P1 - Extrapolation of evidence is used (as evidence) to justify theories
P2 - Microevolution has substantial evidence
C1 - There is evidence of Macroevolution
P3 - Extrapolation of microevolution results is reliable
C2 - The evidence for Macroevolution is reliable.
Questions, Queries, Comments?
Total Posts:4|Showing Posts:1-4
Evidence for macroevolution
|
 Posts: 4,081
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/13/2012 10:37:19 AM Posted: 1 year ago |
 Posts: 15,182
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/13/2012 11:08:05 AM Posted: 1 year ago Eh, I think even referencing extrapoluation opens the window for a slippery slope, nor is it necessary. There is plenty of direct evidence of "macro"evolution (evolution at and above the species level).
|
 Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/13/2012 11:04:38 PM Posted: 1 year ago Excellent. I will see if i can modify it. It looks fairly sound.
Wall of Fail Devil worship much? - SD Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD "you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler |
 Posts: 4,064
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/14/2012 12:38:35 AM Posted: 1 year ago We tend to overlook that all aspects of articial selection, are proofs or natural selection.. Remember it is us that give the name of what we do artificial, this causes us to forget that we really are apart of nature. Aka, we are Natural, That makes us part of the enviroment of other species. This is a natural explanation of its own.
"All the same, it could be that I am mistaken, and what I take for Gold and Diamonds is perhaps nothing but a bit of copper and glass." "I know how much we are prone to err in what affects us, and also how much the Judgments made by our friends should be distrusted when these Judgments in our favor." Rene Descartes |