Debate.org members
Gold Standard Debates
- (MIG Tournament) Conservative Showdown #2: Gold Standard
- Is the gold standard better than paper currency?
- The US should go back to a gold standard
- USFG should disband the Federal Reserve and the gold standard put in it's place.
- Is it IRRATIONAL For the United States to Revert Back to the ***Primitive*** "GOLD Standard"???
- Commodity money (i.e. a gold standard) is beneficial to long-term, sustainable free trade
Gold Standard Debates
History and Debate of Gold Standard
In the gold standard system, the standard economic unit is a predetermined weight of gold. There are several types of gold standard systems, but none are currently used by any country as the basis for a monetary system. Some countries do, however, hold significant reserves of gold, so the gold standard could potentially arise.
Arguments in Favor of the Gold Standard Debate
First, gold is an appealing metal to use. Gold is shiny, beautiful and rare. Gold is used for fine jewelry and artwork and is definitely associated with wealth. If gold is the standard, people are drawn to the beauty of the metal and it gives a certain appeal to the financial state. Another advantage of the gold standard is that it helps to restrict inflation. Gold is available in limited quantities, so this limitation helps prevent abuse of inflation. If citizens notice that inflation is happening, they can simply exchange paper money for gold from the government at a fixed rate.
Another benefit is that the money grows at a steady pace, helping to keep prices stable. If gold becomes overvalued, then production of gold increases which helps to bring down the value. Additionally, if gold is undervalued, then production decreases and the values move upwards. Gold was a financial item for thousands of years. There is an incredible history of gold used in economic situations, so the gold standard has the backing of history throughout the ages.
Arguments Against the Gold Standard Debate
While the advantages in the gold standard debate are great, there are also a number of disadvantages. First, it is incredibly hard to transition to a different monetary system. The biggest problem is, of course, that the Federal Reserve is not in possession of enough gold to back all of the paper money in circulation. While this is a problem, this disadvantage is definitely not an ultimately unsolvable issue. Next, while gold has a certain appeal as a highly valued object, it is not connected to the standard of living that is desired. The disconnect between value and standards of living might not cause issues, but the disconnect could also wreak havoc. For example, even if gold is mass-produced, it does not mean that standard of living increases for all involved.
Gold mining is absolutely necessary in order to utilize the gold standard. Unfortunately, this mining consumes a significant amount of resources. The resources dedicated to mining gold are often of much better use in other ways. The fact that gold costs money to mine can cause difficulties with the economy.
For Gold Standard
Pro
Comment: Good idea, just needs to be improved on and implemented efficiently.
Comment: Stops inflation and makes the dollar worth a lot more
Comment: It would raise the value of the country's currency.
Comment: I am pro because I believe free-market economics is very risky.
Comment: I am still formulating my case for this.
Comment: Our money is worthess without a hard asset to back it up.
Comment: Open to similarly-based alternatives.
Comment: A currency based upon a limited resource seems more valuable than a currency based upon a government's word.
Comment: I don't particularly care whether it's gold, so much as that there's a standard. Something real, lasting, and with luxury rather than mere utility value so it's capable of indefinitely sustaining some demand as a currency no matter how much general p
Comment: I believe the Gold Standard is a good form of currency and trade. But due to the current value of the dollar, the U.S. probably could not deal with another Gold Standard.
Against Gold Standard
Con
Comment: The problem with the gold standard is that there is simply not enough gold to cover every dollar.
Comment: There isn't enough gold in the world for a gold standard. Look at Bitcoins - they are just a bunch of numbers and letters, yet they are about $30 a piece the last time I heard! Currency has its own intrinsic value now.
Comment: Let the free market sort it out :P
Comment: Although it's a good idea to have a currency backed by a commodity, gold may not be the best one. Gold's value fluctuates and it is uncertain what it will be in the future. I personally believe the value will decrease substantially in the next century from an asteroid mining industry and lack of use in most things outside jewelry.
Comment: We are a debtor nation. We need to devalue our currency not the other way around.
Comment: I support transitioning to a inflation based tax system which would make a tangible monetary standard unfeasible.
Comment: Yeah, because the value of our money should be tied to a shiny metal with extremely limited usefulness. Why don't we switch to a hamburger standard, at least it represents something of actual value. No thanks Ron Paul.
Comment: I don't see why you can't have a perfectly good welfare system with the gold standard. Just tax THEN spend rather than spend then tax.
Comment: I don't believe in giving value to a shiny piece of metal primarily because of its unique molding properties.
Comment: Standard? Everything should be free, but humans are too indoctrinated by money to even think about it.

