|Online:||3 Years Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||7 Years Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||8 Years Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Relationship:||In a Relationship||Income:||$50,000 to $75,000|
DePaul University, Graduate Class of 2007
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Resolved: An omnipotent and and omniscient god cannot logically exist.DefinitionsDictionary definition of Omnipotent:om·nip·o·tent [om-nip-uh-tuhnt] adjective1. almighty or infinite in power, as God.2. having very great or unlimited authority or power. The apologists often define omnipotence as the maximum power logically possible (i.e. god does not have the power to create a square circle, since a square circle is not logical).Dictionary definition of Omniscienc...
My opponent wrongfully claims to be an atheist-agnostic, which is confused. A presumption which seems to combine atheism with agnosticism re-defines "Atheism" to indicate merely the absence of belief in God. But a re-definition like this down plays atheism's presumption, that there is no God. On such a definition, atheism cannot be a worldview, even babies would count as atheists! Regarding God's existence, it would be necessary on the atheist, to prove that if God existed, then He would prov...
I will present an argument, which is based on Scott Clifton's (TheoreticalBullshit) argument which attempts to use's William Lain Craig's Kalam Cosmological Argument for God to prove that God does not exist. My opponent should defend the KCA. Cliffton's argument  can be summarized as follows: P1: Nothing which exists can cause something which does not exist to begin existing. P2: Given (1), Anything which begins to exist was not caused to do so by something which exists. P3: The unive...
Mecap thinks ERVs are "evidence for evolution" But this is just an old evolutionist argument that has been proven false by Daniel Nahum. He raises many objections: One problem is that retroviral DNA does not show an apparent link between mammals and other classes of animals, and in fact the difference between retro genes in vertebrates and invertebrates is very significant, and the supposed retro genes in invertebrates are not even considered ERVs by some scientists. This is a very importan...
Resolution: Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs) confirm common ancestry (which is evidence for evolution). Definition: "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are retroviruses derived from ancient infections of germ cells in humans, mammals and other vertebrates; as such their proviruses are passed on to the next generation and now remain in the genome. Retroviruses are viruses that reverse-transcribe their RNA into DNA for integration into the host's genome."(1) Proposition 1. Humans and Chimpanzees s...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where mecap stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with mecap's position on the issue.
|•||Global Warming Exists||N/S|
|•||Medicaid & Medicare||N/S|
|•||National Health Care||N/S|
|•||National Retail Sales Tax||N/S|
|•||War in Afghanistan||N/S|
|•||War on Terror||N/S|