Total Posts:29|Showing Posts:1-29
Jump to topic:

If We Ban . . .

SuperRobotWars
Posts: 3,906
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .
Minister Of Trolling
: At 12/6/2011 2:21:41 PM, badger wrote:
: ugly people should beat beautiful people ugly. simple! you'd be killing two birds with the one stone... women like violent men and you're making yourself more attractive, relatively. i met a blonde dude who was prettier than me not so long ago. he's not so pretty now! ha!
:
: ...and well, he wasn't really prettier than me. he just had nice hair.
Koopin
Posts: 12,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.
kfc
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/29/2010 11:08:46 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.

Source.
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
badger
Posts: 11,793
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/29/2010 11:09:31 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 11:08:46 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.

Source.

i'm fairly sure he's joking..
signature
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/29/2010 11:11:26 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 11:09:31 PM, badger wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:08:46 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.

Source.

i'm fairly sure he's joking..

Yeah, I couldn't find anything on the interwebs.
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
badger
Posts: 11,793
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/29/2010 11:16:03 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 11:11:26 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:09:31 PM, badger wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:08:46 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.

Source.

i'm fairly sure he's joking..

Yeah, I couldn't find anything on the interwebs.

obama wouldn't dare anyway. he's lucky he hasn't been assassinated already.
signature
FREEDO
Posts: 21,057
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/29/2010 11:16:33 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 11:11:26 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:09:31 PM, badger wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:08:46 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.

Source.

i'm fairly sure he's joking..

Yeah, I couldn't find anything on the interwebs.

It's true. Hold on, let me find it...
GRAND POOBAH OF DDO

fnord
badger
Posts: 11,793
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/29/2010 11:18:28 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 11:16:33 PM, FREEDO wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:11:26 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:09:31 PM, badger wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:08:46 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.

Source.

i'm fairly sure he's joking..

Yeah, I couldn't find anything on the interwebs.

It's true. Hold on, let me find it...

lies!
signature
Koopin
Posts: 12,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/30/2010 4:44:51 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 11:18:28 PM, badger wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:16:33 PM, FREEDO wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:11:26 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:09:31 PM, badger wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:08:46 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.

Source.

i'm fairly sure he's joking..

Yeah, I couldn't find anything on the interwebs.

It's true. Hold on, let me find it...

lies!

It is true. Read the link. http://tinyurl.com...
kfc
vardas0antras
Posts: 983
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/30/2010 4:48:12 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/30/2010 4:44:51 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:18:28 PM, badger wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:16:33 PM, FREEDO wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:11:26 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:09:31 PM, badger wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:08:46 PM, wjmelements wrote:
At 12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.

Source.

i'm fairly sure he's joking..

Yeah, I couldn't find anything on the interwebs.

It's true. Hold on, let me find it...

lies!

It is true. Read the link. http://tinyurl.com...

No ! I'll probably just gonna get rick rolled
"When he awoke in a tomb three days later he would actually have believed that he rose from the dead" FREEDO about the resurrection of Jesus Christ
J.Kenyon
Posts: 4,194
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/30/2010 4:52:29 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/30/2010 4:48:12 PM, vardas0antras wrote:
At 12/30/2010 4:44:51 PM, Koopin wrote:
It is true. Read the link. http://tinyurl.com...

No ! I'll probably just gonna get rick rolled

http://preview.tinyurl.com...

It certainly looks that way...
PoeJoe
Posts: 3,822
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/30/2010 4:57:04 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .

I'm acutely aware that you're joking, but... where in Twilight are there unrealistic representations of sex and human degradation?
Television Rot: http://tvrot.com...
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/30/2010 5:03:36 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/30/2010 4:57:04 PM, PoeJoe wrote:
At 12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .

I'm acutely aware that you're joking, but... where in Twilight are there unrealistic representations of sex and human degradation?

Really people? Are you really falling for this? First off, he banned it in 43 out of 50 states? Does that really make any logical sense?
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
PoeJoe
Posts: 3,822
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/30/2010 5:08:17 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/30/2010 5:03:36 PM, OreEle wrote:
At 12/30/2010 4:57:04 PM, PoeJoe wrote:
At 12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .

I'm acutely aware that you're joking, but... where in Twilight are there unrealistic representations of sex and human degradation?

Really people? Are you really falling for this? First off, he banned it in 43 out of 50 states? Does that really make any logical sense?

Ummmm... and I quote myself here, "I'm acutely aware that you're joking."
Television Rot: http://tvrot.com...
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/30/2010 5:12:47 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/30/2010 5:08:17 PM, PoeJoe wrote:
At 12/30/2010 5:03:36 PM, OreEle wrote:
At 12/30/2010 4:57:04 PM, PoeJoe wrote:
At 12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .

I'm acutely aware that you're joking, but... where in Twilight are there unrealistic representations of sex and human degradation?

Really people? Are you really falling for this? First off, he banned it in 43 out of 50 states? Does that really make any logical sense?

Ummmm... and I quote myself here, "I'm acutely aware that you're joking."

Sorry, not meant at you directly, but at everyone that is like "Is that true?" or "I think he's joking."

There should be no question about it. Maybe it is just the nature of forums, in that we can't see the tone that you speak in or any body language, but if people actually had a temporary thought that it might be true, kinda scares me a little.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
djsherin
Posts: 343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/31/2010 11:29:58 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 11:03:52 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 12/29/2010 10:01:15 PM, badger wrote:
who's banning porn!?

Obama just signed the law into effect for 43 of 50 states.

I think you mean 57 of the 50 states.
SuperRobotWars
Posts: 3,906
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/31/2010 12:03:50 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .
Minister Of Trolling
: At 12/6/2011 2:21:41 PM, badger wrote:
: ugly people should beat beautiful people ugly. simple! you'd be killing two birds with the one stone... women like violent men and you're making yourself more attractive, relatively. i met a blonde dude who was prettier than me not so long ago. he's not so pretty now! ha!
:
: ...and well, he wasn't really prettier than me. he just had nice hair.
SuperRobotWars
Posts: 3,906
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/1/2011 1:53:17 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
http://www.secularhumanism.org...
Minister Of Trolling
: At 12/6/2011 2:21:41 PM, badger wrote:
: ugly people should beat beautiful people ugly. simple! you'd be killing two birds with the one stone... women like violent men and you're making yourself more attractive, relatively. i met a blonde dude who was prettier than me not so long ago. he's not so pretty now! ha!
:
: ...and well, he wasn't really prettier than me. he just had nice hair.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/1/2011 2:13:17 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 1/1/2011 1:53:17 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
http://www.secularhumanism.org...

first subheading reads:

Feminist Positions

wat
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/1/2011 2:17:32 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/30/2010 4:57:04 PM, PoeJoe wrote:
At 12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .

I'm acutely aware that you're joking, but... where in Twilight are there unrealistic representations of sex and human degradation?

First, that it doesn't depict it very much at all. Yall know if girl doesn't put out she ain't keeping the attention of a vampire and a werewolf, let alone both.

Second, in real sex, unlike implied twilight sex, no one's junk sparkles unless you decorate it, and that's tacky and probably tastes bad.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
SuperRobotWars
Posts: 3,906
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/1/2011 2:42:15 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
http://www.ffeusa.org...
Minister Of Trolling
: At 12/6/2011 2:21:41 PM, badger wrote:
: ugly people should beat beautiful people ugly. simple! you'd be killing two birds with the one stone... women like violent men and you're making yourself more attractive, relatively. i met a blonde dude who was prettier than me not so long ago. he's not so pretty now! ha!
:
: ...and well, he wasn't really prettier than me. he just had nice hair.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/1/2011 2:45:08 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
*should read, a vampire or a werewolf, let alone both*
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/2/2011 4:42:57 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .

Well then we should ban Harry Potter for showing an unrealistic portrayal of the occult.
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
SuperRobotWars
Posts: 3,906
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/2/2011 6:44:10 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 1/2/2011 4:42:57 PM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .

Well then we should ban Harry Potter for showing an unrealistic portrayal of the occult.

And the same goes to Mormons . . .
Minister Of Trolling
: At 12/6/2011 2:21:41 PM, badger wrote:
: ugly people should beat beautiful people ugly. simple! you'd be killing two birds with the one stone... women like violent men and you're making yourself more attractive, relatively. i met a blonde dude who was prettier than me not so long ago. he's not so pretty now! ha!
:
: ...and well, he wasn't really prettier than me. he just had nice hair.
HatedeatH
Posts: 386
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2011 4:00:07 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
Have there ever been any arguments made that porn can decrease rape rates? Just curious if that is possible.
vardas0antras: If Muhammad is great then why didn't he stop 911 ?
gavin.ogden: He was too busy starting it.
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2011 4:22:03 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 1/1/2011 2:17:32 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
At 12/30/2010 4:57:04 PM, PoeJoe wrote:
At 12/29/2010 9:59:48 PM, SuperRobotWars wrote:
If we ban porn on the basis that they show unrealistic representations of sex, degrade those in it, and preventing people from pursuing relationships then we should ban romance novels as well for it in essence does the exact same thing . . .

I'm acutely aware that you're joking, but... where in Twilight are there unrealistic representations of sex and human degradation?

First, that it doesn't depict it very much at all. Yall know if girl doesn't put out she ain't keeping the attention of a vampire and a werewolf, let alone both.

Second, in real sex, unlike implied twilight sex, no one's junk sparkles unless you decorate it, and that's tacky and probably tastes bad.

I really hate that I'm gunnaargue about TWILIGHT, but I do want to clear something up (for some reason)

She wanted to fvck like in book 2 or something and the gay @ss sparkly freak pushed her away. j/s
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
Puck
Posts: 6,457
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2011 4:48:33 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 1/12/2011 4:00:07 AM, HatedeatH wrote:
Have there ever been any arguments made that porn can decrease rape rates? Just curious if that is possible.

You'd be hard pressed to find empirical proof. The best a study can probably do (and studies have shown this) is that increased Internet usage = decreased rape rates (U.S. state by state comparisons). Correlation, but you can't derive a causation from it.
CosmicAlfonzo
Posts: 5,955
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2011 11:02:27 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
You know what I find funny?

Porn is legal, but prostitution is illegal. They are the same damn thing.

It's as if a judge banged his gavel and said, "No! You may not have consensual sex with another in exchange for money!..... Unless... I can watch. Then it's ok."
Official "High Priest of Secular Affairs and Transient Distributor of Sonic Apple Seeds relating to the Reptilian Division of Paperwork Immoliation" of The FREEDO Bureaucracy, a DDO branch of the Erisian Front, a subdivision of the Discordian Back, a Limb of the Illuminatian Cosmic Utensil Corp