Macro evolution is abstract.

Like God macro evolution is something that can only be expressed in art form of what it may seem like. However without any evidence, you could draw a picture of what emotions macro evolution could flair up. Like some crazy random picture, but no actual animal drawing changing into another, all that is, is a couple of creatures together walking in one direction, probably into the Ark. It seems more so like that.

Macro evolution is micro evolution on another scale, but we know what micro evolution is like, was it looks like, smells like, tastes like, sounds like and feels like. Because of this only something abstract could express macro evolution because our senses cannot! Like God, our senses are useless to Him.

At 10/8/2009 3:38:39 PM, GodSands wrote:
Like God macro evolution is something that can only be expressed in art form of what it may seem like. However without any evidence, you could draw a picture of what emotions macro evolution could flair up. Like some crazy random picture, but no actual animal drawing changing into another, all that is, is a couple of creatures together walking in one direction, probably into the Ark. It seems more so like that.

Macro evolution is micro evolution on another scale, but we know what micro evolution is like, was it looks like, smells like, tastes like, sounds like and feels like. Because of this only something abstract could express macro evolution because our senses cannot! Like God, our senses are useless to Him.

What's the opposite of intelligent?

At 10/8/2009 3:38:39 PM, GodSands wrote:
Like God macro evolution is something that can only be expressed in art form of what it may seem like. However without any evidence, you could draw a picture of what emotions macro evolution could flair up. Like some crazy random picture, but no actual animal drawing changing into another, all that is, is a couple of creatures together walking in one direction, probably into the Ark. It seems more so like that.

Macro evolution is micro evolution on another scale, but we know what micro evolution is like, was it looks like, smells like, tastes like, sounds like and feels like. Because of this only something abstract could express macro evolution because our senses cannot! Like God, our senses are useless to Him.

Macroevolution is abstract, but it is not subjective. It has nothing to do with art or expression or subjectivity. You start out with one true statement, then your twisted, ignorant, mentally challenged mind warps it into something that makes no sense whatsoever.

That's like saying, 1+1=2, and therefore, peanuts ride ferris wheels while wearing funny hats.

/thread please.

At 10/8/2009 3:48:27 PM, leet4A1 wrote:
What's the opposite of intelligent?

The opening poster.

: At 10/8/2009 3:51:11 PM, Kleptin wrote:

At 10/8/2009 3:38:39 PM, GodSands wrote:
Like God macro evolution is something that can only be expressed in art form of what it may seem like. However without any evidence, you could draw a picture of what emotions macro evolution could flair up. Like some crazy random picture, but no actual animal drawing changing into another, all that is, is a couple of creatures together walking in one direction, probably into the Ark. It seems more so like that.

Macro evolution is micro evolution on another scale, but we know what micro evolution is like, was it looks like, smells like, tastes like, sounds like and feels like. Because of this only something abstract could express macro evolution because our senses cannot! Like God, our senses are useless to Him.

Macroevolution is abstract, but it is not subjective. It has nothing to do with art or expression or subjectivity. You start out with one true statement, then your twisted, ignorant, mentally challenged mind warps it into something that makes no sense whatsoever.

That's like saying, 1+1=2, and therefore, peanuts ride ferris wheels while wearing funny hats.

/thread please.

You could draw what you think macro evolution looks like. Like with God. Otherwise you think it, right?

Didn't understand the last part. Oh because it is abstract, it is not science. And yes macro evolution is objective like God. All issues which affect everyone are objective.

At 10/8/2009 4:00:03 PM, GodSands wrote:
Oh because it is abstract, it is not science.

Wrong.

Draw gravity. As a matter of fact, draw an atom. Draw a proton, or an electron. Draw electricity. Draw a black hole.

Every single thing I listed above, is something we cannot sense. Something we can only draw what we *think* it looks like.

Stop saying stupid things that you don't understand.

If you keep on LOSING at a GAME, it doesn't mean that your opponent is cheating, and it doesn't mean that the rules are wrong.

Chances are, YOU JUST SUCK AT THE GAME.

The game right now, is Science. YOU SUCK AT IT.

At 10/8/2009 4:18:23 PM, Kleptin wrote:

At 10/8/2009 4:00:03 PM, GodSands wrote:
Oh because it is abstract, it is not science.

Wrong.

Draw gravity. As a matter of fact, draw an atom. Draw a proton, or an electron. Draw electricity. Draw a black hole.

Every single thing I listed above, is something we cannot sense. Something we can only draw what we *think* it looks like.

Stop saying stupid things that you don't understand.

If you keep on LOSING at a GAME, it doesn't mean that your opponent is cheating, and it doesn't mean that the rules are wrong.

Chances are, YOU JUST SUCK AT THE GAME.

The game right now, is Science. YOU SUCK AT IT.

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Give a man religion, and he dies, praying for a fish.

In other words, those with religion will not stop until they are dead. Ditto to Godsands.