Amazon.com Widgets
  • Liberals use emotion instead of reason

    A lot of the time it seems like Liberals are overly influenced by their emotions. Just about every bleeding heart I have ever met has been a liberal. Liberals don't use reason. They seem to just look at the short term effects of things.
    For example:
    Oh my god, there's been another mass shooting! Lets give up our right to bear arms so that this will never happen again.
    The world trade center exploded! Lets let airport security harass us and steal our toothpaste. Oh and just to make sure it never happens again lets let the government pass the patriot act and monitor our phones and computers.
    Oh my gosh those poor Mexicans! Lets just let them all into our country without any thought of the consequences.

    Every time there is a problem liberals seem to not use reason but emotion. Usually this ends up with them trying to make us give up our rights for perceived safety.

    Many of the things that make liberals emotional aren't even real problems. They are problems invented by the government and spread through the media so that the libs will give up more of their rights. An example of this is gay marriage. For hundreds of years we have not needed gay marriage and now suddenly it is urgent that we have it. The government has made this problem so that they can have the power to change the definition of marriage. The same thing goes for global warming. IT IS FAKE! It was invented so that the government would have an excuse to tax us for our CO2 emissions and try to change the way we live.

  • Emotions Lead to Drama

    I would say so, for the fact that most of the time Liberals seem the most emotional of the Political Parties. If anything does not go "their way", then they have to make a huge fuss about it, when in reality; they should just simply work their way around it.

  • All people are blinded.

    All people are blinded by their emotions. For example, the stock market has simple rules to follow, buy low then sell high. Yet, in every financial crisis most investors panic then sell low and buy high, why? Because our emotions get the better of us in crisis situations. Liberals and conservatives fall prey too their emotions. It's a biological certainty!

  • Their emotions override their ability to think

    Liberals focus mainly on their feelings and emotions which prevents them from logical sound reasoning. While some conservatives suffer from the same misfortune, Liberals corner the market on this matter.

    It is my strong belief liberals have this powerful need for being liked and to be accepted by other liberals that they blindly follow any and every theory that is anti conservative.

    My last point is that there is a cowardice among liberals in that they have no problem attacking conservatives but cannot find the courage to attack groups that commit violent acts for example, Occupy Wall Street, Black lives matter, Antifa, And other liberal groups that advocate violence. Liberals chop people up into pieces for instance, Black, Hispanic, Gay and all its related subsets, Female, And religious groups. They don’t see people. They only see their minority status.

  • Liberal Emotion cause

    Liberals are the most emotional people by far. That is how the Democratic party gets their voters. Its nothing more than psychological warfare. The Democratic party produces misinformation to exploit soft hearts. Classic move all the way back from 380 BC. Aristotle coined the terms pathos, Ethos, And logos. Pathos is basically dealing with emotional agreements. Getting you so pumped up emotionally that you start seeing something that really isn't there. This is also why a lot of the liberals are so violent during protests. Its incited by pure emotion not logic or ethics.

  • Based on what I've seen most liberals do not wait for facts to make judgements

    Liberals no doubt use their feelings to make judgements. They do what feels good instead of what works. After what they've done doesn't work they make excuses and never take responsibility for their actions. It's always someone elses fault in their world and if they were in charge the world would be a utopia. In summary, They never do grow up to adults

  • Trump and collision.

    Liberals say trump colluded with Russia to win the election. No proof has been presented but liberals say its fact. Wiki leaks posting Podesta's emails railroading Bernie in the democrat primary is not Russia collusion impacting election. Liberals say it is collusion solely on the emotional hate of Trump. Unbelievable!

  • No question about it

    When discussing immigration in a very dry, statistical manner to a friends wife (very calmly and in normal conversation), she actually began to cry - a middle-class woman in her thirties. My friend was clearly very embarrassed (he's very logical) and didn't know how to react. It was, quite frankly, absurd. I've seen a lot of these kinds of behaviours exhibited by people who classify themselves as liberals. Strange indeed.

  • Liberals look at the world in terms of how they want it to be, not how it really is.

    Sure there are, but it's not even a close comparison and that's because conservatives look at the world the way it is, liberals look at it in terms of how they want it to be. An example that comes to mind is minimum wage legislation. Liberals look at it primarily through the prism of empathy that it will be helping the working poor. Conservatives look at it in a more logical and will question how it will impact the economy, will jobs be replaced with machines and computers because of it, how will it impact prices and will it cause inflation. When those concerns get relayed, liberals then resort to their childish ways and label us cold, uncompassionate and haters of the poor.

    Liberals can't seem to accept the USA is a republic, where popular vote doesn't necessarily matter when they lose an election. Yet, only the smallest and least diverse countries have a popular vote, MOST don't.

    Conservatives aren't the ones who have "safe spaces" on college campuses because we are so emotionally unstable that we need to seek special administrative protection from divergent ideas. We aren't the ones shutting down opposing points of view on college campuses with violence. We are not the ones calling people racists, fascists or Nazis or any other kind of slur as an automatic form of rebuttal. We aren't the ones who unfriend or disown family over political choices.

    We are not the ones wearing pink pussy hats joining women's marches to protest rights you already have to create this strawman and phony narrative against a President. We aren't the ones who take to the streets and block traffic when democratically run Grand Juries don't hand out the verdicts we want even though all the evidence usually supports that the police operated within the law.

    We aren't the ones who invoke hysteria, name calling, denial of reality, thought control and projection of guilt. There are scientific studies that show that liberals are more emotion-driven than conservatives and I believe the case is so strong that its not even a subjective topic.

  • Liberals look at the world in terms of how they want it to be, not how it really is.

    Sure there are, but it's not even a close comparison and that's because conservatives look at the world the way it is, liberals look at it in terms of how they want it to be. An example that comes to mind is minimum wage legislation. Liberals look at it primarily through the prism of empathy that it will be helping the working poor. Conservatives look at it in a more logical and will question how it will impact the economy, will jobs be replaced with machines and computers because of it, how will it impact prices and will it cause inflation. When those concerns get relayed, liberals then resort to their childish ways and label us cold, uncompassionate and haters of the poor.

    Liberals can't seem to accept the USA is a republic, where popular vote doesn't necessarily matter when they lose an election. Yet, only the smallest and least diverse countries have a popular vote, MOST don't.

    Conservatives aren't the ones who have "safe spaces" on college campuses because we are so emotionally unstable that we need to seek special administrative protection from divergent ideas. We aren't the ones shutting down opposing points of view on college campuses with violence. We are not the ones calling people racists, fascists or Nazis or any other kind of slur as an automatic form of rebuttal. We aren't the ones who unfriend or disown family over political choices.

    We are not the ones wearing pink pussy hats joining women's marches to protest rights you already have to create this strawman and phony narrative against a President. We aren't the ones who take to the streets and block traffic when democratically run Grand Juries don't hand out the verdicts we want even though all the evidence usually supports that the police operated within the law.

    We aren't the ones who invoke hysteria, name calling, denial of reality, thought control and projection of guilt. There are scientific studies that show that liberals are more emotion-driven than conservatives and I believe the case is so strong that its not even a subjective topic.

  • Mixing up two different things.

    You're mixing up irrational emotions with having empathy. Instead of just trying to help corporatiobs and the wealthy and casting out anyone trapped in lower socioeconomic levels and calling them lazy and calling that "just good economics" or "just business." liberals try to improve the economy not by creating inequality, but by trying to improve the economy while also improving peopkes lives and opportunities and the community so everyone can contribute to the economy more and also make society better.

  • Liberals are passionate, but not blindly so.

    While we are more aggressive than people would usually think to be, do not mistake passion for pure emotion. We do look at the outcomes of our beliefs and we do think before we speak. Conservatives call our beliefs blind emotion because they'd rather are beliefs be views as "Bleeding hearts" than honest and true issues people should care about. I'd love to debate this topic further, if any would like to challenge!

  • What do you mean by liberal?

    Why are we labelling people as being 'liberal' or 'conservative' anyway? The democrats are conservative on some policies regarding society and regulation while republicans are liberal regarding different social aspects - like freedom. I don't mean to say individual republicans or democrats, but ideas that make up the party are a mix of liberalism and conservatism. The definitions of liberal and conservative are actually truer in regards to UK politics where the Conservatives are more likely to want a bit less freedom of speech for the sake of safety. Other parties wouldn't stand for this, especially a republican party.

    Why are we grouping people into this category of 'liberal'? People have some conservative and some liberal ideas - it's not like they're totally incompatible.

    I think someone needs to define liberal somehow. I just wanted to emphasize that 'liberals' are not all blinded by their emotions, but I'm sure some might be. We can't make sweeping generalisations about groups of people. "Liberals" don't always share the same ideas either - some agree on many issues some disagree on less issues. Some are one way, some are another.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.