At 7/29/2012 7:06:23 PM, caveat wrote:
I don't see how you're possibly equating the death of a cop to the death of a vanilla.
It's also the mislynch of the only
relevant investigative role.
With the amount of suspicion on her, I doubt anyone would have believed her results.
The case against her was transparent, but everyone followed you, as they usually do.
They followed me because I presented a case for her lynch. Why are you upset that I can persuade people as TOWN? Most of the time, we lynch mafia. I rarely actually lead mislynches. I think this was the second or third time in my entire mafia playing on this site leading a mislynch as town. The first was LDF in Death-in-Mystere.
You weren't buying the argument against Budda. If you had simply voted Budda, we would have won. FT would have come in and added his vote as well.
So, is it really my fault that town lost? Or the fault of people who were buying Budda's argument?
After I died, you didn't once question Budda or try to lynch him.
He claimed an IMPOSSIBLE role. How was that not obvious? It was a bit ambiguous on DP2, but after I died, Budda came up with an even more outrageous claim and ran rampant throughout the town with everyone at his beck and call especially you Caveat. You didn't want to listen to me just for the heck of it? Or because people usually listen? People usually listen to good arguments.
FT COUNTERCLAIMED HCP. I was wrong about affiliation but I was right that it was a counterclaim. HCP admitted to this. So, all the people arguing that it wasn't a counterclaim are wrong.
I am just pissed Medic vigged me. If he hadn't we would almost certainly have won.
Everytime I make a mistake I get fried for it for whatever reason. I led a mislynch in Death-in-Mystere and then zoned in on the 2 remaining mafia offering a plethora of evidence. All Royal (town) did was go after me for leading a mislynch.