Championship Selection
 Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM Posted: 9 years ago Name who you've got for the Super Bowl and NCAA BCS Title Game.
Super Bowl Ravens VS Panthers Ravens-17 Panthers-26 NCAA BCS Tilte Game Oklahoma VS Florida Oklahoma-42 Florida-31 When Reach fell, I came. |
 Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
11/30/2008 5:09:48 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM, theitalianstallion wrote: Ravens and Panthers? Are you kidding me? Jets VS Cowboys Jets 21 - 42 Cowboys NCAA BCS Championship Oklahoma VS Florida Oklahoma 38 - 34 Florida -ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
11/30/2008 5:57:20 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 11/30/2008 5:09:48 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM, theitalianstallion wrote: Jets I can understand, but the Cowboys? The most inconsistent and overhyped team in the league. Also, neither of those teams are playoff tested; at least the Panthers have the core of their team from the '04 Super Bowl and '05 NFC Championship Game. When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/1/2008 2:24:09 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 11/30/2008 5:57:20 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:09:48 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM, theitalianstallion wrote: Look at Cowboys' last 3 games. Healthy Rome = Cowboy wins. -ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/1/2008 5:50:36 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/1/2008 2:24:09 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:57:20 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:09:48 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM, theitalianstallion wrote: True. I'm just not sold on their chemistry and ability to win under pressure. Also, you must look at their last 3 opponents; how many with winning records? 1, the Washington Redskins, who, in my eyes, are on the decline. When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/1/2008 6:06:33 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/1/2008 5:50:36 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/1/2008 2:24:09 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:57:20 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:09:48 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM, theitalianstallion wrote: They aren't necessarily. They have lost the ability to score points recently based on bad calls and stupid penalties. Jim Zorn will harp on that this week. The point is, though, that even if you are not sold on the Cowboys you must admit they legitimately CAN beat anyone. -ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/1/2008 6:29:06 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/1/2008 6:06:33 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 12/1/2008 5:50:36 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/1/2008 2:24:09 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:57:20 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:09:48 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM, theitalianstallion wrote: Haven't really watched the Redskins lately, only seen the highlights, so this is news to me. The Cowboys could beat most teams in the league bu t I can't see them beating The G-Men or the Titans. When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/1/2008 6:45:28 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/1/2008 6:29:06 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/1/2008 6:06:33 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 12/1/2008 5:50:36 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/1/2008 2:24:09 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:57:20 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:09:48 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM, theitalianstallion wrote: Titans haven't played anyone. Giants are overrated. -ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/2/2008 8:18:38 AM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/1/2008 6:45:28 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 12/1/2008 6:29:06 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/1/2008 6:06:33 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 12/1/2008 5:50:36 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/1/2008 2:24:09 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:57:20 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:09:48 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM, theitalianstallion wrote: That's exactly how I feel about the Cowboys. When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/2/2008 11:59:10 AM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/2/2008 8:18:38 AM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/1/2008 6:45:28 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 12/1/2008 6:29:06 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/1/2008 6:06:33 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 12/1/2008 5:50:36 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/1/2008 2:24:09 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:57:20 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 11/30/2008 5:09:48 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 11/30/2008 4:55:13 PM, theitalianstallion wrote: That's a decent point but even if their opponent aren't GREAT, they are GOOD (Cardinals, Giants, Redskins, Eagles, Bucs) -ManUtdRedSeal46 |
 Posts: 888
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/2/2008 12:46:02 PM Posted: 9 years ago basically I think that the Giants will probably be in and the Titans... however, for (a little bit) of a long shot guess, I'm going to go w/ Steelers vs. Buccaneers. However, I'm pulling for the Dolphins!!!!!!! They are ALREADY 6 wins above last year! Panthers have a shot as well. Same w/ Jets and Colts.
|
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/2/2008 1:01:55 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/2/2008 12:46:02 PM, Johnicle wrote: What about NCAA championship? Or do you not pay attention to college? When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 888
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/3/2008 7:11:42 PM Posted: 9 years ago What about NCAA championship? Or do you not pay attention to college? I really don't pay attention. Although I like the Longhorns. Maybe if there was a intelligent system with a playoff system I would watch. But there isn't so I don't care about it. |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/4/2008 5:56:25 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/3/2008 7:11:42 PM, Johnicle wrote:What about NCAA championship? Or do you not pay attention to college? I understand, but I sort of like the controversey that it creates. Then again, it hasn't really affected me yet, being a cornhusker fan and all; the system did give Nebraska a shot at a national title when they really didn't deserve it in '01. But they got stomped so there was no controversey. When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/4/2008 6:19:58 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/4/2008 5:56:25 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/3/2008 7:11:42 PM, Johnicle wrote:What about NCAA championship? Or do you not pay attention to college? I agree with both, there should be a 32 team playoff. Or 16. Personally I'd go for 32. -ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/5/2008 8:10:38 AM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/4/2008 6:19:58 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 12/4/2008 5:56:25 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/3/2008 7:11:42 PM, Johnicle wrote:What about NCAA championship? Or do you not pay attention to college? A 32 team playoff would take forever. It would at an additional five weeks on to the schedule for the winning teams; Just to much for college. 16 would be okay, but if a playoff system was but into place, I'd like to see an 8 team playoff. When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/5/2008 7:31:42 PM Posted: 9 years ago I agree with you that it would be long, but I think that is necessary to find the BEST team around. What if the number 9 team is the best? What if it's an untested team like Boise State?
-ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/8/2008 1:59:08 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/5/2008 7:31:42 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote: I see your point but I have a resolution. I think a 32 or 16 team playoff system would let far too many teams in and an 8 team playoff, like you say lets to few in. The NCAA should try something like this. 1-10 get in but the last four teams play a "qualifying game," before the tournament begins. 7 v 10 and 8 v 9. Those teams are the ones on the bubble and should be given a chance to compete, like you say. This gives the entire top 10 a chance to compete, and I think that is where the line should be drawn. When Reach fell, I came. |
 Posts: 120
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/8/2008 2:25:56 PM Posted: 9 years ago Giants vs. Titans
Giants-24 Titans-17 Alabama Oklahoma Alabama-10 Oklahoma-27 A man comes to a fork in a road. . He ends up going left where he is ran over by a car. Another person comes to the same fork and decides to right. He also gets ran over by a car. A third person comes to the same fork. He decides that walking up a road in the dark is not smart and takes the grassy middle of the fork. He survives. Moral: Don't be an extremist, neither side can be right all the time. Sometimes, you have to make your own path. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/8/2008 5:30:37 PM Posted: 9 years ago Ummmmmmmmmmmm.... crackofdawn... the Championship game is between Florida and Oklahoma. It's been decided. Not Alabama.
-ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/8/2008 5:37:18 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/8/2008 1:59:08 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/5/2008 7:31:42 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote: That's an acceptable view, more so than your last one. However I still don't think it accounts for everything. Going back to my example, Boise State is #9. They could just as easily be 11th. The current system has VERY CLOSE AND PRECISE measurements and calculations so why wouldn't they deserve it? I'm not saying I have a better bay but I think that if you somehow include the entire top 25 or at least 15 then it would be the best possible. That is why I think 16 is best. Easy number and not too many. Always welcome to disagree though ;) -ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/9/2008 2:57:59 PM Posted: 9 years ago At 12/8/2008 5:37:18 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote:At 12/8/2008 1:59:08 PM, theitalianstallion wrote:At 12/5/2008 7:31:42 PM, manutdredseal46 wrote: You are right on the "VERY CLOSE AND PRECISE" part, but letting in the entire top 25 wouldn't work for me; just look at the OU & MIZZOU BigIIV championship game. MIZZOU was ranked 20th and got obliterated; the 25th ranked team could not compete with a top 5 team. As for the 16 team playoff, I also think that is a little to much. I again site an OU game, the OSU game. Although not as in such dominant fashion, OU was able to beat OSU by 20 points, the No. 12 team in the country. When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/9/2008 2:59:36 PM Posted: 9 years ago Also, get the writer's vote out of the system; they're too "biased." Leave the computer and coaches' poll, nothing else, if the NCAA stays with this system.
When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/9/2008 7:06:39 PM Posted: 9 years ago Yes, but you can't tell me the opposite never happens. I don't have time to find out the specifics right now, nor do I have any evidence (sorry) but the opposite can easily happen. Again I go to Boise State. They would be one of your "bubble teams." Say they were 11th. They could be best in the country right now, nobody knows. Is it fair to discount them?
-ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/10/2008 1:09:54 PM Posted: 9 years ago Your right about the opposite happening but I think that is partially due to the writer's vote. They constantly overrate teams that clearly do not need to be a top ten team and leave out those that do. ex. Notre Dame (usually never deserving of their ranking but not lately) and Michigan State (always over shadowed by OSU and Mich.; MSU, not best example but best off the top of my head.)
When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/10/2008 1:11:41 PM Posted: 9 years ago I'm glad you agree but we haven't solved anything.
-ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/10/2008 1:49:52 PM Posted: 9 years ago And I don't think we'll solve anything.
When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/10/2008 1:50:48 PM Posted: 9 years ago Oh, do you still think my Panthers pick is a joke?
When Reach fell, I came. |
|
Posts: 189
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/10/2008 5:10:03 PM Posted: 9 years ago I'd give them first or second seed but they won't go as far as you think.
-ManUtdRedSeal46 |
|
Posts: 1,109
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
12/10/2008 5:35:49 PM Posted: 9 years ago They may not, but a No. 1 seed is way more than anyone expected from them.
When Reach fell, I came. |