Political Graphs

Can someone pull out the link to the "Political Graphs" topic that was made a long time ago. I've looked on every page but can't find it. I was just going to say that DDO makes people more liberal. This is the political graph when I first took the test which was during the time that topic was popular: http://politicalcompass.org...

Then I took it today and found that I was different.
http://www.politicalcompass.org...

You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

You're a genuine @$$hole. I find it annoying how you try to put down people developing their political opinions as though yours are any more matured :p

At 3/19/2012 6:34:28 PM, 000ike wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

You're a genuine @$$hole. I find it annoying how you try to put down people developing their political opinions as though yours are any more matured :p

Do you have any objective standard by which you measure somebody an "@sshole?" If not, then I would suggest that you screw off.

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

At 3/19/2012 6:36:30 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:34:28 PM, 000ike wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

You're a genuine @$$hole. I find it annoying how you try to put down people developing their political opinions as though yours are any more matured :p

Do you have any objective standard by which you measure somebody an "@sshole?" If not, then I would suggest that you screw off.

rofl what is this? Calling you an @sshole did not imply that such behavior had an objective basis. By the rude, inconsiderate, and aggressive nature of your comment, I think most people would agree that you're acting like an @$$hole.

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

At 3/19/2012 6:39:48 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

Alright, just let me pick up my thinking cap. I seem to have lost it when I rebound, stunned at your comment, my dear friend.

At 3/19/2012 6:39:28 PM, 000ike wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:36:30 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:34:28 PM, 000ike wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

You're a genuine @$$hole. I find it annoying how you try to put down people developing their political opinions as though yours are any more matured :p

Do you have any objective standard by which you measure somebody an "@sshole?" If not, then I would suggest that you screw off.

rofl what is this? Calling you an @sshole did not imply that such behavior had an objective basis. By the rude, inconsiderate, and aggressive nature of your comment, I think most people would agree that you're acting like an @$$hole.

For an accusation to be true, there needs to be an objective basis to decide on the validity of the accusation.

People "saying" whether I am an @sshole or not is irrelevant as that is a subjective basis, not an objective basis.

At 3/19/2012 6:41:16 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:48 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

Alright, just let me pick up my thinking cap. I seem to have lost it when I rebound, stunned at your comment, my dear friend.

I would love for you to put on your thinking cap. Perhaps it will make your comments a little more intelligent.

At 3/19/2012 6:42:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:41:16 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:48 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

Alright, just let me pick up my thinking cap. I seem to have lost it when I rebound, stunned at your comment, my dear friend.

I would love for you to put on your thinking cap. Perhaps it will make your comments a little more intelligent.

No, I would love to see you put on yours. That taste of bitterness should keep off your tongue, otherwise you sound as trenchant as the sound of a falling axe.

At 3/19/2012 6:43:36 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:42:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:41:16 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:48 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

Alright, just let me pick up my thinking cap. I seem to have lost it when I rebound, stunned at your comment, my dear friend.

I would love for you to put on your thinking cap. Perhaps it will make your comments a little more intelligent.

No, I would love to see you put on yours. That taste of bitterness should keep off your tongue, otherwise you sound as trenchant as the sound of a falling axe.

Still waiting for your justification of a "libertarian fascist."

At 3/19/2012 6:44:34 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:43:36 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:42:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:41:16 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:48 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

Alright, just let me pick up my thinking cap. I seem to have lost it when I rebound, stunned at your comment, my dear friend.

I would love for you to put on your thinking cap. Perhaps it will make your comments a little more intelligent.

No, I would love to see you put on yours. That taste of bitterness should keep off your tongue, otherwise you sound as trenchant as the sound of a falling axe.

Still waiting for your justification of a "libertarian fascist."

It need not justification, my friend.

At 3/19/2012 6:41:55 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:28 PM, 000ike wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:36:30 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:34:28 PM, 000ike wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

You're a genuine @$$hole. I find it annoying how you try to put down people developing their political opinions as though yours are any more matured :p

Do you have any objective standard by which you measure somebody an "@sshole?" If not, then I would suggest that you screw off.

rofl what is this? Calling you an @sshole did not imply that such behavior had an objective basis. By the rude, inconsiderate, and aggressive nature of your comment, I think most people would agree that you're acting like an @$$hole.

For an accusation to be true, there needs to be an objective basis to decide on the validity of the accusation.

People "saying" whether I am an @sshole or not is irrelevant as that is a subjective basis, not an objective basis.

Wow, you really can't sustain a logically coherent argument.

Most people would agree that you're acting like an @$$hole. That's the extent of my accusation.

At 3/19/2012 6:45:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:44:34 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:43:36 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:42:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:41:16 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:48 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

Alright, just let me pick up my thinking cap. I seem to have lost it when I rebound, stunned at your comment, my dear friend.

I would love for you to put on your thinking cap. Perhaps it will make your comments a little more intelligent.

No, I would love to see you put on yours. That taste of bitterness should keep off your tongue, otherwise you sound as trenchant as the sound of a falling axe.

Still waiting for your justification of a "libertarian fascist."

It need not justification, my friend.

No, you are just avoiding the point.

YOU called me a libertarian fascist and thus you have the BOP to prove that I am such and that such exist.

Pathetic.

At 3/19/2012 6:45:16 PM, 000ike wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:41:55 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:28 PM, 000ike wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:36:30 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:34:28 PM, 000ike wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

You're a genuine @$$hole. I find it annoying how you try to put down people developing their political opinions as though yours are any more matured :p

Do you have any objective standard by which you measure somebody an "@sshole?" If not, then I would suggest that you screw off.

rofl what is this? Calling you an @sshole did not imply that such behavior had an objective basis. By the rude, inconsiderate, and aggressive nature of your comment, I think most people would agree that you're acting like an @$$hole.

For an accusation to be true, there needs to be an objective basis to decide on the validity of the accusation.

People "saying" whether I am an @sshole or not is irrelevant as that is a subjective basis, not an objective basis.

Wow, you really can't sustain a logically coherent argument.

Most people would agree that you're acting like an @$$hole. That's the extent of my accusation.

Very nice rebuttal.

At 3/19/2012 6:46:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:45:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:44:34 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:43:36 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:42:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:41:16 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:48 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

Alright, just let me pick up my thinking cap. I seem to have lost it when I rebound, stunned at your comment, my dear friend.

I would love for you to put on your thinking cap. Perhaps it will make your comments a little more intelligent.

No, I would love to see you put on yours. That taste of bitterness should keep off your tongue, otherwise you sound as trenchant as the sound of a falling axe.

Still waiting for your justification of a "libertarian fascist."

It need not justification, my friend.

No, you are just avoiding the point.

YOU called me a libertarian fascist and thus you have the BOP to prove that I am such and that such exist.

Pathetic.

I'd rather say that I looked to you, in morsels, over a whole to stitch those two parts together.

As for the pathetic part, why thank you? I do not like making comments on the political state or ideologies...

At 3/19/2012 6:48:24 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:46:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:45:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:44:34 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:43:36 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:42:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:41:16 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:48 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

Alright, just let me pick up my thinking cap. I seem to have lost it when I rebound, stunned at your comment, my dear friend.

I would love for you to put on your thinking cap. Perhaps it will make your comments a little more intelligent.

No, I would love to see you put on yours. That taste of bitterness should keep off your tongue, otherwise you sound as trenchant as the sound of a falling axe.

Still waiting for your justification of a "libertarian fascist."

It need not justification, my friend.

No, you are just avoiding the point.

YOU called me a libertarian fascist and thus you have the BOP to prove that I am such and that such exist.

Pathetic.

I'd rather say that I looked to you, in morsels, over a whole to stitch those two parts together.

As for the pathetic part, why thank you? I do not like making comments on the political state or ideologies...

That's not an argument.

Kthnxbye

Started out literally at the middle (moderate) aka (0,0)

Now..
http://www.debate.org...

Ike, I think LKs objection stems from rather than you saying "you're an arsehole", you said "you're a genuine arsehole" which has that extra level of objectivity.

At 3/19/2012 6:48:55 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:48:24 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:46:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:45:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:44:34 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:43:36 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:42:27 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:41:16 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:39:48 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:37:26 PM, Man-is-good wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

Lol, so says the 19 year old libertarian fascist.

Care to explain to anyone how libertarian fascists can exist?

I would LOVE to hear your explanation.

GO!

Alright, just let me pick up my thinking cap. I seem to have lost it when I rebound, stunned at your comment, my dear friend.

I would love for you to put on your thinking cap. Perhaps it will make your comments a little more intelligent.

No, I would love to see you put on yours. That taste of bitterness should keep off your tongue, otherwise you sound as trenchant as the sound of a falling axe.

Still waiting for your justification of a "libertarian fascist."

It need not justification, my friend.

No, you are just avoiding the point.

YOU called me a libertarian fascist and thus you have the BOP to prove that I am such and that such exist.

Pathetic.

I'd rather say that I looked to you, in morsels, over a whole to stitch those two parts together.

As for the pathetic part, why thank you? I do not like making comments on the political state or ideologies...

That's not an argument.

Kthnxbye

It was not intended to. Obviously, I am dancing around you in circles.

And cheerio. You seem eligible for a new member whom I can antagonize...without using a single thought.:)

At 3/19/2012 6:50:58 PM, Thaddeus wrote:
Ike, I think LKs objection stems from rather than you saying "you're an arsehole", you said "you're a genuine arsehole" which has that extra level of objectivity.

No, my objection is that since there is no objective way to qualify and quantify if someone is an "@sshole," then the insult has no meaning.

At 3/19/2012 6:52:56 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:50:58 PM, Thaddeus wrote:
Ike, I think LKs objection stems from rather than you saying "you're an arsehole", you said "you're a genuine arsehole" which has that extra level of objectivity.

No, my objection is that since there is no objective way to qualify and quantify if someone is an "@sshole," then the insult has no meaning.

It seems this conversation is too magnetic for you to turn aside from....apparently...

Man-is-good, please tell me how I am a "libertarian fascist."

If not, then screw off.

At 3/19/2012 6:52:56 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:50:58 PM, Thaddeus wrote:
Ike, I think LKs objection stems from rather than you saying "you're an arsehole", you said "you're a genuine arsehole" which has that extra level of objectivity.

No, my objection is that since there is no objective way to qualify and quantify if someone is an "@sshole," then the insult has no meaning.

The word does not have to objective in meaning (no words are - their meanings are not metaphysical). However, it can be qualified and quantified. For example we could define arsehole as "occasionally displays aggressive and boorish behaviour". A quick analysis would determine whether that was true or false.

At 3/19/2012 6:31:00 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You don't understand politics, let alone have a radical viewpoint.

In the spirit of the weekly holiday you're celebrating on DDO, your name for this week will be, for the same intents and purposes, Jewbutt.

At 3/19/2012 7:00:43 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
Man-is-good, please tell me how I am a "libertarian fascist."

If not, then screw off.

MIG just likes oxymorons. They appeal to his aesthetic nature.

At 3/19/2012 7:01:07 PM, Thaddeus wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:52:56 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:50:58 PM, Thaddeus wrote:
Ike, I think LKs objection stems from rather than you saying "you're an arsehole", you said "you're a genuine arsehole" which has that extra level of objectivity.

No, my objection is that since there is no objective way to qualify and quantify if someone is an "@sshole," then the insult has no meaning.

The word does not have to objective in meaning (no words are - their meanings are not metaphysical). However, it can be qualified and quantified. For example we could define arsehole as "occasionally displays aggressive and boorish behaviour". A quick analysis would determine whether that was true or false.

Yes, however there really is no way in which you can determine whether behaviour is "aggressive" and "boorish" as everybody has their own opinion on this matter and everybody thinks differently of what classifies this behaviours. Hence, there being a lack of objective measurement.

At 3/19/2012 7:04:01 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 7:01:07 PM, Thaddeus wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:52:56 PM, Lordknukle wrote:

At 3/19/2012 6:50:58 PM, Thaddeus wrote:
Ike, I think LKs objection stems from rather than you saying "you're an arsehole", you said "you're a genuine arsehole" which has that extra level of objectivity.

No, my objection is that since there is no objective way to qualify and quantify if someone is an "@sshole," then the insult has no meaning.

The word does not have to objective in meaning (no words are - their meanings are not metaphysical). However, it can be qualified and quantified. For example we could define arsehole as "occasionally displays aggressive and boorish behaviour". A quick analysis would determine whether that was true or false.

Yes, however there really is no way in which you can determine whether behaviour is "aggressive" and "boorish" as everybody has their own opinion on this matter and everybody thinks differently of what classifies this behaviours. Hence, there being a lack of objective measurement.

We just keep defining terms until we have an answer.

Someone should save the link of this thread. It's the perfect evidence that the forum post qualities are much lower than before, and that these kind of threads might easily make everything worse here in the future.