Vote-bombers, I'm calling you out!

Alright, so the votes for past debates recently came out, and I decided to investigate to see who's been vote-bombing me constantly. Most of the voters were n00bs. However, I was very surprised at some of the vote-bombers.

The Debates:
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
Note that all debates listed here were pretty one-sided in the fact that I was the more-or-less obvious victor. Feel free to attempt to justify your votes.
Most of these were just the ones that I lost. There were many more that I won, but barely, due to more vote-bombs.

The Vote Bombers:

Vi_Veri – 9
SaintNick – 6
JBlake – 5
theLwerd – 5
Agnostic – 3
Gmoney – 3
LaSalle – 4
Comoncents – 3
Youngblood – 2
Numa – 2
Lwerd - 2

I dismissed all who seemed to vote-bomb me only once as just a situational misplacement.

So, any explanations for why SaintNick, JBlake, and comoncents all decided to vote-bomb me at about the same time two months ago? Or why Lwerd, a temporary account, was used to vote against me?

Of course, the easiest thing theLwerd could do to justify herself would be to cite evidence of any vote-bombing performed by myself against her. I wish her good luck in finding such evidence, because it does not exist.

I think that if there are going to be callout threads like these, that they should just be compiled in one big thread because I can seriously imagine Phil shutting down the voter tab based on how many flame wars are gonna arise. And I seriously don't want to lose the voter tab with the way I experiment with this site and all.

At 1/19/2010 2:11:42 PM, mongeese wrote:
Alright, so the votes for past debates recently came out, and I decided to investigate to see who's been vote-bombing me constantly. Most of the voters were n00bs. However, I was very surprised at some of the vote-bombers.

The Debates:
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.Debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
Note that all debates listed here were pretty one-sided in the fact that I was the more-or-less obvious victor. Feel free to attempt to justify your votes.
Most of these were just the ones that I lost. There were many more that I won, but barely, due to more vote-bombs.

The Vote Bombers:

Vi_Veri – 9
SaintNick – 6
JBlake – 5
theLwerd – 5
Agnostic – 3
Gmoney – 3
LaSalle – 4
Comoncents – 3
Youngblood – 2
Numa – 2
Lwerd - 2

I dismissed all who seemed to vote-bomb me only once as just a situational misplacement.

So, any explanations for why SaintNick, JBlake, and comoncents all decided to vote-bomb me at about the same time two months ago? Or why Lwerd, a temporary account, was used to vote against me?

Of course, the easiest thing theLwerd could do to justify herself would be to cite evidence of any vote-bombing performed by myself against her. I wish her good luck in finding such evidence, because it does not exist.

wow. Lwerd voted everything against you twice. Good thing we have this new voting thing to find the source of those pesky votebombers :)

I vote-bombed you when I first came on this site, I forget what we were arguing about. But I changed my votes back to zero after a little bit. I'm not sure why I didn't like you initially. No hard feelings.

I looked at a few of my debates as well, and Agnostic vote-bombed me quite a bit.

*crickets chirp as mongeese realizes that this thread is meaningless and is TL;DR not to mention that everyone would stop reading at JBlake being a votebomber and laugh then realize that mongeese got what he deserved and has learned his lesson and should think hard the next time he presses the report button on a prominent member*

At 1/19/2010 2:16:28 PM, Nags wrote:
I vote-bombed you when I first came on this site, I forget what we were arguing about. But I changed my votes back to zero after a little bit. I'm not sure why I didn't like you initially. No hard feelings.

We were arguing over some semantics problems and how heavy the burden is when a debater makes a prediction, as well as grammar stuff, but that's in the past now. I noticed all of the Tied votes.

I called it - I knew he would search through all of his debates and call out vote-bombers.

Lmao.

At 1/19/2010 2:30:12 PM, Volkov wrote:
I called it - I knew he would search through all of his debates and call out vote-bombers.

Lmao.

U wunt sum pointz?

At 1/19/2010 2:31:21 PM, Nags wrote:
U wunt sum pointz?

No, a hero cookie will suffice.

This voting thing will turn a lot of people against each other.