Sedo - Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites project info: debate.org Statistics for project debate.org etracker® web controlling instead of log file analysis
Total Posts:31|Showing Posts:1-10|Last Page

"friends"

|
 
Frodobaggins
Posts: 602
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/19/2010 12:44:37 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
http://www.debate.org...

Every debate I had with him as johngriswald this guy seems to favor Korashk with 7 points, not to mention that Korashk seems to vote for himself despite my several PM's asking him to remove his votes because I did not have the ability to vote. Beware debating Korashk as he voted for himself at the last minute to clench the victory.

Tell me some other "friends" you notice voting together. This shall be the first attempt to make a DO NOT DEBATE LIST similar to the do not call list.

This needs to be done quickly before votes can be reversed.

Post your reasons and evidence

DO NOT DEBATE
1. Korashk
2. Chief-Examiner
Volkov
Posts: 9,074
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/19/2010 12:48:29 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 1/19/2010 12:47:29 PM, Logical-Master wrote:
lol, this voter tab is certainly going to make things more interesting on this site from now on.

How much do you want to bet mongeese/goose are going through every one of their debates right now?
http://www.debate.org...

Ron Paul fanboys! Who also like Sharron Angle!...?
Logical-Master
Posts: 2,076
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/19/2010 12:50:10 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 1/19/2010 12:48:29 PM, Volkov wrote:
At 1/19/2010 12:47:29 PM, Logical-Master wrote:
lol, this voter tab is certainly going to make things more interesting on this site from now on.

How much do you want to bet mongeese/goose are going through every one of their debates right now?

Mongeese is not online, although he shall no doubt do just that when he gets on. A good idea if you're interested I suppose.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 4,537
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/19/2010 12:52:38 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
I don't think it's necessary now because people will no longer even try fishing for votes if they know about the voting tab. I think voting will be a lot more fair from now on because someone does try to vote bomb, they'll be criticized for it in the comments section.
"I think the idea of a divine creator belittles the elegant reality of the Universe." -- Richard Dawkins

"This is what enlightenment is all about - a deep understanding that there is no problem. Then, with no problem to solve, what will you do? Immediately you start living. You will eat, you will sleep, you will love, you will work, you will have a chit-chat, you will sing, you will dance - what else is there to do?
-- OSHO
tkubok
Posts: 1,499
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/19/2010 12:54:15 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
Meh, i dont really mind these people who vote for themselves, or have friends who vote alongside them. Thanks to the new system which shows who voted for who, i am happy to see that my opponent felt the need to vote for himself in order to win, and am happy to know that everyone who sees it will see that too.

For example, my debate with Followhard. Im glad that i was able to crush him, but im even more so happy that i see that he had to vote for himself, whereas i didnt. Im also glad that he had a bunch of christian orgies in order to increase his vote count.
Frodobaggins
Posts: 602
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/19/2010 1:05:28 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
looking at debates of mongeese/mongoose I see that so far when they did vote in each others debates (15% roughly so far) they awarded about 4/3 points towards each other 100% of the time.

Not incredible biased IMO
Korashk
Posts: 2,068
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/19/2010 1:10:41 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 1/19/2010 12:44:37 PM, Frodobaggins wrote:
http://www.debate.org...

Every debate I had with him as johngriswald this guy seems to favor Korashk with 7 points, not to mention that Korashk seems to vote for himself despite my several PM's asking him to remove his votes because I did not have the ability to vote. Beware debating Korashk as he voted for himself at the last minute to clench the victory.

Tell me some other "friends" you notice voting together. This shall be the first attempt to make a DO NOT DEBATE LIST similar to the do not call list.

This needs to be done quickly before votes can be reversed.

Post your reasons and evidence

DO NOT DEBATE
1. Korashk
2. Chief-Examiner

Yes, Chief-Examiner is a friend of mine in real life. This should have nothing to do with how he votes. I will confront him about this tomorrow and if it is true that he voted for me because he's my friend I'll have to beat him up or something, if he claims otherwise I'll make him post an RFD on our 2 debates.

Also I do not see how voting for myself is cheating and you never sent me any messages about not voting for myself. If you actually had asked me not to I would not have. Lying is a poor way to make your point.

Also, I've checked all of my other debates and he hasn't even voted on more than half of them.
At 8/14/2010 2:50:39 PM, Reasoning wrote:
6. Can I be Uncle Ruckus?
Frodobaggins
Posts: 602
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/19/2010 1:13:13 PM
Posted: 7 months ago
At 1/19/2010 1:10:41 PM, Korashk wrote:
Yes, Chief-Examiner is a friend of mine in real life. This should have nothing to do with how he votes. I will confront him about this tomorrow and if it is true that he voted for me because he's my friend I'll have to beat him up or something, if he claims otherwise I'll make him post an RFD on our 2 debates.

Also I do not see how voting for myself is cheating and you never sent me any messages about not voting for myself. If you actually had asked me not to I would not have. Lying is a poor way to make your point.

Also, I've checked all of my other debates and he hasn't even voted on more than half of them.

I absolutely did. Do you remember the PM from Johngriswald "Hey I can't vote please remove your vote"

I got a return "Yeah sure no problem" Vote was removed, then you secretly added it back on.

He seemingly only voted for you in debates that you were in danger of losing.