist war machine has an ample supply of orphans raised in state custody to fight in their future wars. Women who only care about themselves make terrible parents who are usually far more than willing to sacrifice their little "inconvenience" to the Globalist cause.

Social Justice Warriors- Probably most disturbing is the fact that psychotic behavior is being encouraged on college campuses throughout the country as normal... by turning normal women into wild man-hating unemployable asexual looking lesbian hambeasts and instituting safe spaces where one can insulate themselves from the inconveniences of logic and truth with all the comforts of Krispy Kreme doughnuts and Baskin Robbins ice cream. The biggest, loudest hambeast or most insane shaved-cranium "superslut" (an honorific title I guess since they usually reek of Herpes and no man would stand within 10 meters of them for fear of contact infection) is usually the leader of any Feminazi contingent (pretty sure they have some secret fight to the death to determine the leader... maybe someone can verify). There is a very high degree of sexual confusion among these individuals who identify themselves as transvag, cishomo, uberqueer, phallusboss, or a slew of other things I cannot write due to the profanity filter... and are surely the product of the most sadistic, perverse, and twisted minds in existence as often times these monikers make no sense to the human ear and are often contradictory. One thing they all share in common is a common hatred of males... particularly white ones with money which is amazing since the Globalists their movement serves are almost universally white males with billions of ill-gotten dollars. The globalists love SJW feminazis since it furthers their true agenda of martial law so as long as feminazis serve this purpose and obey the shadowy leaders of their movement they are mostly free from the typical legal repercussions associated with destruction of property and legal unrest. Yet if feminazis step out of line and attack the police or other globalist enforcers they quickly find themselves beaten and incarcerated the same way any other useless tool would. Feminazis now only serve the purpose of keeping males in check to make them feel inadequate and less likely to challenge the all-encompassing Globalist control structure. These "useful idiots" are now nothing more than the mutant followers of the Elite 0.1% multi-billionaire super-class that dominates society as a whole and are too stupid to realize they are not fighting for the "freedom of women" against false male oppression (as any sane American will tell you women are coddled much more by society than men) but for a police state and the enslavement as all.

I'm running out of space to type... but there is a lot more that can be said about Feminism and the tyranny it truly represents.

TL;DR Ultimately all persons who practice feminism blindly seek their own destruction in a poorly waged racist and sexist war against a faux straw-man of male privilege while advancing Globalist agenda
bhakun
Posts: 231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 12:32:38 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
What are your thoughts on Islam, and how women are treated in Islamic countries?
"We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered." -MLK Jr
bhakun
Posts: 231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?
"We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered." -MLK Jr
Hayd
Posts: 4,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 12:54:44 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

Yeah, I like their videos
YYW
Posts: 36,325
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.
Tsar of DDO
bhakun
Posts: 231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.
"We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered." -MLK Jr
YYW
Posts: 36,325
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
Tsar of DDO
bhakun
Posts: 231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.

Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.
"We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered." -MLK Jr
YYW
Posts: 36,325
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 1:28:35 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.


Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.

I take it this is a perspective you disagree with.

Btw. I am like the most left leaning guy on this site.

On the compass, I'm a -7, -7.

I think you might be biased too?
Tsar of DDO
bhakun
Posts: 231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 1:33:29 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 1:28:35 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.


Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.

I take it this is a perspective you disagree with.

Btw. I am like the most left leaning guy on this site.

On the compass, I'm a -7, -7.

I think you might be biased too?
You are certainly not the most left wing if you are anti feminism and anti BLM, which Im pretty sure you are.
"We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered." -MLK Jr
Hayd
Posts: 4,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 1:50:23 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.


Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.

Dude, I'm left wing and im using it as my source,
bhakun
Posts: 231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 2:00:42 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 1:50:23 AM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.


Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.

Dude, I'm left wing and im using it as my source,
A better way would be to use the studies PragerU uses and then base your arguments off that. PragerU gives it own opinion on the studies/information it cites, which means its not always factually correct.
"We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered." -MLK Jr
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 2:03:03 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 12:32:38 AM, bhakun wrote:
What are your thoughts on Islam, and how women are treated in Islamic countries?

Islam is filth and the way women are treated in filthy Islamic countries is despicable.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 2:03:16 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It's a decent source.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 2:03:26 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 12:54:44 AM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

Yeah, I like their videos

PragerU is nice.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 2:03:45 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

No, far too racist, sexist, misogynistic, homophobic, etc.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 2:04:15 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

So then what source would he use? It's not as if he was backing up a claim.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 2:05:07 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 1:33:29 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:28:35 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.


Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.

I take it this is a perspective you disagree with.

Btw. I am like the most left leaning guy on this site.

On the compass, I'm a -7, -7.

I think you might be biased too?
You are certainly not the most left wing if you are anti feminism and anti BLM, which Im pretty sure you are.

So that means left wing is characterized as where the retards go, as being anti BLM and anti feminism is not left wing? Good to know, I always knew that I was correct on that assumption.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
YYW
Posts: 36,325
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 2:44:46 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 1:33:29 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:28:35 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.


Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.

I take it this is a perspective you disagree with.

Btw. I am like the most left leaning guy on this site.

On the compass, I'm a -7, -7.

I think you might be biased too?
You are certainly not the most left wing if you are anti feminism and anti BLM, which Im pretty sure you are.

No. I am left wing. Like, really left wing. I'm just not a progressive, or a fool.
Tsar of DDO
bhakun
Posts: 231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 3:02:26 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 2:44:46 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:33:29 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:28:35 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.


Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.

I take it this is a perspective you disagree with.

Btw. I am like the most left leaning guy on this site.

On the compass, I'm a -7, -7.

I think you might be biased too?
You are certainly not the most left wing if you are anti feminism and anti BLM, which Im pretty sure you are.

No. I am left wing. Like, really left wing. I'm just not a progressive, or a fool.

How left wing? Im actually curious.
"We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered." -MLK Jr
Foodiesoul
Posts: 579
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 3:04:36 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
Thanks a lot, Mr Wonderful. You just made me depressed and lose my faith in humanity! You also made me hate human beings even more! YES, I know that not all human beings are sexist! I'm not sexist! I don't discriminate against ANYONE!

So basically what you're saying is that the government is secretly sexist and wants males to be sad, miserable, and oppressed for the rest of their lives.

I feel like I should just kill myself so that I can get out of this stupid, miserable, and unfair world!
YYW
Posts: 36,325
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 3:07:33 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 3:02:26 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 2:44:46 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:33:29 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:28:35 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.


Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.

I take it this is a perspective you disagree with.

Btw. I am like the most left leaning guy on this site.

On the compass, I'm a -7, -7.

I think you might be biased too?
You are certainly not the most left wing if you are anti feminism and anti BLM, which Im pretty sure you are.

No. I am left wing. Like, really left wing. I'm just not a progressive, or a fool.

How left wing? Im actually curious.

Chomsky level.
Tsar of DDO
someloser
Posts: 1,377
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 3:16:21 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
Margaret Sanger isn't the founder of feminism, let alone its modern iteration. She's mostly known for Planned Parenthood, and did not have any significant intellectual influence on the movement.

Wollstonecraft wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Woman over a century before Sanger was born.

"Modern" feminism only goes back to the 60s, at most.
Ego sum qui sum. Deus lo vult.

"America is ungovernable; those who served the revolution have plowed the sea." - Simon Bolivar

"A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as a healthy man of his bones. But if you break a nation's nationality it will think of nothing else but getting it set again." - George Bernard Shaw
Mr.Wonderful
Posts: 98
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 3:28:52 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 12:32:38 AM, bhakun wrote:
What are your thoughts on Islam, and how women are treated in Islamic countries?

Honestly, Islam is the epitome of the the evils many liberals and progressives attempt to assign to the Christian faith... particularly as they pertain to women. Yet for some reason this religion which is pretty much as sexist and homophobic as one can get is revered... probably for the sheer fact it isn't Christianity. This is the whole problem with the Progressive mindset... they are willing to completely sell out to whatever belief system they perceive as anti-Christian no matter how depraved or utterly destructive such beliefs are and sadly it seems, the more destructive the better as exemplified by the practice of true Islam which includes beating, burning, torturing, and beheading women who are insubordinate toward their husbands and allows them to be traded like cattle. But hey... it's not Christian so that's cool... right?

I think Islam treats women about as well as feminists treat women whow refuse to conform to their ideology... in fact, if you were to sit a bunch of Feminists down in a room and have them come up with their own religion... I'm pretty sure they'd come out waving a holy book very similar to the Qur'an with gender roles reversed... and Allah being replaced with a giant omniscient vagina. Other than that it would pretty much just be copy and paste. SJW feminism and Islam share a lot in common... including the smiling of infidels, the silencing of opposition, and the hatred of Christians.
Mr.Wonderful
Posts: 98
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 3:52:52 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 3:16:21 AM, someloser wrote:
Margaret Sanger isn't the founder of feminism, let alone its modern iteration. She's mostly known for Planned Parenthood, and did not have any significant intellectual influence on the movement.

Wollstonecraft wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Woman over a century before Sanger was born.

"Modern" feminism only goes back to the 60s, at most.

She is the one who first coined the term "feminism" and is largely credited with the creation of the movement. "Modern" I suppose could be defined as anything post-dating 1950. In any case there hasn't been anything in the feminist movement that deviated from Sanger's original intent... if anything the current versions of SJW Feminism just build upon those foundations. All in all, it's not really a movement that allows for much original thought which is why more and more women are coming to see it as the misanthropic cult it really is. The only notable difference might be the increased tolerance for non-whites but realistically that only serves to put the proverbial lipstick on the pig that is the founding ideals of the movement. Sanger is still heralded as the founder of feminism and her works still serve as the blueprint of the feminist agenda. In fact, I doubt you can find a more ardent champion of Femist ideals in the past 60 years. She was the real deal.
Mr.Wonderful
Posts: 98
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 4:47:17 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 3:04:36 AM, Foodiesoul wrote:
Thanks a lot, Mr Wonderful. You just made me depressed and lose my faith in humanity! You also made me hate human beings even more! YES, I know that not all human beings are sexist! I'm not sexist! I don't discriminate against ANYONE!

So basically what you're saying is that the government is secretly sexist and wants males to be sad, miserable, and oppressed for the rest of their lives.

I feel like I should just kill myself so that I can get out of this stupid, miserable, and unfair world!

Well... that's good that you are starting to think on your own, but don't kill yourself... that's a knee-jerk reaction most people have when they first start questioning the truths of this world. The thing is the government doesn't love or hate anyone. It's a complex system of controls set in place to subvert the will of the many for the profit of the few... the government knows that for such controls to be effective they must silence dissent. Men have historically proven to be more formidable than women in direct physical conflict and that is of course what corrupt governments fear but men are easy to control using women as a catalyst. The big advantage to feminism as a weapon of social control is that women are far less likely to question their surroundings than men... though many more women are starting to... and men are more likely to listen to women than some totalitarian douche like Bush, Obama or Hillary.

The whole idea is to condition women to listen to the globalist propaganda (disguised as social justice) and use them to influence the men in their lives to do the government's bidding no matter how screwed up it might be. The added male inferiority (another total lie) preached by feminists just serves as icing on the cake of total social control. Since any person made to feel genuinely inferior is unlikely to rise up against their oppressors...
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 4:47:55 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 3:07:33 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 3:02:26 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 2:44:46 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:33:29 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:28:35 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:27:18 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:22:27 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 1:21:08 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:56:15 AM, YYW wrote:
At 7/11/2016 12:38:25 AM, bhakun wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:55:05 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 7/10/2016 9:40:49 PM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:

https://www.youtube.com...

PragerU, really?

It is an excellent source.

Its really not, its a conservative think tank. It only has a right wing perspective and so it doesnt really have any value to the opposite end of the spectrum. Its like a feminist using feminism.com as a source, or a Democrat using what Obama says as a source of information.

It has a perspective, yes, but that doesn't mean it's a bad source of information.
It has an obvious right-wing bias, so while yes it does provide information that information is often skewed or just incorrect.


Its goal is not to provide information and let people think what they want of that information like a non-partisan study, its goal to convert people to conservatism.

I take it this is a perspective you disagree with.

Btw. I am like the most left leaning guy on this site.

On the compass, I'm a -7, -7.

I think you might be biased too?
You are certainly not the most left wing if you are anti feminism and anti BLM, which Im pretty sure you are.

No. I am left wing. Like, really left wing. I'm just not a progressive, or a fool.

How left wing? Im actually curious.

Chomsky level.

Chomsky should be publicly executed.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Foodiesoul
Posts: 579
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 4:53:06 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 4:47:17 AM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:
At 7/11/2016 3:04:36 AM, Foodiesoul wrote:
Thanks a lot, Mr Wonderful. You just made me depressed and lose my faith in humanity! You also made me hate human beings even more! YES, I know that not all human beings are sexist! I'm not sexist! I don't discriminate against ANYONE!

So basically what you're saying is that the government is secretly sexist and wants males to be sad, miserable, and oppressed for the rest of their lives.

I feel like I should just kill myself so that I can get out of this stupid, miserable, and unfair world!

Well... that's good that you are starting to think on your own, but don't kill yourself... that's a knee-jerk reaction most people have when they first start questioning the truths of this world. The thing is the government doesn't love or hate anyone. It's a complex system of controls set in place to subvert the will of the many for the profit of the few... the government knows that for such controls to be effective they must silence dissent. Men have historically proven to be more formidable than women in direct physical conflict and that is of course what corrupt governments fear but men are easy to control using women as a catalyst. The big advantage to feminism as a weapon of social control is that women are far less likely to question their surroundings than men... though many more women are starting to... and men are more likely to listen to women than some totalitarian douche like Bush, Obama or Hillary.

The whole idea is to condition women to listen to the globalist propaganda (disguised as social justice) and use them to influence the men in their lives to do the government's bidding no matter how screwed up it might be. The added male inferiority (another total lie) preached by feminists just serves as icing on the cake of total social control. Since any person made to feel genuinely inferior is unlikely to rise up against their oppressors...

Well, I think feminism is starting to fade away because it's not even helping any good causes. It's just oppressing women and making women think they run the world, like Beyonce once said. Of course, I'm not saying males should dominate. I'm saying that both males and women should be treated equally.

I'm sure that feminism will die one day and be replaced with either masculism, egalitarianism, or both. It's time for men to be given equal rights just like women!

Equality MUST be served!
someloser
Posts: 1,377
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/11/2016 4:55:11 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/11/2016 3:52:52 AM, Mr.Wonderful wrote:
She is the one who first coined the term "feminism"
No, that was Fourier.

and is largely credited with the creation of the movement.
By?

"Modern" I suppose could be defined as anything post-dating 1950.
Yea second wave and onward.

In any case there hasn't been anything in the feminist movement that deviated from Sanger's original intent... if anything the current versions of SJW Feminism just build upon those foundations.
Modern feminism is largely built off hand-me-down critical theory from the Frankfurt school. Sanger might have been influential, but she wasn't anything like a founding member.

Sanger is still heralded as the founder of feminism and her works still serve as the blueprint of the feminist agenda.
No she's not lol.

In fact, I doubt you can find a more ardent champion of Femist ideals in the past 60 years. She was the real deal.
Kate Millett, Simone de Beauvoir, maybe Judith Butler, Valeria Solanas, etc.
Ego sum qui sum. Deus lo vult.

"America is ungovernable; those who served the revolution have plowed the sea." - Simon Bolivar

"A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as a healthy man of his bones. But if you break a nation's nationality it will think of nothing else but getting it set again." - George Bernard Shaw