Amazon.com Widgets

Are developed countries responsible for helping undeveloped countries?

  • Yes, It is Beneficial to Developed Countries

    I believe that every developed country does have a responsibility to help undeveloped countries. Firstly, aiding undeveloped countries and helping them prosper is beneficial to the prosperity of developed countries. Countries that attain help will most likely turn into allies and trading partners. The more loyal allies a country have, the more successful it can become. Secondly, aiding undeveloped countries is beneficial to national security. One significant event proves this fact: the 9/11 attacks. When Islamic terrorists flew planes into the towers of the World Trade Center, the leaders of America discovered that they needed to stifle terrorism in Middle Eastern Countries lest it spread even further onto their own soil. World powers must interfere in the affairs of other countries and help them attain stability because instability will spread and pose a threat to their own countries. Finally, every developed country, especially America, has a moral obligation to help countries that are not as developed. If help is not given to undeveloped countries, immense suffering and injustice will occur. The World Power today, America, was founded on Christian principles and was blessed because of its devotion to God. Because of this, America needs to reach out to other countries to relieve suffering and promote good. During World War II, millions of innocent people were slaughtered because no one came to their rescue. It is only ethical for developed countries, with their abundance of resources, to prevent this kind of injustice. Developed countries certainly have a responsibility primarily to protect their own citizens, but aiding underdeveloped countries, in the end, will increase the prosperity and protection of their citizens. Therefore, developed countries are responsible for helping underdeveloped countries because they will gain allies and trading partners, will protect national security by stifling terrorism, and will fulfill their moral obligations by aiding less fortunate countries.

  • Yes, It is Beneficial to Developed Countries

    I believe that every developed country does have a responsibility to help undeveloped countries. Firstly, aiding undeveloped countries and helping them prosper is beneficial to the prosperity of developed countries. Countries that attain help will most likely turn into allies and trading partners. The more loyal allies a country have, the more successful it can become. Secondly, aiding undeveloped countries is beneficial to national security. One significant event proves this fact: the 9/11 attacks. When Islamic terrorists flew planes into the towers of the World Trade Center, the leaders of America discovered that they needed to stifle terrorism in Middle Eastern Countries lest it spread even further onto their own soil. World powers must interfere in the affairs of other countries and help them attain stability because instability will spread and pose a threat to their own countries. Finally, every developed country, especially America, has a moral obligation to help countries that are not as developed. If help is not given to undeveloped countries, immense suffering and injustice will occur. The World Power today, America, was founded on Christian principles and was blessed because of its devotion to God. Because of this, America needs to reach out to other countries to relieve suffering and promote good. During World War II, millions of innocent people were slaughtered because no one came to their rescue. It is only ethical for developed countries, with their abundance of resources, to prevent this kind of injustice. Developed countries certainly have a responsibility primarily to protect their own citizens, but aiding underdeveloped countries, in the end, will increase the prosperity and protection of their citizens. Therefore, developed countries are responsible for helping underdeveloped countries because they will gain allies and trading partners, will protect national security by stifling terrorism, and will fulfill their moral obligations by aiding less fortunate countries.

  • Yes, It is Beneficial to Developed Countries

    I believe that every developed country does have a responsibility to help undeveloped countries. Firstly, aiding undeveloped countries and helping them prosper is beneficial to the prosperity of developed countries. Countries that attain help will most likely turn into allies and trading partners. The more loyal allies a country have, the more successful it can become. Secondly, aiding undeveloped countries is beneficial to national security. One significant event proves this fact: the 9/11 attacks. When Islamic terrorists flew planes into the towers of the World Trade Center, the leaders of America discovered that they needed to stifle terrorism in Middle Eastern Countries lest it spread even further onto their own soil. World powers must interfere in the affairs of other countries and help them attain stability because instability will spread and pose a threat to their own countries. Finally, every developed country, especially America, has a moral obligation to help countries that are not as developed. If help is not given to undeveloped countries, immense suffering and injustice will occur. The World Power today, America, was founded on Christian principles and was blessed because of its devotion to God. Because of this, America needs to reach out to other countries to relieve suffering and promote good. During World War II, millions of innocent people were slaughtered because no one came to their rescue. It is only ethical for developed countries, with their abundance of resources, to prevent this kind of injustice. Developed countries certainly have a responsibility primarily to protect their own citizens, but aiding underdeveloped countries, in the end, will increase the prosperity and protection of their citizens. Therefore, developed countries are responsible for helping underdeveloped countries because they will gain allies and trading partners, will protect national security by stifling terrorism, and will fulfill their moral obligations by aiding less fortunate countries.

  • A a a

    I don't have any new arguments to make, just clicked yes and this happened, so now I just have to type 29 more words in this box so that the website will let me post this "argument." I got 11 more words left... 7 6 5 4 ok bye now.

  • Yes,developed countries are responsible for helping undeveloped countries.

    Yes,developed countries are responsible for helping undeveloped countries.The world is actually becoming a smaller and smaller community because of technology and the affairs of one country are actually the affairs of many countries so it actually benefits the rich countries and the poor countries that are in need of assistance during hard times.

  • You help yourself by helping them

    It is in the best interests of developed countries to help undeveloped countries progress. If the helping country can reframe from being heavy handed, providing undeveloped countries with technological advice and training produces viable trading partners and potential allies. Helping another country to develop also ensures that there will be less potential need for humanitarian aid to the undeveloped, as they are more adept at attending to their own needs.

  • Yes, But Only If We Ourselves Do Not Need Help

    I have no problem with countries helping smaller countries. In fact, I support this. But we cannot be worried about other countries (Vietnam, War on Terror) if we ourselves need help. The U.S. is trillions of dollars in debt, but we have no problems waging wars on countries who are bullying another country. If the war does not concern us, we should stay out of it. Save our military for when it is truly needed.

  • We need to help ourselves before we help others.

    America has plenty of its own problems. And every time we go to some third world country we end up getting in a war. I know I'm only talking about America but honestly it should be like that for every 1st world country. It is a nice thing to do but you have o help yourselves before others

  • Developed Countries have No Obligation to Undeveloped Countries

    Developed Countries have managed to formulate a system that has allowed them success. They are under no circumstances obligated to assist countries that have no affiliation with them. This obligation can't possibly exist. Aid is at the discretion of the country with wealth. Countries wouldn't assist others if it didn't provide some economic return. Do you see anyone helping Somalia?

  • Lets forget them

    i do not think just because you are a developed country that you should have to help undeveloped countries. The United States has had the policy for so long to help and look at them. The countries they are helping do not like the United States and the U.S. is sending them trillions of dollars.

  • Not necessarily.

    I think that the strong should help the weak. But developed countries cannot provide the best aid to undeveloped countries unless they take care of their own citizens; make sure their economies are healthy, that there is no great unrest in the society. For example, America is in such dire economic and financial straits right now that we should not be focused on foreign aid, we should be trying to address the problems that our own citizens are suffering.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.