Total Posts:71|Showing Posts:1-10|Last Page

The Fort Hood massacre

|
 
comoncents
Posts: 1,137
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2009 9:21:30 AM
Posted: 2 weeks ago
War is hard, even harder when the cause is not justified but anything more then a "what if".

I was in the army for 4 years, and was the medical personnel's that dealt with people going and coming.
There is no coming together for a cause that our own common sense cannot fathom, (as soldiers).
Ignorant people will try to down play this by saying that he was Muslim, that he was crazy, and that he was not an American.
But he was an American, he was a Major in the United States Army, and he was a psychiatrist that dealt with everyone coming back for theater, hurt by everything going on over there.

And if you do not know, a Major in the Army is a guy who has got it all together. To get that position in the army is extremely hard and only for the strong-minded.

You may never understand what really happened, you might brush it off as a crazy person being crazy, you may never realize the pain that comes from this, but I do.

I am sorry for him, for our troops, for his family, and for the family of all of the victims.
It is a sad day that our country, no, our president, will never really realize the truth of what is going on in the Military.

Pull our troops out!
Stop the nonsense!
Admit we were wrong, and correct!
Pull our troops out!!!
Luck is something you make, not something that just happens!

America is a Constitution-based federal republic with a strong democratic tradition.
mattrodstrom
Posts: 291
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2009 10:01:30 AM
Posted: 2 weeks ago
At 11/6/2009 9:21:30 AM, comoncents wrote:
War is hard, even harder when the cause is not justified but anything more then a "what if".

I was in the army for 4 years, and was the medical personnel's that dealt with people going and coming.
There is no coming together for a cause that our own common sense cannot fathom, (as soldiers).
Ignorant people will try to down play this by saying that he was Muslim, that he was crazy, and that he was not an American.
But he was an American, he was a Major in the United States Army, and he was a psychiatrist that dealt with everyone coming back for theater, hurt by everything going on over there.

And if you do not know, a Major in the Army is a guy who has got it all together. To get that position in the army is extremely hard and only for the strong-minded.

You may never understand what really happened, you might brush it off as a crazy person being crazy, you may never realize the pain that comes from this, but I do.

I am sorry for him, for our troops, for his family, and for the family of all of the victims.
It is a sad day that our country, no, our president, will never really realize the truth of what is going on in the Military.

Pull our troops out!
Stop the nonsense!
Admit we were wrong, and correct!
Pull our troops out!!!

Commoncents, I have to disagree.
Regardless of whether or not you, I, he, or muslims think that we ought to be in Iraq and Afghanistan, killing random people is not a solution.
Perhaps he could have gotten a discharge.
Perhaps he could have made a big stink in the media.
Perhaps he could even tried have led some kind of revolution to oust those wrongdoers at the top.
All of these actions would have been more justifiable than just shooting random people.
Yes he shot military people. Essentially in the back. When they trusted him.
The fact that they're military doesn't mean they're free game, they deserve rights just as do any others.
In fact if he may very well have been able to talk to those he killed, and get them to understand and support his point of view.

I too feel bad for him, being a psychiatrist in that field cannot be an easy thing to do. Being a Muslim who objects to the current conflict, while serving in the armed forces cannot be an easy thing to do. Serving in the forces is in itself an easy thing to do.
Killing random people is and it serves no purpose whatsoever.
I think they ought to hang him.
mattrodstrom
Posts: 291
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2009 10:05:01 AM
Posted: 2 weeks ago
At 11/6/2009 10:01:30 AM, mattrodstrom wrote:
At 11/6/2009 9:21:30 AM, comoncents wrote:
War is hard, even harder when the cause is not justified but anything more then a "what if".

I was in the army for 4 years, and was the medical personnel's that dealt with people going and coming.
There is no coming together for a cause that our own common sense cannot fathom, (as soldiers).
Ignorant people will try to down play this by saying that he was Muslim, that he was crazy, and that he was not an American.
But he was an American, he was a Major in the United States Army, and he was a psychiatrist that dealt with everyone coming back for theater, hurt by everything going on over there.

And if you do not know, a Major in the Army is a guy who has got it all together. To get that position in the army is extremely hard and only for the strong-minded.

You may never understand what really happened, you might brush it off as a crazy person being crazy, you may never realize the pain that comes from this, but I do.

I am sorry for him, for our troops, for his family, and for the family of all of the victims.
It is a sad day that our country, no, our president, will never really realize the truth of what is going on in the Military.

Pull our troops out!
Stop the nonsense!
Admit we were wrong, and correct!
Pull our troops out!!!



Commoncents, I have to disagree.
Regardless of whether or not you, I, he, or muslims think that we ought to be in Iraq and Afghanistan, killing random people is not a solution.
Perhaps he could have gotten a discharge.
Perhaps he could have made a big stink in the media.
Perhaps he could even tried have led some kind of revolution to oust those wrongdoers at the top.
All of these actions would have been more justifiable than just shooting random people.
Yes he shot military people. Essentially in the back. When they trusted him.
The fact that they're military doesn't mean they're free game, they deserve rights just as do any others.
In fact if he may very well have been able to talk to those he killed, and get them to understand and support his point of view.

I too feel bad for him, being a psychiatrist in that field cannot be an easy thing to do. Being a Muslim who objects to the current conflict, while serving in the armed forces cannot be an easy thing to do. Serving in the forces is in itself *NOT* an easy thing to do.
Killing random people is and it serves no purpose whatsoever.
I think they ought to hang him.
comoncents
Posts: 1,137
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2009 10:16:33 AM
Posted: 2 weeks ago

Commoncents, I have to disagree.
Regardless of whether or not you, I, he, or muslims think that we ought to be in Iraq and Afghanistan, killing random people is not a solution.

Whoooow, i do not condone that at all... At All!

Perhaps he could have gotten a discharge.

He could not be discharged, or it would have been extremely difficult

Perhaps he could have made a big stink in the media.

He would have gotten in a lot of trouble , and possible jail time.

Perhaps he could even tried have led some kind of revolution to oust those wrongdoers at the top.

I agree!

All of these actions would have been more justifiable than just shooting random people.

I agree!

Yes he shot military people. Essentially in the back. When they trusted him.
The fact that they're military doesn't mean they're free game, they deserve rights just as do any others.
In fact if he may very well have been able to talk to those he killed, and get them to understand and support his point of view.


OK.

I too feel bad for him, being a psychiatrist in that field cannot be an easy thing to do. Being a Muslim who objects to the current conflict, while serving in the armed forces cannot be an easy thing to do. Serving in the forces is in itself an easy thing to do.
Killing random people is and it serves no purpose whatsoever.
I think they ought to hang him.

I think for sure he should get the death penalty but i am looking at it from a deeper point of view then most.
I think what he did was extremely wrong, and he should die for it.
But his story brings truth to how our soldiers feel about a war that makes not sense other then the "What if" factor.

This deeply saddens me... the whole thing.

Soldiers going to war for useless causes.
Soldiers dying here, there.
Soldiers unable to be heard.
Soldiers honored in the public eye, then stabbed in the back by the very government we are sworn to protect.

How easy it is for a president to just pull the trigger, having the ability to sleep sound the very night they pulled that trigger.
Luck is something you make, not something that just happens!

America is a Constitution-based federal republic with a strong democratic tradition.
comoncents
Posts: 1,137
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2009 10:17:16 AM
Posted: 2 weeks ago
At 11/6/2009 10:06:39 AM, mattrodstrom wrote:
Correction:
"Serving in the forces is in itself *NOT*an easy thing to do."

I know, i have done it.
Luck is something you make, not something that just happens!

America is a Constitution-based federal republic with a strong democratic tradition.
mattrodstrom
Posts: 291
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2009 10:37:32 AM
Posted: 2 weeks ago
I agree that the realities of war are taken way too lightly, and that these current conflicts are rather hard to justify considering those realities.

Now as to whether or not Iraq was ever pressing before: no
Aghanistan after 9.11: a little
Iraq now: a little

It isn't in our Natnl. interest, and is dangerous, to have such very unstable countries around. It is in our interest to have them be stable.

It is not in our interest to send our people over there to kill and be killed, and to harm their well being. And this should be taken most seriously when weighing what we ought to do.

I would rather we didn't have such a big standing army, to tempt such big scale international efforts. If instead State Militia's were the main body of forces who could be directed by the Pres. in times of great national need, I think it would be considerably harder to so easily commit troops to non-pressing conflicts.
wonderwoman
Posts: 295
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/14/2009 10:09:35 PM
Posted: 5 days ago
pulling out the troops and stopping support is exactly what phucked us over in the first place.

Charlie Wilson's War enough said
Life is pain princess, anyone who tells you different is selling something.
theLwerd
Posts: 3,353
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/15/2009 12:03:11 PM
Posted: 5 days ago
At 11/14/2009 10:09:35 PM, wonderwoman wrote:
pulling out the troops and stopping support is exactly what phucked us over in the first place.

Charlie Wilson's War enough said

So what? Sending more troops hasn't always worked and hasn't always been necessary.

-- In the Revolutionary War, Washington asked Congress to increase the size of his army. Instead, he had to rely on the states which raised far fewer than the 88 battalions promised. Washington still won.

-- In the War of 1812, generals were hesitant to attack the British in Canada without an influx of troops. More were OK'd, but it ended in a draw.

-- During the Civil War, after General McClellan kept asking for more troops, Lincoln fired him (and still won).

-- Similarly, during the Korean War, General MacArthur kept asking for more troops. He was fired, and the war ended in a stalemate.

-- In Vietnam, president Johnson let General Westmoreland raise troop levels from 184,000 to over 500,000. We all know how the Vietnam war ended, so yeah.
MistahKurtz
Posts: 257
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2009 10:30:42 AM
Posted: 4 days ago
It enrages me to no extent to hear people calling this a terrorist attack. It makes my blood boil to the point of aneurysm when the talking heads suggest background checks for all Muslims serving in the military.

Let me first point out that while serving, Nidal Milk Hasan was actually targeted -because- of his religion by other servicemen. Because of this, and because of his war weariness, he filed to get a discharge, which he did not receive. He gave a presentation that included the idea that the army "should allow Muslims [sic] Soldiers the option of being released as "Conscientious objectors" to increase troop morale and decrease adverse events."

This shooting was an unintentional failing of an army stretched to the brink. To some extent, it was religiously motivated insofar as an American solider may have been disenchanted by attacking churches in North Vietnam. There's something unsettling about having to attack, or to be complacent in attacking your own religion. Furthermore, Islam advocates, above all else, a kinship between brothers of the faith.

That's not to say that what he did was right. What he did was reprehensible and disgusting. At the same time, the man was obviously not in his right mind. He saw the army as the enemy; the force that killed thousands of his brothers in the faith (I, of course, am speaking only of civilians) and the force that would not let him leave, forcing him to watch the byproducts of war.

This event is a tragedy and should be seen as a learning tool for dealing with religious sensitivity and post traumatic stress disorder. To call it anything else is disingenuous and disgusting.