Amazon.com Widgets

Are Stormfront's arguments about the white race being superior plausible?

Asked by: NotReallySmart
  • Yes, they invented most things

    Whites are the deepest thinkers and also naturally very moral and humanitarian. Claims that whites are more brutal are just lies. Whites only dominated the world through scientific superiority. We should continue to dominate for the good of all. Jewish influences have been trying to attack their competitor. We see what happens when Jews dominate such as Soviet Russia, which caused World War 2 and killed 100 million.

  • Stop Misrepresenting White Nationalism

    As a White Nationalist I want to preserve my race and feel all other races should be preserved as well. Why can all other races have their lands and cultures to themselves, but liberals feel that we should open up our boarders to non Whites? As I said real White Nationalist want to preserve our own race and that shouldn't be a crime.

  • It's a fact

    Everyone wants to live in a white majority country in a white majority neighborhood. Tell me which place would you live? A white suburb in Europe or a black neighborhood in America. The white race also has several advantages, such as its strong will to achieve anything. Just look at the facts.

  • The facts are the facts

    Out of the thousands and thousands of physicists in the united states. Only about 70 are black. Percentage wise even less are doctors dentists or lawyers. This world was built by white people. Not saying they are better but if you look at a list of billionaires and captains of industry you won't see black man on the top 10 of any list. For whatever reason minorities aren't interested in advancing themselves. It has nothing to do with opportunity, there are plenty of poor white people who made it big by working hard. So i am not a believer that the opportunity doesn't exist.

  • Cooperation and the ice age

    Europe at the dawn of civilization had far more natural resources and a more productive climate to grow crops and farm animals. Resources are what is required to fuel a large brain. Add this on to the fact that early Europeans had to cooperate more readily with one another to find food and shelter in a climate that we did not evolve to be in. Africa is birth place of man, humanity evolved for a tropical climate. Europe was far worse in weather during the Paleolithic and Neolithic periods. So, to reiterate my point we had to cooperate with one another on a larger scale to survive. It should be pointed out that Europeans are superior not due to skin color, that would be a fallascious argument. Even if Europeans had remaind dark skinned we would still be superior.

  • It's just way better being white.

    You can go to any age or time anywhere and if you're white. You're gonna have the best time of your life. You're not going to be forced into slavery or stopped by the cops and asked if you stole the car you're driving or you somehow got it. It's really way more superior to any other race.

  • Race Realism is more rational than egalitarianism; from a scientific standpoint.

    "The assumption that more recent expansions are all driven by cultural factors is based on the notion that modern humans everywhere have essentially the same abilities. That's a logical consequence of human evolutionary stasis: If humans have not undergone a significant amount of biological change since the expansion out of Africa, then people everywhere would have essentially the same potentials, and no group would have a biological advantage over its neighbors. But as we never tire of pointing out, there has been significant biological change during that period--tremendous amounts of change, particularly in those populations that have practiced agriculture for a long time.

    Therefore, the biological equality of human races and ethnic groups is not inevitable: In fact it's about as likely as a fistful of silver dollars all landing on edge when dropped. There are important, well-understood examples of human biological inequality: Some populations can (on average) deal far more effectively with certain situations than others."

  • Stormfront argues for White people to have the right of self -determination not supremacy.

    The lands which the White man inhabits have been taken over by a hostile elite who has done every possible thing to prevent Whites from having any kind of autonomy or self-rule. The hostile elite has done this because they believe White are the only race capable of successfully opposing them. The hostile elite believes that Whites are superior to other races. This is why the White race has been targeted in Europe, Australia. And North America with incessant negative propaganda, an alteration of their history an viligence against any White interests. This elite is cruel, callous and unprincipled. They will hurt non-whites w/o remorse if they are successful in grinding down the White population. God help everyone if the White race fails against this criminal cabal and its supporters.

  • No, they're unreasonable and not probable.

    Honestly most people on Stormfront are ugly white guys who are upset that better looking non white guys are getting girls and they aren't. They need work out and do their best to improve themselves and gain some confidence if they want to successfully hook up or start a relationship with another woman.

  • No superior race exists

    Whites are not better than non-whites, vice versa. The needs of individuals from any race to express superiority of the latter indicates insecurity, hatred, ignorance, low-self esteem and many other flawed characteristics that presents one as a dysfunctional racist. No superior race exists period. Throughout history, time advances, and wealth and power shifts to nations with greater productivity. Productivity has nothing to do with race. It's all about the cooperative attitudes of the citizens as a whole. As the western nations continue to experience stagnant economic growth in the 21st century, and Asia's economy rapidly expands, we will soon be ushered into an era of Eastern dominance.

  • No, they're not

    The only thing sadder than Stormfront itself is that there are people that consider it a credible resource. That's not even close to the case, it's just a harbor for racist ideas and for people with inferiority complexes to project themselves onto others in an anonymous fashion that's safe for them.

  • The "superior race" is YOUR RACE

    At least that is the only rational explanation from the position of a "racialist". Arguments about what race is superior lack any real meaning unless placed in a specific context. All race's can pose this same question in contexts which produce an answer that their race is "superior". If we are going to be honest racialists, then we should embrace this principle and encourage people of all races to do the same. Teach your children to be proud of their race and to embrace their race as their extended family. But arguments about one race being superior to others are counterproductive and set us up to be easily undermined. Better to stick to pressing questions which we cannot lose....Like do white people have a right to exist? Do we have interests and do we have a right to organize to protect those interests? These are questions where our positions are morally, ethically and logically unassailable.

  • Racism Is Despicable and Evil

    Under no way, manner, shape, or form would any argument about ethnic superiority be correct. Racism is vile, and there is never a justification for it. Anybody who would publicly argue about such is position is ignorant and uneducated. There is no place for hate speech in a multicultural society.

  • People who believe this are clearly biased...

    There is no real evidence that suggests whites are superior from a genetic standpoint...


    These people don't care about humanity, science or even reality itself. All they do is try to blend their emotions with fake science to make themselves feel better, they hide their pathetic superiority complex by saying it's "realism".


    I bet they think that by making their group look superior, they will to make up for the fact that they THEMSELVES are inferior human beings.

  • All people are equal until they are brought up

    Up until the Europeans started colonising, Asia has better technology while Europe was dabbling in dark arts and prosecuting people for being a witch. Had Asia colonised and brought over resources to improve infrastructure at home, they would have had better scientists because the people's talents would have been nurtured more leading to more scientists and we would be having an argument saying "are South/East Asians the superior race?". However since Asia didn't colonize, none of the resources from Africa were brought to Asia to build infrastructure, they were brought to Europe and the Europeans had more chances in life than the undeveloped Asia and that is what lead to more discoveries by white people. Just the simple idea of colonisation by a Spanish person.

  • All races are equal, until they are brought up

    Up until the Europeans started colonising, Asia has better technology while Europe was dabbling in dark arts and prosecuting people for being a witch. Had Asia colonised and brought over resources to improve infrastructure at home, they would have had better scientists because the people's talents would have been nurtured more leading to more scientists and we would be having an argument saying "are South/East Asians the superior race?". However since Asia didn't colonize, none of the resources from Africa were brought to Asia to build infrastructure, they were brought to Europe and the Europeans had more chances in life than the undeveloped Asia and that is what lead to more discoveries by white people. Just the simple idea of colonisation by a Spanish person.

  • People are equal, until they are brought up

    Asia had many of the greater minds when their civilisation was more rich and the infrastructure was greater and the people's talents more nurtured while Europe was dabbling in the dark arts. However, when the Europeans started colonising other countries and taking resources to build infrastructures in their homeland and each man working for his country to colonize and defeat other countries. Each man had more resources to work with and his talents were more nurtured with the superior European infrastructure which was created through resources from Africa and America. This age of each man in Europe's talent being nurtured so they could do great things for their country led to more Europeans making more invention. However, if it had been the other way round, Europe having more resources and Asia overtaking Europe through colonization, we would be having an argument saying "are East/South Asians the superior race?' because the Asians would have had better infrastructures and people's talents would have been nurtured better than rest of the world's and consequently Asia would have had superior arts and sciences.

  • Different nationalities were superior at different points

    It was only 200 years ago that the industrial revolution took place - and that was predominantly in Europely, closely following the dark ages.
    Prior to that, several countries had been superior - like the Chinese who had their own medicines, infrastructure irrigation system, Indians described and conducted surgeries akin to what is being done today, had palaces and building that later influenced european architecture. The Indians brought on the concept of zero, used solar power, knew that the earth revolved around the sun before Galileo figured it out. The middle east was the most prosperous in 700 ADs. All societies contributed to development.
    Back to the industrial revolution: true that it was a milestone in the progress of mankind. But the knowledge derived during the revolution was built on not just by Americans and Europeans but also by Asians, Arabs and Africans to get to where we are today.
    The problem that most developing countries are facing today is not because of inferiority but because their civilizations were older and the population to land ratio is very high. If you count the absolute number of Indians / Chinese who have contributed to development or live life in their own countries with a lifestyle similar or superior to Whites, you would realize they are higher in number.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.