Mod Knowledge

At 4/17/2012 12:19:59 PM, royalpaladin wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:19:08 PM, Lickdafoot wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:13:52 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
You're one to talk, LDF. All of your relationships are a cover for the fact that you are this individual's lover: http://2.bp.blogspot.com...

freaks of nature need a little TLC too :(

Don't worry. :(

I'm sure we can find you someone :p

(That was mean. I'm sowwy. I didn't mean it. :( )

Don't worry, she's looking. She's already taken about every guy on DDO for a test run. (JK LDF, we love you!)

At 4/17/2012 12:21:38 PM, Mestari wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:19:59 PM, royalpaladin wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:19:08 PM, Lickdafoot wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:13:52 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
You're one to talk, LDF. All of your relationships are a cover for the fact that you are this individual's lover: http://2.bp.blogspot.com...

freaks of nature need a little TLC too :(

Don't worry. :(

I'm sure we can find you someone :p

(That was mean. I'm sowwy. I didn't mean it. :( )

Don't worry, she's looking. She's already taken about every guy on DDO for a test run. (JK LDF, we love you!)

She better not have taken you for a test run . . .

I'm jelly :(

At 4/17/2012 12:22:34 PM, royalpaladin wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:21:38 PM, Mestari wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:19:59 PM, royalpaladin wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:19:08 PM, Lickdafoot wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:13:52 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
You're one to talk, LDF. All of your relationships are a cover for the fact that you are this individual's lover: http://2.bp.blogspot.com...

freaks of nature need a little TLC too :(

Don't worry. :(

I'm sure we can find you someone :p

(That was mean. I'm sowwy. I didn't mean it. :( )

Don't worry, she's looking. She's already taken about every guy on DDO for a test run. (JK LDF, we love you!)

She better not have taken you for a test run . . .

I'm jelly :(

She wanted to and even asked to marry me. I told her no, of course. <3

At 4/17/2012 12:23:24 PM, Mestari wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:22:34 PM, royalpaladin wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:21:38 PM, Mestari wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:19:59 PM, royalpaladin wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:19:08 PM, Lickdafoot wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:13:52 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
You're one to talk, LDF. All of your relationships are a cover for the fact that you are this individual's lover: http://2.bp.blogspot.com...

freaks of nature need a little TLC too :(

Don't worry. :(

I'm sure we can find you someone :p

(That was mean. I'm sowwy. I didn't mean it. :( )

Don't worry, she's looking. She's already taken about every guy on DDO for a test run. (JK LDF, we love you!)

She better not have taken you for a test run . . .

I'm jelly :(

She wanted to and even asked to marry me. I told her no, of course. <3

<3

LOL. I <3 you guys.

(in spite of you not being the cutest.)

At 4/17/2012 12:40:16 PM, Lickdafoot wrote:
LOL. I <3 you guys.

(in spite of you not being the cutest.)

Even if you and TUF were to be, hypothetically speaking, cuter than Royal and Thett, you are not cuter by any measure than Royal and myself.

It's only unfair if the game is ongoing. I think it was F-16 that was modding me, when I was mafia (Mob Wars) and then used info on my playstyle to FOS me in another game (when I was town). Yet, I had no way to defend myself in the game I was town because I couldn't explain how F-16 reached his conclusion and why it was wrong.

It was an uncomfortable situation.

Other than that, I don't see how it's any different from gathering info by playing with someone in previous games (either as a fellow mafioso or townie).

At 4/17/2012 12:42:40 PM, Mestari wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:40:16 PM, Lickdafoot wrote:
LOL. I <3 you guys.

(in spite of you not being the cutest.)

Even if you and TUF were to be, hypothetically speaking, cuter than Royal and Thett, you are not cuter by any measure than Royal and myself.

Prove it.

At 4/17/2012 1:59:28 PM, TUF wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:42:40 PM, Mestari wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:40:16 PM, Lickdafoot wrote:
LOL. I <3 you guys.

(in spite of you not being the cutest.)

Even if you and TUF were to be, hypothetically speaking, cuter than Royal and Thett, you are not cuter by any measure than Royal and myself.

Prove it.

Your response being presented as defensive and serving to instigate a debate proves that you are insecure about the cuteness of your relationship with LDF and only will be confident about it if you can prove that it is superior to other relationships. Royal and I are secure about how cute we are so although we know we are cuter than you and LDF, we need not prove it to feel comfortable with ourselves. I think it is cuter to focus on your own relationship than the relationships of others. :p

At 4/17/2012 1:57:29 PM, bluesteel wrote:
It's only unfair if the game is ongoing. I think it was F-16 that was modding me, when I was mafia (Mob Wars) and then used info on my playstyle to FOS me in another game (when I was town). Yet, I had no way to defend myself in the game I was town because I couldn't explain how F-16 reached his conclusion and why it was wrong.

It was an uncomfortable situation.

Other than that, I don't see how it's any different from gathering info by playing with someone in previous games (either as a fellow mafioso or townie).

Yeah, this is what I was talking about regarding not using ongoing games. In Mob Wars, you were mafia godfather and acted just scummy enough to get investigated and as the mod, I knew it. However, in Ancap mafia, you were acting slightly scummy so I thought it was the same strategy but it turns out you were legit town.

At 4/17/2012 1:57:29 PM, bluesteel wrote:
It's only unfair if the game is ongoing. I think it was F-16 that was modding me, when I was mafia (Mob Wars) and then used info on my playstyle to FOS me in another game (when I was town). Yet, I had no way to defend myself in the game I was town because I couldn't explain how F-16 reached his conclusion and why it was wrong.

It was an uncomfortable situation.

Other than that, I don't see how it's any different from gathering info by playing with someone in previous games (either as a fellow mafioso or townie).

This is precisely what I'm talking about, but it makes sense that the statute of limitations would be merely the duration of the game. Once the game is over, then all knowledge is fair game, regardless of how it is obtained.

At 4/17/2012 2:03:35 PM, Mestari wrote:

At 4/17/2012 1:59:28 PM, TUF wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:42:40 PM, Mestari wrote:

At 4/17/2012 12:40:16 PM, Lickdafoot wrote:
LOL. I <3 you guys.

(in spite of you not being the cutest.)

Even if you and TUF were to be, hypothetically speaking, cuter than Royal and Thett, you are not cuter by any measure than Royal and myself.

Prove it.

Your response being presented as defensive and serving to instigate a debate proves that you are insecure about the cuteness of your relationship with LDF and only will be confident about it if you can prove that it is superior to other relationships. Royal and I are secure about how cute we are so although we know we are cuter than you and LDF, we need not prove it to feel comfortable with ourselves. I think it is cuter to focus on your own relationship than the relationships of others. :p

Ah, but then if all this is true, then you must see the fallacy your words hold. If you feel debate as to who is cuter, is not neccesary and presents insecurities, then why do you, my good sir, continue to try and flaunt the opinion that you and royal are specifically cuter than LDF and I? Because it seems to me as if you yourself are in fact doing the act of which you are telling me not to do in order to prove my cuteness with LDF above yours. In effect you, my good sir, are the hypocrite. I did not actively make an argument to you that mine and LDF's cuteness level is higher than yours, while you actively have made an argument that yours and royals in higher than LDF. So tell me friend, who then is the one who has instigated this debate? I simply feel that you, as the instigator of the debate, require the burden of proof, in order to sustain the position that royalpaladin and yourself are indeed cuter. While I am not actively instigating this debate, I am ready to stand by and defend the chalace that me and LDF have together. For it would be the reverse of "cute" to not defend the place in which you and your lover stand in a relationship status. I would then be, in fact, proving my cuteness level with LDF, by indubitably, and passionately proving the ways that we are cute, comparing them to that of a relationship which couples should tend to stay away from (That of mestari's and royals). I then, in the scenario presented, and proving that by not committing the relation ship acts committed by royal and mestari, am indeed in a healthy relationship with LDF, satisfying both the mental and physical needs of both myself and my partner.

So intelligently, your argument collapses as hypocritical, and overall a logical fallacy. ;-)