At 6/28/2011 7:28:05 AM, askbob wrote:
You need not apologized, you summarized, i didn't have to waste my time reading you lost precious moments of your life for me and I gained them.
I guess you used up all your grammar on your project. Brb have to work on super complicated excel spreadsheet for my honors undergraduate degree in finance (fe-nans).
Shifting the goalposts. Also nice rebuttal of 1 and 2. Oh wait you didn't rebut them because you're not serious. Don't waste my time k? Kind of defeats the purpose of asking Juggle to remove troll accounts if you're just going to troll too.
"same level as pedophiles"
In that it is a severe "level" of abuse. If I say being kicked in the balls is "on the same level" as taking a baseball bat to the stomach, I don't mean they're literally the same, or that one isn't systematically found subjectively worse than the other.
They're not "on the same level"
Good thing you have an argument for that.
and pointing out that SOME PEOPLE would prefer poor being molested to being around second hand smoke does not prove your point that it is. It just proves that people are willing to compare experiences that they've never suffered through. Not that they're on the same level or even comparable.
Guess you're just going to nitpick my argument. I don't see why never having experienced either of these things invalidates the analysis. I guess you'd have to prove that everyone is so mistaken about the trauma of child abuse compared to the trauma of obesity. You can't make this argument because you've never experienced it either. Good job.
And even if you have, it doesn't matter because each individual is different. Trolololol. Expressed individual preference is the best touchstone we have.
But surely you understand this is just a technique to get people to take nutritional child abuse really seriously. You might understand that if you had read through the thread. But you just want to troll so you're just nitpicking. See you even dropped 2 of my main arguments against your position to harp on the weakest one.
"First, people can get over being molested. Even if there were a 90% chance of recovering from child molestation, it would still be horribad right? It would still be a despicable crime? hmm?
Second, there are long term effects of poor diet that can't be reversed. You just haven't been following the thread and don't know anything about nutrition."
In a debate I would extend them, point out you dropped them, and you would automatically lose. Too bad you can just wave your dick around on forums without any accountability.
I agree that it's abuse, but it's not pedophilia or comparable or on the same level or whatever terminology you want to use.
Want to debate that?